Phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 and oxaliplatin in previously untreated advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65:473-480. [PMID: 19551382 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-009-1052-3]

Analysis of the efficacy and influencing factors of preoperative P-SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for progressive gastric cancer-construction of a clinical prediction model

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy is one of the most common treatments for patients with advanced gastric cancer that cannot be completely removed by surgery. Nab-paclitaxel is a nano-formulation of paclitaxel that has been shown to be effective in treating stomach cancer. In addition, oxaliplatin + S-1 (SOX) has been a first-line chemotherapy regimen for gastric cancer, and it has the effect of tumor downstaging, improving the R0 resection rate, and reducing the postoperative recurrence rate, but the side effects are significant. During the application of oxaliplatin, obvious gastrointestinal reactions such as nausea and vomiting can be observed. There may also be blood system side effects such as leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, as well as serious adverse reactions such as peripheral neuropathy. Therefore, we reduced the amount of oxaliplatin in SOX and added nab-paclitaxel on the basis of this, in order to increase the efficacy while reducing the side effects of SOX regimen. We selected 192 patients with advanced gastric cancer admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology of Qinghai University Hospital from July 2019 to February 2022, and all were treated with nab-paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin + S-1 neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen, and underwent further surgery after chemotherapy. The tumor regression grade (TRG grade) and response evaluation criteria of solid tumor 1.1 (RECIST1.1) were taken as the dependent variables. According to TRG classification, 120 patients were effective (grade 0, 1, 2 = 62.50%, age: 55.63 ± 9.02 years), 72 patients were ineffective (grade 3 = 37.50%, 55.82 ± 9.21 years), and the effective rate of chemotherapy was 62.50%. According to RECIST1.1, 116 patients were effective (CR + PR = 60.42%, mean age 55.84 ± 9.02 years), 76 patients were ineffective (SD + PD = 39.58%, 55.47 ± 9.19 years), and the effective rate was 60.42%. The factors p < 0.2 in univariate logistic regression analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis, and p < 0.05 was the statistical difference, and statistically significant factors were screened out for modeling and plotted the nomogram. Among them, in the tumor regression grade, the final factors related to effective chemotherapy are the degree of differentiation, cT. stage, tumor diameter, chemotherapy cycle, and the final factors related to effective chemotherapy in the solid tumor response evaluation criteria are the degree of differentiation, cT. stage, tumor diameter. Therefore, we conclude that the regimen of nab-paclitaxel combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 has certain positive significance in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Effect of S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin Plus Oxaliplatin as Perioperative Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced, Resectable Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Perioperative chemotherapy is a potential treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) vs fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as a perioperative chemotherapy regimen for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients from 12 Chinese hospitals were enrolled between June 2011 and August 2016, with a last follow-up date of September 2019. The primary tumor was evaluated as either invading the serosa or the adjacent structures with or without metastatic lymph nodes, and with no evidence of distant metastases. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to June 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 6 perioperative (2-4 preoperative and 2-4 postoperative) 3-week cycles of 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 and 80 to 120 mg/d S-1 orally daily for 2 weeks (SOX) or 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 400 mg/m2 fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 leucovorin, and 2400 mg/m2 fluorouracil as 46-hour infusion on day 1 (FOLFOX).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was 3-year overall survival (OS). An absolute noninferiority margin of -8% was chosen.

RESULTS

A total of 583 patients were enrolled; 293 were randomized to the SOX group and 290 were randomized to the FOLFOX group. Twelve patients (2.1%) refused preoperative chemotherapy (5 patients in the SOX group and 7 patients in the FOLFOX group), leaving a total of 288 patients in the SOX group (median [range] age, 61 [24 to 78] years; 197 men [68.4%]) and 283 patients in the FOLFOX group (median [range] age, 62 [24 to 80] years; 209 men [73.9%]) who received preoperative chemotherapy. The 3-year OS rate was 75.2% (95% CI, 70.3% to 80.5%) in the SOX group and 67.8% (95% CI, 62.5% to 73.5%) in the FOLFOX group. The absolute difference of 3-year OS rate between the 2 groups was 7.4% (95% CI, -0.1% to 14.9%), which was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin (-8%) and showed the noninferiority of perioperative chemotherapy with SOX compared with FOLFOX.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, SOX was noninferior to FOLFOX as perioperative chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer and could be recommended as an alternative treatment for these patients in Asia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01364376.

