Factors associated with insufficient nasogastric tube visibility on X-ray: a retrospective analysis

Deep Learning-Based Localization and Detection of Malpositioned Nasogastric Tubes on Portable Supine Chest X-Rays in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine: A Multi-center Retrospective Study

Malposition of a nasogastric tube (NGT) can lead to severe complications. We aimed to develop a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to localize NGTs and detect NGT malposition on portable chest X-rays (CXRs). A total of 7378 portable CXRs were retrospectively retrieved from two hospitals between 2015 and 2020. All CXRs were annotated with pixel-level labels for NGT localization and image-level labels for NGT presence and malposition. In the CAD system, DeepLabv3 + with backbone ResNeSt50 and DenseNet121 served as the model architecture for segmentation and classification models, respectively. The CAD system was tested on images from chronologically different datasets (National Taiwan University Hospital (National Taiwan University Hospital)-20), geographically different datasets (National Taiwan University Hospital-Yunlin Branch (YB)), and the public CLiP dataset. For the segmentation model, the Dice coefficients indicated accurate delineation of the NGT course (National Taiwan University Hospital-20: 0.665, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.630-0.696; National Taiwan University Hospital-Yunlin Branch: 0.646, 95% CI 0.614-0.678). The distance between the predicted and ground-truth NGT tips suggested accurate tip localization (National Taiwan University Hospital-20: 1.64 cm, 95% CI 0.99-2.41; National Taiwan University Hospital-Yunlin Branch: 2.83 cm, 95% CI 1.94-3.76). For the classification model, NGT presence was detected with high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): National Taiwan University Hospital-20: 0.998, 95% CI 0.995-1.000; National Taiwan University Hospital-Yunlin Branch: 0.998, 95% CI 0.995-1.000; CLiP dataset: 0.991, 95% CI 0.990-0.992). The CAD system also detected NGT malposition with high accuracy (AUC: National Taiwan University Hospital-20: 0.964, 95% CI 0.917-1.000; National Taiwan University Hospital-Yunlin Branch: 0.991, 95% CI 0.970-1.000) and detected abnormal nasoenteric tube positions with favorable performance (AUC: 0.839, 95% CI 0.807-0.869). The CAD system accurately localized NGTs and detected NGT malposition, demonstrating excellent potential for external generalizability.

Nasogastric tube insertion length measurement and tip verification in adults: a narrative review

Nasogastric feeding tube insertion is a common but invasive procedure most often blindly placed by nurses in acute and chronic care settings. Although usually not harmful, serious and fatal complications with misplacement still occur and variation in practice still exists. These tubes can be used for drainage or administration of fluids, drugs and/or enteral feeding. During blind insertion, it is important to achieve correct tip position of the tube ideally reaching the body of the stomach. If the insertion length is too short, the tip and/or distal side-openings at the end of the tube can be located in the esophagus increasing the risk of aspiration (pneumonia). Conversely, when the insertion length is too long, the tube might kink in the stomach, curl upwards into the esophagus or enter the duodenum. Studies have demonstrated that the most frequently used technique to determine insertion length (the nose-earlobe-xiphoid method) is too short a distance; new safer methods should be used and further more robust evidence is needed. After blind placement, verifying correct gastric tip positioning is of major importance to avoid serious and sometimes lethal complications.

A scoping review of clinical practices and adherence to UK national guidance related to the placement and position confirmation of adult nasogastric feeding tubes

INTRODUCTION

The administration of nutrition or medication into the lungs or pleura via a misplaced nasogastric feeding tube is considered a never event. Despite guidance from the National Patient Safety Agency and NHS Improvement this never event is regularly reported. Confirmation of correct placement and correct use of nasogastric tubes requires appropriate actions and decisions by a multidisciplinary team.

METHODS

A scoping review identified 43 records that discussed and supported nasogastric tube misplacement as a Never Event. Searches were completed using Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, British Nursing Index (BNI), as well as selected journals. A further manual search revealed 22 publicly available NHS Trust policies related to nasogastric feeding tube procedures. Items generated between 2011 and 2020 were considered eligible. A thematic analysis was completed to assess adherence to guidance and the practices in place across the NHS.

RESULTS

Three key themes were identified as part of the review: referral and authorisation of radiography, examination description, and visualisation of the nasogastric tube tip. Large variations in practice were identified. While there is recognition of national guidance, records showed inconsistency and lacked the required detail to ensure patient safety.

CONCLUSION

Despite classification as a never event, it is apparent that there is still room for improvement and further guidance in ensuring patient safety with respect to nasogastric tube insertion.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Practice requires further standardisation whilst also ensuring optimisation and safety. Guidance should address in depth imaging authorisation, language and exact standards of acceptability for imaging the full length of the nasogastric tube.

X-ray checks of NG tube position: a case for guided tube placement

OBJECTIVES

Checking nasogastric (NG) tube position by X-ray is too late to prevent 1.5% of blind tube placements entering the lung and results in delays to feeding and drugs. We audit the safety of the tube position and delay incurred by X-ray.

METHODS

From Radiology reports, we determined whether tube position was safe for feeding, factors associated with an X-ray request and the time delay from X-ray request to that report. For tubes misplaced into the lung, the distance from the carina to tube tip was measured and compared with that from published records of guided tube placement.

RESULTS

From 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020, 1934 X-rays were done to check NG tube position in 891 patients. Gastric placement was confirmed in 85% but, because of tube proximity to the oesophagus, only 73% were deemed safe to feed. The 2.2% of tubes reported to be in the lung were a median of 18 cm beyond the carina compared to 12 cm and 0 cm for electromagnetic and direct vision methods of guided placement. X-ray checks delayed feed and drug treatment by >2 h in 51% of placements and 33% of patients required >3 X-rays during their enteral episode.

CONCLUSION

X-ray checks are common and detect a high percentage of unsafe tube placements, leading to repeated X-ray and delayed delivery of drugs and nutrition. Interpretation can be difficult even when following standard national criteria and post-placement X-ray cannot prevent deep lung placement. Guided or combined methods of confirming tube placement should be investigated.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Reports included 27.5% of placements as unsafe, 2.2% in the lung at a median depth of 18 cm beyond the carina and too late to prevent 7 pneumothoraces. X-rays were repeated >3 times in 33% of patients over their enteral course and we are associated with clinically significant delays to drug treatment (and nutrition) in 51%; combined methods of tube confirmation or guided placement may be safer and more efficient.