1
|
Lopez-Lopez V, Morise Z, Albaladejo-González M, Gavara CG, Goh BKP, Koh YX, Paul SJ, Hilal MA, Mishima K, Krürger JAP, Herman P, Cerezuela A, Brusadin R, Kaizu T, Lujan J, Rotellar F, Monden K, Dalmau M, Gotohda N, Kudo M, Kanazawa A, Kato Y, Nitta H, Amano S, Valle RD, Giuffrida M, Ueno M, Otsuka Y, Asano D, Tanabe M, Itano O, Minagawa T, Eshmuminov D, Herrero I, Ramírez P, Ruipérez-Valiente JA, Robles-Campos R, Wakabayashi G. Explainable artificial intelligence prediction-based model in laparoscopic liver surgery for segments 7 and 8: an international multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2411-2422. [PMID: 38315197 PMCID: PMC11078826 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10681-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more useful as a decision-making and outcomes predictor tool. We have developed AI models to predict surgical complexity and the postoperative course in laparoscopic liver surgery for segments 7 and 8. METHODS We included patients with lesions located in segments 7 and 8 operated by minimally invasive liver surgery from an international multi-institutional database. We have employed AI models to predict surgical complexity and postoperative outcomes. Furthermore, we have applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to make the AI models interpretable. Finally, we analyzed the surgeries not converted to open versus those converted to open. RESULTS Overall, 585 patients and 22 variables were included. Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) showed the highest performance for predicting surgery complexity and Random Forest (RF) for predicting postoperative outcomes. SHAP detected that MLP and RF gave the highest relevance to the variables "resection type" and "largest tumor size" for predicting surgery complexity and postoperative outcomes. In addition, we explored between surgeries converted to open and non-converted, finding statistically significant differences in the variables "tumor location," "blood loss," "complications," and "operation time." CONCLUSION We have observed how the application of SHAP allows us to understand the predictions of AI models in surgical complexity and the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic liver surgery in segments 7 and 8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Lopez-Lopez
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Zeniche Morise
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan
| | | | - Concepción Gomez Gavara
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona Autonomic University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ye Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sijberden Jasper Paul
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Kohei Mishima
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Jaime Arthur Pirola Krürger
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paulo Herman
- Serviço de Cirurgia do Fígado, Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alvaro Cerezuela
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Roberto Brusadin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Takashi Kaizu
- Department of General, Pediatric and Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Juan Lujan
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mar Dalmau
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona Autonomic University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Masashi Kudo
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Akishige Kanazawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nitta
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Satoshi Amano
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | | | - Mario Giuffrida
- General Surgery Unit, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Masaki Ueno
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama City, Wakayama, Japan
| | | | - Daisuke Asano
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Itano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takuya Minagawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Dilmurodjon Eshmuminov
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irene Herrero
- Department of Surgery, Getafe University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Ramírez
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vitale A, Angelico R, Sensi B, Lai Q, Kauffmann E, Scalera I, Serenari M, Ginesini M, Romano P, Furlanetto A, D'Amico F. What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in Treating Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Cirrhosis? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:966. [PMID: 38473327 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) has been slowly introduced in the past two decades and today represents a major weapon in the fight against HCC, for several reasons. This narrative review conveys the major emerging concepts in the field. The rise in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)-related HCC means that patients with significant cardiovascular risk will benefit more profoundly from MILS. The advent of efficacious therapy is leading to conversion from non-resectable to resectable cases, and therefore more patients will be able to undergo MILS. In fact, resection outcomes with MILS are superior compared to open surgery both in the short and long term. Furthermore, indications to surgery may be further expanded by its use in Child B7 patients and by the use of laparoscopic ablation, a curative technique, instead of trans-arterial approaches in cases not amenable to radiofrequency. Therefore, in a promising new approach, multi-parametric treatment hierarchy, MILS is hierarchically superior to open surgery and comes second only to liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Vitale
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Roberta Angelico
- Transplant and HPB Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Transplant and HPB Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, AUO Policlinico I of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Kauffmann
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Irene Scalera
- Unità di Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianti di Fegato, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Michael Ginesini
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Romano
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Furlanetto
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Padua University, 35122 Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco D'Amico
- Unità di Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianti di Fegato, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krenzien F, Schmelzle M, Pratschke J, Feldbrügge L, Liu R, Liu Q, Zhang W, Zhao JJ, Tan HL, Cipriani F, Hoogteijling TJ, Aghayan DL, Fretland ÅA, Siow TF, Lim C, Scatton O, Herman P, Coelho FF, Marino MV, Mazzaferro V, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Choi SH, Lee JH, Gastaca M, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Dalla Valle B, Ruzzenente A, Yong CC, Chen Z, Yin M, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Morise Z, Di Benedetto F, Brustia R, Dalla Valle R, Boggi U, Geller D, Belli A, Memeo R, Gruttadauria S, Mejia A, Park JO, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Robles-Campos R, Wang X, Sutcliffe RP, Hasegawa K, Tang CN, Chong CCN, Lee KF, Meurs J, D'Hondt M, Monden K, Lopez-Ben S, Kingham TP, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Pascual F, Cherqui D, Zheng J, Liang X, Soubrane O, Wakabayashi G, Troisi RI, Cheung TT, Kato Y, Sugioka A, Dokmak S, D'Silva M, Han HS, Nghia PP, Long TCD, Hilal MA, Chen KH, Fuks D, Aldrighetti L, Edwin B, Goh BKP. Propensity Score-Matching Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Limited Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: An International Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2024; 279:297-305. [PMID: 37485989 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic limited liver resections (RLLR) versus laparoscopic limited liver resections (LLLR) of the posterosuperior segments. BACKGROUND Both laparoscopic and robotic liver resections have been used for tumors in the posterosuperior liver segments. However, the comparative performance and safety of both approaches have not been well examined in the existing literature. METHODS This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 5446 patients who underwent RLLR or LLLR of the posterosuperior segments (I, IVa, VII, and VIII) at 60 international centers between 2008 and 2021. Data on baseline demographics, center experience and volume, tumor features, and perioperative characteristics were collected and analyzed. Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis (in both 1:1 and 1:2 ratios) was performed to minimize selection bias. RESULTS A total of 3510 cases met the study criteria, of whom 3049 underwent LLLR (87%), and 461 underwent RLLR (13%). After PSM (1:1: and 1:2), RLLR was associated with a lower open conversion rate [10 of 449 (2.2%) vs 54 of 898 (6.0%); P =0.002], less blood loss [100 mL [IQR: 50-200) days vs 150 mL (IQR: 50-350); P <0.001] and a shorter operative time (188 min (IQR: 140-270) vs 222 min (IQR: 158-300); P <0.001]. These improved perioperative outcomes associated with RLLR were similarly seen in a subset analysis of patients with cirrhosis-lower open conversion rate [1 of 136 (0.7%) vs 17 of 272 (6.2%); P =0.009], less blood loss [100 mL (IQR: 48-200) vs 160 mL (IQR: 50-400); P <0.001], and shorter operative time [190 min (IQR: 141-258) vs 230 min (IQR: 160-312); P =0.003]. Postoperative outcomes in terms of readmission, morbidity and mortality were similar between RLLR and LLLR in both the overall PSM cohort and cirrhosis patient subset. CONCLUSIONS RLLR for the posterosuperior segments was associated with superior perioperative outcomes in terms of decreased operative time, blood loss, and open conversion rate when compared with LLLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Linda Feldbrügge
