Early versus late misoprostol administration after mifepristone for medical abortion

Medical termination for pregnancy in early first trimester (≤ 63 days) using combination of mifepristone and misoprostol or misoprostol alone: a systematic review

Background

A wide range of drugs have been studied for first trimester medical abortion. Studies evaluating different regimens, including combination mifepristone and misoprostol and misoprostol alone regimens, show varying results related to safety, efficacy and other outcomes. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review were to compare the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion and to compare medical with surgical methods of abortion ≤63 days of gestation.

Methods

Pubmed and EMBASE were systematically searched from database inception through January 2019 using a combination of MeSH, keywords and text words.

Randomized controlled trials on induced abortion at ≤63 days that compared different regimens of medical abortion using mifepristone and/or misoprostol and trials that compared medical with surgical methods of abortion were included.

We extracted data into a pre-designed form, calculated effect estimates, and performed meta-analyses where possible. The primary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy and successful abortion.

Results

Thirty-three studies composed of 22,275 participants were included in this review. Combined regimens using mifepristone and misoprostol had lower rates of ongoing pregnancy, higher rates of successful abortion and satisfaction compared to misoprostol only regimens. In combined regimens, misoprostol 800 μg was more effective than 400 μg. There was no significant difference in dosing intervals between mifepristone and misoprostol and routes of misoprostol administration in combination or misoprostol alone regimens. The rate of serious adverse events was generally low.

Conclusion

In this systematic review, we find that medical methods of abortion utilizing combination mifepristone and misoprostol or misoprostol alone are effective, safe and acceptable. More robust studies evaluating both the different combination and misoprostol alone regimens are needed to strengthen existing evidence as well as assess patient perspectives towards a particular regimen.

Mifepristone and misoprostol is safe and effective method in the second-trimester pregnancy termination

PURPOSE

The second-trimester medical abortions constitute 10-15 % of all induced abortions worldwide, but are responsible for two-thirds of major abortion related complications. During the last decade, medical methods for the second-trimester-induced abortion have been become safer and more accessible. The aim of this study is to evaluate factors affecting clinical effectiveness of the second-trimester medical terminations using mifepristone and misoprostol combination.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, 142 consecutive women underwent medical abortion on 12-24 weeks of gestation. Clinical data were collected from Oulu University Hospital patients' records for the period between January 2008 and June 2011. The associations between patient characteristics and different outcomes were evaluated using the standard statistical test for correlation.

RESULTS

The majority (92 %) of women aborted successfully within 24 h and were considered as day cases with small complication rate, as compared to hospitalized patients. In nulliparous patients, the time for complete abortion was longer than in other groups (P < 0.0019). Nulliparous women and women with gestation more than 16 weeks required opiate analgesia more often (P = 0.003 and <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Women with previous live births aborted more often within 8 h than women with no previous births. Mifepristone and misoprostol is safe and effective method for the second-trimester pregnancy termination. The second-trimester medical abortion can be provided by a nurse-midwife with the back-up of a gynecologist.