Prediction for pathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of triple-negative invasive breast carcinomas: the performance comparison between quantitative and qualitative sonographic feature analysis

Artificial intelligence-based, semi-automated segmentation for the extraction of ultrasound-derived radiomics features in breast cancer: a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based semi-automated segmentation for the extraction of ultrasound (US)-derived radiomics features in the characterization of focal breast lesions (FBLs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two expert radiologists classified according to US BI-RADS criteria 352 FBLs detected in 352 patients (237 at Center A and 115 at Center B). An AI-based semi-automated segmentation was used to build a machine learning (ML) model on the basis of B-mode US of 237 images (center A) and then validated on an external cohort of B-mode US images of 115 patients (Center B).

RESULTS

A total of 202 of 352 (57.4%) FBLs were benign, and 150 of 352 (42.6%) were malignant. The AI-based semi-automated segmentation achieved a success rate of 95.7% for one reviewer and 96% for the other, without significant difference (p = 0.839). A total of 15 (4.3%) and 14 (4%) of 352 semi-automated segmentations were not accepted due to posterior acoustic shadowing at B-Mode US and 13 and 10 of them corresponded to malignant lesions, respectively. In the validation cohort, the characterization made by the expert radiologist yielded values of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 0.933, 0.9, 0.857, 0.955, respectively. The ML model obtained values of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 0.544, 0.6, 0.416, 0.628, respectively. The combined assessment of radiologists and ML model yielded values of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 0.756, 0.928, 0.872, 0.855, respectively.

CONCLUSION

AI-based semi-automated segmentation is feasible, allowing an instantaneous and reproducible extraction of US-derived radiomics features of FBLs. The combination of radiomics and US BI-RADS classification led to a potential decrease of unnecessary biopsy but at the expense of a not negligible increase of potentially missed cancers.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound-based artificial intelligence for predicting key molecular markers in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment rely heavily on molecular markers such as HER2, Ki67, PR, and ER. Currently, these markers are identified by invasive methods.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis investigates the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-based radiomics as a novel approach to predicting these markers.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify studies evaluating ultrasound-based radiomics in BC. Inclusion criteria encompassed research on HER2, Ki67, PR, and ER as key molecular markers. Quality assessment using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) was performed. The data extraction step was performed systematically.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis quantifies the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-based radiomics with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.76 and 0.78 for predicting HER2, 0.80, and 0.76 for Ki67 biomarkers. Studies did not provide sufficient data for quantitative PR and ER prediction analysis. The overall quality of studies based on the RQS tool was moderate. The QUADAS-2 evaluation showed that the studies had an unclear risk of bias regarding the flow and timing domain.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis indicated that AI models have a promising accuracy for predicting key molecular biomarkers' status in BC patients. We performed the quantitative analysis for HER2 and Ki67 biomarkers which yielded a moderate to high accuracy. However, studies did not provide adequate data for meta-analysis of ER and PR prediction accuracy of developed models. The overall quality of the studies was acceptable. In future research, studies need to report the results thoroughly. Also, we suggest more prospective studies from different centers.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the preoperative prediction of pathological characteristics in breast cancer

Objective

We aimed to investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the preoperative prediction of the histological grades and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 183 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer were included. Contrast enhancement patterns and quantitative parameters were compared in different groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the efficacy of CEUS in the preoperative prediction of pathological characteristics, including histologic grade and molecular subtypes.

Results

Heterogeneous enhancement, perfusion defects, and peripheral radial vessels were mostly observed in higher histologic grade (grade III) breast cancer. Heterogeneous enhancement and perfusion defect were the most effective indicators for grade III breast cancer, with the areas under the ROC curve of 0.768 and 0.756, respectively. There were significant differences in the enhancement intensity, post-enhanced margin, perfusion defects, and peripheral radial vessel among the different molecular subtypes of breast cancer (all P < 0.01). Perfusion defects and clear edge after enhancement were the best qualitative criteria for the diagnosis of HER-2 overexpressed and triple-negative breast cancers, and the corresponding areas under the ROC curves were 0.804 and 0.905, respectively. There were significant differences in PE, WiR, WiPI, and WiWoAUC between grade III vs grade I and II breast cancer (P < 0.05). PE, WiR, WiPI, and WiWoAUC had good efficiency in the diagnosis of high-histologic-grade breast cancer. PE had the highest diagnostic efficiency in Luminal A, while WiPI had the highest diagnostic efficiency in Luminal B subtype breast cancer, and the areas under the ROC curve were 0.825 and 0.838, respectively. WiWoAUC and WiR were the most accurate parameters for assessing triple-negative subtype breast cancers, and the areas under the curve were 0.932 and 0.922, respectively.

