The modified Clavien classification system: a standardized platform for reporting complications in transurethral resection of the prostate

Suprapubic Transvesical Adenoma Resection of the Prostate (STAR-P): A Novel Technique for Surgical Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Several minimally invasive treatments have been developed to treat benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) via a transurethral approach, with a non-negligible risk of complications such as urethral stricture and external sphincter damage. Our aim was to present the Gozzi surgical technique for suprapubic transvesical adenoma resection of the prostate (STAR-P) for BPO and to assess its safety, feasibility, and outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 44 consecutive patients who underwent STAR-P for BPO. All the procedures were performed in a single private hospital by one surgeon from 2020 to 2022. An innovative resectoscope designed by the surgeon was subsequently produced by Tontarra Medizintechnik (Wurmlingen, Germany) with a 42.06 Fr external sheath that allows the use of loops of three different sizes. The instrument is inserted into the bladder via suprapubic access, which ensures greater freedom of movement without compromising the external sphincter. Clinical data were retrospectively collected. Preoperative and intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes of the STAR-P procedure were assessed. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

No intraoperative complications were observed. Two patients (4.5%) experienced urinary urgency symptoms after catheter removal that resolved within 90 d. Median times were 105 min for surgery overall and 65 min for resection. All patients showed an improvement in voiding quality.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

STAR-P is a safe, feasible, and cost-effective procedure that spares the bulbomembranous and penile urethra and the external urethral sphincter, and should be discussed with patients as a possible option for treatment of BPO.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We describe a new, safe, and feasible technique for surgical treatment of urinary obstruction caused by a large prostate. Keyhole surgery is performed through the lower abdomen, which means that the urethra below the prostate is not damaged. Only a small scar of 2-3 cm in the lower abdomen is evident at the end of the healing process.

Propensity score-matched evaluation of palliative transurethral resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction in patients with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

While transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard-of-care, Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is widely accepted as a size-independent method for surgical treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). However, in an ageing society an increasing number of patients presents with BOO due to locally advanced prostate cancer. There is currently no guidelines recommendation as to the enucleation or resection technique. Therefore, we compared intraoperative performance, postoperative outcomes, and safety for palliative (p)TURP and (p)HoLEP.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of 1373 and 2705 men who underwent TURP or HoLEP for LUTS/BOO between 2014 and 2021, respectively. Patients were matched for age, prostate size and preoperative international prostate symptom score (IPSS). Patients were stratified by technique and groups were compared for perioperative parameters, safety, and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

While postoperative symptoms and urodynamic parameters improved irrespective of technique, we report significantly increased resection and enucleation times for palliative indication. For corresponding efficiency parameters, we observed a two-fold higher surgical performance (g/min) for both techniques in patients without prostate cancer. While adverse events were comparable between groups, we found a two-fold higher hemoglobin drop in palliative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is no standard-of-care for patients with BOO and locally advanced prostate cancer. Our data show that both TURP and HoLEP offer adequate symptom improvement and comparable safety profiles. While HoLEP is feasible even in larger prostates, both procedures become more difficult in patients with prostate cancer. Taken together, this study covers an important gap in current literature, helping urological surgeons to make evidence-based decisions for the benefit of their patients.

Safety and clinical outcomes of GreenLight laser prostatectomy in octogenarians

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the impact of age on perioperative morbidity and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing GreenLight laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from individuals who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy from May 2018 to July 2022. Patient demographics and outcome measures were recorded, including indications for the procedure and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores. All patients had postoperative followup visits at one, three, six, and 12 months. Our evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS ), quality of life (QoL) assessment, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual volume (PVR), and catheter-free status.

RESULTS

One-hundred-sixty-eight males who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy were included. The non-octogenarian group consisted of 111 patients and the octogenarian group comprised 57 individuals. Based on ASA scores, most octogenarians were deemed high-risk (ASA III: 91.2%), while over half of non-octogenarians were lower-risk (ASA II: 53.2%) (p<0.001). Intraoperative parameters, including operative time, vaporization time, lasing time, and energy did not differ significantly between groups. There was no difference in the proportion of intraoperative complications between non-octogenarians and octogenarians (0.9% vs. 3.5%). Postoperative complications were not statistically significant between the two groups (p=0.608). There was also no observed difference in the proportion of patients requiring readmission (p=0.226) or retreatment (p=1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

GreenLight laser prostatectomy is a safe and effective treatment for BPH regardless of age. It provides similar surgical and functional outcomes as younger men while maintaining the QoL of octogenarians.

Efficacy of Low Dose Intravenous Epinephrine Infusion in Improving Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Prostate: A Prospective Parallel Arm Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of intraoperative low-dose intravenous epinephrine infusion in improving intraoperative bleeding and perioperative outcomes of transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) surgery.

METHODS

This was a double-blinded, randomized control trial in which all patients undergoing bipolar TURP were included. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac disease, and on anticoagulants were excluded. The study group received intravenous epinephrine, whereas the control group received normal saline at the same rate (0.05 μg/kg/min) throughout the procedure. Intraoperative blood loss was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were incidence of intraoperative hypotension (due to spinal anesthesia), resection time, indwelling catheter time, and length of hospitalization.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included in each group. Demographic and clinical profiles were comparable with an overall median prostate size of 41 (34-52) gram in both groups. The primary objective, mean intraoperative blood loss in the study group was lower than the control group but statistically insignificant (67.91+/-18.7 mL vs 75.14 +/-17.1 mL; P = .086). Incidence of intraoperative hypotension was significantly lower in the study group (8.3% vs 33.3%; P = .01). Rest of the secondary outcomes, resection time (83 (64-111.5) minutes vs 86 (68-94.75) minutes; P = .97), mean indwelling catheter time (P = .94), postoperative complications (P = .73), and length of hospitalization (P = .87) were comparable.

CONCLUSION

In this first-of-its-kind trial, low-dose epinephrine infusion did not reduce intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing TURP. However, it significantly reduced intraoperative hypotension, which complicates spinal anesthesia particularly in elderly population.

Incidence and risk factors of in-hospital venous thromboembolism in non-oncological urological inpatients: A single center experience

Objective

To determine incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) development of in-hospital VTE in urological inpatients who underwent non-oncological surgery in a tertiary hospital in China.

Methods

Consecutive 1453 inpatients who were admitted to a non-oncological urological ward in the tertiary hospital from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 were enrolled in the study, and the VTE events were diagnosed by ultrasound or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Patients' occurrence of VTE and characteristics which may contribute to the development of VTE were collected and analyzed as incidence and risk factors.

Results

The incidence of VTE in non-oncological urological inpatients is 2.3%. In our cohort, patients who experienced previous VTE (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 14.272, 95% CI 3.620-56.275), taking anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents before admission (aOR 10.181, 95% CI 2.453-42.256), D-dimer (max) ≥1 μg/mL (aOR 22.456, 95% CI 6.468-77.967), lower extremity swelling (aOR 10.264, 95% CI 2.242-46.994), chest symptoms (aOR 79.182, 95% CI 7.132-879.076), operation time of more than or equal to 180 min (aOR 10.690, 95% CI 1.356-84.300), and Caprini score (max) of more than or equal to 5 (aOR 34.241, 95% CI 1.831-640.235) were considered as risk factors for VTE.

Conclusion

In this study, we found that the incidence of VTE in non-oncological surgery was about 2.3%, which was higher than some previous studies. Risk factors could be used for early detection and diagnosis of VTE.

Efficacy, Efficiency, and Safety of En-bloc vs Three-lobe Enucleation of the Prostate: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy, efficiency, and safety in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), we directly compared intraoperative performance, postoperative outcomes, and safety in the original 3-lobe enucleation technique with the more recent en-bloc method. As HoLEP is widely accepted as a size-independent method for surgical treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), detailed understanding of its benefits is mandatory.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of 1,396 men who underwent HoLEP for LUTS/BPO between 2017 and 2020. We included 606 patients in the final analysis (en-bloc n = 303; 3-lobe n = 303), who were matched for prostate size (50 cc), age, body mass index, and preoperative international prostate symptom score. Patients were then stratified by technique, and groups were compared for perioperative parameters, safety, and short-term functional outcomes.

