Komplikationen der Descemetmembran-Endothel-Keratoplastik

Analysis of Graft Detachments and Re-Bubblings After 450 Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Procedures

PURPOSE

To objectify the indication for re-bubbling by analyzing graft detachments (GDs) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

METHODS

In this retrospective monocentric observational study, re-bubbling cases of 450 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasties and the percentage of the residual gas filling (RGF) in the anterior chamber on the first postoperative day were collected. The number/location/extent of GDs and the corneal thickness above GDs were analyzed using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

From a total of 450 grafts, 384 (85.3%) had at least a minimal degree GD. One hundred twenty-two of 450 grafts (27.1%) underwent at least 1 re-bubbling. The mean RGF was significantly lower in eyes with GD (67.7 ± 12.6%) than in eyes without GD (74.2 ± 11.3%). GDs occurred most frequently in the inferotemporal quadrant (46.0%). GDs were significantly more likely to require a re-bubbling when the central parts of the graft were affected (94.0% vs. 35.7%). The number of detachments per graft was directly proportional to the re-bubbling rate. The GDs which required a re-bubbling were on average 56 μm higher and 461 μm wider than the untreated ones. The cornea above the GDs that needed a re-bubbling was significantly thicker than above the untreated GDs (mean 988 ± 102 μm vs. 951 ± 99 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

The RGF seems to be a major influencing factor for graft attachment. The most susceptible location of the GD is inferotemporal. The main factors that need to be investigated to decide if a re-bubbling is required are the number of detachments per graft, their dimensions, whether the central portions of the graft are involved, and the corneal thickness above GDs.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Triple Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With Macular Comorbidity

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate results after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and DMEK with cataract surgery (triple DMEK) in eyes with endothelial dysfunction and concomitant macular pathology.

METHODS

A monocentric, prospective clinical observational study of patients who underwent DMEK or triple DMEK surgery at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany, from June 2013 to February 2016 was conducted. Sex, age, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, and central retinal thickness in the 1 millimeter zone were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 209 eyes were included in the study. Forty-two eyes (20.1%) had vision-limiting concomitant maculopathies. These were age-related macular degeneration (n = 17, 8.1%), epiretinal gliosis (n = 13, 6.2%), chronic macular edema (n = 7, 3.3%), macular holes (n = 3, 1.4%), and macular scarring (n = 2, 1.0%). BCVA significantly increased in patients without maculopathy from 0.6 ± 0.33 logMAR to 0.1 ± 0.15 logMAR ( P < 0.001) and also in patients with maculopathy from 0.9 ± 0.38 logMAR to 0.27 ± 0.23 logMAR 12 months postoperatively ( P < 0.001). There was a significant central retinal thickness increase of 34.1 μm 6 weeks after triple DMEK in the central 1-mm zone ( P = 0.011). This increase was insignificant after DMEK. Postoperative macular edema occurred in 5.9% of cases after DMEK and 8.1% after triple DMEK, which was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK and triple DMEK significantly increase BCVA in eyes with concomitant maculopathy. Postoperative macular edema is a common disorder after lamellar keratoplasty; therefore, prophylactic treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs should be considered. Maculopathies did not predispose the development of postoperative macular edema.

Influence of Body Position on Intraocular Pressure After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of patient positioning on intraocular pressure (IOP) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in pseudophakic patients treated for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.

METHODS

Forty patients were included in this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients received a YAG iridotomy 1 day before surgery and an 80% anterior chamber tamponade [20% concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)]. Postoperative positioning was either supine (group 1) or seated (group 2, at least 30 degrees upper-body high position). IOP was measured with iCare.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in IOP postoperatively [group 1 vs. group 2-after 1h: 13.9 mm Hg (±4.2 mm Hg) versus 13.6 mm Hg (±4.1 mm Hg) ( P = 1.00); after 2h: 13.9 mm Hg (±5.4 mm Hg) versus 15.3 mm Hg (±4.6 mm Hg) ( P = 0.370); after 4h: 13.8 mm Hg (±4.2 mm Hg) versus 15.2 mm Hg (±4.2 mm Hg) ( P = 0.401]. In group 1, 10% of patients showed IOP decompensations well above 30 mm Hg, and in group 2, there were no IOP decompensations. Seated position led to relative risk reduction of 100% and absolute risk reduction of 10% regarding IOP decompensations. The number of patients needed to position seated to prevent 1 additional IOP decompensation was 10. Rebubbling rates, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and reduction of corneal thickness were comparable between the 2 groups in the follow-up period up to 1 month.

