Motion-corrected multiparametric renal arterial spin labelling at 3 T: reproducibility and effect of vasodilator challenge

MR Perfusion Imaging for Kidney Disease

Renal perfusion reflects overall function of a kidney. As an important indicator of kidney diseases, renal perfusion can be noninvasively measured by multiple methods of MR imaging, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion analysis, and arterial spin labeling method. In this article we introduce the principle of the methods, review their recent technical improvements, and then focus on summarizing recent applications of the methods in assessing various renal diseases. By this review, we demonstrate the capability and clinical potential of the imaging methods, with the hope of accelerating their adoption to clinical practice.

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI of renal parenchyma and its clinical significance in patients with untreated acute leukemia: a pilot study

PURPOSE

To evaluate quantitative parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI (IVIM) of renal parenchyma in patients with untreated acute leukemia (AL) and analyze its prognostic significance and probable pathological mechanism.

METHODS

From March 2019 to November 2021, 67 newly diagnosed AL patients and 67 healthy controls matched in age and sex were recruited. All participants underwent IVIM in the kidneys, and D, D*, f, standard ADC values were measured. The differences of all parameters between AL and controls were analyzed. The relationship between imaging parameters and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was studied. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to investigate prognostic significance of possible indicators.

RESULTS

The f and D value of renal medulla and D value of renal cortex in AL patients were lower than those in the healthy control group (t = - 2.173, t = - 3.463, t = - 2.030, respectively, all P < 0.05). The cortical f, cortical standard ADC, medullary f, and medullary standard ADC were correlated with the eGFR (r = 0.524, r = 0.401, r = 0.415, r = 0.325, respectively, all P < 0.05) in patients with AL. A medullary f value ≤ 9.51% (hazard ratio: 0.282; 95% confidence interval: 0.110, 0.719; P = 0.008) was associated with overall survival in a multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

The f and standard ADC values in renal parenchyma were the probable imaging markers of renal function in patients with newly diagnosed de novo AL. Lower renal medullary f value was a potential independent predictor for overall survival.

Saturated multi-delay renal arterial spin labeling technique for simultaneous perfusion and T1 quantification in kidneys

PURPOSE

To propose a free-breathing simultaneous multi-delay arterial spin labeling (ASL) and T₁ mapping technique with a stepwise kinetic model for renal assessment in a single 4-min scan at 3 T.

METHODS

The proposed saturated multi-delay renal arterial spin labeling (SAMURAI) sequence used flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) preparation, followed by acquisition of 9 images with Look-Locker spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR). Pre-saturation at the imaging slice was used to achieve saturation-based T₁ mapping. A 4-step 2-compartment kinetic model was proposed to characterize water transition through artery- and tissue-compartment. The impact of the Look-Locker sampling scheme on the ASL signal was corrected in this model. T₁ estimation with dictionary searching method and perfusion quantification based on the proposed kinetic model fitting were conducted after groupwise registration of the acquired images. The feasibility and repeatability of SAMURAI were validated in healthy subjects (n = 11) and patients with different renal diseases (n = 4).

RESULTS

The proposed SAMURAI technique can provide accurate T₁ map with strong correlation (R²  = 0.98) with inversion recovery spin echo (IR-SE) on phantom. SAMURAI provided equally reliable whole kidney and cortical ASL and T₁ quantification results compared with multi-TI FAIR (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.880-0.958) and IR-SPGR (ICC, 0.875-0.912), respectively. Low renal blood flow and increased T₁ were detected by SAMURAI in the affected kidneys of the patients. SAMURAI had excellent scan-rescan repeatability (ICC, 0.905-0.992) and significantly reduced scan time (4 min 6 s vs. 45 min for 9 TIs) compared to multi-TI FAIR.

CONCLUSION

The proposed SAMURAI technique is feasible and repeatable for simultaneously quantifying T₁ and perfusion of kidneys with high time-efficiency.

Bias and Precision in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Estimates of Renal Blood Flow: Assessment by Triangulation

BACKGROUND

Renal blood flow (RBF) can be measured with dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL). Unfortunately, individual estimates from both methods vary and reference-standard methods are not available. A potential solution is to include a third, arbitrating MRI method in the comparison.