RESULTS

While postoperative symptoms and urodynamic parameters improved irrespective of technique, we report significantly less adverse events (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥II vs <II) for patients receiving en-bloc enucleation. Additionally, en-bloc enucleation was more efficient, that is, less than half of total laser energy (kJ), twice shorter enucleation time, and surgical performance (g/kJ/min) significantly increased 4-fold with prostate volume, compared to 3-lobe enucleation.

CONCLUSION

While HoLEP in general is a safe and effective procedure, en-bloc enucleation techniques offer better surgical performance.

Safety profile of treatment with greenlight versus Thulium Laser for benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

The major strengths of surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with laser are reduced morbidity compared to endoscopic resection. No studies analysed the different risk of intra/peri-operative events between patients undergoing Thulium and GreenLight procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive cases undergoing GreenLight vaporization and Thulium procedures performed during the learning curve of two expert endoscopic surgeons. Pre-operative data, intra and post-operative events at 90 days were analysed.

RESULTS

Patients on antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy were pre-dominant in the Green group (p < 0.0001). Rates of blood transfusion (p < 0.0038), use of resectoscope (p < 0.0086), and transient stress urinary incontinence were statistically higher in the Thulium group. On the contrary conversions to TURP (p < 0.023) were more frequent in GreenLight patients. Readmissions were more frequently necessary in GreenLight group (24%) vs. Thulium group (26.6%). The overall complication rate in GreenLight and Thulium groups were 31% and 53% respectively; Clavien 3b complications were 13% in Thulium patients versus 1% in GreenLight patients.

CONCLUSIONS

GreenLight and Thulium treatments show similar safety profiles. Randomized controlled trial are needed to better clarify the rate of major complications in Thulium group, and the incidence of post-operative storage symptoms in these patients' populations.

Peri- and post-operative outcomes, complications, and functional results amongst different modifications of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP): a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate and assess outcomes, complications, and functional results amongst different modifications of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA checklist. We searched the Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases. We included only randomised-controlled trials (RCT) comparing modifications of EEPs and assessed the risk of bias (RoB).

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included in the study. Overall, 1266 patients were treated with Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and 80 patients with thulium laser vapo-enucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP). The operative time during pulse shape-modified HoLEP was shorter when compared to standard pulse HoLEP (MD 18.08 min, 95% CI 8.11-28.05 min, p = 0.0004). The decrease in haemoglobin was significantly lower for two-lobe HoLEP when compared to three-lobe HoLEP (MD 0.16 g/dl, 95% CI 0.22-0.1 g/dl, p < 0.00001). Virtual Basket (VB) HoLEP showed a smaller haemoglobin decrease when compared to standard pulse HoLEP (1.12 ± 1.78 vs. 2.54 ± 1.23 g/dl, p = 0.03). When directly comparing one- vs. two- vs. three-lobe HoLEP, surgical time (p < 0.001) and enucleation efficiency (p = 0.006) were significantly different and favouring one- and two-lobe HoLEP in the study with the largest patient population included. No significant differences for complications were observed; however, Clavien-Dindo IVa events were reported for two patients.

CONCLUSION

All variations of EEP improve symptoms and functional parameters with a low incidence of high-grade complications. One- and two-lobe approaches and pulse shape-modified HoLEP seem to be beneficial in terms of operative time and blood loss.

UroLift for Treating Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance Update

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) commonly occur as a consequence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), also known as prostate enlargement. Treatments for this can involve electrosurgical removal of a section of the prostate via transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), or prostatic urethral lift using the UroLift system. The UroLift system implants to pull excess prostatic tissue away so that it does not narrow or block the urethra. In this way, the device is designed to relieve symptoms of urinary outflow obstruction without cutting or removing tissue. National guidance recommending the use of UroLift in the UK NHS was first issued in 2015 by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE MTG26). We now report on the process to update the economic evaluation of UroLift, leading to updated NICE guidance published in May 2021 (NICE MTG58). The conclusions of the available clinical evidence were mixed and suggested that whilst UroLift improves symptoms over time, this improvement is smaller than that of TURP for symptom severity (IPSS) and urological outcomes. However, UroLift appears to be superior to Rezum for symptom severity and measures of erectile dysfunction and ejaculatory dysfunction. The updated economic model estimated that using UroLift as a day-case procedure for people with prostate of volume 30-80 mL creates a saving of £981 per person compared with bipolar TURP, £1242 compared with monopolar TURP, and £1230 compared with HoLEP.

Composite urinary and sexual outcomes after Rezum: an analysis of predictive factors from an Italian multi-centric study

BACKGROUND

The Rezum system is one of the latest minimally invasive surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent the Rezum treatment in seven different Italian institutions. A successful urinary outcome was defined as: ≥50% improvement in the IPSS <7, improvement in peak flow ≥50% and/or more than 15 ml/s, ≥1-point improvement in the QoL questionnaire and in the absence of perioperative major complications (AUR, transfusion) or postoperative incontinence. A successful sexual outcome was defined as postoperative (latest follow up consultation) antegrade ejaculation or no variation in ejaculatory function and an increase, or stability or max 1 class reduction, in IIEF-5.

RESULTS

262 patients were enrolled with a follow-up period of 11 months (IQR 5-15). No early or late serious adverse events (Clavien III-IV) occurred. Early complications occurred in 39.3% of cases, with 4 cases of clot retention and one case of blood transfusion. Urge incontinence was reported by 6 patients (2.2%). A treatment failure requiring re-intervention occurred in 4 cases (1.5%). The preoperative antegrade ejaculation rate was 56.5%, and after the procedure it increased to 78.2%. The increase of ≥1-point in the QoL was achieved in 92.7% of the cases. Optimal urinary and sexual outcomes were achieved in 52.9% and 87.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, water vapor intraprostatic injections seem to be an effective and safe procedure.

Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center preliminary study in Korea

Background

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) are the two most important therapeutic modalities for large benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, there are currently no studies comparing these two treatments in a Korean setting. In this study, the authors seek to compare the safety and efficacy associated with these procedures.

Methods

The authors retrospectively analyzed 59 male patients who underwent HoLEP (n = 26) or RASP (n = 33) at single center. The following preoperative data were compared: age, the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), transrectal ultrasonography, uroflowmetry, and hemoglobin. Intraoperative data included operation time and specimen weight. Postoperative data included change in IPSS, uroflowmetry, and hemoglobin. Length of stay, catheterization time, and complications were also reviewed.

Results

No significant differences between the two groups were found in terms of age, total prostate, and transitional volume. Postoperatively, both groups showed similar improvement in the maximum flow rate, post-void residual urine, IPSS, and quality of life. Intraoperatively, there were no differences regarding operation time and resected prostate volume. Catheter removal time and length of stay were significantly shorter in the HoLEP group than the RASP group. In addition, postoperative hemoglobin changes were significantly lower in the HoLEP group. However, incontinence rates at 1 month and 2 months postoperative in the RASP group were lower than the HoLEP group.

Conclusions

Both HoLEP and RASP can produce excellent postoperative outcomes. However, catheter removal time, length of stay, and hemoglobin changes were more favorable in the HoLEP group. On the other hand, postoperative incontinence was more favorable in the RASP group. These factors must be heavily considered when deciding surgical the method for large benign prostatic hyperplasia.

A ten-year observational study of the use of two-way catheters post-transurethral resection of the prostate without the use of post-op irrigation

Background:

Over 15,000 transurethral resections of the prostate (TURP) are performed annually in the United Kingdom. It is therefore vital that every aspect of peri-operative care be optimised. Our centre favours the use of two-way catheters post-operatively without the use of continuous bladder irrigation (CBI).

