1
|
Ding J, Thye M, Edmondson-Stait AJ, Szaflarski JP, Mirman D. Metric comparison of connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping in post-stroke aphasia. Brain Commun 2024; 6:fcae313. [PMID: 39318782 PMCID: PMC11420983 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping relates behavioural impairments to disruption of structural brain connectivity. Connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping can be based on different approaches (diffusion MRI versus lesion mask), network scales (whole brain versus regions of interest) and measure types (tract-based, parcel-based, or network-based metrics). We evaluated the similarity of different connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping processing choices and identified factors that influence the results using multiverse analysis-the strategy of conducting and displaying the results of all reasonable processing choices. Metrics derived from lesion masks and diffusion-weighted images were tested for association with Boston Naming Test and Token Test performance in a sample of 50 participants with aphasia following left hemispheric stroke. 'Direct' measures were derived from diffusion-weighted images. 'Indirect' measures were derived by overlaying lesion masks on a white matter atlas. Parcel-based connectomes were constructed for the whole brain and regions of interest (14 language-relevant parcels). Numerous tract-based and network-based metrics were calculated. There was a high discrepancy across processing approaches (diffusion-weighted images versus lesion masks), network scales (whole brain versus regions of interest) and metric types. Results indicate weak correlations and different connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping results across the processing choices. Substantial methodological work is needed to validate the various decision points that arise when conducting connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping analyses. Multiverse analysis is a useful strategy for evaluating the similarity across different processing choices in connectome-based lesion-symptom mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junhua Ding
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK
| | - Melissa Thye
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK
| | | | - Jerzy P Szaflarski
- Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Daniel Mirman
- Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Painter DR, Norwood MF, Marsh CH, Hine T, Harvie D, Libera M, Bernhardt J, Gan L, Zeeman H. Immersive virtual reality gameplay detects visuospatial atypicality, including unilateral spatial neglect, following brain injury: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2023; 20:161. [PMID: 37996834 PMCID: PMC10668447 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01283-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In neurorehabilitation, problems with visuospatial attention, including unilateral spatial neglect, are prevalent and routinely assessed by pen-and-paper tests, which are limited in accuracy and sensitivity. Immersive virtual reality (VR), which motivates a much wider (more intuitive) spatial behaviour, promises new futures for identifying visuospatial atypicality in multiple measures, which reflects cognitive and motor diversity across individuals with brain injuries. METHODS In this pilot study, we had 9 clinician controls (mean age 43 years; 4 males) and 13 neurorehabilitation inpatients (mean age 59 years; 9 males) recruited a mean of 41 days post-injury play a VR visual search game. Primary injuries included 7 stroke, 4 traumatic brain injury, 2 other acquired brain injury. Three patients were identified as having left sided neglect prior to taking part in the VR. Response accuracy, reaction time, and headset and controller raycast orientation quantified gameplay. Normative modelling identified the typical gameplay bounds, and visuospatial atypicality was defined as gameplay beyond these bounds. RESULTS The study found VR to be feasible, with only minor instances of motion sickness, positive user experiences, and satisfactory system usability. Crucially, the analytical method, which emphasized identifying 'visuospatial atypicality,' proved effective. Visuospatial atypicality was more commonly observed in patients compared to controls and was prevalent in both groups of patients-those with and without neglect. CONCLUSION Our research indicates that normative modelling of VR gameplay is a promising tool for identifying visuospatial atypicality after acute brain injury. This approach holds potential for a detailed examination of neglect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Painter
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia
| | - Michael F Norwood
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
| | - Chelsea H Marsh
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Trevor Hine
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia
- School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, QLD, Australia
| | - Daniel Harvie
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia
- Allied Health and Human Performance, Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health), University South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Marilia Libera
- Psychology Department, Logan Hospital, Logan, QLD, Australia
| | - Julie Bernhardt
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Leslie Gan
- Rehabilitation Unit, Logan Hospital, Meadowbrook, QLD, Australia
| | - Heidi Zeeman
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Webb SS, Demeyere N. Using Multiverse Analysis to Highlight Differences in Convergent Correlation Outcomes Due to Data Analytical and Study Design Choices. Assessment 2023; 30:1825-1835. [PMID: 36176188 PMCID: PMC10363922 DOI: 10.1177/10731911221127904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
In neuropsychological research, there are a near limitless number of different approaches researchers can choose when designing studies. Here we showcase the multiverse/specification curve technique to establish the robustness of analytical pathways choices within classic psychometric test validation in an example test of executive function. We examined the impact of choices regarding sample groups, sample sizes, test metrics, and covariate inclusions on convergent validation correlations between tests of executive function. Data were available for 87 neurologically healthy adults and 117 stroke survivors, and a total of 2,220 different analyses were run in a multiverse analysis. We found that the type of sample group, sample size, and test metric used for analyses affected validation outcomes. Covariate inclusion choices did not affect the observed coefficients in our analyses. The present analysis demonstrates the importance of carefully justifying every aspect of a psychometric test validation study a priori with theoretical and statistical factors in mind. It is essential to thoroughly consider the purpose and use of a new tool when designing validation studies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Rengasamy M, Moriarity