PURPOSE

To compare RBF estimates between ASL, DCE, and phase contrast (PC)-MRI.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Twenty-five patients with type-2 diabetes (36% female) and five healthy volunteers (HV, 80% female).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES

A 3 T; gradient-echo 2D-DCE, pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) and cine 2D-PC.

ASSESSMENT

ASL, DCE, and PC were acquired once in all patients. ASL and PC were acquired four times in each HV. RBF was estimated and split-RBF was derived as (right kidney RBF)/total RBF. Repeatability error (RE) was calculated for each HV, RE = 1.96 × SD, where SD is the standard deviation of repeat scans.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Paired t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for statistical analysis. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference between ASL/PC and DCE/PC was assessed using two-sample F-test for variances. Statistical significance level was P < 0.05. Influential outliers were assessed with Cook's distance (D_i  > 1) and results with outliers removed were presented.

RESULTS

In patients, the mean RBF (mL/min/1.73m² ) was 618 ± 62 (PC), 526 ± 91 (ASL), and 569 ± 110 (DCE). Differences between measurements were not significant (P = 0.28). Intrasubject agreement was poor for RBF with limits-of-agreement (mL/min/1.73m² ) [-687, 772] DCE-ASL, [-482, 580] PC-DCE, and [-277, 460] PC-ASL. The difference PC-ASL was significantly smaller than PC-DCE, but this was driven by a single-DCE outlier (P = 0.31, after removing outlier). The difference in split-RBF was comparatively small. In HVs, mean RE (±95% CI; mL/min/1.73 m² ) was significantly smaller for PC (79 ± 41) than for ASL (241 ± 85).

CONCLUSIONS

ASL, DCE, and PC RBF show poor agreement in individual subjects but agree well on average. Triangulation with PC suggests that the accuracy of ASL and DCE is comparable.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Human microvascular reactivity: a review of vasomodulating stimuli and non-invasive imaging assessment

The microvasculature serves an imperative function in regulating perfusion and nutrient exchange throughout the body, adaptively altering blood flow to preserve hemodynamic and metabolic homeostasis. Its normal functioning is vital to tissue health, whereas its dysfunction is present in many chronic conditions, including diabetes, heart disease, and cognitive decline. As microvascular dysfunction often appears early in disease progression, its detection can offer early diagnostic information. To detect microvascular dysfunction, one uses imaging to probe the microvasculature's ability to react to a stimulus, also known as microvascular reactivity (MVR). An assessment of MVR requires an integrated understanding of vascular physiology, techniques for stimulating reactivity, and available imaging methods to capture the dynamic response. Practical considerations, including compatibility between the selected stimulus and imaging approach, likewise require attention. In this review, we provide a comprehensive foundation necessary for informed imaging of MVR, with a particular focus on the challenging endeavor of assessing microvascular function in deep tissues.

Use of Three-Dimensional Arterial Spin Labeling to Evaluate Renal Perfusion in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

A noninvasive method for evaluating renal blood flow (RBF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may have clinical value in disease staging, management, and prognostication.

PURPOSE

To evaluate effectiveness of three-dimensional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) and pulsed arterial spin labeling (PASL) in assessment of cortex and outer medulla (cortex/OM) RBF in CKD patients and healthy volunteers (HVs).

STUDY TYPE

Prospective, in a single institution.

SUBJECTS

A total of 48 CKD patients (stage 1, 2, 3, and 4-5: N = 11, 12, 13, and 12, respectively) and 18 HVs FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T, pCASL, and PASL with a three-dimensional hybrid gradient echo/spin echo sequence.

ASSESSMENT

Quality of RBF images derived from pCASL and PASL were evaluated and RBF in cortex/OM measured. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Image quality differences between pCASL and PASL were evaluated with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For both methods, analysis of variance, followed by Fisher's LSD-t test, was used to determine whether RBF differed between CKD stages and HVs. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess strength of relationships between cortex/OM RBF and data from clinical and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Image quality differences were significantly higher in pCASL than PASL in both patients and HVs (both P < 0.05). For pCASL, cortex/OM RBF of patients were significantly lower than those of HVs (P < 0.05). Cortex/OM RBF were higher in S1 and S2 patients than those in S3 and S4-5 (P < 0.05). For PASL, only RBF in cortex of S1 and S2 patients were significantly higher than those of S4-5 (P < 0.05). Good correlations between pCASL RBF and estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) were found in cortex/OM of patients (rho = 0.796 and 0.798, respectively, both P < 0.05), higher than those between PASL RBF and eGFR (rho = 0.430 and 0.374, respectively, both P < 0.05).