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qu Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wanguang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center and Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Joseph J Zhao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hwee-Leong Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Davit L Aghayan
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Åsmund A Fretland
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tiing Foong Siow
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Paulo Herman
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabricio F Coelho
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
- Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mikel Gastaca
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, United Hospital of Ancona, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Bernardo Dalla Valle
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chee-Chien Yong
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Zewei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Mengqiu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center-IRCCS-G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatc-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy, Palermo, Italy
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Alejandro Mejia
- The Liver Institute, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - James O Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain & Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gi-Hong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chung-Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C N Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kit-Fai Lee
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Juul Meurs
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe M Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Pascual
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Junhao Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University Paris Cite, Clichy, France
| | - Mizelle D'Silva
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Phan Phuoc Nghia
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vandeputte M, Saveyn T, Lutin B, De Meyere C, Parmentier I, D'Hondt M. Combined Ablation and Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Minimally Invasive Surgical Era. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2023; 33:121-128. [PMID: 36821654 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thermal ablation is an accepted treatment modality for small and central liver tumors. In extensive colorectal liver metastatic disease (CRLM), hepatectomy can be combined with ablation, resulting in a parenchymal-sparing strategy. This may increase salvageability rates in case of recurrence. METHODS All patients with advanced CRLM that underwent combined ablation and resection between April 2012 and April 2021, were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Primary endpoints include postoperative 30-day morbidity and ablation-site recurrence (ASR). The surgical approaches were compared. Ablated lesions were screened for ASR on postoperative follow-up imaging. RESULTS Of 54 patients that underwent combined ablation and resection, 32 (59.3%) were performed through a minimally invasive approach. Eleven (20.4%) were minor resections, 32 (59.3%) were technically major and 11 (20.4%) were anatomically major resections. Twelve complications occurred (22.2%), among which 2 (3.8%) major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa). Ninety-day mortality rate was 1.9%. Out of 82 ablated lesions, 6 ASRs (11.1%) occurred. Median blood loss was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group, compared with open [90 mL (32.5 to 200) vs. 200 mL (100 to 400), P =0.005]. Pringle maneuver was significantly performed less in the minimally invasive group [8 (25.0%) vs. 16 (72.7%), P =0.001], but took more time [36.1 min (±15.6) vs. 21.6 (±9.9); P =0.011]. Short-term (1 y) overall and disease-free survival were respectively 81.4% and 50.0%. CONCLUSION Combining microwave ablation and liver resection is a feasible and safe parenchymal-sparing technique, through both minimally invasive and open approach for treating extended CRLM disease. It has a low ablation-related complication rate and acceptable ablation-site recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Departments of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ding DY, Liu L, Lin KY, Gan XJ, Guo XG, Ding WB, Sun DP, Li W, Tao QF, Gu FM, Guo WX, Zeng YY, Zhou WP, Yuan SX. Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for BCLC stage A large hepatocellular carcinoma patients in difficult segments: A two-centre, propensity score matching analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1095357. [PMID: 36969010 PMCID: PMC10038276 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1095357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe differences in short- and long-term outcome between laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) for BCLC stage A large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in difficult segments (I, IVa, VII, VIII) remain unclear. This PSM two-centre study aimed to compare perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of LLR with OLR for this HCC.MethodsHCC patients with BCLC stage A who underwent OLR or LLR in two medical centres were enrolled in the study. PSM analysis was performed to match patients between the LLR cohort and OLR cohort. Survival was analysed based on the Kaplan–Meier method. Independent risk factors were identified by Cox regression.ResultsAfter PSM, 35 patients remained in the LLR cohort, and 84 remained in the OLR cohort. Patients in the LLR cohort had more intraoperative blood loss (p=0.036) and shorter hospital stays after surgery (p<0.001). The LLR cohort and OLR cohort had no difference in intraoperative blood transfusion, surgical margin or postoperative short-term outcomes. The OS and RFS were not significantly different between the two cohorts. The OS and RFS of these two cohorts were not different in the subgroup analysis. Surgical margin was identified as an independent risk factor for tumour recurrence.ConclusionFor BCLC stage A large HCC patients with lesions in difficult segments, LLR was feasible and had shorter hospital stay than OLR. In addition, a surgical margin ≥1 cm could significantly decrease the recurrence probability for large HCC located in different segments without compromising short-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-yang Ding
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Liu
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kong-ying Lin
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiao-jie Gan
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xing-gang Guo
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-bin Ding
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Da-peng Sun
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Li
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi-fei Tao
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fang-ming Gu
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-xing Guo
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Wei-ping Zhou, ; Sheng-xian Yuan, ; Yong-yi Zeng, ; Wei-xing Guo,
| | - Yong-yi Zeng
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Wei-ping Zhou, ; Sheng-xian Yuan, ; Yong-yi Zeng, ; Wei-xing Guo,
| | - Wei-ping Zhou
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Wei-ping Zhou, ; Sheng-xian Yuan, ; Yong-yi Zeng, ; Wei-xing Guo,
| | - Sheng-xian Yuan
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Wei-ping Zhou, ; Sheng-xian Yuan, ; Yong-yi Zeng, ; Wei-xing Guo,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pure robotic major hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction for hepatobiliary malignancies: first European results. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09863-5. [PMID: 36759354 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09863-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined liver and bile duct resection with biliary reconstruction for hepatobiliary malignancies are defined as highly complex surgical procedures. The robotic platform may overcome some major limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery for these complex cases but its precise role is however still to be defined. METHODS In our institution, patients requiring major hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction for malignancies were consecutively selected for minimally invasive robotic surgery from September 2020. All surgeries were undertaken using the da Vinci Xi Surgical System® (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Intra-operative technique and postoperative outcome were analyzed. RESULTS A total number of 10 patients (3 males and 7 females, median age 72 years) underwent robotic major hepatectomy and bile duct resection for hepatobiliary malignancies between September 2020 and March 2022. The indication for surgery was perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in 5 of 10 patients. Median operative time was 338 min and median blood loss was 110 mL. Postoperative length of stay was between 3 and 16 days (median: 9 days). There was no postoperative 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS A robotic approach for hepatobiliary malignancies requiring combined major hepatectomy and bile duct resection seems feasible and safe in experienced hands.