Conclusion

Qualitative and quantitative perfusion analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be useful in the non-invasive prediction of the histological grade and molecular subtypes of breast cancers.

Artificial intelligence in breast imaging: potentials and challenges

Breast cancer, which is the most common type of malignant tumor among humans, is a leading cause of death in females. Standard treatment strategies, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, postoperative chemotherapy, targeted therapy, endocrine therapy, and radiotherapy, are tailored for individual patients. Such personalized therapies have tremendously reduced the threat of breast cancer in females. Furthermore, early imaging screening plays an important role in reducing the treatment cycle and improving breast cancer prognosis. The recent innovative revolution in artificial intelligence (AI) has aided radiologists in the early and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer. In this review, we introduce the necessity of incorporating AI into breast imaging and the applications of AI in mammography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography based on published articles since 1994. Moreover, the challenges of AI in breast imaging are discussed.

Ultrasound-based radiomics model for predicting molecular biomarkers in breast cancer

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and is highly heterogeneous. BC can be classified into four molecular subtypes based on the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and proliferation marker protein Ki-67. However, they can only be obtained by biopsy or surgery, which is invasive. Radiomics can noninvasively predict molecular expression via extracting the image features. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of data available regarding the prediction of molecular biomarker expression using ultrasound (US) images in BC.

Objectives

To investigate the prediction performance of US radiomics for the assessment of molecular profiling in BC.

Methods

A total of 342 patients with BC who underwent preoperative US examination between January 2013 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. They were confirmed by pathology and molecular subtype analysis of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67. The radiomics features were extracted and four molecular models were constructed through support vector machine (SVM). Pearson correlation coefficient heatmaps are employed to analyze the relationship between selected features and their predictive power on molecular expression. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used for the prediction performance of US radiomics in the assessment of molecular profiling.

Results

359 lesions with 129 ER- and 230 ER+, 163 PR- and 196 PR+, 265 HER2- and 94 HER2+, 114 Ki-67- and 245 Ki-67+ expression were included. 1314 features were extracted from each ultrasound image. And there was a significant difference of some specific radiomics features between the molecule positive and negative groups. Multiple features demonstrated significant association with molecular biomarkers. The area under curves (AUCs) were 0.917, 0.835, 0.771, and 0.896 in the training set, while 0.868, 0.811, 0.722, and 0.706 in the validation set to predict ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 expression respectively.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-based radiomics provides a promising method for predicting molecular biomarker expression of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 in BC.

Nomograms predicting recurrence in patients with triple negative breast cancer based on ultrasound and clinicopathological features

OBJECTIVES

The clinicopathological and ultrasound features associated with recurrence in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were used to develop a nomogram to predict the prognosis of TNBC.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data of 300 patients with TNBC treated between July 2012 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Prognostic factors were screened by multivariate COX regression to develop nomograms. The C-index and calibration curves were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy and discriminatory ability of nomograms.

RESULTS

Of 300 patients with TNBC followed-up for 5 years, 80 (26.7%) had PFS events. Five informative prognostic factors (large size, vertical orientation, posterior acoustic enhancement, lymph node involvement, and high pathological stage) were screened and used to construct a nomogram for PFS. The C-index of the PFS nomogram was 0.88 (p < 0.01, 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.90), indicating good predictive accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a nomogram for predicting PFS in TNBC. Vertical orientation and posterior acoustic enhancement in ultrasound images of TNBC were associated with worse outcomes.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Patients with TNBC have a very poor prognosis and patients have a high risk of recurrence, and our study developed a nomogram based on ultrasound and clinicopathological features for TNBC patients to improve the accuracy of individualized prediction of recurrence and provide help for clinical treatment.