Current status of doublet combinations of platinum and fluoropyrimidines using oxaliplatin for advanced gastric cancer

The most common treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is systemic chemotherapy. The standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer differs worldwide. In Japan, two phase III clinical trials demonstrated the non-inferiority of S-1 compared with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and superiority of cisplatin plus S-1 (CS), compared with S-1, with respect to overall survival (SPIRITS trial). Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) has a favorable toxicity profile compared with cisplatin; hence, a phase III clinical trial (G-SOX trial) demonstrated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in CS was 5.4 and 13.1 months and those in SOX was 5.5 and 14.1 months, respectively. Serious adverse events were more frequently seen in CS than in SOX. So, SOX is as effective as CS for advanced gastric cancer with favorable safety profile. After the publication of this G-SOX trial, the combination of oral or intravenous 5-FU and various doses of L-OHP have been reported. And FOLFOX6 regimen (FOLFOX: a combination of 1-LV and FU with L-OHP) was approved for the treatment of AGC in Japan in 2017. FOLFOX was promising for patients with severe peritoneal metastasis from AGC, because the FOLFOX regimen does not require hydration and does not include oral agents. This review summarizes the efficacy and safety of doublet combinations of platinum and fluoropyrimidines using L-OHP for advanced gastric cancer.

A Phase II Study Demonstrates No Feasibility of Adjuvant Treatment with Six Cycles of S-1 and Oxaliplatin in Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, with ERCC1 as Biomarker for Response to SOX

Simple Summary

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is currently standard of care in esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, prognosis remains dismal. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of administering six cycles of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy. Although six cycles of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin were not feasible in pretreated patients, mainly due to toxicity, efficacy results were promising compared to a propensity-score matched cohort. Exploratory biomarker analyses demonstrated potential benefit for patients with Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) negative tumor expression. A proteomics biomarker model provided valuable information for prediction of survival and pharmacokinetics of 5-FU showed a correlation with treatment-related toxicity. Although it remains unclear if additional chemotherapy should be provided in the adjuvant setting, subgroups such as patients with ERCC1 negativity, could potentially benefit from this treatment option based on our exploratory biomarker research.

Abstract

We assessed the feasibility of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and esophagectomy. Patients treated with nCRT (paclitaxel, carboplatin) and esophagectomy received six 21-day cycles with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m²) on day 1 and S-1 (25 mg/m² twice daily) on days 1–14. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as ≥50% completing treatment. We performed exploratory propensity-score matching to compare survival, ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase (TS) immunohistochemistry analyses, proteomics biomarker discovery and 5-FU pharmacokinetic analyses. Forty patients were enrolled and 48% completed all adjuvant cycles. Median dose intensity was 98% for S-1 and 62% for oxaliplatin. The main reason for early discontinuation was toxicity (67%). The median recurrence-free and overall survival were 28.3 months and 40.8 months, respectively (median follow-up 29.1 months). Survival was not significantly prolonged compared to a matched cohort (p = 0.09). Patients with ERCC1 negative tumor expression had significantly better survival compared to ERCC1 positivity (p = 0.01). Our protein signature model was predictive of survival [p = 0.04; Area under the curve (AUC) 0.80]. Moreover, 5-FU pharmacokinetics significantly correlated with treatment-related toxicity. To conclude, six cycles adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin were not feasible in pretreated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although the question remains whether additional treatment with chemotherapy should be provided in the adjuvant setting, subgroups such as patients with ERCC1 negativity could potentially benefit from adjuvant SOX based on our exploratory biomarker research.