CONCLUSIONS

After DMEK in pseudophakic eyes with 80% anterior chamber tamponade, positioning patients with at least 30 degrees elevation of the upper body up immediately after surgery until bedtime prevents IOP decompensations.

Wound Healing of Descemet Membrane After Penetrating Keratoplasty and Its Relevance for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgeons

ABSTRACT

Compared with penetrating keratoplasty (PK), Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is characterized as lower risk for complications such as immunological graft reaction and faster and better postoperative visual recovery. In patients with endothelial graft failure after PK, DMEK can be used to regenerate PK graft transparency. The surgical technique for DMEK in this specific situation is still under debate, particularly regarding stripping of Descemet membrane (DM) from the failed PK and diameter of the DMEK graft. Here we report a case of a 75-year-old female patient with a failed graft 16 years after PK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, who underwent uneventful DMEK surgery. Stripping of DM in this particular case was performed outside the failed PK and demonstrated a biomechanically stable junction between the PK donor and the host DM. Histopathologic analysis of the excised DM showed continuous extracellular matrix connecting the host and donor DM, indicating primary intention wound healing after PK at this tissue level. This case demonstrates that after PK, a biomechanically stable and histologically continuous DM can enable Descemetorhexis outside the failed graft and transplantation of a DMEK graft larger than the previous PK. This may provide more endothelial cells for transplantation.

Intraoperative OCT - Real-World User Evaluation in Routine Surgery

BACKGROUND

In recent years, great progress has been made in intraoperative imaging using optical coherence tomography (iOCT). There are now several commercially available iOCT systems that allow high-resolution imaging of all structures of the eye without interrupting surgery. This real-time visualisation can provide additional information to conventional surgical microscopy, but is relatively expensive. The aim of our study was to find out how often OCT integrated into the surgical microscope is used by trained surgeons, or to what extent they consider that iOCT is relevant for intraoperative procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective monocentric analysis was conducted of the field of application and user-friendliness of the EnFocus Ultra-Deep OCT (Leica Microsystems), a mobile device combination of surgical microscope and OCT. The use and benefit were investigated of iOCT, which was not mandatory. Standardised documentation and evaluation using a questionnaire was performed by the respective surgeon (n = 5) immediately after surgery.

RESULTS

Over a period of 25 working days, 118 procedures were performed in the operating theatre equipped with the microscope-OCT combination. The iOCT was used in 24.6% of the 118 procedures performed. iOCT was regarded as crucial to the intraoperative procedure in 3 of the 29 patients. In one patient, it was possible to check graft orientation during a DMEK operation in a very opaque cornea and, in the second patient, to visualise the correct positioning of an iris diaphragm in the capsular bag. In the third patient, the risk of developing a pseudoforamen was assessed, and this led to the decision not to perform a full gliosis peel.

CONCLUSION

Experienced surgeons in a university eye hospital with a full surgical spectrum considered that intraoperative OCT was decisive for the course of surgery in only a few selected surgical situations, e.g. in case of limited corneal transparency. The impact of the use of iOCT on post-operative outcome quality still needs to be evaluated by larger prospective studies. On the basis of this survey, the cost-benefit ratio is still unclear.

[DMEK in complicated cases of bullous keratopathy after multiple intraocular surgeries]

BACKGROUND

During the last decade Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has been established as a surgical treatment even for complex cases of bullous keratopathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a case series 9 eyes from 8 patients with chronic corneal edema caused by multiple intraocular operations underwent DMEK surgery. It was the sole surgical procedure in three eyes. In one case DMEK was combined with an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, with opacified intraocular lens exchange in a second case, with transscleral cyclophotocoagulation with Iridex micropulse laser (Iridex, Silicon Valley, CA, USA) and intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in a third case and with the Tutopatch® (DMR srl, Italy) coverage of a scleral perforation in a fourth case. Additionally, DMEK was combined with trimming of the Ahmed valve tube length in two cases. The follow-up period was 12 months.