Collapse
|
7
|
Tian F, Leng S, Chen J, Cao Y, Cao L, Wang X, Li X, Wang J, Zheng S, Li J. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center 10-year experience. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1112380. [PMID: 36761978 PMCID: PMC9905741 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1112380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased. However, the long-term outcomes of LLR for HCCs should be validated further. Besides, the validity of laparoscopic minor liver resection in difficult segments (1, 4a, 7, 8) (LMLR-DS) and laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) for HCCs need to be studied. Methods A total of 1773 HCC patients were collected: 683 received LLR and 1090 received OLR. Propensity score matching (PSM) with 1:1 ratio was used to eliminate the selection bias. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. In subgroup analyses, the validity of LMLR-DS or LMH for HCCs was studied. Results After PSM, 567 patients were in LLR or OLR group. LLR had lower intraoperative blood-loss and shorter postoperative hospital-stays than OLR. The postoperative complications were lower in LLR group (23.8% vs. 32.8%, P=0.001). The Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) had no significant difference between LLR and OLR groups (P=0.973, P=0.812). The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OR rates were 87.9%, 68.9%, and 57.7% for LLR group, and 85.9%, 68.8%, 58.8% for OLR group. The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 73.0%, 51.5%, 40.6% for LLR group, and 70.3%, 49.0%, 42.4% for OLR group. In subgroup analyses, 178 patients were in LMLR-DS or open surgery (OMLR-DS) group after PSM. LMLR-DS had lower intraoperative blood-loss and shorter postoperative hospital-stays than OMLR-DS. The postoperative complications were lower in LMLR-DS group. The OS and DFS had no difference between LMLR-DS and OMLR-DS groups. The cumulative 5-year OR and DFS rates were 61.6%, 43.9% for LMLR-DS group, and 66.5%, 47.7% for OMLR-DS group. In another subgroup analyses, 115 patients were in LMH or open major hepatectomy (OMH) group. LMH had lower blood-loss and shorter postoperative hospital-stays than OMH. The complications, OS and DFS had no significantly differences between two groups. The cumulative 5-year OR and DFS rates were 44.3%, 29.9% for LMH group, and 44.7%, 33.2% for OMH group. Conclusions LLR for HCCs showed better short-term outcomes and comparable long-term outcomes with OLR, even for patients who received LMLR-DS or LMH. LLR could be reliable and recommended for HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Tian
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Songyao Leng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China,Department of General Surgery, The First People’s Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, Sichuan, China
| | - Jian Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yong Cao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Cao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiaojun Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Juan Wang
- Clinical Skills Training Center, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China,*Correspondence: Jianwei Li, ; Shuguo Zheng, ; Juan Wang,
| | - Shuguo Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China,*Correspondence: Jianwei Li, ; Shuguo Zheng, ; Juan Wang,
| | - Jianwei Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China,*Correspondence: Jianwei Li, ; Shuguo Zheng, ; Juan Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
D’Silva M, Han HS, Liu R, Kingham TP, Choi GH, Syn NLX, Prieto M, Choi SH, Sucandy I, Chiow AKH, Marino MV, Efanov M, Lee JH, Sutcliffe RP, Chong CCN, Tang CN, Cheung TT, Pratschke J, Wang X, Park JO, Chan CY, Scatton O, Rotellar F, Troisi RI, D’Hondt M, Fuks D, Goh BKP, Gastaca M, Schotte H, De Meyere C, Lai EC, Krenzien F, Schmelzle M, Kadam P, Giglio M, Montalti R, Liu Q, Lee KF, Lee LS, Jang JY, Lim C, Labadie KP. Limited liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: international multicentre propensity score-matched and coarsened exact-matched analysis comparing the laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1140-1149. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Limited liver resections (LLRs) for tumours located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver are technically demanding procedures. This study compared outcomes of robotic (R) and laparoscopic (L) LLR for tumours located in the posterosuperior liver segments (IV, VII, and VIII).
Methods
This was an international multicentre retrospective analysis of patients who underwent R-LLR or L-LLR at 24 centres between 2010 and 2019. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were analysed; 1 : 3 propensity score matching (PSM) and 1 : 1 coarsened exact matching (CEM) were performed.
Results
Of 1566 patients undergoing R-LLR and L-LLR, 983 met the study inclusion criteria. Before matching, 159 R-LLRs and 824 L-LLRs were included. After 1 : 3 PSM of 127 R-LLRs and 381 L-LLRs, comparison of perioperative outcomes showed that median blood loss (100 (i.q.r. 40–200) versus 200 (100–500) ml; P = 0.003), blood loss of at least 500 ml (9 (7.4 per cent) versus 94 (27.6 per cent); P < 0.001), intraoperative blood transfusion rate (4 (3.1 per cent) versus 38 (10.0 per cent); P = 0.025), rate of conversion to open surgery (1 (0.8 per cent) versus 30 (7.9 per cent); P = 0.022), median duration of Pringle manoeuvre when applied (30 (20–46) versus 40 (25–58) min; P = 0.012), and median duration of operation (175 (130–255) versus 224 (155–300); P < 0.001) were lower in the R-LLR group compared with the L-LLR group. After 1 : 1 CEM of 104 R-LLRs with 104 L-LLRs, R-LLR was similarly associated with significantly reduced blood loss and a lower rate of conversion to open surgery.