Multicenter phase III trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SOPP trial)

BACKGROUND

In East Asia, S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) is one of the standard first-line chemotherapy regimens for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC). Oxaliplatin is generally less toxic and more convenient to administer than cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, phase III study assessing whether S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) was non-inferior/superior to SP in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with MRGC were randomized 1:1 to receive either SOX (S-1 80 mg/m²/day on days 1-14; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day 1; every 3 weeks) or SP (S-1 80 mg/m²/day on days 1-14; cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 1; every 3 weeks [SP3]).

RESULTS

Between October 2012 and October 2014, 338 patients were randomized. The median age was 56 years, and 51% of patients had measurable lesions. SOX was significantly non-inferior but not superior to SP3 in terms of PFS [median 5.6 versus 5.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.07]. In patients with measurable disease, objective response rates were similar between SOX and SP3 (58% versus 60%). Overall, the survival in both groups did not differ (median 12.9 versus 11.4 months; HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66-1.11). Treatment was well tolerated in both arms. Anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and oral mucositis were more common with SP3. In contrast, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with SOX.

CONCLUSIONS

SOX was non-inferior to SP3. The two regimens were well tolerated with different toxicity profiles. The SOX regimen can be recommended as a first-line treatment for MRGC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01671449.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on patients with advanced gastric cancer: A multicenter randomized clinical trial

Objectives

Exploring the efficacy and safety of perioperative chemotherapy on patients with AGC at different clinical and pathological stages.

Methods

A phase III randomized, multicenter, trial comparing adjuvant (arm A) or perioperative S‐1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX, arm B), and perioperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX, arm C) was initiated in T3/4, node + gastric cancer patients (unclear). Each patient received an 8‐cycle chemotherapy (3 weeks for one cycle). Group arms B and C received two cycles preoperatively, and six cycles postoperatively. Primary endpoints were R0 resection rate and DFS, and secondary endpoints included OS, ORR, DCR, and safety. This study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT01516944.

Results

A total of 749 patients were randomly assigned into groups A, B, and C. Group A received 1460 circles chemotherapy and group B received 1177 circles while group C received 1200 circles. R0 resection rates in the three groups were 81.7%, 88.7%, and 83.1%, respectively. The difference between groups A and B was considered to be statistically significant (P = .018), and no significant difference between groups B and C (P = .051). Hazard ratio were compared between groups B and C and DFS showed 0.72 (0.67‐0.77 with 95% CI), P_{non‐inferiority} < .0001, P_log‐rank = .064). The CI top limit actually lower than the estimated value of 1.38, which indicated noninferiority of SOX to XELOX.

Conclusions

Compared with PAC, perioperative chemotherapy showed a significant improvement in R0 resection rates and prognosis in AGC patients with higher safety rates. This study was powered to show superiority of perioperative over adjuvant SOX, and noninferiority of SOX to XELOX. Volume measurement, repeated laparoscopic exploration combined with exfoliative cytology can be used as a supplementary method in the clinical staging and efficacy evaluation of AGC.

Comparison of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant chemotherapies for stage II and III gastric cancer after D2 resection: A single-center retrospective study

Background

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer (GC) reduces cancer recurrence and improves survival. S‐1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is well‐tolerated and effective against advanced GC, and also be used widely in adjuvant treatment. However, data comparing SOX and XELOX as adjuvant treatments are lacking.

Method

Data on treatment modalities, adverse events, recurrence and metastasis were collected from 180 patients with stage II and III GC, who received SOX or XELOX after D2 gastrectomy between January 2012 and December 2015, and analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was 3‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) rate.

Results

Median follow was 52.9 months; 3‐year DFS rate and overall survival (OS) rate were 75.2% and 67.6% (P = 0.359) and 81.2% and 83.3% (P = 0.77) in the SOX and XELOX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in peritoneal metastasis rates in the SOX and XELOX groups (8.6% vs 15%, respectively; P = 0.232). Compound recurrent disease was associated with significantly shorter OS. Multivariate analysis identified metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) as an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.036; hazard ratio = 2.875; 95% confidence interval, 1.069–7.729); the LNR ≥17% group had inferior 3‐year OS rate to the LNR <17% group (P = 0.001). The incidence of grades 3 and 4 adverse events was similar in both groups; however, grade ≥2 hand–foot syndrome was significantly less frequent in the SOX group (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

SOX has similar survival benefits to XELOX and is well‐tolerated in Chinese patients with GC following D2 gastrectomy.