DATA CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional pCASL may potentially be a noninvasive technique to assess renal perfusion in CKD patients in different stages.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Early detection of subclinical pathology in patients with stable kidney graft function by arterial spin labeling

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of arterial spin labeling (ASL) for the identification of kidney allografts with underlying pathologies, particularly those with stable graft function.

METHODS

A total of 75 patients, including 18 stable grafts with normal histology (normal group), 21 stable grafts with biopsy-proven pathology (subclinical pathology group), and 36 with unstable graft function (unstable graft group), were prospectively examined by ASL magnetic resonance imaging. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to calculate the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

Patient demographics among the 3 groups were comparable. Compared with the normal group, kidney allograft cortical ASL values decreased in the subclinical pathology group and the unstable graft group (204.7 ± 44.9 ml/min/100 g vs 152.5 ± 38.9 ml/min/100 g vs 92.3 ± 37.4 ml/min/100 g, p < 0.001). The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for discriminating allografts with pathologic changes from normal allografts were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97), 71.9%, and 100% respectively by cortical ASL and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.90), 54.4%, and 100% respectively by serum creatinine. The cortical ASL identified allografts with subclinical pathology among patients with stable graft function with an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-0.91), sensitivity of 57.1%, and specificity of 88.9%. Combined use of proteinuria and cortical ASL could improve the sensitivity and specificity to 76.2% and 100% respectively for distinguishing the subclinical pathology group from the normal group.

CONCLUSIONS

Cortical ASL is useful for the identification of allografts with underlying pathologies. More importantly, ASL showed promise as a non-invasive tool for the clinical translation of identifying kidney allografts with subclinical pathology.

KEY POINTS

• Cortical ASL values were decreased in kidney allografts with subclinical pathologic changes as compared with normal allografts (152.5 ± 38.9 ml/min/100 g vs 204.7 ± 44.9 ml/min/100 g, p < 0.001). • Cortical ASL differentiated allografts with pathologic changes and subclinical pathology group from normal group with an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-0.91) respectively. • Cortical ASL discriminated allografts with underlying pathologic changes from normal allografts with a specificity of 100%, and combined use of proteinuria and cortical ASL values could also achieve 100% specificity for discriminating allografts with subclinical pathology from normal allografts.

Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal ASL MRI

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed at developing technical recommendations for the acquisition, processing and analysis of renal ASL data in the human kidney at 1.5 T and 3 T field strengths that can promote standardization of renal perfusion measurements and facilitate the comparability of results across scanners and in multi-centre clinical studies.

METHODS

An international panel of 23 renal ASL experts followed a modified Delphi process, including on-line surveys and two in-person meetings, to formulate a series of consensus statements regarding patient preparation, hardware, acquisition protocol, analysis steps and data reporting.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine statements achieved consensus, while agreement could not be reached on two statements related to patient preparation. As a default protocol, the panel recommends pseudo-continuous (PCASL) or flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) labelling with a single-slice spin-echo EPI readout with background suppression and a simple but robust quantification model.

DISCUSSION

This approach is considered robust and reproducible and can provide renal perfusion images of adequate quality and SNR for most applications. If extended kidney coverage is desirable, a 2D multislice readout is recommended. These recommendations are based on current available evidence and expert opinion. Nonetheless they are expected to be updated as more data become available, since the renal ASL literature is rapidly expanding.

Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal ASL MRI

Objectives

This study aimed at developing technical recommendations for the acquisition, processing and analysis of renal ASL data in the human kidney at 1.5 T and 3 T field strengths that can promote standardization of renal perfusion measurements and facilitate the comparability of results across scanners and in multi-centre clinical studies.

Methods

An international panel of 23 renal ASL experts followed a modified Delphi process, including on-line surveys and two in-person meetings, to formulate a series of consensus statements regarding patient preparation, hardware, acquisition protocol, analysis steps and data reporting.

Results

Fifty-nine statements achieved consensus, while agreement could not be reached on two statements related to patient preparation. As a default protocol, the panel recommends pseudo-continuous (PCASL) or flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) labelling with a single-slice spin-echo EPI readout with background suppression and a simple but robust quantification model.