RESULTS

Out of 9 eyes 2 showed a persistent partial or total detachment of the graft with concomitant recurrence of bullous keratopathy despite repeated injection of 20% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) in the anterior chamber. These 2 eyes were treated with penetrating keratoplasty and achieved satisfactory postoperative results including pain relief. Visual acuity did not improve in these 2 eyes due to optic atrophy. Visual acuity and pain improved in the first postoperative month in 7 eyes. Donor endothelial cell density decreased from 2465±147/mm² to 1295 ± 254/mm² and 1180 ± 197/mm² (p < 0.001, n = 7) after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Central corneal thickness decreased from 880 ± 232 μm to 571 ± 15 μm (p = 0.001, n = 7) after 12 months. Multiple rebubblings were performed in 2 of the 9 eyes because of a persistent corneal graft detachment.

CONCLUSION

Although DMEK is a technically demanding surgical treatment for complicated cases of severe bullous keratopathy, it provides satisfactory results in terms of the improvement of visual acuity, pain relief and a shorter postoperative period.

Corneal clearance and central endothelial cell repopulation despite graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Objective: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is the gold standard procedure for treatment of primary corneal endothelial disorders. Graft detachment is a frequent complication of DMEK, which often requires re-operation or re-bubbling. However, several cases of spontaneous corneal clearance despite graft detachment after DMEK have been reported. The underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon are poorly understood. We report three cases of corneal clearance after graft detachment in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and provide a review of the literature.

Methods: An 81-year-old and a 69-year-old phakic patient as well as a 56-year-old pseudophakic patient with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent Triple-DMEK and DMEK, respectively. All three patients presented postoperatively with blurred vision due to an almost complete detachment of the graft, as shown by slit-lamp photography and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Results: Without additional intervention, gradual corneal clearance and presence of endothelial cells on the posterior recipient’s stroma were observed in all patients three months postoperatively. Increase in endothelial cell density, decrease in central corneal thickness (CCT), recovery of corneal transparency, and improvement of visual acuity were documented in all patients.

Conclusions: Our findings support the theory of corneal clearance after Descemet membrane endothelial transfer (DMET) (“free-floating” donor Descemet graft in the recipient anterior chamber after descemetorhexis). Further understanding on endothelial homeostasis might lead to innovative approaches in handling endothelial disorders.

[Influence of the donor age on graft survival : Is the demographic change also important for corneal tissue donation?]

The success of corneal transplantation highly depends on the quality of the used graft. Various factors play a crucial role such as a perfect stroma without optically relevant, centrally located cloudiness or changes (e. g. scars) or an adherent Descemet membrane. One of the most important parameters is the quality of the endothelial cell layer with a sufficiently large endothelial cell count. An open question is so far whether the donor age affects corneal quality and therefore has an impact on the success of transplantation. A comprehensive review of the available literature revealed that a large amount of scientific data on the influence of donor age exist to answer this question. In a variety of studies, no significant dependence of graft quality of donor age could be detected. Rather the studies prove that graft survival depends primarily on the state of the endothelial cell layer, and postoperative endothelial cell loss must be considered as a major cause of graft failure. Extensive quality assurance procedures in tissue preparation and cornea processing in the eye banks in Germany (Europe) ensures that only corneas with tested high quality are allocated for transplantation regardless of the donor age. Against the background of an aging population, the use of grafts from older donors should not be waived.

[A new technique to facilitate donor preparation for DMEK surgery]

BACKGROUND

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is becoming more and more the method of choice to treat corneal endothelial diseases in specialized centers. The reasons that prevent this technique from becoming widespread are the delicate donor tissue preparation. By inverting the curvature of the cornea from convex to concave after mounting onto an artificial anterior chamber, we developed a combined manual delamination and hydrodissection technique, which allows a rapid and endothelium-preserving method of separating donor Descemet membranes from the underlying stroma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Experiments were perfomed with 60 donor corneas that were not suitable for transplantation. Donor age ranged between 42 and 94 years. Two experimental groups were formed: 1 inverse manual delamination (n = 16) and 2 combined manual delamination and hydrodissection (n = 44). All experiments were undertaken by an experienced surgeon who was, however, not experienced with these techniques. We examined the frequency of Descemet membrane rupture as well as the amount of induced endothelial damage (trypan blue staining with quantitative image analysis).

RESULTS

Significant lesions of Descemet's membrane that would have led to a loss of the graft occurred in 25% of the manual delamination cases and in 4.5% using the combined technique. Endothelial damage induced by both techniques was low (6 and 5.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

For DMEK donor preparation, a combination of manual delamination and hydrodissection was shown to be a safe and endothelium-protective technique to separate Descemet membranes from the underlying stroma. A very rapid learning curve for the combination technique is of specific additional interest for beginners in DMEK surgery.