Paclitaxel/oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (TOF) regimen versus S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen for metastatic gastric cancer patients

Aims and background

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (TOF) regimen and S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen for metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients.

Methods

Sixty patients were divided into TOF group and SOX groups randomly. Patients in the TOF group received paclitaxel (135 mg/m² iv) on day 1, oxaliplatin (100 mg/m² iv) on day 1, fluorouracil (500 mg/m² continuous iv) on day 1-5. The patients in the SOX group received oxaliplatin (130 mg/m² iv) on day 1 and S-1 (40 mg~60mg orally twice/day based on body surface area) on days 1-14. All the treatments were repeated every 21d for 4-6 cycles.

Results

The ORR and DCR of TOF group was 43.3% and 60.0%, respectively while that of SOX group was 36.7% and 56.7%. There were no statistical differences between the ORRs (?² = 0.278) and the DCRs (?² = 0.069) of the 2 groups. The majority of adverse events of two groups were hematological and digestive ones. Most of them were grade I and II. The adverse event rate of TOF group was higher than SOX group. The PFS times of TOF and SOX groups were 6.5 and 5.8 months, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the PFSs of the 2 groups (P = 0.451).

Conclusions

The efficacies of TOF and SOX regimens are similar but the safety of SOX regimen better than TOF regimen.

Effect of oxaliplatin combined with polyenephosphatidylcholine on the proliferation of human gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells

Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is a platinum compound that is widely used to treat certain solid tumors, including gastric tumors. L-OHP is an effective anti-cancer treatment; however, its usage increases the probability of patients developing hepatic injury with inflammation, referred to as chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis. The present study aimed to evaluate the outcome of L-OHP treatment combined with polyenephosphatidylcholine (PPC), a major component of essential phospholipids used to treat steatohepatitis, on SGC-7901 gastric cancer cell proliferation. This would help to determine whether combination therapy with L-OHP and PPC is clinically beneficial for patients with gastric cancer. The viability of SGC-7901 cells was verified by an MTT assay; flow cytometry was used to analyze the cell cycle and rates of cell apoptosis; oxidation-related indicators were measured by spectrophotometry, and the expression of cell cycle- and apoptosis-related proteins was determined by western blotting. The results demonstrated that L-OHP significantly inhibited SGC-7901 cell growth in a dose- and time-dependent manner (F=194.193, P<0.01 and F=12.428, P=0.01, respectively). Furthermore, PPC stimulated the growth of SGC-7901 cells and greatly promoted their apoptosis induced by L-OHP, which was supported by the upregulation of cytochrome c and the downstream activation of caspases 3 and 9. Finally, following treatment with a combination of PPC and L-OHP, the expression of cyclins D1 and E was downregulated; however, PPC did not alter the production of reactive oxygen species caused by L-OHP (P=0.88). The present study determined that the combination of L-OHP and PPC exerts a synergistic anti-tumor effect, suggesting that L-OHP and PPC combination therapy may be used as a treatment for patients with gastric cancer that reduces the side effects of L-OHP without inhibiting its efficacy.

Improving trends in survival of patients who receive chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer: 12 years of experience at a single institution

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the changes in clinical features and treatment outcomes of the patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC) treated in the past 12 years.

METHODS

A total of 3888 patients who received chemotherapy for MRGC between January 2000 and December 2011 were analyzed via a prospectively collected registry. The analysis focused on the comparison among three periods: 2000-2003 (period 1), 2004-2007 (period 2) and 2008-2011 (period 3).