Objectives:

To evaluate our practice of using two-way catheters without irrigation post-TURP and to determine impact on patient care compared with standard three-way catheterisation. Our primary outcome was duration of admission, but multiple secondary outcomes were also analysed. Design, setting, and participants: This was a prospective observational study. Every patient undergoing TURP at our centre from 2009 to 2019 was included. Following TURP patients were catheterised with two-way catheters. Prospective patient data were collected pertaining to peri-operative factors. These data were then compared with the data published in the literature.

Results:

687 patients underwent TURP at our centre between 2009 and 2019. The average age of patients was 71.42 (±7.89). 87.17% ( n = 598) had two-way catheters placed post-operatively. Average duration of admission was 1.61 (±1.35) days, increasing to 2.20 days if patients required three-way catheters or 2.53 days if requiring CBI. TWOC was successful in 97.71% of patients. Complication rate was 8.73% ( n = 60). When compared with other centres, our method reduced lengths of admission and transfusion rates (1.6 days versus 3.1 days and 0.87% versus 2.83%, respectively).

Conclusion:

Our method is safe and is associated with a reduced length of admission. We recommend this practice to the wider urological community.

Patient summary:

This study looked at whether there was any impact on patients if two-way catheters were used following TURP. We found that use of two-way catheters reduced length of admission and duration of catheterisation. We also found that it did not increase likelihood of peri-operative complications in comparison with other centres.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients After Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)

Objective

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been overlooked for many years. This research was aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of VTE in patients after TURP.

Methods

A total of 451 patients who underwent TURP between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data of the patients were collected, such as basic demographic data, prostate volume, creatinine values, hemoglobin values, surgery duration, Caprini score, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) score, plasma D-dimer levels, and so on. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify the potential risk factors of VTE. Venous ultrasonography of lower extremities was performed routinely to detect VTE for patients after TURP.

Results

In total, 36 (8%) out of the 451 patients suffered from VTE. A total of 12 (2.7%) patients were confirmed with deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Two patients (0.4%) were identified with pulmonary embolism (PE). Twenty-two (4.9%) patients were suffered from superficial venous thrombosis. Furthermore, according to the results of multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis, having a history of VTE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 10.980, 95% CI = 2.265–53.223), complicated with postoperative bladder hematoma (aOR = 6.302, 95% CI = 2.265–17.532), D-dimer >1.25 mg/L (aOR = 4.402, 95% CI = 1.798–10.774), and age >65 (aOR = 3.106, 95% CI = 1.084–8.893) were independent risk factors of VTE after TURP. In addition, the nomogram prediction model is a useful auxiliary prevention tool of VTE.

Conclusion

The incidence of VTE is severely underestimated in patients following TURP. A lot of asymptomatic VTEs have been overlooked. Early detection and diagnosis of VTE are essential. Nevertheless, further verifications based on the results of large-scaled studies are still needed.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on urinary continence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate due to lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective study

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is known as a risk factor of stress urinary incontinence after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). We aimed to compare the postoperative continence status of patients with and without DM, after HoLEP surgery.

Material and methods

A total of 214 patients who underwent HoLEP between January 2017 and January 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Functional outcomes, perioperative total operation time (TOT)(min), enucleation time (ET)(min), enucleation efficiency (EE)(g/min), enucleated tissue weight (ETW)(g), morcellation efficiency (ME)(g/min), morcellation time (MT)(min), continence status, intraoperative and postoperative complications according to Clavien–Dindo classification were recorded.

Results

A total of 96 patients had DM additional to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) (Group 1), while 118 patients had only benign prostate hyperplasia without DM (Group 2). When comparing preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes, a statistically significant improvement was observed in both groups from baseline to the 1^st and 6^th month follow-up (p ≤0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in postoperative stress urinary incontinence at postoperative months 1 and 6 (1.7% vs 2.1%, p = 1 and 0.8% vs 1%, p = 1; respectively). There was no significant difference between groups in intraoperative and postoperative complications (p >0.05).

Conclusions

HoLEP is safe to perform in patients with DM at low complication and urinary incontinence rates.

Evaluating Patient Preferences in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment Using Conjoint Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To quantify BPH patient preferences to promote guidelines-compliant, patient-centered care. Discordance between patient and urologist priorities for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) hinders patient-centered care. Physician assumptions regarding patient preferences lead to dissatisfied patients; a poor outcome in any quality of life surgery. American Urologic Association guidelines urge urologists to consider patient preferences when recommending a BPH treatment.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, online survey study using researchmatch.org, participants were required to decide between theoretical BPH treatments in a balanced, choice-based conjoint analysis. The treatments had varying levels of four attributes: efficacy, recovery difficulty, risk of complications (Clavien-Dindo 2+), and risk of de novo ejaculatory dysfunction. Demographic information and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were collected and analyzed using comparative statistics. Each attribute was analyzed using a conditional logit model, and attribute importance (range in utility between attribute-levels) was calculated.

RESULTS

Out of 1235 recruited participants, 812 (66%) completed the study. Median IPSS and age was 6 (IQR 3-12) and 56 (IQR 38-67), respectively. Complication risk was the most important attribute, followed by efficacy, recovery difficulty, and risk of ejaculatory dysfunction. In a subgroup analysis of age quartiles, participants age <38 and >67 held efficacy (31%) and complication risk (47%) to the highest relative importance, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Males valued BPH treatments that minimize complication risks, while ejaculatory dysfunction was least impactful. Variation in results between age subgroups emphasizes the need for individualized care to maximize patient satisfaction.

Immediate Transurethral Plasma Kinetic Enucleation of the Prostate Gland for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-Associated Massive Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose: Benign prostatic hyperplasia-associated massive hemorrhage is a urological emergency. We evaluated the outcome from immediate transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate gland (i-TUPKEP) for BHM treatment.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 49 patients with acute BMH who underwent i-TUPKEP between January 2014 and November 2018 at our institution. The hemostatic effect, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (QoL) score were evaluated preoperatively as well as 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative follow-up also included measurement of the peak flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine volume (PVR). Clinical characteristics, weight of resected tissue, duration of bladder irrigation, duration of hospital stay, complications, as well as the time required for enucleation and resection, were recorded.

Results: BMH causes were attributed to transurethral surgery (17/49, 34.7%), violent catheterization (13/49, 26.5%), cystoscopy (10/49, 20.4%), and urethral dilatation (9/49, 18.4%). Bleeding was from different sites of prostate-gland tissues during i-TURKEP. i-TUPKEP-controlled BMH effectively induced immediate, notable, and lasting improvements in the IPSS and QoL score. Qmax was close to normal, and the PVR was within the physiological range, postoperatively. Long-term complications were not observed.

Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggest that i-TUPKEP is a feasible method for controlling BHM and relieving BPH symptoms.

How does symptom severity impact clinical outcomes of men with lower urinary tract symptoms after holmium laser enucleation or transurethral resection of the prostate?

Introduction

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated outcome measure for the evaluation of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). When treating patients with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), patient selection is key to achieve the best clinical outcome. Therefore, we analyzed how the severity of LUTS as determined by IPSS influenced postoperative functional outcomes.

Material and methods

We conducted a retrospective, matched-pair analysis of 2,011 men who underwent HoLEP or TURP for LUTS/BPO between 2013-2017. We included 195 patients in the final analysis (HoLEP n = 97; TURP n = 98), who were matched for prostate size (50 cc), age, and body mass index. Patients were then stratified by IPSS. Groups were compared for perioperative parameters, safety and short-term functional outcomes.

Results

While preoperative symptom severity was a significant predictor of postoperative clinical improvement, patients who received HoLEP showed superior postoperative functional results with higher peak flow rates and 2-fold greater improvement in IPSS. In patients presenting with severe symptoms, we observed 3- to 4-fold less Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II and overall complications after receiving HoLEP compared to TURP.

