A New Diagnosis-Specific Survival Score for Patients to be Irradiated for Brain Metastases from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Evaluation of Potential Predictive Biomarkers for Defining Brain Radiotherapy Efficacy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A Case Report and a Narrative Review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the second most common cancer worldwide, resulting in 1.8 million deaths per year. Most patients are diagnosed with a metastatic disease. Brain metastases are one of the most common metastatic sites and are associated with severe neurological symptoms, shorter survival, and the worst clinical outcomes. Brain radiotherapy and systemic oncological therapies are currently used for controlling both cancer progression and neurological symptoms. Brain radiotherapy includes stereotactic brain ablative radiotherapy (SBRT) or whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). SBRT is applied for single or multiple (up to ten) small (diameter less than 4 cm) lesions, whereas WBRT is usually applied for multiple (more than ten) and large (diameter greater than 4 cm) brain metastases. In both cases, radiotherapy application may be viewed as an overtreatment which causes severe toxicities without achieving a significant clinical benefit. Thus far, a number of scoring systems to define the potential clinical benefits derived from brain radiotherapy have been proposed. However, most are not well established in clinical practice. In this article, we present a clinical case of a patient with advanced NSCLC carrying a BRAFV600E mutation and brain metastases. We review the variables in addition to applicable scoring systems considered to have potential for predicting clinical outcomes and benefits of brain radiotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastases. Lastly, we highlight the unmet need of specific scoring systems for advanced NSCLC patients with brain metastases carrying oncogene alterations including BRAFV600E mutations.

Brain Metastases: Is There Still a Role for Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy?

Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has commonly been prescribed to palliate symptoms from brain metastases, to reduce the risk of local relapse after surgical resection, and to improve distant brain control after resection or radiosurgery. While targeting micrometastases throughout the brain can be considered advantageous, the simultaneous exposure of healthy brain tissue might cause adverse events. Attempts to mitigate the risk of neurocognitive decline after WBRT include the selective avoidance of the hippocampi, among others. Besides selective dose reduction, dose escalation to boost volumes, for example, simultaneous integrated boost, aiming at increased tumor control probability is technically feasible. While up-front radiotherapy for newly diagnosed brain metastases often employs radiosurgery or other techniques targeting visible lesions only, sequential (delayed) salvage treatment with WBRT might still become necessary. In addition, the presence of leptomeningeal tumors or very widespread parenchymatous brain metastases might prompt clinicians to prescribe early WBRT.

The impact of preoperative MRI-based apparent diffusion coefficients on local recurrence and outcome in patients with cerebral metastases

BACKGROUND

Surgery of single cerebral metastases is standard but frequently fails to achieve local tumour control. Reliable predictors for local tumour progression and overall survival are unknown. MRI-based apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) correlate with tumour cellularity and invasion. The present study analysed a potential relation between the MRI based apparent diffusion coefficients local recurrence and outcome in patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for patients with cerebral metastases and complete surgical resection evaluated by an early postoperative MRI < 72h. Minimal ADC and mean ADC were assessed in preoperative 1,5T-MRI scans by placing regions of interests in the tumour and the peritumoural tissue.

RESULTS

Analysis of the relation between ADC values, local progression and outcome was performed in 86 patients with a mean age of 59 years (range 33-83 years). Primary site was NSCLC in 37.2% of all cases. Despite complete resection 33.7% of all patients suffered from local in-brain-progression. There were no significant differences in ADC values in groups based on histology. In the present cohort, the mean ADCmin and the mean ADCmean within the metastasis did not differ significantly between patients with and without a later local in-brain progression (634 × 10^-6 vs. 661 × 10^-6 mm²/s and 1324 × 10^-6 vs. 1361 × 10^-6 mm²/s; 1100 × 10^-6 vs. 1054 × 10^-6 mm²/s; each p > 0.05). Mean ADC values did not correlate significantly with PFS and OAS.

CONCLUSION

In the present study analysed ADC values had no significant impact on local in brain progression and survival parameters.

Time taken for a primary tumor to metastasize to the brain and the overall survival of patients with brain metastasis: An analysis of outcomes and factors affecting survival

BACKGROUND:

Brain metastasis (BM) is one of the main causes of high morbidity and mortality in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the factors that influenced the survival time of patients with primary cancer and survival time after BM.

