Validation and Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the SWAL-QOL

Dysphagia with recurrent severe aspiration due to cervical diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (Forestier's disease)

Dysphagia is a common symptom in patients presenting to the gastroenterologist. However, extraluminal causes of dysphagia may be missed by endoluminal diagnosis alone. This case report presents a 72-year-old man with slowly progressive dysphagia that occurred with the ingestion of certain solid foods and was intermittently associated with severe aspiration. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and barium swallow study were both normal. However, a conventional x-ray and computed tomography (CT) scan of the neck revealed diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (Forestier's disease) of the anterior cervical spine (C2-C7). Fiber endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) revealed functionally incomplete emptying of the oral cavity during swallowing, and the patient reported dysphagia score (EAT-10) was 23 (normal < 3). Surgical removal of the hyperostosis (C3-C6) resulted in immediate and sustained improvement in dysphagia at 3 months.

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Mandarin Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index

This study aimed to develop the Dysphagia Handicap Index-Chinese Mandarin (DHI-CM) and to assess its reliability and validity. This prospective study was conducted in China with individuals who speak Mandarin. The DHI-CM was developed according to a five-stage process. 264 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) and 187 healthy individuals completed the study. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability. Differences between healthy participants and patients with OD were analyzed for instrument validity. Convergent and concurrent validity were assessed using the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QoL) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), respectively. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was used to assess content validity. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (EFA and CFA, respectively) were used to assess structural validity. The Cronbach's alpha was > 0.9 for the total score and every individual subscale. The Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients were both > 0.8. The patients with OD showed significantly higher scores in the DHI-CM and its subscales than the healthy individuals. Significant correlations were found between most subscales of the DHI-CM and both the SWAL-QoL and FOIS. The CVI of the DHI-CM was 0.892 and ranged between 0.878 and 1.000 for the subscales. The EFA identified three components that explained 24.33%, 23.99%, and 22.73% of the variance, respectively. The scale showed good structural validity through CFA. Conclusions. The DHI-CM demonstrated good reliability and validity among Mandarin-speaking Chinese adults.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Translation and Validation of Kannada Version of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (KSWAL-QOL)

The swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire is a commonly used tool to assess the impact of dysphagia on quality of life. SWAL-QOL has been translated and validated in many languages. There is no valid dysphagia-specific quality of life tool in Indian languages. Hence, the current study aimed at cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of SWAL-QOL in Kannada (KSWAL-QOL), a south Indian Dravidian language. The original SWAL-QOL was translated into Kannada using the standard translation procedure. A group of 55 participants with oro-pharyngeal dysphagia (clinical group) and 55 participants with normal swallowing abilities (control group) were recruited for the current study to assess the validity and reliability of KSWAL-QOL. Dysphagia Handicap Index- Kannada version (DHI-K) and Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LISAT) were used to check for the convergent validity of the KSWAL-QOL. The KSWAL-QOL demonstrated excellent discriminant validity and distinguished clinical from the control group across all domains (p = 0.00). Internal consistency for all the nine domains of KSWAL-QOL measured using Cronbach's α ranged from 0.89 to 0.92, demonstrating excellent reliability. Test-retest measures were exceptional, with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ranging between 0.92 and 0.98 and Spearman's rho values between 0.91 and 0.97. A very strong negative correlation was obtained between KSWAL-QOL and DHI-K, and a strong positive correlation was seen between KSWAL-QOL and LISAT. The KSWAL-QOL is a reliable and valid tool with excellent psychometric properties to evaluate the quality of life associated with swallowing in individuals with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-04162-w.

[Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing health-related quality of life in patients with voice and swallowing disorders]

Standardized and validated patient surveys in the form of questionnaires are becoming increasingly important in otorhinolaryngology. Subjective symptoms and functional limitations but also health-related quality of life are assessed with so-called patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Besides patient history and objective findings, these questionnaires can be applied as another important source for ensuring the quality of patient-centered care. In German-speaking countries there are now several PROMs that specifically ask for the patient perspective on voice and swallowing disorders. For patients with voice disorders the following questionnaires based on the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), which are also used internationally, are mainly applied: VHI-30, VHI-12i, and VHI-9i. In the field of oropharyngeal dysphagia, the German versions of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10), des Sydney Swallow Questionnaire SSQ‑G, the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QoL), and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) are currently mostly used.