Conclusions

Patients with severe LUTS were more likely to experience clinically significant improvement after surgery than patients with moderate LUTS, and HoLEP showed superior functional outcomes than TURP. However, patients with moderate LUTS should not be denied surgery, but may warrant a more comprehensive clinical work-up.

Complications and functional outcomes of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised-controlled studies

Introduction

There are several endoscopic enucleation procedures (EEP) using different energy sources: holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP), Greenlight^® (GreenVEP) and diode (DiLEP) lasers, and plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP). The comparative outcomes among these EEPs are unclear. We aimed to compare the peri-operative and post-operative outcomes, complications and functional outcomes among different EEPs.

Material and methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Only randomised-controlled trials (RCT) comparing EEPs were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for RCTs.

Results

The search identified 1153 articles and 12 RCTs were included. The number of RCTs for each comparison was, HoLEP vs ThuLEP; n = 3, HoLEP vs PKEP; n = 3, PKEP vs DiLEP; n = 3, HoLEP vs GreenVEP; n = 1, HoLEP vs DiLEP; n = 1, ThuLEP vs PKEP; n = 1. Operative time was shorter and blood loss was lower with ThuLEP compared with HoLEP, whereas operative time was shorter for HoLEP compared with PKEP. Blood loss was lower with HoLEP and DiLEP compared with PKEP. There were no Clavien-Dindo IV-V complications, and the incidence of Clavien-Dindo I complications was lower with ThuLEP compared with HoLEP. No significant differences were detected among EEPs regarding urinary retention, stress urinary incontinence, bladder neck contracture or urethral stricture. Lower International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and higher quality of life (QoL) scores were in favour of ThuLEP compared with HoLEP at 1 month.

Conclusions

EEP improves symptoms and uroflowmetry parameters with a low incidence of high-grade complications. ThuLEP was associated with shorter operative time, lower blood loss, and lower incidence of low-grade complications compared with HoLEP.

The impact of preoperative lower urinary tract symptoms medication on the functional performance of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

Introduction

Medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) targets prostate size, to prevent disease progression, and prostate smooth muscle tone for rapid relieve of LUTS. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a size-independent method for surgical treatment of LUTS/BPO in medication-refractory patients and offers durable long-term results with reduced perioperative morbidity. As up to 50% of patients receive medical treatment for LUTS/BPO prior to surgery, we analyzed the impact of alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) on outcomes and perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing HoLEP for LUTS.

Material and methods

We retrospectively gathered data of 1,057 patients, who underwent HoLEP for LUTS/BPO from 2013–2018, and divided patients into group 1 (no medication), group 2 (α-blockers), and group 3 (5-ARI and α-blockers). Perioperative parameters, short-term functional outcomes and safety were assessed and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V26.0 software.

Results

Even though preoperative LUTS profile was significantly different between groups, all patients improved significantly after HoLEP, irrespective of preoperative LUTS medication. Median improvement of IPSS was 9, 8 and 7 points, of Q_max was 10, 12 and 9.5 ml/s, with significant improvement of quality of life (QoL) and reduction of post-void residual volume (PVR) for groups 1–3, respectively, 30 days after surgery. With only 4.0% (42/1,057) of patients experiencing a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II complication, there was no difference in prevalence of perioperative complications between groups (p = 0.943).

Conclusions

Although preoperative LUTS medication does not impair efficacy of HoLEP with acceptable perioperative morbidity, the time gap between medical therapy and surgical treatment may favor an earlier response.

How obesity affects the benefits of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms

Objectives:

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) can be used regardless of prostate size and offers durable long-term results for patients suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), with reduced perioperative morbidity. In most western societies almost half of the population are overweight, and obesity itself is often a risk factor for surgical treatment of patients. We therefore analysed the impact of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes and perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing HoLEP for LUTS at our tertiary referral centre.

Methods:

We retrospectively collected data for 877 patients who underwent HoLEP for LUTS/BPO between 2014 and 2018 and divided patients into group 1 (BMI<25), 2 (BMI 25<30), and 3 (BMI⩾30). We analysed perioperative parameters, safety, and short-term functional outcomes.

Results:

In preoperative patient characteristics we observed a similar LUTS profile throughout our patient cohorts. The highest proportion of ASA score ⩾III was observed in the obese patient cohort. Enucleation time was significantly prolonged in morbidly obese patients and operative speed was significantly slower, without difference in perioperative complications. Functional outcomes were assessed 30 days post-surgery with significant improvement in IPSS, quality of life (QoL) and Qmax for all groups.

Conclusion:

Although operating on overweight and obese patients takes significantly longer, HoLEP is efficient and offers acceptable perioperative complication rates even in morbidly obese patients (BMI⩾30).

Level of evidence:

Not applicable.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A truly size-independent method?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of prostate size on functional outcomes and perioperative morbidity, we analyzed patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). As LUTS secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) are a chronic progressive disease, prevalence and prostate size increase with age. HoLEP is a size-independent method for surgical treatment of LUTS/BPO and can be offered in medication-refractory patients with durable long-term results and reduced perioperative morbidity.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of 852 patients who underwent HoLEP for LUTS secondary to BPO between 2014-2018. Patients were divided into group 1 (≤60 cc), group 2 (>60 < 120 cc), group 3 (≥120 cc). Perioperative parameters, safety and short-term functional outcomes were assessed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients in group 3 were significantly older and showed a significantly higher median prostate-specific antigen level. Perioperative parameters, such as enucleation time and morcellation time significantly differed in favor of smaller prostate sizes, while enucleation and morcellation speed showed favorable results for larger prostate sizes. Larger prostates ≥120 cc showed a significantly higher postoperative drop in hemoglobin. However, patients did not differ in postoperative functional outcomes or Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II complications (4.8% of all patients [41/852]). There was no difference in perioperative complications between all groups (P = 0.760).

CONCLUSION

While larger prostates take significantly longer to operate on, postoperative functional outcomes show no difference between all sizes. In conclusion, HoLEP is a size-independent and effective method for surgical treatment of LUTS/BPO in prostates ≥30 cc.

Reasons to go for thulium-based anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate

PURPOSE

To summarize the current evidence and the reasons to go for thulium-based anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP).

METHODS

This review discusses the available literature on thulium-based AEEP.

RESULTS

Thulium lasers operate at a wavelength between 1940 and 2013 nm. This wavelength, which has a low penetration depth in water, allows to perform smooth cuts in the prostatic tissue and allows urologists to perform various procedures: resection, vaporization, enucleation, or vapoenucleation of the prostate. Depending on the type of thulium laser, it can be used either in a continuous, or pulsed mode.

CONCLUSION

In recent years, an increasing amount of evidence has described the thulium laser as a minimally invasive and size-independent treatment option for benign prostatic enlargement with excellent long-term results.

Safety and Efficacy of High-Powered Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate within 1-3 Weeks Following Prostate Biopsy

PURPOSE

We aim to document the feasibility, perioperative safety, and the 12-month efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) within 1-3 weeks following transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy.

METHODS

Data of the patients who underwent HoLEP following TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between March 2017 and July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 had undergone HoLEP in the early period after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, while group 2 patients were biopsy-naive ("control group"). All patients were assessed preoperatively by a physical examination with the digital rectal examination; time from biopsy to HoLEP; measurement of Qmax, postvoiding residual volume, and prostate volume by transabdominal ultrasonography; serum prostate-specific antigen level, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS); the International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire; and urine analysis. The patients were reevaluated at 3- and 12-month follow-up. Perioperative and postoperative complications were documented according to the modified Clavien-Dindo System.

RESULTS

Group 1 comprised 66 patients with a mean age of 67.3 ± 6.7 (range, 53-86) years, and group 2 comprised 114 patients with a mean age of 69.4 ± 9.4 (range, 36-95) years. The operation, enucleation, and morcellation efficiencies were not statistically significant between the groups. Preoperative Qmax and IPSS values were significantly improved after HoLEP surgery in the 3rd and 12th months in all patients. Our complication rates were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

High-powered HoLEP using 140 W energy within 1-3 weeks following TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is a feasible procedure with high enucleation efficiency, low perioperative morbidity, and excellent functional outcomes. A recent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is not a contraindication to HoLEP.

