Macular pigment measurements: which method should we use?

Idiopathic juxtafoveolar retinal telangiectasis: a current review

Idiopathic juxtafoveolar retinal telangiectasis (IJFT), also known as parafoveal telangiectasis or idiopathic macular telangiectasia, refers to a heterogeneous group of well-recognized clinical entities characterized by telangiectatic alterations of the juxtafoveolar capillary network of one or both eyes, but which differ in appearance, presumed pathogenesis, and management strategies. Classically, three groups of IJFT are identified. Group I is unilateral easily visible telangiectasis occurring predominantly in males, and causing visual loss as a result of macular edema. Group II, the most common, is bilateral occurring in both middle-aged men and women, and presenting with telangiectasis that is more difficult to detect on biomicroscopy, but with characteristic and diagnostic angiographic and optical coherence tomography features. Vision loss is due to retinal atrophy, not exudation, and subretinal neovascularization is common. Group III is very rare characterized predominantly by progressive obliteration of the perifoveal capillary network, occurring usually in association with a medical or neurologic disease. This paper presents a current review of juxtafoveolar retinal telangiectasis, reviewing the classification of these entities and focusing primarily on the two most common types encountered in clinical practice, i.e., groups I and II, describing their clinical features, histopathology, natural history, complications, latest results from imaging modalities and functional studies, differential diagnosis, and treatment modalities.

[The macular pigment: short- and intermediate-term changes of macular pigment optical density following supplementation with lutein and zeaxanthin and co-antioxidants. The LUNA Study]

BACKGROUND

How long do the elevated concentrations of macular pigment persist after stopping supplementation with lutein and zeaxanthin?

METHODS

One hundred eight (108) probands with and without age-related macular degeneration (68 female, 40 male, age 51-87 years) received a supplement containing 12 mg lutein and 1 mg zeaxanthin once per day (Ocuvite lutein) for 6 months. Analysis of macular pigment optical density (MPOD) was performed during the period of supplementation and again 3, 6, and 9 months following discontinuation of the supplement. A control group of 28 subjects received no dietary supplement.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean MPOD at 0.5 degrees was 0.50 in the supplemented group. Following supplementation, values rose, and 3 months after discontinuation of supplementation the highest levels of MPOD0.5 degrees (0.59 ODU) were detected (increase of +0.1 ODU, (p<0.001). Six months after supplement discontinuation, a slight decrease of mean MPOD0.5 degrees appeared (to 0.54 ODU), followed again by a slight increase 3 months later (to 0.57 ODU). An increment of MPOD0.5 degrees in the control group was not significant (0.03 ODU, p=0.15).

DISCUSSION

Supplementation of lutein and zeaxanthin leads to an increase of MPOD0.5 degrees . This effect outlasts the duration of intake, and 9 months after supplementation was stopped, the mean MPOD0.5 degrees was still elevated compared with baseline levels. A longer follow-up subsequent to stopping supplementation might clarify whether the values decrease over time or whether a plateau of elevated MPOD levels is reached. High doses of lutein and zeaxanthin seem to be necessary to increase macular pigment density in the retina; afterwards, the amount of carotenoids needed to maintain high concentrations seems to be covered by daily food.

Changes in macular pigment optical density and serum concentrations of its constituent carotenoids following supplemental lutein and zeaxanthin: The LUNA study

Macular pigment (MP), consisting of lutein (L) and zeaxanthin (Z), is believed to protect the retina from photo-oxidative damage. The current study investigates, in terms of MP optical density (MPOD) and serum concentrations of its constituent carotenoids, response to supplemental L and Z, and co-antioxidants. An intervention (I) group, consisting of 108 subjects (mean [+/-SD] age: 71.5 [+/-7.1] years), of which 92.6% exhibited features of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), received a daily supplement consisting of 12 mg L and 1 mg Z, both provided as ester 120 mg vitamin C, 17.6 mg vitamin E, 10 mg zinc, 40 microg selenium (Ocuvite Luteintrade mark) for a period of 6 months. MPOD was measured, by 2-wavelength autofluorescence (AF), on five occasions during the period of supplementation, and once again 3 months following discontinuation of the supplement. A control (C) group of 28 subjects (mean [+/-SD] age: 71.0 [+/-8.1] years), who received no dietary supplementation or modification, was examined at baseline and once again after a mean of 29.4 (+/-9.3) weeks. At baseline, mean (+/-SD) MPOD (at 0.5 degrees) was 0.504 (+/-0.197) and 0.525 (+/-0.189) in the I and C groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant increase in MPOD (at 0.5 degrees) for the I group (0.1 [+/-0.009]; p<0.0008), whereas no significant increase was seen in the C group (0.03 [+/-0.02]; p>0.05), over the period of supplementation. In order to classify supplemented subjects into quartiles, in terms of MPOD response, we calculated the difference between MPOD (at 0.5 degrees) at visit 6 and at baseline (visit 1). Quartile 1 (the "non-responder" quartile) displayed no increase in MPOD (at 0.5 degrees), in spite of rises seen in serum concentrations of L and Z. The three "responder" quartiles reached similar final plateaus of MPOD (at 0.5 degrees), reflected in final mean (+/-SEM) values of 0.59 (+/-0.04) optical density unit (ODU), 0.64 (+/-0.03) ODU and 0.64 (+/-0.03) ODU for quartiles 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Subjects with low baseline MPOD were more likely to exhibit a dramatic rise in MPOD, or to exhibit no rise in MPOD, in response to supplements than subjects with medium to high baseline MPOD values. Supplementation with 12 mg L and 1 mg Z, combined with co-antioxidants, resulted in an increase of MPOD at 0.5 degrees eccentricity in a majority of subjects, including those afflicted with AMD. However, there remains a substantial proportion of subjects for whom, in spite of rises in serum concentrations of L and Z in these subjects, MPOD augmentation in response to supplemental L, Z and co-antioxidants could not be detected over the study period, thus indicating that intestinal malabsorption of these carotenoids is not responsible for the lack of a macular response to such supplements. Further, our results suggest that saturable mechanisms play a role in the retinal capture and/or stabilisation of the macular carotenoids.

Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: the Rotterdam Study

OBJECTIVE

To study the prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in various age categories of a large population-based study.

METHODS

For the study, 6775 subjects aged 55 years or older underwent an extensive ophthalmologic screening examination, including measurements of visual acuity and the visual field and fundus photography. The causes of blindness or visual impairment were determined using all screening information and medical records.

RESULTS

The prevalence of blindness, according to World Health Organization criteria, ranged from 0.1% in subjects aged 55 to 64 years to 3.9% in subjects aged 85 years or older; the prevalence of visual impairment ranged from 0.1% to 11.8%. For persons younger than 75 years, myopic degeneration and optic neuropathy were the most important causes of impaired vision. For persons aged 75 years or older, age-related macular degeneration was the major cause of the increased prevalence of blindness, whereas age-related cataract predominantly caused the increased prevalence of visual impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

The hierarchy of causes of blindness and visual impairment is highly determined by age. As yet, little can be done to reduce the exponential increase of blindness; however, adequate implementation of surgery to treat cataract could reduce visual impairment by one third. Underuse of ophthalmologic care is a prominent cause of the high frequency of untreated cataracts among the elderly.