Coexisting ovarian malignancy in patients with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma

Safety of ovarian preservation for premenopausal patients with FIGO stage I grade 2 and 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utilization and outcomes of ovarian preservation for premenopausal patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I grade 2 and 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed; patients aged ≤45 years diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2015 with FIGO stage I grade 2 or 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, who underwent hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and had at least 1 month of follow-up, were identified. Overall survival was assessed following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected variables.

RESULTS

A total of 2941 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified; 200 (6.8%) patients did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Rate of ovarian preservation was comparable between patients with grade 2 (n=163, 6.6%) and grade 3 (n=37, 7.7%) tumors (p=0.38). Patients who did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were younger (median 39 vs 41 years, p<0.001) and less likely to undergo surgical lymph node assessment (52% vs 76.2%, p<0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (p=0.94); 5 year overall survival rates were 96.6% and 97%, respectively. After controlling for confounders, including tumor grade, ovarian preservation was not associated with worse overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.84).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with grade 2 and 3 FIGO stage I endometrioid carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy, ovarian preservation is rarely performed while no clear detrimental effect on overall survival was found.

Ovarian metastasis risk factors in endometrial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence of ovarian metastasis in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and analyze its risk factors and provide a theoretical basis for whether retention of the ovary in patients with EC.

METHODS

A systematic search using synonyms of 'ovarian cancer' and 'metastasis' was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, Google Scholar, and WOS database. Meta-analysis was performed on 7 included studies, comprising 4281 clinical-stage I-IV EC patients. Studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria. Odds risks (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using an inverse variance weighted random-effects model.

RESULTS

The ovarian metastasis risk of EC was significantly higher for patients with myometrial invasion >1/2 (OR = 18.19, 95% CI 5.34 to 61.96 compared to myometrial invasion ≤1/2), any pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI) (OR = 5.41, 95% CI 2.60-10.97 compared to without PLNI), G3 pathological grade (OR = 2.66, 95%CI 1.35-5.24 compared to G1-G2), non-endometrioid pathological type (OR = 6.46, 95% CI 3.25 to 12.83 compared to endometrioid), lymphatic vascular space invasion (LVSI) (OR = 6.46, 95% CI 3.25 to 12.83 compare to without LVSI), age >45 (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 0.29 to 14.11 compared to age ≤45), and cervical invasion (OR = 4.12, 95% CI 1.87 to 9.08 compared to without cervical invasion).

CONCLUSION

About 4.95% of EC patients develop ovarian metastasis. Age >45, myometrial invasion >1/2, cervical invasion, PLNI, pathological type, G3 pathological grade, and LVSI were the high-risk factors for ovarian metastasis of EC. Ovarian preservation should be carefully selected for patients with EC, and preoperative and intraoperative evaluations should be entirely performed.

A preoperative prediction model for predicting coexisting adnexa malignancy of patients with G1/G2 endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To identify the predictors of coexisting adnexa malignancy (CAM) before surgery for patients with G1/G2 endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC).

METHODS

Patients with G1/G2 EEC who received surgery in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from 1996 to 2017 were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify the predictors for CAM, and the nomogram was constructed and evaluated the discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

Among the 1511 patients in the study cohort, 66 (4.4%) coexisted adnexa malignancy (51 metastatic and 15 synchronous primaries). In the univariate logistic regression analysis, CA125 level (>35 U/ml), histologic grades, myometrial invasion depth in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), adnexal involvement in MRI/surgical exploration (SEP) were found to be significant predictors for CAM (P < .001, 0.047, 0.011, <0.001, respectively). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that high CA125 level (P < .001; OR: 2.945; 95%CI: 1.700-5.101), deep myometrial invasion (P = .011; OR: 2.194; 95%CI: 1.200-4.011), and suspected adnexal involvement in MRI/SEP (P < .001; OR: 11.524; 95%CI: 6.726-19.744) were independent predictors for CAM (AUC = 0.786). In 338 patients with MMR results, eighty-seven (25.7%) were detected MSI-high. There were 5.7% (5/87) patients diagnosed with CAM in the MSI-high group compared with 4.4% (11/251) in the MSS group.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram with pre- and intra-operative factors was constructed to predict CAM in G1/G2 EEC patients, which may help clinicians in decision-making for ovarian preservation for these patients.