Discussion

This approach is considered robust and reproducible and can provide renal perfusion images of adequate quality and SNR for most applications. If extended kidney coverage is desirable, a 2D multislice readout is recommended. These recommendations are based on current available evidence and expert opinion. Nonetheless they are expected to be updated as more data become available, since the renal ASL literature is rapidly expanding.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10334-019-00800-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Robust pCASL perfusion imaging using a 3D Cartesian acquisition with spiral profile reordering (CASPR)

PURPOSE

To improve the robustness of arterial spin-labeled measured perfusion using a novel Cartesian acquisition with spiral profile reordering (CASPR) 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) in the brain and kidneys.

METHODS

The CASPR view ordering followed a pseudo-spiral trajectory on a Cartesian grid, by sampling the center of k-space at the beginning of each echo train of a segmented 3D TSE acquisition. With institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 14 normal subjects (9 brain and 5 kidneys) were scanned with pCASL perfusion imaging using 3D CASPR and compared against 3D linear TSE (brain and kidneys), the established 2D EPI and 3D gradient and spin echo perfusion (brain), and 2D single-shot turbo spin-echo perfusion (kidneys). The SNR and the quantitative perfusion values were compared among different acquisitions.

RESULTS

3D CASPR TSE achieved robust perfusion across all slices compared to 3D linear TSE in the brain and kidneys. Compared to 2D EPI, 3D CASPR TSE showed higher SNR across the brain (P < 0.01), and exhibited good agreement (36.4 ± 4.7 and 36.9 ± 5.3 mL/100 g/min with 2D EPI and 3D CASPR, respectively), and with 3D gradient and spin echo (27.9 ± 7.2 mL/100 g/min). Compared to a single slice 2D single-shot turbo spin-echo acquisition, 3D CASPR TSE achieved robust perfusion across the entire kidneys in similar scan time with comparable quantified perfusion values (154.1 ± 74.6 and 151.7 ± 70.6 mL/100 g/min with 2D single-shot turbo spin-echo and 3D CASPR, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The CASPR view ordering with 3D TSE achieves robust arterial spin-labeled perfusion in the brain and kidneys because of the sampling of the center of k-space at the beginning of each echo train.

Image registration in dynamic renal MRI-current status and prospects

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities have achieved an increasingly important role in the clinical work-up of chronic kidney diseases (CKD). This comprises among others assessment of hemodynamic parameters by arterial spin labeling (ASL) or dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) MRI. Especially in the latter, images or volumes of the kidney are acquired over time for up to several minutes. Therefore, they are hampered by motion, e.g., by pulsation, peristaltic, or breathing motion. This motion can hinder subsequent image analysis to estimate hemodynamic parameters like renal blood flow or glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To overcome motion artifacts in time-resolved renal MRI, a wide range of strategies have been proposed. Renal image registration approaches could be grouped into (1) image acquisition techniques, (2) post-processing methods, or (3) a combination of image acquisition and post-processing approaches. Despite decades of progress, the translation in clinical practice is still missing. The aim of the present article is to discuss the existing literature on renal image registration techniques and show today’s limitations of the proposed techniques that hinder clinical translation. This paper includes transformation, criterion function, and search types as traditional components and emerging registration technologies based on deep learning. The current trend points towards faster registrations and more accurate results. However, a standardized evaluation of image registration in renal MRI is still missing.

Renal perfusion imaging by MRI

Renal perfusion can be quantitatively assessed by multiple magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods, including dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE), arterial spin labeling (ASL), and diffusion-weighted imaging with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis. In this review we summarize the advances in the field of renal-perfusion MRI over the past 5 years. The review starts with a brief introduction of relevant MRI methods, followed by a discussion of recent technical developments. In the main section of the review, we examine the clinical and preclinical applications for three disease populations: chronic kidney disease, renal transplant, and renal tumors. The DCE method has been routinely used for assessing renal tumors but not other renal diseases. As a noncontrast alternative, ASL was extensively explored in both preclinical and clinical applications and showed much promise. Protocol standardization for the methods is desperately needed, and then large-scale clinical trials for the methods can be initiated prior to their broad clinical use. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:369-379.