Watt matters: Safety and efficacy of using a 140-W high-powered holmium laser for enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the perioperative and the 12-month efficacy and safety of 140 W high-powered holmium laser for enucleation of the prostate (HP-HoLEP) for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The data of 540 patients who underwent HoLEP by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative evaluation included a physical examination with a digital rectal examination, measurement of maximum urinary flow rate (Q_max), postvoid residual volume (PVR) and prostate volume by transabdominal ultrasonography, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), international prostate symptom score (I-PSS) and international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaires, and urine analysis. Morcellation, enucleation, and operation efficiencies were calculated with the resected weight divided by morcellation, enucleation, and operative times, respectively. The patients were reassessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery by I-PSS, IIEF-5, Q_max, PSA, and the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 65.2±20.9 minutes. The mean enucleation time and efficiency were 53±15.1 minutes and 1.72±0.4 g/min, respectively. The mean morcellation time and efficiency were 12.3±15.1 minutes and 7.4±3.2 g/min respectively. Clavien grade 1 complications were observed in 102 (18.9%) patients, Clavien grade 2 complications in 20 (3.7%) patients, and Clavien grade 3b complications in 23 (5.4%) patients. I-PSS, Q_max, and IIEF-5 at postoperative 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly better than baseline results.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that 140 W HP-HoLEP can be performed with high enucleation efficiency, low perioperative and postoperative complication rates, and excellent functional results.

The Comprehensive Complication Index for Advanced Monitoring of Complications Following Endoscopic Surgery of the Lower Urinary Tract

Purpose: To evaluate the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) for reporting complications in lower urinary tract transurethral procedures and compare it with the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Materials and Methods: A total of 450 consecutive patients were included into the analyses [150 each of transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and transurethral enucleation of the prostate using Tm:YAG, (ThuLEP)]. Complications were assessed according to the modified CDC. The CCI was calculated using a freely accessible online tool. Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were applied to quantify operational differences and length of stay (LOS) between CDC and CCI. Sample size calculations for hypothetical clinical trials were contrasted for CDC and CCI application. Results: Overall n = 150 patients with complications (33.3%) within the first 60 days after operation were identified. Of these, n = 125 (83.4%) were minor complications up to CDC grade IIIa. Of patients with complications, n = 57 patients (12.6%) experienced more than one complication. Here, the cumulative CCI led to an upgrade of at least one CDC grade in 33 patients. Hence, in 22.0% of cases, the highest CDC grade underestimated the degree of complications. CCI showed higher correlation with LOS compared with CDC (all r > 0.2, all p-values ≤0.0001). Using CCI instead of CDC for sample calculation resulted in a strong reduction of the required number of patients for all three interventions (percentage of patient number decrease: -93.2% for TURBT, -71.8% for TURP, and -81.1% for ThuLEP). Conclusion: The CCI gives a more precise interpretation of the postinterventional complications of TURBT, TURP, and ThuLEP. CCI application may reduce the required sample size for clinical trials and will relieve their recruitment in the future.

The safety and feasibility of the simultaneous use of 180-W GreenLight laser for prostate vaporization during concomitant surgery

OBJECTIVES

To explore the safety and feasibility of photo-selective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) with GreenLight XPS 180 Watt laser (GL-180- W XPS) combined with other surgical procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data on patients in whom GL-180-W XPS was performed to relieve lower urinary tract symptoms/ benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) symptoms were extracted from a multi-institutional database (2011-2016). Patients were stratified into two groups. In the first all patients who had GL-180-W XPS with a concomitant procedure during the same surgical session were included as cases while those who underwent GL-180-W XPS PVP only were included as control.

RESULTS

A total of 487 patients were included. Fifty-eight (11.9%) patients underwent concomitant procedures. Multivariable linear regression models failed to find an association between concomitant procedures and longer laser time (p = 0.4). Similarly, multivariable linear regression models failed to find an association between concomitant procedures and laser time even when the analyses were repeated and stratified into endoscopic (p = 0.6) and open/laparoscopic (p = 0.4) procedures. Multivariable logistic regression models failed to demonstrate any association between concomitant procedures and early complications (OR:1.39, CI: 0.379-2.44, p = 0.2), late complications (OR:1.84, CI:0.78-3.98; p = 0.1) and acute urinary retention (OR:1.84, CI:0.78-3.98; p = 0.1). When the analyses were repeated and the concomitant procedures stratified into endoscopic and open/laparoscopic ones, they yielded virtually the same results.

CONCLUSIONS

GL-180-W XPS PVP could be safely performed in concomitant endoscopic or open/laparoscopic surgery. These results should be taken into consideration in the counseling of the patient who might choose to undergo simultaneous procedures.

The clinical value of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in octogenarians

OBJECTIVES

With holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) a size-independent method for surgical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has been introduced. HoLEP offers durable long-term results with reduced perioperative morbidity. As the risk of disease progression increases with age, the main goals, when offering surgery to an elderly population, are reducing perioperative morbidity and preserving quality of life (QoL). We therefore analyzed the impact of age on outcomes and perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing HoLEP for LUTS at our tertiary referral center.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of 487 patients who underwent HoLEP for LUTS secondary to BPO between 2018 and 2019. Patients were divided into group 1 (<70 years), group 2 (70-79 years), and group 3 (≥80 years). Perioperative parameters, safety, and short-term functional outcomes were assessed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Perioperative Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II complications were seen in 4.1% of patients (20/487). There was no difference in perioperative complications between all age groups (P = .176). Functional outcome was assessed 30 days post surgery. There was significant improvement in median International Prostate Symptom Score of 14, 10, and 8 points for groups 1, 2, and 3 (P < .001), respectively, with constant improvement of median QoL of 3 points for all groups. Median maximum flow rate (Q_max ) showed significant improvement of 14.5, 10.5, and 13 mL/s for groups 1 to 3 (P = .467), respectively.

CONCLUSION

HoLEP offers acceptable perioperative complication rates even in the oldest patient cohort (≥80 years). Therefore, HoLEP is a safe and efficient option even in oldest patients.

Comparison Between 1-Day and Inpatient Procedure of Holmium Laser Enucleation in Patients With Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is one of the minimally invasive procedures that is used for patients with benign prostate hyperplasia. The procedure usually requires patients to stay in the hospital 2 nights or longer. The present study evaluated the safety and feasibility of HoLEP with discharge of the patients on Day 1 after surgery (1-day surgery). A total of 1,164 patients were included in the study, with 510 of them planned for 1-day surgery and others planned for inpatient surgery. The primary outcomes included complication rate and clinical outcomes. A total 489 out of 510 patients received 1-day HoLEP and were discharged on Day 1 after surgery. In a 30-day follow-up period, no significant differences were found between the 1-day and inpatient surgery groups in terms of the rate of complications and clinical outcomes. Patients in the 1-day surgery group had a significantly shorter waiting time for admission (9.5 ± 4.8 vs. 17.6 ± 7.4 days, p < .05), and the mean hospitalization cost was lower (CNY$ 9140.6 ± 1452.2 vs. 10533.4 ± 1594, p < .05).The 1-day HoLEP surgery was safe and had satisfactory clinical outcomes. This treatment strategy could reduce the waiting time for admission and cost of hospitalization. Majority of the patients found this 1-day surgery beneficial, especially elderly patients who prefer to have an early return home and rapid resumption of activities.

Transurethral resection of the prostate: fate of the non-responders

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the standard method of surgical management of benign prostatic enlargement for decades. Some patients experience significant voiding dysfunction and discomfort postoperatively, without any apparent clinical complications from the procedure. Furthermore, a significant proportion of men still require postoperative catheterisation. This study analysed patients defined as non-responders after TURP with the principal aim to reveal their fate.