RESULTS

There were 880 patients (23%) in period 1, 1573 (40%) in period 2 and 1435 (37%) in period 3. The most commonly used first-line chemotherapy regimen was fluoropyrimidine with/without platinum (72%) for all periods. The use of second- and third-line chemotherapy was slightly but significantly more common in the two recent periods: 46 and 19 % in period 1, 54 and 26% in period 2, and 53 and 27% in period 3, respectively. Overall, 3494 patients (89.9%) died with a median overall survival (OS) of 10.6 months (95% CI 10.2-11.0). The OS was statistically significantly improved over the study period: 9.6 months (95% CI 9.0-10.2) in period 1, 10.3 months (95% CI 9.8-10.9) in period 2 and 11.7 months (95% CI 11.0-12.4) in period 3 (p for trend <0.001). Multivariate analysis including eight prognostic factors (performance, gastrectomy, peritoneal/bone/lung metastasis, abnormal alkaline phosphatase/albumin/total bilirubin) showed that the more recent treatment period was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The OS of patients who receive chemotherapy for MRGC has been shown to improve over time.

Combination Chemotherapy with S-1 and Oxaliplatin (SOX) as First-Line Treatment in Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

This study is a retrospective analysis evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) as first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. One hundred and twenty-nine patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with SOX; S-1 (40-60 mg depending on patient's body surface area) was given orally, twice daily on days 1 to 14 followed by a 7-day rest period, 130 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin was given as an intravenous infusion over 2-hours on day one. The cycle was repeated every three weeks. All of the patients were older than 65 years. Among 129 patients enrolled, nine patients could not be evaluated for responses because of the absence of any measurable lesions or early discontinuation of therapy. Assessment of the response of 120 patients was made. The overall objective response rate was 54.2 % (95 %CI, 45.3-63.1 %), with three complete responses and 62 partial responses. The disease control rate was 80.8 % (95 %CI, 73.8-87.8 %). The median follow-up period was 23 months (range, 5-42 months). The median time to progression was 6.9 months (95 %CI, 5.5-8.3 months) and the median overall survival was 12.8 months (95 %CI, 11.4-14.2 months). The one-year survival rate was 57.5 % (95 %CI, 48.7-66.3 %). In 129 patients assessed safety, grade 3 and 4 toxicities included leucopenia (20.9 %), neutropenia (24.0 %), anemia (10.9 %), thrombocytopenia (10.1 %), anorexia (3.1 %), peripheral neurotoxicity (15.5 %), and fatigue (12.4 %). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Combination chemotherapy with SOX offers an effective, safe and well-tolerated regimen for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Surgical outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer treated with S-1 and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

We wished to evaluate the impact of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX regimen) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical outcomes after gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

From February 2012 to September 2013, 170 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II-III gastric cancer were assessed retrospectively. Eighty patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical gastrectomy, and 90 patients received surgical treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients received S-1 (80 mg/m(2)/day; days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2); day 1) as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, and this schedule was repeated every 3 weeks. Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was standard therapy for each patient. Surgical outcomes between the two groups were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the total prevalence of complications between neoadjuvant and adjuvant groups (18.8% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.704). The most common postoperative complications were surgical site infection (6.5%) and gastrointestinal motility disorders (3.5%). The clinical response rate was 68.8%, and ten patients (12.5%) had a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The SOX regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for AJCC stage II/III gastric cancer can be effective without increasing the risk of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The SOX regimen could be a neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer worldwide in the future.

Clinical evaluation of cetuximab combined with an S-1 and oxaliplatin regimen for Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer

Background

The prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer is poor. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of cetuximab and S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