Translation, Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity Evidence of the Feeding/Swallowing Impact Survey (FS-IS) to Brazilian Portuguese

The purpose of this study was to translate and adapt the Feeding/Swallowing Impact Survey (FS-IS) into Brazilian Portuguese and provide a validated instrument for caregivers of children with feeding/swallowing disorders. This cross-cultural study involved initial translation, synthesis of translations, back-translation, Committee of Experts, and pre-test. The sample consisted of 95 primary caregivers of children with feeding/swallowing disorders classified by Pediatric Dysphagia Evaluation Protocol (PDEP) in mild (n = 9), moderate-severe (n = 40), or profound (n = 46) dysphagia. Reliability and evidence of validity based on test content, response processes, internal structure and the relations to other variables were investigated. Internal consistency, test-retest, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were performed, in addition to the correlation with PedsQL™ Family Impact Module (PedsQL^TMFIM). The pre-test participants did not report any difficulties in understanding the translated version. The Brazilian Portuguese version of FS-IS (Pt-Br-FS-IS) presented Cronbach's Alpha of 0.83, Exploratory Factor Analysis verified that the instrument would not be unifactorial (KMO = 0.74 and Bartlett's sphericity test p < 0.001) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the original model in three subscales with χ²/df = 1.23, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.90, RMSEA (90% CI) 0.049 (0.011-0.073) adjustment indexes and the ICC was excellent in all subscales and total score. The correlation with PedsQL™FIM was significant in the total score and subscales. This study successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted the FS-IS instrument to the Brazilian Portuguese language and the investigation of its reliability and validity evidence suggests that the Pt-Br-FS-IS is a reliable and valid tool to measure the impact of feeding/swallowing disorders on the quality of life of caregivers of affected children.

Assessment of Bulbar Function in Adult Patients with 5q-SMA Type 2 and 3 under Treatment with Nusinersen

The antisense oligonucleotide nusinersen has been shown to improve trunk and limb motor function in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Bulbar dysfunction, which is regularly present in SMA, is not captured by standard motor scores, and validated measurement instruments to assess it have not yet been established. Data on whether and how bulbar function changes under gene-based therapies in adult SMA patients are also unavailable. Here, we present data on the course of bulbar dysfunction assessed prospectively before nusinersen treatment initiation and 6 and 14 months later in 23 adult SMA patients using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) and the bulbar subscore of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R). While no improvement in bulbar scores was observed under treatment with nusinersen, the absence of a decline still implies a therapeutic effect of nusinersen on bulbar dysfunction. The results of this study aim to contribute to a standardized assessment of bulbar function in adult SMA patients, which may show therapeutic effects of gene-based therapies that are not evident from standard motor scores.

Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Questionnaires for Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life with Dysphagia in Different Countries: A Systematic Review

Dysphagia can have devastating and long-lasting effects on the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In recent years, a number of questionnaires for the evaluation of the HRQoL of patients with dysphagia have been developed and have been adapted for use in different countries and cultures. However, problems may arise in the process of cultural adaptation and validation, which can affect the quality of the questionnaires and their measurements. This study was conducted to systematically summarize the cultural adaptation and validation of questionnaires for the evaluation of dysphagia-related HRQoL in different countries, assessing the varieties, measurement properties, and qualities of these questionnaires, with the aim of identifying the status of their adaptation and validation and ways in which they might be improved. Four databases were searched, and relevant articles were screened, with data from eligible reports extracted and reviewed. The methodological quality of the included articles was evaluated using the QualSyst critical appraisal tool. The HRQoL questionnaires for patients with dysphagia were assessed using the quality criteria for the measurement properties of health status questionnaires proposed by Terwee et al. and Timmerman et al. 29 studies published between 2008 and 2020 were included. The questionnaires described in these 29 studies were translated into 19 languages and culturally adapted to 21 countries. The adapted questionnaires were based on the Swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) by Mchorney et al., the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) by Silbergleit et al., the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) by Chen et al., and the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) by Belafsky et al. It was found that the questionnaires were reliable and valid instruments for the assessment of dysphagia-related HRQoL, but the quality criteria for cultural adaptation and validation were not strictly followed, especially in the categories of criterion validity, agreement, responsiveness, and interpretability. In conclusion, although the questionnaires were found to be both reliable and valid, the quality criteria should be considered and strictly followed in the cultural adaptation and validation process in the future.

[The German Sydney Swallow Questionnaire : Reliability and validity in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia]

BACKGROUND

The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) is a self-report inventory assessing subjective symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia with strong content, construct, discriminant, and predictive validity and test-retest reliability in a range of patient populations.

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this work was to assess the validity and reliability of the German version of the SSQ (SSQ-G).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a cross-validation study, 48 adult German-speaking patients (12 women, 36 men) with neurogenic (n = 16), structural (n = 16), and functional (n = 16) oropharyngeal dysphagia were assessed with the SSQ‑G and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Cronbach's α was applied to assess the reliability. Criteria and construct validity were investigated using the Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

With Cronbach's α = 0.94, the internal consistency of the SSQ‑G was excellent. The SSQ‑G questions 1 and 17 showed a moderately significant and highly significant correlation coefficient of -0.43 and -0.45, respectively, with MDADI question 1 (p < 0.5, p < 0.001). Between questions 8, 11, and 12 of the SSQ‑G and questions 7, 13, and 10 of the MDADI, coefficients of -0.48 to -0.55 showed a moderate to strong highly significant correlation (p < 0.001). Thus, the reliability and criterion and construct validity were statistically confirmed.

CONCLUSION

The German version of the SSQ (SSQ-G) allows a reliable and valid assessment of functional swallowing difficulties. In combination with questionnaires on symptom-specific quality of life, such as the MDADI, a more differentiated clinical analysis of swallowing problems is thus possible.

The presence of dysphagia in patients with cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS): a subjective and objective study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of dysphagia in patients with cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS), characterizing this condition, both in its objective dimension and in terms of quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was developed in 11 patients diagnosed of CANVAS. In all patients, clinical records were reviewed and the Eating assessment tool 10 (EAT-10) was performed as screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia. To evaluate the QoL impairment secondary to dysphagia, we applied the swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). To evaluate the deglutition mechanisms impaired, two objective-instrumental studies were performed: the volume-viscosity swallow test (V-VST) and the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).

RESULTS

82% of the patients presented an abnormal EAT-10 score. A correlation was found between the EAT-10 and MDADI and between both QoL questionnaires. After the FEES and V-VST analysis, all 11 patients presented some degree of swallow effectiveness impairment, and most of them safety alterations as well.

CONCLUSION

CANVAS remains an underestimated and underdiagnosed condition and the prevalence of swallowing disorders in those patients is higher than expected. Despite the possibility that EAT-10 works as a useful screening test to predict the results in the QoL questionnaires, the absence of correlation between QoL test and instrumental results suggests that to properly evaluate the patients swallowing status, objective instrumental procedures must be conducted.

[Late toxicity following primary conservative treatment : Dysphagia and xerostomia]

Dysphagia and xerostomia are still among the most important acute and late side effects of radiotherapy. Technical developments over the past two decades have led to improved diagnostics and recognition as well as understanding of the causes of these side effects. Based on these findings and advances in both treatment planning and irradiation techniques, the incidence and severity of treatment-associated radiogenic late sequelae could be clearly reduced by the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), which could contribute to marked long-term improvements in the quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Highly conformal techniques, such as proton therapy have the potential to further reduce treatment-associated side effects in head and neck oncology and are currently being prospectively tested within clinical trial protocols at several centers.