METHODS

A prospectively recruited cohort of 355 men, who underwent TURP during 2010-2012, was investigated. Non-responders were identified as still requiring catheterisation postoperatively and/or exhibiting all of the following voiding outcomes based on the de Wildt criteria: IPSS > 7, bother score > 2, Q_max < 15 mL/s and PVR > 100 mL. The non-responders were followed for a maximum period of three years using retrospective chart reviews.

RESULTS

Thirty-five men were defined as non-responders. Of these, 26 men were operated on due to urinary retention and nine men due to bothersome symptoms. The non-responders were followed for a mean time of 72 months. Seven men underwent a redo-TURP and two men a bladder neck incision. Eleven of the 35 men were finally judged as having satisfactory voiding parameters. Sixteen men used CISC. Eleven men reduced the frequency of CISC to a minimum. Seven men had to use an indwelling catheter indefinitely.

CONCLUSION

Men with preoperative urinary retention constituted the vast majority of non-responders. The use of postoperative urodynamic studies was remarkably low. Almost one in three non-responders finally had a satisfactory outcome with or without re-intervention.

Transperineal interstitial laser ablation of the prostate, a novel option for minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic obstruction

BACKGROUND

In the algorithm of treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), the shift from medical therapy to surgery is steep in terms of invasiveness. Recently, a lively interest has developed on alternative micro-invasive options. Transperineal interstitial laser ablation (TPLA) was recently proposed for BPO treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to illustrate feasibility, efficacy and safety profile of TPLA in BPO treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We prospectively analyzed the results of TPLA performed between September 2018 and March 2019 for LUTS due to BPO, in men with prostate volume <100 ml.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

TPLA was performed in OR, under local anesthesia, using Soracte Lite-EchoLaserX4. Diode laser light is conveyed through 300 μm optical fibers introduced transperineally by 21 Ga needles and placed at a security distance from urethra and bladder neck. EchoLaser Smart Interface eases needle positioning and increases the safety.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary endpoint was the variation of Qmax and IPSS at 1, 3 and 6 months. We also assessed the ejaculatory function and recorded complications. These outcomes were further investigated at 12 months by phone call.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

21 men with prostate volume of 43.5 ± 8.5 ml underwent TPLA. All were discharged after 24 h, keeping the transurethral catheter for 8.7 ± 2.5d. At one month all patients but one discontinued medical therapy, showing significant advantage in Qmax (+3.4 ± 5.7 ml/s; p < 0.01) and IPSS (-5.6 ± 7.0; p < 0.01). Functional results were still progressing at 6 months, with Qmax (+4.7 ± 6.0 ml/s; p < 0.01) and IPSS improvement (-13.1 ± 4.7; p < 0.01). The ejaculatory function was preserved as the MSHQ-EjD increased (p < 0.05). The only complication was a prostatic abscess, treated with transperineal drainage and antibiotic.

CONCLUSIONS

TPLA is a micro-invasive treatment for BPO showing good functional and safety outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This work illustrates the results of TPLA to treat LUTS due to BPO, showing high efficacy, preservation of the ejaculation, and low complication rate.

Assessment of Complications of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Using Clavien-Dindo Classification in South Eastern Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is one of the most common diseases in aging males. For men that need surgical treatment, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard. The aim of this article is to retrospectively review the complications of TURP over a 3-year period in Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Nnewi and a Specialist Urology Center in Awka all in Anambra South-East Nigeria using Clavien-Dindo classification.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a retrospective review of consecutive TURPs done over a 3-year period. Patients' information and complications arising from the procedure were collected and graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification with a pro forma designed for the study and analyzed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 20.0.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients had TURP during the period of this study. Twenty-nine complications were noted in 24 patients. The postoperative morbidity rate was 24.74%, and no mortality was recorded. Most of the complications were grade 2 (55%), followed by grade 1 and 3 (20.69%) each. Grade 4a complication accounted for only 3.45%. No grade 5 complication was recorded.

CONCLUSION

TURP is safe, with minimal life-threatening morbidity even in a resource-poor economy where TURP is gradually gaining grounds.

Anteroposterior dissection three-lobe technique: an effective surgical method for inexperienced surgeons performing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of anteroposterior dissection three-lobe technique for surgeons with no prior experience of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, we compared perioperative complications and postoperative urinary conditions between an experienced surgeon and surgeons with no prior experience of HoLEP. Forty patients were operated by one experienced surgeon (group A), and another 40 patients were operated by four inexperienced surgeons (group B) under the guidance of the instructor. The enucleation procedure was performed by anteroposterior dissection three-lobe technique.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were comparable in the two groups in age, body mass index, and preoperative prostate volume. The enucleation efficiency rate [0.96 vs 0.56 g/min (P < 0.001)] was significantly different between groups A and B. However, there were no significant differences in enucleate prostate weight, hemoglobin decrease, or postoperative catheter-indwelling period between the two groups. There were no significant differences with respect to postoperative urinary incontinence rate at 1 month [43 vs 50% (P = 0.65)], 3 months [13 vs 20% (P = 0.55)], and 6 months [0 vs 3% (P = 1.00)] between the two groups. Both groups showed a significant improvement in the maximum flow rate and postvoid residual volume after HoLEP compared with baseline levels (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP three-lobe technique was found to be a safe and effective enucleation method for surgeons with no prior experience of HoLEP under the guidance of the instructor.

Thulium Laser Vapoenucleation of the Prostate (ThuVEP) in Men at High Cardiovascular Risk and on Antithrombotic Therapy: A Single-Center Experience

Bleeding is the most common complication of transurethral resection of the prostate and simple open prostatectomy, especially in men on antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients on chronic antithrombotic medications. Between January 2015 and December 2019, 88 men underwent the procedure under antithrombotic agents in our center. The mean age was 74.7 ± 6.1 years. Median prostate volume was 66.5 mL. Patients on oral anticoagulants were bridged to low-molecular-weight heparin (n = 35). Aspirin (n = 39), clopidogrel (n = 10), and ticlopidine (n = 4) were maintained. Of the patients, 69.3% had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3. Blood loss at 24 h was comparable in all groups. Median catheterization length and postoperative stays were 2 and 3 days respectively. Acute cardiovascular events occurred in 2 patients (2.3%). Of the patients, 4 required prolonged bladder irrigation, 2 required blood transfusions, 1 required a cystoscopy for bleeding control, and 1 required a suprapubic cystostomy for blood clot evacuation. No patients died within 30 days of being discharged. Late complications occurred in 3 (3.8%) patients (1 optical urethrotomy and 1 bladder neck incision for stenosis; 1 acute myocardial infarction). All follow-up visits (1, 6, and 12-month) showed a significant improvement in all urinary parameters compared to baseline. ThuVEP appears to be a feasible surgical option in high-risk patients on antithrombotic regimens, with acceptable postoperative morbidity, good functional outcome, and low incidence of medium-term reoperation rate.

First Multi-Center All-Comers Study for the Aquablation Procedure

Waterjet-based prostate resection (Aquablation procedure) is an increasingly recognized treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We confirmed the safety and effectiveness of the Aquablation procedure in the commercial setting in 178 men at five sites. The mean prostate volume was 59 cc. The procedure time averaged 24 min and total anesthesia duration was 50 min. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) decreased from 21.6 at the baseline to 6.5 at the 12-month follow-up, a 15.3-point improvement (p < 0.0001). The maximum urinary flow rate increased from 10 cc/s at the baseline to 20.8 cc/s at month 12 (increase of 11.8 cc, p < 0.0001). Ejaculatory function was relatively preserved. Prostate volume assessed with transrectal ultrasound decreased 36% by month three. Five patients (2.7%) underwent a transfusion in the first week after the procedure. Real-world evidence shows that Aquablation is safe and effective for the treatment of BPH.