For patients in the experimental group (cetuximab in combination with SOX (Ce-SOX), 30 patients), once-weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m² at the first infusion then 250 mg/m² every week) was administered. For patients in both the control (SOX alone, 26 patients) and experimental groups, oxaliplatin (100 mg/m²) was administered intravenously on day 1, while S-1 (80 mg/m²/day) was given orally twice daily for 14 days. The endpoints of this study included progression-free survival, response rate, and disease-control rate.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in response rate between the Ce-SOX and SOX groups (54.8% versus 44%, P = 0.225). The difference in disease-control rate was also statistically insignificant between the two groups (87.1% versus 76%, P = 0.162). Median progression-free survival in the Ce-SOX group was significantly higher than that in the SOX group (12.8 versus 10.1 months, P = 0.007). The median overall survival of the Ce-SOX group and SOX group was 14.0 and 12.2 months, respectively (P = 0.043). The one-year survival rate for the Ce-SOX group was 57% compared to 40% in the SOX group. There was no statistical difference in the grade 3 or 4 adverse effects between the two groups.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the cetuximab combined with SOX regimen is feasible and shows promising efficacy with tolerable adverse effects in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Clinical evaluation of cetuximab combined with an S-1 and oxaliplatin regimen for Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer is poor. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of cetuximab and S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

For patients in the experimental group (cetuximab in combination with SOX (Ce-SOX), 30 patients), once-weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m2 at the first infusion then 250 mg/m2 every week) was administered. For patients in both the control (SOX alone, 26 patients) and experimental groups, oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) was administered intravenously on day 1, while S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) was given orally twice daily for 14 days. The endpoints of this study included progression-free survival, response rate, and disease-control rate.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in response rate between the Ce-SOX and SOX groups (54.8% versus 44%, P=0.225). The difference in disease-control rate was also statistically insignificant between the two groups (87.1% versus 76%, P=0.162). Median progression-free survival in the Ce-SOX group was significantly higher than that in the SOX group (12.8 versus 10.1 months, P=0.007). The median overall survival of the Ce-SOX group and SOX group was 14.0 and 12.2 months, respectively (P=0.043). The one-year survival rate for the Ce-SOX group was 57% compared to 40% in the SOX group. There was no statistical difference in the grade 3 or 4 adverse effects between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the cetuximab combined with SOX regimen is feasible and shows promising efficacy with tolerable adverse effects in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer.

S-1 plus oxaliplatin vs. S-1 as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer: a randomized phase II study

This randomized phase II study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin combined with S-1 (OXS regimen) with S-1 alone in the management of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Ninety-four patients were 1:1 randomly assigned to S-1 on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle or S-1 on days 1-14 plus oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2) i.v.) on day 1 of the 3-week cycle. S-1 was orally administered in a fixed quantity according to body surface area. The median survival time with OXS versus S-1 monotherapy was 14·0 versus 11·0 months (P = 0·03), progression-free survival was 6·5 versus 4·0 months (P = 0·02), and the 1-year survival rate was 63·8% versus 48·9%, respectively. The response rate was significantly higher for OXS than for S-1 monotherapy (51·1% vs. 27·7%, P = 0·03). OXS was well tolerated with no treatment-related death. In conclusion, the OXS regimen evidenced a relatively high efficacy and was well tolerated as a first-line therapy for AGC patients.

Dose-finding study on adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common type of cancer, accounting for an estimated one million new cases annually worldwide. Locally advanced GC often recurs, even following curative surgical resection. Therefore, there is a need for an effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. The aim of this trial was to investigate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 when administered in combination with oxaliplatin in postoperative GC patients. Oxaliplatin was administered at a fixed dose of 130 mg/m² on day 1. S-1 was administered from day 1 to 14 of a 3-week cycle and escalated by 10 mg/m²/day from 60 to 80 mg/m²/day. A total of 15 patients were enrolled in this study. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred at level 1 (S-1, 60 mg/m²; n=3). One case of DLT (grade 3 vomiting) occurred at level 2 (S-1, 70 mg/m²; n= 6), whereas 2 cases of grade 3 vomiting were observed at level 3 (S-1, 80 mg/m²; n=6). Based on these results, the MTD of S-1 was initially determined to be 70 mg/m². Furthermore, we observed that cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6) 41349640C>G was associated with severe neutropenia (C/C vs. C/G vs. G/G = 0 vs. 33.33 vs. 100%; P=0.03297, Fisher's exact test) during the entire course of the treatment.