Quality of care in dysphagia patients: adaptation and validation of the Swedish SWAL-CARE questionnaire

Background

The aim of this study was to adapt the instrument and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Swallowing Quality of Care questionnaire (S-SWAL-CARE) in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Methods

Translation and adaptation of the original SWAL-CARE into Swedish was performed according to established international guidelines. Field testing was performed using 100 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia due to multiple reasons such as head and neck cancer and neurologic/neuromuscular disease, who had undergone swallowing evaluation within 6 months prior to the study. The patients answered the S-SWAL-CARE, the Quality from the Patient’s Perspective (QPP) and the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL). Test–retest was performed in 20% of the participants. The reliability and validity of the S-SWAL-CARE were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient and Cronbach’s alpha as well as convergent and discriminative validity, respectively.

Results

The field testing of the S-SWAL-CARE resulted in sufficient reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha values exceeding 0.90 for all domains. All items correlated strongly to their own domain, with weaker correlations to the other domains, indicating proper scale structure. Results also indicate sufficient convergent and discriminant validity when tested for association to the QPP domains and the SWAL-QOL Total score. The test–retest reliability of the S-SWAL-CARE demonstrated sufficient intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the General advice domain (0.73) and Clinical advice domain (0.82). The ICC for the Patient satisfaction domain was lower (0.44).

Conclusion

The S-SWAL-CARE can be considered a reliable and valid tool to assess the dysphagia-related quality of care in a mixed Swedish dysphagia patient population.

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Mandarin Version of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire

Swallowing disorders can adversely affect quality of life (QOL). To develop the Chinese version of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (ChSWAL-QOL) and evaluate its reliability and validity, the ChSWAL-QOL was generated by forward translation of the original SWAL-QOL, backward translation, cultural adaptation, and revision using the Delphi method. The ChSWAL-QOL was administered to 376 patients with dysphagia treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between November 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability. Content validity was assessed using the content validity index (CVI). Structural validity was evaluated by exploratory factor and confirmatory factor analyses. The 44-item, 11-dimension of ChSWAL-QOL was considered semantically relevant, clearly expressed and easy to understand in a preliminary study. The final analysis included 360 of 376 questionnaires (95.7%). Cronbach's α was 0.906 for the whole scale and ranged from 0.815 to 1.000 for the individual dimensions, and the test-retest reliability was 0.847, indicating that the ChSWAL-QOL had excellent internal consistency. CVI was 0.964 overall and ranged from 0.870 to 1.000 for the individual dimensions. Exploratory factor analysis identified a dysphagia-related component (psychological burden, feeding duration, swallowing symptoms, eating desire, communication, feeding fear, mental health, and social function) and a generic component (fatigue and sleep) explaining 52.8% and 10.8% of the variance, respectively. The ChSWAL-QOL has excellent reliability and validity. This scale could be used as a tool to assess the QOL of patients with dysphagia in mainland China.

Swallowing-related quality of life among oral-feeding Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease - a preliminary study using Chinese SWAL-QOL

PURPOSE

The objective of the present study is to evaluate swallowing-related quality of life in Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) using the validated Chinese version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (C-SWAL-QOL) and factors associated with swallowing-related quality of life, including age, disease duration, and severity of depression by 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale in Chinese version (GDS-C).

METHODS

C-SWAL-QOL was administered to 67 Chinese patients with PD. Upon completion of C-SWAL-QOL, they completed the 15-item GDS-C. Spearman's Rho correlation analyses were performed to examine the relationship between the 10-subscale scores of C-SWAL-QOL and (1) age, (2) disease duration, and (3) depression.

RESULTS

Among the subscales in C-SWAL-QOL, sleep, fatigue, eating duration, and communication were the most severely affected. Significant relationships existed between composite C-SWAL-QOL score, total C-SWAL-QOL score, Dysphagia Symptom Battery (DSB) core, and depression. Significant relationships were also observed between depression and the following subscales: communication, fear, mental health, social functioning, and fatigue. Yet, no relationships existed between score of C-SWAL-QOL and age or disease duration in PD.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the goal of dysphagia intervention is to improve swallowing safety and efficiency and ultimately enhance patients' QOL, clinicians should consider using C-SWAL-QOL in clinical practice to measure swallowing outcomes and to better understand treatment effectiveness.Implications for rehabilitationDysphagia-related patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures such as Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) are the cornerstone to systematically collecting patient-centered data and monitoring rehabilitation outcomes.Based on the scores of Chinese Parkinson's disease (PD) patients in an oral feeding population indicated in the current study, treatment goal and rehabilitation plan can be set.Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease might benefit from a rehabilitation program focusing on the most severely affected subscales in C-SWAL-QOL.

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL)

Introduction

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is a disorder that can have devastating and long lasting effects on a person’s medical, mental and psychosocial well-being, thus negatively impacting quality of life. There is currently no validated dysphagia-specific quality of life instrument in Norway. This project aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the culturally adapted Norwegian version of SWAL-QOL (Nor-SWAL-QOL).

Methods

The original SWAL-QOL was translated into Norwegian according the international translation guidelines. A group of 102 persons with OD and a group of 123 healthy controls were recruited to assess the validity and reliability of the Nor-SWAL-QOL. Correlation analysis of the Nor-SWAL-QOL and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and correlation analysis of OD group and control group Nor-SWAL-QOL subscale scores were computed to determine convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity which help comprise construct validity. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were computed for reliability.

Results

Convergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated between Nor-SWAL-QOL subscales and SF-36 domains, and distinguished between persons with and those without oropharyngeal dysphagia on all subscales and on the symptom frequency battery (p < 0.001). Additionally, the Nor-SWAL-QOL differentiated between symptom severity levels within the OD group; those requiring food and liquid modifications and those who are tube fed and not tube fed. Nor-SWAL-QOL showed good reliability with adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s α ≥0.70), test-retest reliability (Spearman’s rho values 0.68–0.90) and ICC values (0.67–0.89) for all subscales and for the symptom frequency battery.

Conclusion

Access to valid and reliable dysphagia-specific QoL outcome measures for health care practitioners, dysphagia clinicians and researchers is necessary for comprehensive assessment and treatment outcome measures. The Nor-SWAL-QOL exhibits sufficient psychometric properties for implementation in the Norwegian population.

Coordination and timing deficits in speech and swallowing in autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS)

BACKGROUND

Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) is a rare early onset neurodegenerative disease that typically results in ataxia, upper motor neuron dysfunction and sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. Dysarthria and dysphagia are anecdotally described as key features of ARSACS but the nature, severity and impact of these deficits in ARSACS are not known. A comprehensive quantitative and qualitative characterization of speech and swallowing function will support diagnostics, provide insights into the underlying pathology, and guide day-to-day clinical management.

METHODS

11 consecutive non-Quebec ARSACS patients were recruited, and compared to healthy participants from several published and unpublished cohorts. A comprehensive behavioural assessment including objective acoustic analysis and expert perceptual ratings of motor speech, the Clinical Assessment of Dysphagia in Neurodegeneration (CADN), videofluoroscopy and standardized tests of dysarthria and swallowing related quality of life was conducted.

RESULTS

Speech in this ARSACS cohort is characterized by pitch breaks, prosodic deficits including reduced rate and prolonged intervals, and articulatory deficits. The swallowing profile was characterized by delayed initiation of the swallowing reflex and late epiglottic closure. Four out of ten patients were observed aspirating thin liquids on videofluoroscopy. Patients report that they regularly cough or choke on thin liquids and solids during mealtimes. Swallowing and speech-related quality of life was worse than healthy controls on all domains except sleep.

CONCLUSIONS

The dysphagia and dysarthria profile of this ARSACS cohort reflects impaired coordination and timing. Dysphagia contributes to a significant impairment in functional quality of life in ARSACS, and appears to manifest distinctly from other ARSACS dysfunctions such as ataxia or spasticity.