Exploration of day-surgery photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in Chinese population

To explore the surgical effect and cost-effectiveness of day surgery versus inpatient surgery for photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in Chinese population. We retrospectively collected 240 patients undergoing day-surgery PVP (April 2016 to March 2018) and 156 patients undergoing inpatient-surgery PVP (May 2014 to March 2016). Differences between groups in demographics, perioperative outcomes, complications, and postoperative changes were calculated. Economical results in terms of hospital stay and relevant preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative cost were evaluated. There was no significant difference in operative time, incidence of postoperative complications, and other functional outcomes between two groups (P > 0.05), but the waiting time for admission and the hospital cost including the drug charges, bed fee, nursing fee, laboratory test, and imaging fee of day-surgery group were significantly lower than that of inpatient-surgery group (P < 0.05). Day surgery of PVP has firm and well accepted position in ambulatory surgery of urology. It could significantly reduce the waiting time for admission and hospitalization costs in BPH patients.

Intraoperative Adverse Incident Classification (EAUiaiC) by the European Association of Urology ad hoc Complications Guidelines Panel

BACKGROUND

A surgical adverse incident (AI) is defined as any deviation from the normal operative course. Current complication-grading systems mostly focus on postoperative events.

OBJECTIVE

To propose an intraoperative AI classification (EAUiaiC) to facilitate reporting.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The classification was developed using a modified Delphi process in which experts answered two rounds of survey questionnaires organised by the European Association of Urology ad hoc Complications Guidelines Panel. Experts evaluated AI terminology using a 5-point Likert scale for clarity, exhaustiveness, hierarchical order, mutual exclusivity, clinical utility, and quality improvement.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We considered ≥70% agreement for inclusion or exclusion. The resultant EAUiaiC was evaluated using ten sample clinical scenarios. Numerical and graphical statistical techniques were used to report the results.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In total, 343 respondents participated. The proposed EAUiaiC system comprises eight AI grades ranging from grade 0 (no deviation and no consequence to the patient) to grade 5B (wrong surgery site or intraoperative death). In the validation stage, EAUiaiC was rated highly favourably in terms of relevance and reliability (consistency) by 126 experts. Ratings for self-reported ease of use were at acceptable levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a novel intraoperative AI classification (EAUiaiC) for use for urological procedures. Both the initial assessment of feasibility and the subsequent assessment of reliability suggest that it is a simple and effective tool for classifying intraoperative complications.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Complications in surgery are common. It is helpful to classify complications in a uniform and objective manner so that surgeons can easily compare outcomes and learn from complications. Here we propose a new classification system for complications that occur during urological surgical procedures. An abstract of this work was presented at the 2018 congress of the European Association of Urology.

Comparative efficacy and safety of new surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of different endoscopic surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to 31 March 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled trials comparing vapourisation, resection, and enucleation of the prostate using monopolar, bipolar, or various laser systems (holmium, thulium, potassium titanyl phosphate, or diode) as surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The primary outcomes were the maximal flow rate (Qmax) and international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) at 12 months after surgical treatment. Secondary outcomes were Qmax and IPSS values at 6, 24, and 36 months after surgical treatment; perioperative parameters; and surgical complications.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers extracted the study data and performed quality assessments using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The effect sizes were summarised using weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes and odds ratios for binary outcomes. Frequentist approach to the network meta-analysis was used to estimate comparative effects and safety. Ranking probabilities of each treatment were also calculated.

RESULTS

109 trials with a total of 13 676 participants were identified. Nine surgical treatments were evaluated. Enucleation achieved better Qmax and IPSS values than resection and vapourisation methods at six and 12 months after surgical treatment, and the difference maintained up to 24 and 36 months after surgical treatment. For Qmax at 12 months after surgical treatment, the best three methods compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were bipolar enucleation (mean difference 2.42 mL/s (95% confidence interval 1.11 to 3.73)), diode laser enucleation (1.86 (-0.17 to 3.88)), and holmium laser enucleation (1.07 (0.07 to 2.08)). The worst performing method was diode laser vapourisation (-1.90 (-5.07 to 1.27)). The results of IPSS at 12 months after treatment were similar to Qmax at 12 months after treatment. The best three methods, versus monopolar TURP, were diode laser enucleation (mean difference -1.00 (-2.41 to 0.40)), bipolar enucleation (0.87 (-1.80 to 0.07)), and holmium laser enucleation (-0.84 (-1.51 to 0.58)). The worst performing method was diode laser vapourisation (1.30 (-1.16 to 3.76)). Eight new methods were better at controlling bleeding than monopolar TURP, resulting in a shorter catheterisation duration, reduced postoperative haemoglobin declination, fewer clot retention events, and lower blood transfusion rate. However, short term transient urinary incontinence might still be a concern for enucleation methods, compared with resection methods (odds ratio 1.92, 1.39 to 2.65). No substantial inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence was detected in primary or secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Eight new endoscopic surgical methods for benign prostatic hyperplasia appeared to be superior in safety compared with monopolar TURP. Among these new treatments, enucleation methods showed better Qmax and IPSS values than vapourisation and resection methods.

STUDY REGISTRATION

CRD42018099583.

Bipolar vaporization of the prostate may cause higher complication rates compared to bipolar loop resection: a randomized prospective trial

INTRODUCTION

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) by resection loop or vaporization button is becoming a standard of care due to its better safety profile (less bleeding and less incidence of TUR syndrome). However, there are published data showing bipolar vaporization may be associated with increased late complications. In this study, we compared results of bipolar TURP using the resection loop versus vaporization button for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to determine the relative safety profile.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2013 and March 2014, 89 patients with BPH were randomized to surgical intervention either by Olympus (Gyrus) Bipolar loop TURP or Olympus (Gyrus) Bipolar button vaporization. Inclusion criteria were; BPH with Q-max < 10 ml/s, IPSS  > 18 and prostate volume > 40 g. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3 and 9 months. Evaluation included IPSS, uroflowmetry, prostate volume by ultrasound. Clavien complications and operative time were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) version 17 software.

RESULTS

44 patients were included in bipolar TURP and 45 patients in vaporization arm. Preoperative mean prostate volume (59 g versus 58 g, p = 0.52) and mean IPSS (19 versus 20, p = 0.38) were equivalent in both groups. Vaporization was associated with a significant increase in operative time (mean of 81 ± 15 min range 40-110 versus 55 ± 10 min range 30-70 min, p < 0.001), less blood loss (0.8% versus 2.0% drop in hemoglobin, p < 0.001) but increased postoperative urinary frequency (80% versus 50%, p < 0.001), hematuria with clots up to 4 weeks post surgery (20% versus 2%, p < 0.001) and postoperative urethral stricture (11% versus 0%, p < 0.001). Both techniques improved urine flow with Q-max (17 ml/s versus 18 ml/s p = 0.22). Prostate volume (32 g versus 31 g, p = 0.31) and IPSS (6 versus 5, p = 0.22), were comparable in both treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar vaporization of the prostate, despite being a technically robust, speedy and with less intraoperative bleeding, appears to be associated with increased postoperative irritative symptoms, increased late-onset postoperative bleeding and high urethral stricture rates.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus thulium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of large-volume prostates > 80 ml: 18-month follow-up results

PURPOSE

To compare the perioperative and functional outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) for the treatment of large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (> 80 ml).

METHODS

A total of 116 consecutive patients with BPH were randomized to be treated surgically with either HoLEP (n = 58) or ThuLEP (n = 58), following the classical three-lobe enucleation technique. Follow-up was assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after surgery.