A randomized phase II trial of S-1-oxaliplatin versus capecitabine-oxaliplatin in advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

S-1 or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin are considered active and tolerable in gastric cancer patients. We conducted a randomized phase II trial in gastric cancer patients to compare the activity and safety of these combinations.

METHODS

The patients received S-1 at 80 mg/m2 for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest period within a 3-week schedule in the S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) arm, and capecitabine at 2000 mg/m2 for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest period within a 3-week schedule in the capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CAPOX) arm. Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 was administered every 3 weeks in both arms.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to SOX (N=65) or CAPOX (N=64). The median time to progression and the overall survival were 6.2 and 12.4 months with SOX, respectively; and 7.2 and 13.3 months with CAPOX, respectively. The overall response rates were 40% and 44% for SOX and CAPOX, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (15.4%) for SOX and neutropenia (18.8%) for CAPOX. The median time to 10% deteriorations in global health scores was similar in both arms (SOX, 4.3 months, CAPOX, 4.9 months).

CONCLUSION

Both the SOX and CAPOX regimens were equally active and well tolerated in advanced gastric cancer patients.

Therapeutic effects of combined oxaliplatin and S-1 in older patients with advanced gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the effects and safety of combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) and S-1 (SOX regimen) in older patients with advanced gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma (GCA).

METHODS: Seventy patients with advanced GCA were classified according to age into an older group (≥ 75 years) and a control group (< 75 years). The SOX regimen was administered to the two groups as follows: S-1 (40 mg/m² po bid) on days 1 to 14 followed by a 7-d off period, plus L-OHP (65 mg/m² iv) for 2 h on days 1 and 8 of a 21-d cycle. This regimen was repeated for four to six cycles. Response and swallow statuses were evaluated after two cycles (6 wk). Effects and toxicity were evaluated four weeks after chemotherapy was completed.

RESULTS: The response rate was 65.6% (21/32) in the older group and 68.4% (26/38) in the control group (χ² = 0.062 and P = 0.804). Improvement in swallowing was 78.1% (25/32) in the older group and 76.3% (29/38) in the control group (χ² = 0.032 and P = 0.857). Efficacy was 68.8% (22/32) in the older group and 65.8% (25/38) in the control group (χ² = 0.069 and P = 0.793). Toxicities were reversible and similar in both groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The SOX regimen is an effective, safe and well-tolerated regimen for older patients with advanced GCA.

A phase II study of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOx) combination chemotherapy as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Palliative chemotherapy has been shown to have a survival benefit for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin have been widely used in a variety of combinations. We conducted a phase II study of combination chemotherapy with new agents, S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOx), in advanced gastric cancer patients in an effort to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of this regimen.

METHOD

Histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer were treated by the oral administration of S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-28, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) administered as a 90-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 15, and 29. Treatment courses were repeated every 6 weeks. Patients received a maximum of four cycles.

RESULTS

From Feb 2006 to May 2008, 41 patients were enrolled in this study. The ratio of males to females was 28 to 13. The median patient age was 61 years (range, 36-74 years), and 85.4% (35/41) of the patients had a performance status (ECOG) of 1. The median number of chemotherapy cycles administered was 3 (range, 1-4). According to the results of our Intent-to-Treat analysis, 22 patients (53.7%) achieved a partial response (95% CI, 38-70%). 15 patients (36.6%) evidenced a stable disease, and 1 patient (2.4%) progressed during the course of the treatment. 3 patients were lost to follow-up prior to evaluation. The median time to progression and overall survival time were 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.4-5.8 months) and 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.9-8.7 months) from the start of the chemotherapy, respectively. A total of 114 cycles were assessed for toxicity. The major hematologic toxicities included grade 2 anemia (41.2%), grade 1-2 neutropenia (28.1%), and grade 1 thrombocytopenia (23.7%). Only 1 cycle of neutropenic fever occurred. The non-hematological toxicities observed were grade 3 vomiting (12.2%) and grade 3 diarrhea (4.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred in our patient population during the study period.

CONCLUSION

The SOx regimen evidenced a relatively high response rate and was well tolerated as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer.