Lateral rectus muscle recession for intermittent exotropia with anomalous head position in type 1 Duane’s retraction syndrome

MRI evaluation of cranial nerve abnormalities and extraocular muscle fibrosis in duane retraction syndrome and congenital extraocular muscle fibrosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the alterations in extraocular muscles (EOMs) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) among patients diagnosed with Duane retraction yndrome (DRS) and congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles (CFEOM), who present with various cranial nerve anomalies in an attempt to enhance the clinical diagnostic process.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted to evaluate 27 patients with DRS and 14 patients with CFEOM. All patients underwent MRI scans of the brainstem and orbital examination. Neurodevelopmental assessments were conducted through MRI, and maximum cross-sectional area and volumes of EOMs were obtained. Three types of models were constructed using machine learning decision tree algorithms based on EOMs to predict disease diagnosis, cranial nerve abnormalities, and clinical subtypes.

RESULTS

Patients with bilateral CN VI abnormalities had smaller volumes of LR, MR, and IR muscles compared to those with unilateral involvement (P < 0.05). Similarly, patients with CFEOM and unilateral third cranial nerve abnormalities had a smaller maximum cross-section of the affected eye's SR compared to the contralateral eye (P < 0.05). In patients with both CN III and CN VI abnormalities, the volume of SR was smaller than in patients with CN III abnormalities alone (P < 0.05). The prediction model using EOMs volume showed a diagnostic precision of 82.5% for clinical cases and 60.1% for predicting cranial nerve abnormalities. Nonetheless, the precision for identifying clinical subtypes was relatively modest, at only 41.7%.

CONCLUSION

The distinctive volumetric alterations in EOMs among individuals exhibiting distinct cranial nerve anomalies associated with DRS or CFEOM provide valuable diagnostic insights into to Congenital Cranial Neurodevelopmental Disorders (CCDDs). MRI analysis of EOMs should thus be regarded as a crucial diagnostic modality.

Imaging of congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders: What radiologist wants to know?

We aim to review the imaging features of congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders. Characteristic imaging findings can define subtypes of these disorders through assessment of cranial nerves, extraocular muscles, orbital, and brain abnormalities. Duane retraction syndrome shows absent or hypoplasic 6th cranial nerve and preserved extraocular muscles (EOM). Mobius syndrome shows absent 7th and 6th cranial nerves, absence of facial colliculus, flattening of the dorsal aspect of the pons, hypoplasia of the pons and medulla, and flattening of the 4th ventricular floor. Congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles reveals unilateral or bilateral hypoplasia or aplasia of the 3rd cranial nerve, atrophy of superior rectus and levator palpebrae superioris muscles, and atrophy of the brainstem and cerebellar hemispheres. Horizontal gaze palsy and progressive scoliosis show characteristic split pons sign, butterfly medulla, absent facial colliculi, and spinal scoliosis. HOXA1 Mutations show a bilateral absence of 6th cranial nerves with the underdeveloped inner ear. Pontine Cap Tegmental Dysplasia shows ventral pontine hypoplasia, dorsal tegmental projection into the 4th ventricle, and variable cranial nerve deficits.