Survival outcome assessment for triple-negative breast cancer: a nomogram analysis based on integrated clinicopathological, sonographic, and mammographic characteristics

Objective

This study aimed to incorporate clinicopathological, sonographic, and mammographic characteristics to construct and validate a nomogram model for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with TNBC at our institution between 2011 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. A nomogram model was generated based on clinicopathological, sonographic, and mammographic variables that were associated with 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis in the training set. The nomogram model was validated according to the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves in the validation set.

Results

A total of 636 TNBC patients were enrolled and divided into training cohort (n = 446) and validation cohort (n = 190). Clinical factors including tumor size > 2 cm, axillary dissection, presence of LVI, and sonographic features such as angular/spiculated margins, posterior acoustic shadows, and presence of suspicious lymph nodes on preoperative US showed a tendency towards worse DFS. The multivariate analysis showed that no adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 6.7, 95% CI: 2.6, 17.5, p < 0.0005), higher axillary tumor burden (HR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.0, 7.1, p = 0.045), and ≥ 3 malignant features on ultrasound (HR = 2.4, CI: 1.1, 5.0, p = 0.021) were identified as independent prognostic factors associated with poorer DFS outcomes. In the nomogram, the C-index was 0.693 for the training cohort and 0.694 for the validation cohort. The calibration plots also exhibited excellent consistency between the nomogram-predicted and actual survival probabilities in both the training and validation cohorts.

Conclusions

Clinical variables and sonographic features were correlated with the prognosis of TNBCs. The nomogram model based on three variables including no adjuvant chemotherapy, higher axillary tumor load, and more malignant sonographic features showed good predictive performance for poor survival outcomes of TNBC.

Key Points

• The absence of adjuvant chemotherapy, heavy axillary tumor load, and malignant-like sonographic features can predict DFS in patients with TNBC.

• Mammographic features of TNBC could not predict the survival outcomes of patients with TNBC.

• The nomogram integrating clinicopathological and sonographic characteristics is a reliable predictive model for the prognostic outcome of TNBC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08910-4.

Radiomics Based on Digital Mammography Helps to Identify Mammographic Masses Suspicious for Cancer

Objectives

This study aims to build radiomics model of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 and 5 mammographic masses extracted from digital mammography (DM) for mammographic masses characterization by using a sensitivity threshold similar to that of biopsy.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 288 female patients (age, 52.41 ± 10.31) who had BI-RADS category 4 or 5 mammographic masses with an indication for biopsy. The patients were divided into two temporal set (training set, 82 malignancies and 110 benign lesions; independent test set, 48 malignancies and 48 benign lesions). A total of 188 radiomics features were extracted from mammographic masses on the combination of craniocaudal (CC) position images and mediolateral oblique (MLO) position images. For the training set, Pearson’s correlation and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to select non-redundant radiomics features and useful radiomics features, respectively, and support vector machine (SVM) was applied to construct a radiomics model. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the classification performance of the radiomics model and to determine a threshold value with a sensitivity higher than 98% to predict the mammographic masses malignancy. For independent test set, identical threshold value was used to validate the classification performance of the radiomics model. The stability of the radiomics model was evaluated by using a fivefold cross-validation method, and two breast radiologists assessed the diagnostic agreement of the radiomics model.

Results

In the training set, the radiomics model obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.934 [95% confidence intervals (95% CI), 0.898–0.971], a sensitivity of 98.8% (81/82), a threshold of 0.22, and a specificity of 60% (66/110). In the test set, the radiomics model obtained an AUC of 0.901 (95% CI, 0.835–0.961), a sensitivity of 95.8% (46/48), and a specificity of 66.7% (32/48). The radiomics model had relatively stable sensitivities in fivefold cross-validation (training set, 97.39% ± 3.9%; test set, 98.7% ± 4%).

Conclusion

The radiomics method based on DM may help reduce the temporarily unnecessary invasive biopsies for benign mammographic masses over-classified in BI-RADS category 4 and 5 while providing similar diagnostic performance for malignant mammographic masses as biopsies.