Vaginal hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an alternative treatment for endometrial cancer patients with medical co-morbidities precluding standard surgical procedures: a systematic review

Objective

Vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an alternative strategy for patients with low-risk endometrial cancer and medical co-morbidities precluding laparoscopic or abdominal procedures. The current study evaluates the prevalence of co-existent ovarian malignancy in patients with endometrial cancer and the influence of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on survival outcomes in these patients.

Methods

Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies published between January 1, 2000 and November 20, 2017 that investigated (1) the prevalence of co-existing ovarian malignancy (either metastases or primary synchronous ovarian cancer in women with endometrial cancer, and (2) the influence of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on recurrence and/or survival rates.

Results

Of the pre-menopausal and post-menopausal patients (n=6059), 373 were identified with metastases and 106 were identified with primary synchronous ovarian cancer. Of the post-menopausal patients (n=6016), 362 were identified with metastases and 44 were identified with primary synchronous ovarian cancer. Survival outcomes did not differ for pre-menopausal patients with endometrial cancer with and without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (5-year overall survival rates were 89–94.5% and 86–97.8%, respectively).

Conclusion

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy seems to have a limited impact on disease outcome in patients with endometrial cancer. These results support the view that vaginal hysterectomy alone or with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an option for patients with endometrial cancer who are not ideal surgical candidates.

Risk factors for ovarian involvement in young and premenopausal endometrioid endometrial cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of ovarian malignant involvement in young and premenopausal endometrioid endometrial cancer and study the possible risk factors.

METHODS

Premenopausal patients 45 years of age or younger with endometrioid endometrial cancer treated at the OB/GYN Hospital of Fudan University between 2009 and 2013 were identified. The incidence of ovarian malignant involvement in young and premenopausal endometrioid endometrial cancer patients were calculated and the possible risk factors were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 144 younger (age ≤ 45, premenopausal) patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer were identified and coexisting malignant ovarian neoplasms were detected in 6 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that deeper myometrial invasion, positive lymphonode metastasis, positive LVSI, and high histologic grade (G2-G3) were associated with ovarian involvement in younger endometrial cancer patients. However, multivariate analysis revealed that only deep myometrial invasion was an independent risk factors for ovarian involvement (OR = 12.81, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

In conclusions, the incidence of coexisting ovarian malignant neoplasms in young and premenopausal patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer is low, and these findings may facilitate preoperative counseling of patients and decision making at the time of surgery.

Analysis of endometrial carcinoma in young women at a high-volume cancer center

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, survival, and prognosis of endometrial cancer in women aged ≤40 years.

METHODS

Women who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer at a single high-volume cancer center between January 1995 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Women aged >40, patients with missing data, and those who did not undergo surgical staging were excluded. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to identify the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients with endometrial cancer were assessed. The median age at diagnosis was 38 (range, 21-40) years, and most of the uterine tumors found were early-stage (85%), low-grade (67.5%), and endometrioid carcinomas (97.5%). The median serum cancer antigen 125 level was 10.9 IU/mL (range, 3-1284 IU/mL). Optimal cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 35 patients (87.5%). All patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, and 97.5% of the patients underwent hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Among the total group of 40 patients, 21 (52.5%) underwent pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection, and 15 (37.5%) underwent only pelvic lymph node dissection. Multivariate analysis confirmed that a cancer antigen 125 level ≥35 was the only independent prognostic factor for both progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 22.997; 95% confidence interval, 1.783-296.536; p = 0.016) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 22.541; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-290.364; p = 0,017).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that a cancer antigen 125 level ≥ 35 is the only independent prognostic factor for both progression-free survival and overall survival in patients aged ≤40 years with endometrial cancer.