Conclusion
Based on a matched analysis of well selected patients, both robotic and laparoscopic access could be undertaken safely with good outcomes for tumours in the posterosuperior liver segments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizelle D’Silva
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul , Korea
| | - Ho Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul , Korea
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery , First Medical Centre of Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing , China
| | - Thomas Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York , USA
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul , Korea
| | - Nicholas Li Xun Syn
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore , Singapore
| | - Mikel Prieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country , Bilbao , Spain
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Centre, CHA University School of Medicine , Seongnam , Korea
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute , Tampa, Florida , USA
| | - Adrian Kah Heng Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital , Singapore
| | - Marco Vito Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy and Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital , Palermo , Italy
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Centre , Moscow , Russia
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul , Korea
| | - Robert Peter Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , UK
| | - Charing Ching Ning Chong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong , New Territories Hong Kong , China
| | - Chung Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital , Hong Kong , China
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong , China
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health , Berlin , Germany
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University , Shanghai , China
| | - James Oh Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle , Washington , USA
| | - Chung Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-National University Singapore Medical School , Singapore
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary–Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Pitie-Salpetriere, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université , Paris , France
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra and Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA) , Pamplona , Spain
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples , Naples , Italy
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital , Kortrijk , Belgium
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes , Paris , France
| | - Brian Kim Poh Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-National University Singapore Medical School , Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lopez-Lopez V, López-Conesa A, Brusadin R, Perez-Flores D, Navarro-Barrios Á, Gomez-Valles P, Cayuela V, Robles-Campos R. Pure laparoscopic vs. hand-assisted liver surgery for segments 7 and 8: propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:4470-4478. [PMID: 34697682 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08800-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection of tumors located in segments 7 and 8 are considered a complex resection. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of patients operated by pure laparoscopic (PLS) vs hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS). METHODS From January 2003 to January 2021, we included patients with minimally invasive surgery for lesions located in segments 7 and 8. To overcome selection bias, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) between HALS and PLS cohorts, including 30 patients in each of the groups. Of the 60 patients who underwent PSM, we compared the first 30 patients with the following 30 patients. RESULTS A total of 79 LLRs were performed, 46 by HALS and 33 by PLS. After PSM, in the PLS cohort, cirrhosis was more frequent (33.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.02). The surgical time, blood loss, Pringle maneuver, clamping time, and morbidity were similar between both groups, but with a lower hospital stay in the PLS group (3 days vs. 4 days, p < 0.01). In the first 30 patients who underwent LLR, the use of PLS was lower than the use of HALS, increasing due to the learning curve (16.7% in the first period vs. 83.3% in the second period; p < 0.01). The hospital stay was lower in the second period due to the more frequent use of PLS (3 vs. 4 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION PLS presents similar intraoperative and early postoperative results with lower hospital stay for lesions located in segments 7 and 8 compared to HALS. In centers with experience in LLRs, PLS could be performed safely in these segments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Víctor Lopez-Lopez
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Asunción López-Conesa
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Roberto Brusadin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Álvaro Navarro-Barrios
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Paula Gomez-Valles
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Valentín Cayuela
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, Nuytens F, Vanneste G, Libbrecht L, Alaerts H, Parmentier I, Verslype C, D’Hondt M. Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: retrospective analysis of prognostic factors and oncological outcomes in a single-center cohort. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:2399-2414. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02534-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
|
11
|
Kuemmerli C, Fichtinger RS, Moekotte A, Aldrighetti LA, Aroori S, Besselink MGH, D’Hondt M, Díaz-Nieto R, Edwin B, Efanov M, Ettorre GM, Menon KV, Sheen AJ, Soonawalla Z, Sutcliffe R, Troisi RI, White SA, Brandts L, van Breukelen GJP, Sijberden J, Pugh SA, Eminton Z, Primrose JN, van Dam R, Hilal MA. Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:206. [PMID: 35264216 PMCID: PMC8908665 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06112-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A shift towards parenchymal-sparing liver resections in open and laparoscopic surgery emerged in the last few years. Laparoscopic liver resection is technically feasible and safe, and consensus guidelines acknowledge the laparoscopic approach in the posterosuperior segments. Lesions situated in these segments are considered the most challenging for the laparoscopic approach. The aim of this trial is to compare the postoperative time to functional recovery, complications, oncological safety, quality of life, survival and costs after laparoscopic versus open parenchymal-sparing liver resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery setting. METHODS The ORANGE Segments trial is an international multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial conducted in centres experienced in laparoscopic liver resection. Eligible patients for minor resections in the posterosuperior segments will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to undergo laparoscopic or open resections in an enhanced recovery setting. Patients and ward personnel are blinded to the treatment allocation until postoperative day 4 using a large abdominal dressing. The primary endpoint is time to functional recovery. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative outcomes, length of stay, resection margin, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, time to adjuvant chemotherapy initiation, quality of life and overall survival. Laparoscopic liver surgery of the posterosuperior segments is hypothesised to reduce time to functional recovery by 2 days in comparison with open surgery. With a power of 80% and alpha of 0.04 to adjust for interim analysis halfway the trial, a total of 250 patients are required to be randomised. DISCUSSION The ORANGE Segments trial is the first multicentre international randomised controlled study to compare short- and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open resections in the posterosuperior segments within an enhanced recovery programme. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03270917 . Registered on September 1, 2017. Before start of inclusion. PROTOCOL VERSION version 12, May 9, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Kuemmerli
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
| | - Robert S. Fichtinger
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Alma Moekotte
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
| | | | - Somaiah Aroori
- Peninsula HPB Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Marc G. H. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Rafael Díaz-Nieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Giuseppe M. Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Aali J. Sheen
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Zahir Soonawalla
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roberto I. Troisi
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Steven A. White
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lloyd Brandts
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard J. P. van Breukelen
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Siân A. Pugh
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Zina Eminton
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - John N. Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ronald van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
| | - on behalf of the ORANGE trials collaborative
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Peninsula HPB Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
- Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abu-Zaydeh O, Sawaied M, Berger Y, Mahamid A, Goldberg N, Sadot E, Haddad R. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Is Superior to Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Posterosuperior Segments. Front Surg 2021; 8:746427. [PMID: 34901138 PMCID: PMC8654808 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.746427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) of colorectal metastasis located in posterosuperior segments (1, 4A, 7 and 8) are challenging and highly demanding. The aim of our study is to determine the safety and feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in the resections of the posterosuperior lesions and to compare the peri-operative, short-term and long-term outcomes with the open liver resection (OLR) approach. Methods and Results: A retrospective study of patients who underwent either HALS or OLR for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver between 2008 and 2018 in two university affiliated medical centers. Results: A total of 187 patients were identified, of whom 78 underwent HALS and 109 underwent OLR. There was no difference between the HALS and OLR with regard to preoperative factors (age, primary CRC tumor location, number and anatomical distribution of liver metastasis, pre-operative neo-adjuvant treatment, operative time, blood transfusion rate, and resection margins positivity). On the other hand, HALS compared to OLR had a significantly shorter mean hospital stay (4 vs. 6 days; P = 0.003), and a lower total complications rate (25 vs. 47% P = 0.006). Both groups had no 30-day mortality. Also, patients who underwent HALS vs. OLR had similar liver metastases recurrence (55 vs. 51%. P = 0.65) and 5-year survival (47 vs. 45%. P = 0.72). Conclusions: HALS for mCRC located in posterosuperior liver segments is safe and feasible and it is a preferable approach due to its lower complication rate and shorter hospital stay while not compromising survival and disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muneer Sawaied
