Effect of over-the-counter brimonidine tartrate 0.025% ophthalmic solution on pupil size in healthy adults

The long-term effects of topical latanoprost 0.005% treatment on pupillary functions: A 2-year longitudinal study

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term effects of topical latanoprost 0.005% treatment on pupillary functions in early-stage primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes using automated pupillometry.

METHODS

This prospective study involved 20 eyes of 20 treatment-naive subjects with early-stage POAG. After comprehensive ophthalmic examination, static and dynamic pupillometry measurements were performedbefore treatment, at the 1st follow-up visit (1.10 ± 0.30 months) and the 2nd follow-up visit (25.85 ± 10.26 months) after treatment initiation. Dynamic parameters included resting diameter (mm), amplitude (mm), latency (ms), duration (ms), and velocity (mm/s) of pupil contraction and dilation. Static pupillometry parameters were pupil diameter (PD, mm) in high-photopic, low-photopic, mesopic and scotopic conditions.

RESULTS

The velocity of pupil dilation significantly decreased during the 1st visit (p = 0.008) and the 2nd visit (p = 0.0003) of treatment compared to the pre-treatment visit. The resting PD was also significantly higher after the 1st visit (p = 0.003) and the 2nd visit (p = 0.001) compared to the pre-treatment visit. However, the difference in resting PD measured between the 1st and 2nd visits did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.065). There were no significant changes in other dynamic parameters (p > 0.05 for all). Additionally, a mild, but not significant, mydriatic effect was observed in PD measurements under scotopic, mesopic and low photopic lighting conditions after follow-up. None of the static and dynamic parameters correlate with age, changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) or mean deviation (MD) values of visual field tests.

CONCLUSION

The long-term topical latanoprost 0.005% treatment in early-stage POAG has a slight mydriatic effect on the pupil. Further longitudinal clinical studies with larger patient cohorts are necessary to better understand the effects of latanoprost on pupillary functions.

Effects of brimonidine tartrate 0.2 and 0.15% ophthalmic solution on the static and dynamic pupil characteristics

Aims

To investigate the differences between 0.2 and 0.15% brimonidine tartrate eye drops for anti-mydriatic effects and the optical quality under different light conditions.

Methods

This prospective study involved 80 consecutive high myopia patients undergoing implantation of a V4c ICL. The patients were randomly instilled with brimonidine 0.2 and 0.15% 2 weeks postoperatively. Visual quality, pupil center, pupil size, and refraction under different light conditions were measured before and 0.5 h after brimonidine administration. A symptom questionnaire was also evaluated.

Results

There was no statistical difference in the static and dynamic pupil diameters and velocity after LS between the two groups (p > 0.05). The 0.2% group had significant changes in pupil center before and after treatment, while there was no obvious movement of the 0.15% group under all illumination condition (p > 0.05). The OSI after treatment of the 0.15% group was lower than that of 0.2% group (p = 0.012). The PVA9% and PVA100% of the 0.15% group was higher than that of 0.2% group in the dark (p = 0.009, p = 0.012). The HOA RMS of the 0.15% group was lower than that of 0.2% group (p = 0.016). The QIRC score in the 0.15% group was significantly higher than that in the 0.2% group (p = 0.043).

Conclusion

0.15 and 0.2% brimonidine tartrate eye drops had similar anti-mydriatic ability, while 0.15% group had better visual quality than 0.2% concentration, and hardly introduced pupil shift. 0.15% brimonidine tartrate eye drops may be more suitable for patients with nocturnal glare symptoms in the early postoperative period after ICL implantation.

Brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.025% for redness relief: an overview of safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Ocular redness, or conjunctival hyperemia, is a common ophthalmic sign associated with reduced quality of life. For redness without apparent underlying pathology, topical ophthalmic decongestants have been widely used.

AREAS COVERED

Brimonidine tartrate was approved in 2017 as a topical vasoconstrictor at a 0.025% concentration for relief of ocular redness. Since then, investigators have reported on efficacy and safety findings from studies evaluating low-dose brimonidine for reducing ocular redness.

EXPERT OPINION

Brimonidine is highly selective for α₂-adrenergic receptors. Clinical trials have so far shown that the drug in low doses significantly reduces ocular redness in comparison to vehicle for up to 8 hours. Brimonidine-treated eyes did not present side effects of other vasoconstrictors, such as hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia or drowsiness. Ocular adverse events such as allergic reactions and redness rebound were also minimal. In this review, we examine in detail published literature on the mechanism of brimonidine tartrate and its efficacy and safety in relieving conjunctival hyperemia.