D, Kraynak T, Tervo-Clemmens B, Price R. Exploring the multiverse: the impact of researchers' analytic decisions on relationships between depression and inflammatory markers. Neuropsychopharmacology 2023; 48:1465-1474. [PMID: 37336935 PMCID: PMC10425405 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-023-01621-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, a replication crisis in psychiatry has led to a growing focus on the impact of researchers' analytic decisions on the results from studies. Multiverse analyses involve examining results across a wide array of possible analytic decisions (e.g., log-transforming variables, number of covariates, or treatment of outliers) and identifying if study results are robust to researchers' analytic decisions. Studies have begun to use multiverse analysis for well-studied relationships that have some heterogeneity in results/conclusions across studies.We examine the well-studied relationship between peripheral inflammatory markers (PIMs; e.g., white blood cell count (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP)) and depression severity in the large NHANES dataset (n = 25,962). Specification curve analyses tested the impact of 9 common analytic decisions (comprising of 58,000+ possible combinations) on the association of PIMs and depression severity. Relationships of PIMs and total depression severity are robust to analytic decisions (based on tests of inference jointly examining effect sizes and p-values). However, moderate/large differences are noted in effect sizes based on analytic decisions and the majority of analyses do not result in significant findings, with the percentage of analyses with statistically significant results being 46.1% for WBC and 43.8% for CRP. For associations of PIMs with specific symptoms of depression, some associations (e.g., sleep, appetite) in males (but not females) were robust to analytic decisions. We discuss how multiverse analyses can be used to guide research and also the need for authors, reviewers, and editors to incorporate multiverse analyses to enhance replicability of research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manivel Rengasamy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Daniel Moriarity
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Thomas Kraynak
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Rebecca Price
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moore MJ, Driscoll R, Colwell M, Hewitt O, Demeyere N. Aligning formal and functional assessments of Visuospatial Neglect: A mixed-methods study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2022; 32:2560-2579. [PMID: 34392812 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1967172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe occurrence of visuospatial neglect acts as a key predictor of recovery outcome following stroke. However, the specific behavioural profiles associated with various neglect subtypes are not well understood. This study aims to identify real-world functional impairments associated with neglect, to determine whether functional impairment profiles differ across patients with egocentric and allocentric neglect, and to investigate how neglect severity predicts functional impairments.Notes from 290 stroke patients' occupational therapy functional assessments were qualitatively and quantitatively analysed in the context of neglect type and severity as reported by the OCS Cancellation Task. Overall, neglect patients had more references to having difficulty initiating tasks, finding items, exhibiting spatial inattention, and having difficulty using both arms than patients without neglect. The proportion of theme references did not differ significantly across patients with egocentric and allocentric neglect. The quantitative severity of egocentric neglect was acted as a significant predictor of reference occurrence over and above stroke severity within difficulty finding items, spatial inattention, body inattention, and upper limb use.This study expands on previous findings by identifying real-world functional impairments differentiating patients with and without neglect. This data provides novel insight into the impact of neglect on functional abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Jane Moore
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Driscoll
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Colwell
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Olivia Hewitt
- Oxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training and Research, Isis Education Centre, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Nele Demeyere
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moore MJ, Vancleef K, Riddoch MJ, Gillebert CR, Demeyere N. Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect Subtypes and Relationship to Functional Outcome Six Months After Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2021; 35:823-835. [PMID: 34269128 PMCID: PMC8414826 DOI: 10.1177/15459683211032977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Background/Objective. This study aims to investigate how complex visuospatial neglect behavioural phenotypes predict long-term outcomes, both in terms of neglect recovery and broader functional outcomes after 6 months post-stroke. Methods. This study presents a secondary cohort study of acute and 6-month follow-up data from 400 stroke survivors who completed the Oxford Cognitive Screen's Cancellation Task. At follow-up, patients also completed the Stroke Impact Scale questionnaire. These data were analysed to identify whether any specific combination of neglect symptoms is more likely to result in long-lasting neglect or higher levels of functional impairment, therefore warranting more targeted rehabilitation. Results. Overall, 98/142 (69%) neglect cases recovered by follow-up, and there was no significant difference in the persistence of egocentric/allocentric (X2 [1] = .66 and P = .418) or left/right neglect (X2 [2] = .781 and P = .677). Egocentric neglect was found to follow a proportional recovery pattern with all patients demonstrating a similar level of improvement over time. Conversely, allocentric neglect followed a non-proportional recovery pattern with chronic neglect patients exhibiting a slower rate of improvement than those who recovered. A multiple regression analysis revealed that the initial severity of acute allocentric, but not egocentric, neglect impairment acted as a significant predictor of poor long-term functional outcomes (F [9,300] = 4.742, P < .001 and adjusted R2 = .098). Conclusions. Our findings call for systematic neuropsychological assessment of both egocentric and allocentric neglect following stroke, as the occurrence and severity of these conditions may help predict recovery outcomes over and above stroke severity alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret J. Moore
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kathleen Vancleef
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M. Jane Riddoch
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Nele Demeyere
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|