- Department of Surgery, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Yael Berger
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ahmad Mahamid
- Department of Surgery, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.,The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Natalia Goldberg
- The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.,Department of Radiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Eran Sadot
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Riad Haddad
- Department of Surgery, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.,The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Impact of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of lesions in the right posterosuperior liver segments on surgical outcomes: A multicenter study based on propensity score analysis. Surgery 2021; 171:1311-1319. [PMID: 34887090 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic lesions is increasingly performed worldwide. However, parenchyma-sparing laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic lesions in the right posterosuperior segments is very technically demanding. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection and open liver resection for hepatic lesions in the right posterosuperior segments. METHODS In total, 617 patients who underwent liver resection of hepatic lesions in the right posterosuperior segments (segment Ⅶ or Ⅷ) at 8 centers were included in this study. We lessened the impact of confounders through propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, and double/debiased machine learning estimations. RESULTS After matching and weighting, the imbalance between the 2 groups significantly decreased. Compared with open liver resection, laparoscopic liver resection was associated with a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications in the matched and weighted cohorts. After surgery, the incidence of pulmonary complication and cardiac disease was lower in the laparoscopic liver resection group than in the open liver resection group in both the matched and weighted cohorts. The odds ratios of laparoscopic liver resection for postoperative complications in the matched and weighted cohorts were 0.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.83) and 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.25%-0.64%), respectively. The double/debiased machine learning risk difference estimator for postoperative complications of laparoscopic liver resection was -19.8% (95% confidence interval, -26.8% to -13.4%). CONCLUSION Parenchyma-sparing laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic lesions in the right posterosuperior segments had clinical benefits, including lower volume of intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
14
|
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Tumors in the Posterosuperior Segments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021; 30:93-105. [PMID: 31929396 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resection for tumors in the posterosuperior segments. METHODS We performed a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards. We conducted a search of electronic information sources to identify all studies comparing outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resection for tumors in the posterosuperior segments. We used the Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. RESULTS We identified 11 observational studies, enrolling a total of 1023 patients. The included population in both groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. Laparoscopic approach was associated with lower risks of total complications [odds ratio (OR): 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33, 0.61; P<0.00001], major complications (Dindo-Clavien III or more) (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.73; P=0.0002), and intraoperative blood loss [mean difference (MD): -114.71; 95% CI: -165.64, -63.79; P<0.0001]. Laparoscopic approach was associated with longer operative time (MD: 50.28; 95% CI: 22.29, 78.27; P=0.0004) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD: -2.01; 95% CI: -2.09, -1.92; P<0.00001) compared with open approach. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of need for blood transfusion (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.75, 2.02; P=0.41), R0 resection (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.81; P=0.72), postoperative mortality (risk difference: -0.00; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.02; P=0.68), and need for readmission (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.19, 2.60; P=0.60). In terms of oncological outcomes, there was no difference between the groups in terms disease recurrence (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.95, 2.63; P=0.08), overall survival (OS) at maximum follow-up (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.81; P=0.73), 1-year OS (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 0.48, 4.92; P=0.47), 3-year OS (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.67, 2.37; P=0.48), 5-year OS (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.41, 1.99; P=0.80), disease-free survival (DFS) at maximum follow-up (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.65, 1.27; P=0.56), 1-year DFS (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.60, 1.81; P=0.88), 3-year DFS (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.75, 1.69; P=0.57), and 5-year DFS (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.44, 1.24; P=0.25). CONCLUSIONS Compared with the open approach in liver resection for tumors in the posterosuperior segments, the laparoscopic approach seems to be associated with a lower risk of postoperative morbidity, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter length of hospital stay with comparable survival and oncological outcomes. The best available evidence is derived from observational studies with moderate quality; therefore, high-quality randomized controlled trials with adequate statistical power are required to provide a more robust basis for definite conclusions.
Collapse
|
15
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, D'Hondt M. The role of the laparoscopic approach in two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:559-568. [PMID: 33537846 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08317-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In selected patients, laparoscopic liver surgery for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) leads to better short-term outcomes and comparable oncologic outcomes in comparison with an open approach. However, its role in two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) remains poorly explored. METHODS A single-center retrospective study was performed to evaluate the role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the first and second stage of TSH. Demographic data, comorbid factors, perioperative outcomes, and short-term outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Between September 2011 and May 2020, 23 patients were planned to undergo a TSH. The first stage hepatectomy (FSH) was performed laparoscopically in 22 patients (96%) without need for conversion. The median blood loss was 50 cc (IQR 30-100 cc) and postoperative length of hospital stay was 4 days (IQR 2.5-5 days). R0 resections were obtained in 18 FSHs (78%), while all others were R1 vascular (22%). Fourteen patients (61%) underwent a second stage hepatectomy (SSH). All SSHs were anatomically major hepatectomies. SSH was performed laparoscopically in 7 patients (50%), with need for conversion in 1 case (14%). The median blood loss was slightly lower in the open liver resection (OLR) group compared to the LLR group (200 cc (IQR 110-375 cc) vs. 240 cc (IQR 150-400 cc), respectively. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 3 days shorter in the LLR group compared to the OLR group (4 days (IQR 3.5-4 days) vs. 7 days (IQR 4.5-8.5 days), respectively). CONCLUSIONS The already proven advantages of LLR in the treatment of CRLM favor the role of a laparoscopic approach in TSH for CRLM. In first stage minor or technically major hepatectomy, LLR is progressively becoming the gold standard. Laparoscopic second stage anatomically major hepatectomy is feasible in experienced hands, but should be limited to selected cases and should be performed in expert centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Taillieu
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schullian P, Johnston E, Laimer G, Putzer D, Eberle G, Amann A, Effenberger M, Maglione M, Freund MC, Loizides A, Bale R. Frequency and risk factors for major complications after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors in 1235 ablation sessions: a 15-year experience. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:3042-3052. [PMID: 33125554 PMCID: PMC8043912 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07409-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To assess the frequency of major complications after multi-probe stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) in a large cohort of patients over 15 years and to elucidate risk factors for adverse events. Materials and methods A retrospective study was carried out between July 2003 and December 2018. Seven hundred ninety-three consecutive patients (median 65.0 years (0.3–88), 241 women and 552 men, were treated in 1235 SRFA sessions for 2475 primary and metastatic liver tumors with a median tumor size of 3.0 cm (0.5–18 cm). The frequency of major complications was evaluated according to SIR guidelines and putative predictors of adverse events analyzed using simple and multivariable logistic regression. Results Thirty-day mortality after SRFA was 0.5% (6/1235) with an overall major complication rate of 7.4% (91/1235). The major complication rate decreased from 11.5% (36/314) (before January 2011) to 6.0% (55/921) (p = 0.001). 50.5% (46/91) of major complications were successfully treated in the same anesthetic session by angiographic coiling for hemorrhage and chest tube insertion for pneumothorax. History of bile duct surgery/intervention, number of coaxial needles, and location of tumors in segment IVa or VIII were independent prognostic factors for major complications following multivariable logistic regression analysis. Simple logistic regression revealed the number of tumors, tumor size, location close to the diaphragm, tumor conglomerate, and segment VII as other significant predictors. Conclusion SRFA of liver tumors is safe and can extend the treatment spectrum of conventional RFA. Adaptations over time combined with increasing experience resulted in a significant decrease in complications. Key Points • In 1235 ablation sessions in 793 patients over 15 years, we found a mortality rate of 0.5% (6/1235) and an overall major complication rate of 7.4%, which fell from 11.5 (36/314) to 6.0% (55/921, p = 0.001) after January 2011, likely due to procedural adaptations. • History of bile duct surgery/intervention (p = 0.013, OR = 3.290), number of coaxial needles (p = 0.026, OR = 1.052), and location of tumors in segment IVa (p = 0.016, OR = 1.989) or VIII (p = 0.038, OR = 1.635) were found to be independent prognostic factors. • Simple logistic regression revealed that number of tumors, tumor size, location close to the diaphragm, tumor conglomerates, and segment VII were other significant predictors of major complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schullian
- Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Edward Johnston
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, Chelsea, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Gregor Laimer
- Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Daniel Putzer
- Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gernot Eberle
- Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Arno Amann
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maria Effenberger
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Manuel Maglione
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martin C Freund
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alexander Loizides
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Reto Bale
- Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rubinkiewicz M, Mizera M, Małczak P, Gajewska N, Torbicz G, Su M, Karcz K, Pędziwiatr M. Laparoscopic versus open liver resections of posterolateral liver segments - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2020; 15:395-402. [PMID: 32904535 PMCID: PMC7457196 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.94268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic resection has become an accepted approach to liver tumour surgery. However, it is considered difficult, especially in unfavourably located lesions. AIM To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) of posterolateral segments. MATERIAL AND METHODS We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases from inception to 30 September 2019. Full text articles and conference abstracts were included for further analysis. This review follows the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS From 643 articles, 15 studies (N = 1196 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. All of them were non-randomised. Our findings showed that LLR had significantly lowered overall morbidity compared to OLR (MD = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.51-0.86; p = 0.002). Length of hospital stay (MD = 2.48; 95% CI: -3.87, -1.08; p < 0.001) was also shorter in the LLR group. Operative time (MD = 55.65; 95% CI: 24.14-87.16; p < 0.001) was significantly shorter in the OLR group. In terms of blood loss, major complications, R0 resection rates, and resection margin, there were no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis showed that the laparoscopic approach to resections of posterolateral liver segments is beneficial. However, the results are based on non-randomised trials, and further research is needed to fully establish their clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz Rubinkiewicz
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Magdalena Mizera
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Piotr Małczak
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Natalia Gajewska
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Torbicz
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Michael Su
- Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Konrad Karcz
- Clinic of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Michał Pędziwiatr
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gholami S, Judge SJ, Lee SY, Mashayekhi K, Goh BKP, Chan CY, Nuño MA, Gönen M, Balachandran VP, Allen PJ, Drebin JA, Jarnagin WR, D' Angelica MI, Kingham TP. Is minimally invasive surgery of lesions in the right superior segments of the liver justified? A multi-institutional study of 245 patients. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:1428-1434. [PMID: 33459363 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controversy exists regarding the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive resection for lesions in segments 7 or 8. We compare outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and Open parenchymal sparing liver resections at two high-volume centers. METHODS From 2003 to 2016 we identified patients who underwent MIS or Open resections for lesions in segments 7 or 8 at two institutions (MSKCC and SGH). Outcomes were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Two-hundred and forty-five patients underwent resection of lesions in segments 7 or 8 (MIS 30% and Open 70%). Compared to the Open group, the MIS group had longer operative time (223 ± 88 vs 188 ± 72 minutes, P = .003), lower blood loss (297 ± 287 vs 448 ± 670 mL, P = .03), and shorter mean length of stay (5.2 ± 7.4 vs 8.3 ± 11.7 days, P < .001), which remained significant on multivariate analysis. No differences in Pringle time, rate of postoperative complications, or R0 resections were detected. CONCLUSIONS With appropriately selected patients treated by experienced MIS hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons, MIS resection of segments 7 or 8 is safe with similar rates of complications and R0 resections, with significantly less blood loss and shorter length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepideh Gholami
- Department of Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Sean J Judge
- Department of Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Ser-Yee Lee
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Miriam A Nuño
- Department of Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, University of California Davis, Davis, California
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vinod P Balachandran
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeffrey A Drebin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Thomas Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Laparoscopic Liver Resections for Tumors in the Posterosuperior Segments: A Single-center Experience of 174 Consecutive Cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 30:518-521. [PMID: 32769742 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic posterosuperior liver resection is a technically difficult and complex surgery. These patients are seen as poor candidates for laparoscopic surgery. This study aimed to show the safe and effective applicability of the posterosuperior segment resections by experienced surgeons in advanced centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent laparoscopic posterosuperior liver resection between October 2011 and October 2019 at the Groeninge Hospital were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic and perioperative data were obtained from the prospectively maintained database. Resection of at least 3 consecutive Couinaud segments was accepted as a major surgery (trisegmentectomy). Postoperative complications were registered according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS The median age of the 174 patients was 68 years [interquartile range (IQR): 60 to 75]. The semiprone position was used in the majority of operations (82.2%). Nonanatomic resection was performed in more than half of the operations (55.1%). A total of 5 patients underwent major hepatic resection. The median time of surgery was 150 (IQR: 120 to 190) minutes. Median blood loss was determined to be 150 (IQR: 50 to 300) mL. Malignancy was detected in 95% of the cases. The surgical margin was reported to be R0 in 93.3% of the specimens. The median hospitalization time was 4 (IQR: 3 to 6) days. The major complication rate was 1.7%, and only 1 patient died. Overall survival rates for patients who underwent a resection for colorectal liver metastases in the first and fifth years were 97.5% and 62.2%, and disease-free survival rates were 69.8% and 35.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic resections in the posterosuperior segments can be performed safely in experienced hands with good short and long term (oncologial) outcomes.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ban D, Ishikawa Y, Tanabe M. Can robotic liver resection compensate for weaknesses of the laparoscopic approach? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2020; 9:385-387. [PMID: 32509837 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.11.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Ban
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiya Ishikawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Laparoscopic Liver Resection of Segments 7 and 8: from the Initial Restrictions to the Current Indications. THE JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY 2020; 23:5-16. [PMID: 35600734 PMCID: PMC8985615 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2020.23.1.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Since the beginning of laparoscopic liver surgery, resection of the posterosuperior segments has been considered one of the most challenging procedure due to its difficult access. The main drawbacks of the laparoscopic approach to dome lesions are poor visualization, the difficulty of instrumentation and the greater complexity in the control of bleeding. In the evolution of minimally invasive techniques from hybrid techniques to the current purely laparoscopic approaches, the different authors have established gradually the currents indications and surgical techniques to operate these segments with a similar feasibility and safety than open approach. The standardization in the patient position, the use of intercostal trocars, the learning curve in laparoscopic liver surgery, the management of the hepatic blood flow and the refinement of the technique in the extrahepatic and intrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approaches, has allowed to leave behind the initial contraindications about the laparoscopic approach in these segments. In the present review of the literature, the accumulated experience of the different groups in minimally invasive liver surgery together with the technological advances in the different laparoscopic devices have facilitated the resection of tumors in segments 7 and 8 with similar and even better results than open surgery.
