Oro-facial motor assessment: validation of the MBLF protocol in facial palsy

Normal Facial Function in the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System: Is the 100% Score too Restrictive?

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to describe the distribution of the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System scores in the general population. Secondary objectives included analyzing the effects of age, gender and facial side on these scores.

DESIGN

Two speech therapists specializing in facial motor skill assessment evaluated the healthy participants using the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System, first with the right hemiface as a reference and then with the left hemiface as a reference.

SETTING

The study was conducted in our ENT department from September 2022 to June 2023.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eleven healthy participants were included (57 women and 54 men), aged 18 to 79 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

SFGS composite scores (SFGS-Total) and sub-scores at rest (SFGS-Rest) and in movement (SFGS-Movement) were studied according to three age categories (18-39 years) (40-59 years) and (60-79 years) and gender. Inter-rater reliability was collected between the two evaluators with Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

Taking the right hemiface as a reference, SFGS-Total scores ranged from 65% to 100% (median = 96, IQR [91-100]). When the left hemiface was considered as the reference, scores ranged from 78% to 100% (median = 95; IQR [90-100]). Right and left SFGS-Total scores showed high inter-rater reliability (respectively α = 0.953 and α = 0.926). There was a slight negative correlation between age and SFGS-Total scores.

CONCLUSIONS

By embracing a more realistic approach that acknowledges natural variations and asymmetry in facial movements, we can enhance patient care and promote a more holistic understanding of facial rehabilitation outcomes.

Moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is associated with altered tongue motion during wakefulness

PURPOSE

Impairment of genioglossus control is a frequent "non-anatomical" cause of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in non- or mildly obese patients. Although wake-related compensatory mechanisms prevent the occurrence of obstructive events, the genioglossus control is often impaired during wakefulness. We hypothesized that the lingual motion would be altered during wakefulness in this population in patients with moderate-to-severe OSAS.

METHODS

We included non- or mildly obese participants with suspected OSAS. They underwent a Bucco-Linguo-Facial Motor Skills assessment using the MBLF ("Motricité Bucco-Linguo-Faciale"), which includes an evaluation of 13 movements of the tongue. This was followed by a night-attended polysomnography. We compared patients with moderate-to-severe OSAS (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h; n = 15) to patients without or with mild OSAS (AHI < 15/h; n = 24).

RESULTS

MBLF total and "tongue" sub-scores were lower in patients with moderate-to-severe OSAS: total z-score - 0.78 [- 1.31; 0.103] versus 0.20 [- 0.26; 0.31], p = 0.0011; "tongue" z-sub-score (- 0.63 [- 1.83; 0.41] versus 0.35 [0.26; 0.48], p = 0.014). There was a significant age-adjusted correlation between the "tongue" sub-score and AHI. The logistic regression model for the prediction of moderate-to-severe OSAS gave area under the curve ratio of 88.2% for MBLF score plus age.

CONCLUSIONS

Myofunctional activity of the tongue is impaired during wakefulness in non- or mildly obese patients with moderate-to-severe OSAS. This study supports the lingual myofunctional assessment using the MBLF in screening of moderate-to-severe OSAS. This simple tool could help clinicians to select patients with suspected moderate-to-severe OSAS for polysomnography.

[Holistic semi-presential evaluation of oropharygeal dysphagia with the framework of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Optimizing evaluation to improve rehabilitation treatment]

INTRODUCTION

Oropharyngeal dysphagia can lead to medical complications and decreased quality of life. Although there is a wide diversity of instrumental and clinical procedures to assess it, consensus for its holistic evaluation is scarce and poorly defined. The objective of this article is to present the design of a model for the holistic examination of oropharyngeal dysphagia that takes into account the components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and that can be carried out both face to face and semi-presentially using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A non-systematic review of the literature is carried out in order to select validated oropharyngeal dysphagia assessment tools with the highest degree of recommendation. These tools are analyzed by a group of experts in oropharyngeal dysphagia from the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau in Barcelona to design a holistic exploration model.

RESULTS

This evaluation model includes an assessment at the beginning and at the end of the treatment, as well as continuous monitoring during the rehabilitation process. It is implemented in a semi-presential and multidisciplinary way, and its purpose is to understand oropharyngeal dysphagia holistically to design and monitor an individualized therapeutic plan.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia should be within the biopsychosocial framework proposed by the ICF. The application of ICT in blended interventions facilitates this.