Is there a peripheral site of action contributing to the voiding effects of α2-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists?

Adrenoceptors in the Lower Urinary Tract

Adrenoceptors importantly contribute to the physiological regulation of lower urinary tract (LUT) function and have become a target of several clinically successful treatments for major LUT diseases. In the bladder dome, β-adrenoceptor subtypes are found in multiple cell types and mediate relaxation of detrusor smooth muscle, perhaps partly indirectly by acting on afferent nerves and cells of the mucosa. β3-adrenoceptor agonists such as mirabegron and vibegron are used to treat overactive bladder syndrome. In the bladder trigone and urethra, α1-adrenoceptors cause contraction and thereby physiologically contribute to bladder outlet resistance. α1-adrenoceptors in the prostate also cause contraction and pathophysiologically elevate bladder outlet resistance leading to voiding dysfunction in benign prostatic hyperplasia. α1-adrenoceptor antagonist such as tamsulosin is widely used as a first-line option to treat LUT symptoms in men, but it remains unclear to which extent and how smooth muscle relaxation contributes to symptom relief.

Fadolmidine - Favourable adverse effects profile for spinal analgesia suggested by in vitro and in vivo models

Fadolmidine is an α₂-adrenoceptor full agonist developed for spinal analgesia with a local mode of action. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the safety of fadolmidine on known α₂-adrenoceptor-related effects: kidney function, urodynamics and cardiovascular variables. Furthermore, the binding affinity of fadolmidine for the 5-HT₃ receptor prompted functional studies on 5-HT₃. According to the binding affinity data, fadolmidine demonstrated partial agonism on the 5-HT₃ receptor in transfected cells and in guinea pig ileum preparation. However, intravenous (IV) fadolmidine did not produce any 5-HT₃-related hemodynamic effects in anaesthetised rats. In urodynamic studies, intrathecal (IT) fadolmidine interrupted volume-evoked voiding cycles and induced overflow incontinence at high concentrations in anaesthetised rats; however, at the analgesic dose range, the effects were mild. The effects of fadolmidine on kidney function were studied in conscious rats after IV and IT dosing. While IT fadolmidine increased dose-dependent urine output, sodium ion concentration, IV doses increased only sodium ion concentration The effects of IT fadolmidine on heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and sedation were evaluated in the home cage and in the open field using a telemetry system. In resting conditions, fadolmidine decreased HR dose-dependently and increased initial MAP, whereas in actively moving rats, there were no effects at analgesic doses. The results suggest that at anticipated analgesic clinical doses, IT fadolmidine provides analgesia without significant adverse effects on sedation, MAP or HR and with only modest effects on kidney function and urodynamics.

Pharmacodynamics of intrathecal and epidural fadolmidine, an α2-adrenoceptor agonist, after bolus and infusion in dogs-comparison with clonidine

An α₂-adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine, is extensively used in both anesthesia and intensive care medicine. However, clonidine may produce pronounced hemodynamic side effects such as hypotension and bradycardia which may limit its usefulness in certain conditions. Fadolmidine is a potent α₂-adrenoceptor agonist with different physicochemical properties than clonidine. Here, the effects of fadolmidine and clonidine on analgesia (an increase in thermal skin twitch response latency), sedation, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature were evaluated either up to 8 h after either intrathecal or epidural bolus injections or during a 24-h continuous intrathecal infusion at equipotent analgesic doses in non-anesthetized Beagle dogs. Fadolmidine and clonidine produced a dose-dependent and equipotent maximal antinociception after intrathecal bolus injection (ED₅₀: 67 μg and 78 μg, respectively), but the duration of action of fadolmidine was more long-lasting. During the intrathecal infusion, fadolmidine achieved a good analgesic effect without evoking cardiovascular side effects, e.g., hypotension; these were evident during clonidine infusion. Epidurally, the antinociceptive potency of fadolmidine was weaker (ED₅₀: 128 μg) than when intrathecally administered and weaker than that of epidural clonidine (ED₅₀: 51 μg). At analgesic doses, fadolmidine injection induced moderate initial hypertension concomitantly with a decrease in heart rate whereas clonidine evoked hypotension and bradycardia. These results suggest that especially when non-opioid long-term pain relief is needed, an intrathecal infusion of fadolmidine can provide long-term antinociception with less of the known use-limiting adverse effects associated with clonidine.