RESULTS

At 18 months, the lower urinary tract symptom index was improved significantly in both groups compared with the baseline values. The operative time (78.4 ± 8.0 vs. 71.4 ± 6.4 min) and enucleation time (61.2 ± 5.4 vs. 56.4 ± 8.4 min) were significantly shorter for ThuLEP compared to HoLEP (both p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding morcellation time, resected weight, hemoglobin decrease, catheter time and hospital stay (p > 0.05). The HoLEP and ThuLEP groups had equivalent International Prostate Symptom Scores (3 [3-3] vs. 3 [3-3], p = 0.776), quality of life (1 [1-2] vs. 2 [1-2], p = 0.809), Qmax (25.3 ± 4.8 ml/s vs. 24.7 ± 4.4 ml/s, p = 0.470), postvoid residual urine (PVR) (6.1 [2.6-20.8] vs. 7.7 [3.1-22.8] ml, p = 0.449) and PSA (0.84 ± 0.32 vs. 0.90 ± 0.34 ml, p = 0.309) at 18 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Both HoLEP and ThuLEP relieve lower urinary tract symptoms in a comparable way with high efficacy and safety. ThuLEP was statistically superior to HoLEP in operation time and enucleation time, although the differences were clinically negligible.

The morbidity associated with a TURP procedure in routine clinical practice, as graded by the modified Clavien-Dindo system

Background: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered the reference surgical method of treating benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) causing obstruction. The procedure still carries a significant risk of perioperative morbidity according to previous reports. The aim of the present study was to disclose complications after TURP undertaken in routine clinical practice at a non-academic center.Methods: All patients with BPE submitted to TURP from January 2010 to December 2012 were evaluated for complications occurring during hospital stay, after discharge up to the end of the third post-operative month and finally for any late endourological re-interventions undertaken up to five years after TURP. All complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system.Results: In total, 354 men underwent a TURP during the study period. In total, 47% had pre-operative urinary retention. Significant co-morbidity was seen in 17% of men (ASA III-IV). Spinal anaesthesia was applied to 312 men (88%). During hospital stay, major complications, graded as Clavien-Dindo ≥ III, was seen in only eight men (2.3%). Minor complications occurred in 91 men (26%). Between hospital discharge and follow-up visit major complications were noted in 12 men (3.4%). Minor complications occurred in 79 men (22%). The only factor that was associated with an increased risk of a major complication was general anaesthesia. Late complications, requiring an endourological re-intervention, occurred in 30 men (9.7%).Conclusion: TUR-P in routine clinical practice was associated with a low incidence of severe complications. TUR syndrome was very rare. Within five years a small proportion of men require the transurethral intervention to be redone.

Management of Urinary Retention in Patients with Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Practice patterns for the management of urinary retention (UR) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO; UR/BPO) vary widely and remain unstandardized.

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence for managing patients with UR/BPO with pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments included in the European Association of Urology guidelines on non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Search was conducted up to April 22, 2018, using CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies. Methods as detailed in the Cochrane handbook were followed. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Literature search identified 2074 citations. Twenty-one studies were included (qualitative synthesis). The evidence for managing patients with UR/BPO with pharmacological or nonpharmacological treatments is limited. CoE for most outcomes was low/very low. Only α1-blockers (alfuzosin and tamsulosin) have been evaluated in more than one RCT. Pooled results indicated that α1-blockers provided significantly higher rates of successful trial without catheter compared with placebo [alfuzosin: 322/540 (60%) vs 156/400 (39%) (odds ratio {OR} 2.28, 95% confidence interval {CI} 1.55 to 3.36; participants=940; studies=7; I²=41%; low CoE); tamsulosin: 75/158 (47%) vs 40/139 (29%) (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.29 to 4.45; participants=297; studies=3; I²=30%; low CoE)] with rare adverse events. Similar rates were achieved with tamsulosin or alfuzosin [51/87 (59%) vs 45/84 (54%) (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.41; participants=171; studies=2; I²=0%; very low CoE)]. Nonpharmacological treatments have been evaluated in RCTs/prospective comparative studies only sporadically.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence that usage of α1-blockers (alfuzosin and tamsulosin) may improve resolution of UR/BPO. As most nonpharmacological treatments have not been evaluated in patients with UR/BPO, the evidence is inconclusive about their benefits and harms.

PATIENT SUMMARY

There is some evidence that alfuzosin and tamsulosin may increase the rates of successful trial without catheter, but little or no evidence on various nonpharmacological treatment options for managing patients with urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.

Feasibility of en bloc thulium laser enucleation of the prostate in a large case series. Are results enhanced by experience?

Objective

To provide the first large single-operator case series of patients who undergo “en bloc” thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) and to demonstrate an improvement in enucleation efficacy with experience.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated a cohort of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent “en bloc” ThuLEP between May 2015 and November 2017. Association between dependent variables (delivered energy and operating time) and independent variables (adenoma volume and experience) were estimated with regression analysis. The experience was calculated as the time interval between the date of the first operation of the series and the date of the operation being considered.

Results

A total of 100 patients were registered for the study. Median operative time was 56.5 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 40–85 min). Median enucleation time was 17.4 min (IQR: 15–21.5 min). Median enucleation index (enucleation time per adenoma gram) was 0.3 min/g (0.2–0.3 min/g). The overall operative time is not influenced by experience, but we registered a significant trend towards a reduction in the total amount of energy delivered energy normalized per adenoma gram (p = 0.0148).

Conclusion

We believe that further attention is needed for these new “en bloc” prostatic enucleation techniques, which can facilitate some surgical steps, leading to a widespread use of laser technology for BPH surgical treatment.

Application of 180W XPS GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes after photovaporization of the prostate with the 180W-XPS Greenlight laser in patients with low urinary tracts symptom secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All 102 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent 180W XPS laser vaporization of the prostate from April 2017 to April 2018 were enrolled. The preoperative parameters, postoperative functional, uroflowmetry outcomes and complications were collected.

RESULTS

All patients were successfully treated with 180W XPS laser vaporization. Mean preoperative prostate volume was 81±28.7 ml and mean laser time was 28.2±12.5 minutes. No major complications intraoperatively or postoperatively were observed and no blood transfusions were required. Comparing to preoperative characteristics, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual (PVR) parameters were improved significantly and sustained during the follow-up period. At 3, 6 and 12-month follow-ups, mean urinary peak flow increased from 6.2±2.1 ml per second to 19.8±4.6, 19.4±4.7 and 19.6±4.9 ml per second, respectively. Mean International Prostate Symptom Scores decreased over time, from 28.9±4.5 to 8.2±1.6, 6.2±1.22 and 5.88±1.15 at 3, 6, 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

180W XPS Greenlight laser vaporization is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH.

Dual-centre randomized-controlled trial comparing transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using diode laser vs. bipolar plasmakinetic for the treatment of LUTS secondary of benign prostate obstruction: 1-year follow-up results

PURPOSE

Bipolar endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (BEEP) was recommended by the 2016 EAU guidelines as the first choice of surgical treatment in men with a substantially enlarged prostate and moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms. The main aim of this study was to compare a modified diode laser enucleation of the prostate (DiLEP) to BEEP.

METHODS

A total of 114 patients with prostate (20-160 mL) were randomized 1:1 into either DiLEP or BEEP in a dual-centre, non-inferiority-design randomized-controlled trial. The primary outcomes included Q_max and IPSS at 12 months. Non-inferiority was evaluated by comparing the two-sided 95% CI for the mean differences of Q_max and IPSS. Secondary endpoints included other perioperative parameters, postoperative micturition variables, and complication rate.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients (97%) had completed the intent-to-treat analysis, The results showed that DiLEP was comparable to BEEP regarding Q_max (28.0 ± 7.0 vs. 28.1 ± 7.2 mL/s) and IPSS (3.0 ± 2.2 vs. 2.9 ± 2.6) at 12 months, the non-inferiority was met for both Q_max and IPSS. There were also no significant difference between two groups regarding tissue removal rate (71.8 vs. 73.8%), hemoglobin decrease (0.33 ± 0.66 vs. 0.36 ± 0.75 g/dL), sodium decrease (1.0 ± 2.7 vs. 0.3 ± 2.9 mmol/L), and Clavien III complications (5.3 vs. 1.8%) at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This DiLEP is an anatomical endoscopic enucleation technique for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, it is non-inferior to BEEP regarding Q_max and IPSS at 12 months postoperatively.