Is tumor cellularity in primary invasive breast carcinoma of prognostic significance?

On the Additional Information Provided by 3T-MRI ADC in Predicting Tumor Cellularity and Microscopic Behavior

BACKGROUND

to evaluate whether Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values of invasive breast cancer, provided by 3T Diffusion Weighted-Images (DWI), may represent a non-invasive predictor of pathophysiologic tumor aggressiveness.

METHODS

100 Patients with histologically proven invasive breast cancers who underwent a 3T-MRI examination were included in the study. All MRI examinations included dynamic contrast-enhanced and DWI/ADC sequences. ADC value were calculated for each lesion. Tumor grade was determined according to the Nottingham Grading System, and immuno-histochemical analysis was performed to assess molecular receptors, cellularity rate, on both biopsy and surgical specimens, and proliferation rate (Ki-67 index). Spearman's Rho test was used to correlate ADC values with histological (grading, Ki-67 index and cellularity) and MRI features. ADC values were compared among the different grading (G1, G2, G3), Ki-67 (<20% and >20%) and cellularity groups (<50%, 50-70% and >70%), using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. ROC curves were performed to demonstrate the accuracy of the ADC values in predicting the grading, Ki-67 index and cellularity groups.

RESULTS

ADC values correlated significantly with grading, ER receptor status, Ki-67 index and cellularity rates. ADC values were significantly higher for G1 compared with G2 and for G1 compared with G3 and for Ki-67 < 20% than Ki-67 > 20%. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that ADC values were significantly different among the three grading groups, the three biopsy cellularity groups and the three surgical cellularity groups. The best ROC curves were obtained for the G3 group (AUC of 0.720), for G2 + G3 (AUC of 0.835), for Ki-67 > 20% (AUC of 0.679) and for surgical cellularity rate > 70% (AUC of 0.805).

CONCLUSIONS

3T-DWI ADC is a direct predictor of cellular aggressiveness and proliferation in invasive breast carcinoma, and can be used as a supporting non-invasive factor to characterize macroscopic lesion behavior especially before surgery.

Comparison of the multigene panel test and OncoScan™ for the determination of HER2 amplification in breast cancer

The diagnostic accuracy of the multigene panel test (MPT) and OncoScan™ in the determination of HER2 amplification in breast tumors remains controversial. In the present study, HER2 copy number was analyzed using both MPT and OncoScan™ in 45 breast tumors and was compared with that in fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Tumors with low cellularity were examined using tumor cell enrichment and fluorescence‑activated cell sorting. Both MPT and OncoScan™ exhibited significant correlations with FISH with respect to the determination of HER2 amplification in breast tumors. However, the correlation coefficient was significantly higher for the comparison of MPT and FISH (r=0.770) compared with that between OncoScan™ and FISH (r=0.564). The accuracy of MPT (93.3%) was slightly higher compared with that in OncoScan™ (84.4%) in determining the HER2 status, which was mostly explained by the higher sensitivity of MPT in tumors with low cellularity (83.3 vs. 33.3%), but not in those with high cellularity (81.8 vs. 72.7%). The specificity was 100% for both tests. The MPT exhibited higher sensitivity in the determination of the amplification of other genes, including MYC, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 and GATA binding protein 3 in tumors with low cellularity compared with that in tumors with high cellularity. OncoScan™ exhibited low sensitivity without tumor cell enrichment. The results suggested that MPT could be a promising method to determine HER2 status in breast tumors and that it could exhibit improved accuracy compared with that in OncoScan™ in tumors with low cellularity.