Collapse
|
22
|
Cipriani F, Ratti F, Paganelli M, Reineke R, Catena M, Aldrighetti L. Laparoscopic or open approaches for posterosuperior and anterolateral liver resections? A propensity score based analysis of the degree of advantage. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1676-1686. [PMID: 31208900 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benefits over the open technique are demonstrated for laparoscopic liver resections. Whether the degree of advantage is different for anterolateral and posterosuperior resections is investigated in this retrospective study. METHODS Laparoscopic anterolateral and posterosuperior resections (Lap-AL/Lap-PS) were compared with open (Open-AL/Open-PS) after propensity score matching. Mean/median differences of relevant parameters were calculated after bootstrap sampling. The degree of advantage was compared between anterolateral and posterosuperior resections and expressed as delta of differences (Δ-difference). RESULTS 239 Lap-AL were compared with 239 matched Open-AL, and 176 Lap-PS with 176 matched Open-PS. Lap-AL showed reduced blood loss, morbidity, time to orally-controlled pain, mobilization and total stay; Lap-PS showed reduced blood loss, transfusions, morbidity, time to orally-controlled pain, mobilization, functional recovery and total stay. The degree of advantage of Lap-PS resulted significantly greater than Lap-AL blood loss (Δ-difference: 101 mL, p 0.017), transfusions (Δ-difference: 6.3%, p 0.008), morbidity (Δ-difference: 7.6%, p 0.034), time to orally-controlled pain (Δ-difference: 1 day, p 0.020) and functional recovery (Δ-difference: 1 day, p 0.042). CONCLUSIONS While both resulting in benefit, the advantage of laparoscopy is greater for posterosuperior than anterolateral resections. Despite their technical difficulty, these should be considered among the most worthwhile laparoscopic liver resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Paganelli
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Reineke
- Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Catena
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vandeputte M, D'Hondt M, Willems E, De Meyere C, Parmentier I, Vansteenkiste F. Stepwise implementation of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Case series of a single centre's experience. Int J Surg 2019; 72:137-143. [PMID: 31704423 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery still represents a challenge for surgeons. However, in recent decades the experience is expanding. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses confirm that laparoscopic pancreatic resection (LPR) is safe, feasible and worthwhile. This study analyses the first 100 consecutive LPRs in our centre. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted of the first 100 LPRs in a single supra-regional Belgian centre, performed between January 2012 and January 2019. Pre-, peri- and postoperative data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. All procedures were performed laparoscopically by two attending surgeons, specialized in minimally invasive and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. RESULTS Of 100 procedures, 62 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomies (LPD) and 36 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (LDP) were performed, along with 1 enucleation and 1 central pancreatectomy. Indication was malignancy in 70%. Conversion rate was 24,2% in LPD and 11% in LDP. Median operative time was 330 min (IQR 300-360) in LPD and 150 min (IQR 142.5-210) in LDP. Median blood loss was 200 mL (IQR 100-487.5) in LPD and 150 mL (IQR 50-500) in LDP, transfusion rate was 22.6% and 8.3% respectively. Median length of stay (LOS) was 13 days (IQR 10-19.25) in LPD and 9 days (IQR 9-14) in LDP. R0 resection rate was 88.6% (62/70). Major complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV) was 12%. Thirty-day mortality was 0%, 90-day mortality was 2%. CONCLUSION Our results confirm that LPR is a feasible and safe alternative to open pancreatic surgery. Safe implementation with a clear strategy is fundamental to gain experience and overcome the learning curve of this technically demanding procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Vandeputte
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, Kortrijk, Belgium.
| | - Edward Willems
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Parmentier
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Franky Vansteenkiste
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, Kortrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Laparoscopic liver resection for liver tumours in proximity to major vasculature: A single-center comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 46:539-547. [PMID: 31668978 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2019] [Revised: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With growing popularity and experience in laparoscopic liver surgery, the options for more difficult procedures increase. Only small case series have been published regarding laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for tumours in proximity to major vessels (MVs). The aim was to compare outcomes of LLR for tumours located less or more than 15 mm from MVs. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of consecutive LLR (October 2011-August 2017). Proximity to MVs (PMV) was defined as lesions located within 15 mm to the caval vein, hepatic veins and portal vein (main trunk and first branches). The control group were all lesions located more than 15 mm from MVs. RESULTS Some 60/235 LLR were performed for lesions in proximity to major vasculature (24%). In the PMV group, median IWATE Difficulty Score was higher (8.5 (IQR: 6.0-9.0) VS 5.0 (IQR: 3.0-6.0), p < 0.001) as was the use of CUSA® (45.0% VS 8.6%, p < 0.001) and Pringle manoeuvre (8.3% VS 1.7%; p = 0.028). Operative time was longer (180min (IQR: 140-210) VS 120min (IQR: 75-150), p < 0.001) and blood loss was higher (190 ml (IQR: 100-325) VS 75 ml (IQR: 50-220), p < 0.001) in the PMV group. There was no difference in perioperative blood transfusion (3.3% VS 1.7%, p = 0.60) or postoperative morbidity (15.0% VS 14.3%, p = 0.89). There was no mortality in both groups. On mean follow-up of 21 months, no significant differences could be found in disease free (p = 0.77) and overall survival (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION In experienced hands, LLR of lesions in proximity to MVs is safe and feasible with acceptable short and long-term results.
Collapse
|
25
|
Aghayan DL, Fretland ÅA, Kazaryan AM, Sahakyan MA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjørnbeth BA, Flatmark K, Kristiansen R, Edwin B. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection in the posterosuperior segments: a sub-group analysis from the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1485-1490. [PMID: 30962136 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection in the posterosuperior segments is technically challenging. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and open resection of colorectal liver metastases located in the posterosuperior segments. METHODS This was a subgroup analysis of the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial, where 280 patients were randomly assigned to open or laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing liver resections of colorectal metastases. Patients with tumors in the posterosuperior segments were identified, and perioperative outcomes and health related quality of life (HRQoL) were compared. RESULTS We identified a total of 136 patients, 62 in the laparoscopic and 74 in the open group. The postoperative complication rate was 26% in the laparoscopic and 31% in the open group. The blood loss was less in the open group (500 vs. 250 ml, P = 0.006), but the perioperative transfusion rate was similar. The operative time was similar, while postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (2 vs. 4 days, P < 0.001). HRQoL was significantly better after laparoscopy at 1 month. CONCLUSION In patients undergoing laparoscopic or open liver resection of colorectal liver metastases in the posterosuperior segments, laparoscopic surgery was associated with shorter hospital stay and comparable perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
| | - Åsmund A Fretland
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Airazat M Kazaryan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia; Department of Surgery, Fonna Hospital Trust, Stord, Norway; Department of Faculty Surgery №2I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mushegh A Sahakyan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia; Department of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Central Clinical Military Hospital, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Vegar J Dagenborg
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjersti Flatmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Tumor Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ronny Kristiansen