METHODS:

Ninety patients with BM diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the study. We retrospectively analyzed the time to brain metastasis (TTB), overall survival time (OS1) and survival time after BM (OS2). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analyses.

RESULTS:

The median TTB was 12.0 (95% CI: 9.2–14.8 months), the median OS1 was 31.0 (95% CI: 25.8–35.2 months) and the median OS2 was 14.0 (95% CI: 10.9–17.1 months). Surgical excision of the primary tumor was an independent factor for a prolonged TTB (p< 0.000) and prolonged OS1 (p< 0.000). A single intracranial metastatic lesion was an independent protective factor for prolonged OS1 (p= 0.011) and prolonged OS2 (p= 0.050). TTB, OS1 and OS2 were analyzed with Gender (p< 0.000, < 0.000, and = 0.017, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

It suggests that TTB can be prolonged by primary tumor resection. Furthermore, women with a prolonged TTB and single intracranial metastasis are associated with high OS. These were helpful for the clinical treatment of BM patients before brain metastasis.

Interval Between Cancer Diagnosis and Radiotherapy - An Independent Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients Irradiated for Bone Metastases from Kidney Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Cancer patients with metastatic disease require personalized treatment regimens. This study was performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) following irradiation of bone metastases from kidney cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of 29 patients irradiated for bone metastases from kidney cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Ten factors were analyzed, including age, gender, performance score, interval from diagnosis of kidney cancer until radiotherapy for bone metastases, visceral metastases, other bone metastases, metastatic sites, number of irradiated sites, surgery of irradiated sites and systemic treatment prior to radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Using univariate analyses, a longer interval from diagnosis of kidney cancer radiotherapy was associated with better OS (p=0.012). Using Cox regression analysis, this factor remained significant (risk ratio=3.54, p=0.012).

CONCLUSION

The interval from diagnosis of kidney cancer until radiotherapy is an independent prognostic factor associated with OS following irradiation of bone metastases from kidney cancer. This type of data can help personalize radiation programs.

Applicability of the adjusted graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer with brain metastases using molecular markers (Lung-molGPA) in a Chinese cohort: A retrospective study of multiple institutions

Background

In this era of precision medicine, prognostic heterogeneity is an important feature of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM). This multi‐institutional study is aimed to verify the applicability of the adjusted Lung‐molGPA model for NSCLC with BM in a Chinese cohort.

Methods

This retrospective study included 1903 patients at three hospitals in Southwest China. The performance of the Lung‐molGPA model was compared with that of the adjusted DS‐GPA model in terms of estimating the survival of NSCLC with BM.

Results

The median OS of this patient cohort was 27.0 months, and the adenocarcinoma survived longer than the non‐adenocarcinoma (28.0 months vs 18.7 months, p < 0.001). The adjusted Lung‐molGPA model was more accurate in predicting survival of adenocarcinoma patients than the adjusted DS‐GPA model (C‐index: 0.615 vs 0.571), and it was not suitable for predicting survival of non‐adenocarcinoma patients (p = 0.286, 1.5‐2.0 vs 2.5‐3.0; p = 0.410, 2.5‐3.0 vs 3.5‐4.0).

Conclusions

The adjusted Lung‐molGPA model is better than the DS‐GPA model in predicting the prognosis of adenocarcinoma patients. However, it failed to estimate the prognosis for non‐adenocarcinoma patients.

The optional approach of oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases in the new generation targeted therapies era

In recent years, the study of the molecular characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has highlighted a specific role of some genes that represent important therapeutic targets, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS-1) and v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF). Patients with oncogene-addicted cancer benefit more from therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than from chemotherapy. The brain is a preferred site for tumor spread in these patients. In addition, given greater control of extracranial disease and prolonged survival, the brain is often the first site of progression. Therefore, there is great interest in therapeutic approaches that optimize the control of intracranial disease associated with systemic drugs that, by penetrating the blood-brain barrier (BBB), may improve local control. On the latter, radiotherapy provides excellent efficacy but following the results of clinical trials with new brain penetrant drugs, the question of how and especially when to perform brain radiotherapy in patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC remains open. Prospective studies may indicate which patients are most likely to benefit from combined use or in what sequence they will undergo systemic and radiotherapy treatment. Due to the heterogeneity of patients and the introduction of new generation TKIs, a multidisciplinary assessment for the best management of therapies in NSCLC patients with molecular driver alterations and brain metastases (BM) is required.