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Department of Information Technology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schullian P, Putzer D, Laimer G, Levy E, Bale R. Feasibility, safety, and long-term efficacy of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation for tumors adjacent to the diaphragm in the hepatic dome: a case-control study. Eur Radiol 2019; 30:950-960. [PMID: 31489472 PMCID: PMC6957558 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06399-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Achievement of adequate treatment margins may be challenging when the target is either difficult to visualize, awkward to access, or situated adjacent to vulnerable structures. Treatment of tumors located close to the diaphragm in the hepatic dome is challenging for percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation for these reasons. The purpose was to assess the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcome of multi-probe stereotactic RF ablation (SRFA) of liver tumors in the subdiaphragmatic area. Methods Between 2006 and 2018, 177 patients (82 HCCs, 6 ICCs, and 89 metastatic tumors) underwent SRFA of 238 tumors abutting the diaphragm in the hepatic dome. For comparison, 177 patients were randomly selected from our database by the R package “MatchIt” for propensity score matching to compare treatment safety and efficacy in this retrospective, single-center study. Results Median treated tumor size was 2.2 cm (range 0.5 to 10 cm). SRFA was primarily successful for 232/238 (97.5%) tumors. Five tumors were successfully retreated, resulting in a secondary technical efficacy rate of 99.6%. Local tumor recurrence developed in 21 of 238 tumors (8.8%). The major ablation complication rate was 10.7% (22 of 204). Twelve (55%) of 22 major complications could be successfully treated by the interventional radiologist in the same anesthesia session. There was no significant difference in adverse events or disease control rates between the subdiaphragmatic tumors and matched controls. Conclusions SRFA is a safe and feasible option in the management of difficult-to-treat tumors abutting the diaphragm in the hepatic dome, with similar safety profile compared with matched controls. Key Points • RFA was primarily successful for 232/238 (97.5%) subdiaphragmatic dome tumors. Local tumor recurrence developed in 21 of 238 tumors (8.8%). • The major complication rate directly related to ablation of the hepatic dome tumors was 10.7% (22 of 204). 12/22 (55%) of major complications could be successfully treated in the same anesthesia session. • There was no significant difference in adverse events or disease control rates between the subdiaphragmatic tumors and matched controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schullian
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Daniel Putzer
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gregor Laimer
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Elliot Levy
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Reto Bale
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Oncology - Microinvasive Therapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for lesions located in posterosuperior segments: a meta-analysis of short-term and oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:3910-3918. [PMID: 31451921 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07071-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for lesions located in posterosuperior (PS) segments remains a matter of development to be further assessed. This systematic review aims to compare the short-term and oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open liver resection (OLR) in PS lesions. METHODS EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library were searched from date of inception to June 2019. This meta-analysis was performed using the STATA 12.0 statistical software. Standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for continuous variables, dichotomous variables and long-term variables, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS A total of 788 patients from eight studies were identified for the final analysis, with 371 patients in the LLR group and 417 in the OLR group. Although the operation time (SMD 0.22; 95% CI 0.08-0.36; P = 0.003) was longer whereas overall complication rate (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.36-0.70; P < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (SMD - 0.45; 95% CI - 0.59 to - 0.30; P = 0.003) were lower in the LLR group than in the OLR group, no significant differences in blood loss (SMD - 0.14; 95% CI - 0.28 to 0.00; P = 0.054), transfusion rate (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.56-1.54; P = 0.764), major complication rate (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.38-1.05; P = 0.079), R0 resection rate (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.55-1.96; P = 0.902), and disease-free survival (DFS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (HR 1.43; 95% CI 0.95-2.17), DFS for colorectal liver metastases (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.61-1.81), overall survival for HCC (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.43-2.30) were noted between the groups. CONCLUSION LLR is technically feasible and safe without compromising long-term oncological outcomes for selected patients with lesions in the PS segments of the liver.
Collapse
|
28
|
Fiorentini G, Ratti F, Cipriani F, Cinelli L, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L. Theory of Relativity for Posterosuperior Segments of the Liver. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1149-1157. [PMID: 30675701 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07165-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The accessibility to posterosuperior segments of the liver has traditionally constituted a restrain to adopt the laparoscopic approach in this setting. To overcome this challenge, multiple approaches have been reported in literature. Total transabdominal approach has been previously described for this purpose, even though the rationale to standardly adopt it and a technical depiction of how to achieve an optimal mobilization has never been specifically addressed. METHODS Total transabdominal purely laparoscopic approach to posterosuperior segments of the liver is presented, with detailed emphasis to the rotational motions targeted in laparoscopy. A literature review is presented to summarize all other possible accesses to posterosuperior area of the liver. The institutional series for the laparoscopic approach to Sg 7, Sg 6+7, and Sg8 is retrospectively described. RESULTS Three rotational motions of the liver are specifically addressed in a video presentation and described for the laparoscopic total-transabdominal approach; the local institutional series using this approach is presented. Other miscellaneous approaches identified from literature encompassing variations in operative position, transabdominal, transthoracic, and combined approaches are described. CONCLUSIONS Complete mobilization of the ligaments of the liver leads to a rotation of the transection line in front of the operator's view, allowing to achieve a safe total trans-abdominal laparoscopic approach to the posterosuperior ligaments of the liver, without compromising the vascular inflow control, the possibility to convert to open approach, nor requiring potentially harmful decubitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Fiorentini
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - F Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - F Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - L Cinelli
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - M Catena
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - M Paganelli
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - L Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Haber PK, Wabitsch S, Krenzien F, Benzing C, Andreou A, Schöning W, Öllinger R, Pratschke J, Schmelzle M. Laparoscopic liver surgery in cirrhosis - Addressing lesions in posterosuperior segments. Surg Oncol 2018; 28:140-144. [PMID: 30851889 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimal-invasive liver resection has gained considerable attention in recent years, assuming a weighty position in the field of HPB surgery. Even lesions in posterosuperior segments, the technically most challenging localization, have been resected while achieving comparable outcomes to laparotomy. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the similar beneficial results can be conveyed through minimal-invasive techniques for patients with liver cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection with at least one lesion in the posterosuperior liver segments (IVa, VII, VIII) at our center between January 2012 and July 2018. Patients were separated in two groups based on the presence (n = 43) or absence (n = 115) of liver cirrhosis. RESULTS Preoperative patient characteristics showed that patients with cirrhosis were older (p < 0.001), had more frequently diabetes (p < 0.005) and a history of alcohol consumption (p < 0.0005). Preoperative liver function, as assessed by LiMAx score was markedly decreased in patients with liver cirrhosis (p < 0.005). While a similar percentage in both groups had anatomical resection, significantly more major resections were performed in patients without cirrhosis (cirrhosis: 23.3% vs. no cirrhosis 55.7%; p < 0.0005). Consequently, surgeries were markedly longer in the no cirrhosis group (p < 0.0005). There was no difference with regard to the need for perioperative transfusion or conversion to laparotomy. There was no differences found between both groups with regard to the postoperative course showing similar ICU- and hospital stays. Complication rate, both with regard to minor and major complications, as well as rate of clear resection margins were similar between the two groups as well. CONCLUSION Patients with liver cirrhosis and a lesion in the posterosuperior liver segments are amenable to the minimal-invasive approaches as no significant differences can be observed with regard to safety and oncologic sufficiency. As these procedures are from a technical perspective challenging, they should be performed in specialized centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Konstantin Haber
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Wabitsch
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Benzing
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Andreou
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Integrative Oncology (BSIO), Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Lesions Located on Posterosuperior Segments: A Meta-Analysis of Short-term Outcomes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2018; 28:203-208. [PMID: 30074976 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) are currently acknowledged as safe and efficient procedures. LLR in posterosuperior (PS) segments are considered highly challenging procedures. The aim of our meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of LLR versus open liver resection on short-term outcomes for PS segment lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for articles was performed. RESULTS Five studies involving 531 patients who underwent resection for PS liver segments lesions were included. LLR were associated with reduced blood loss and overall complications. Operative time, blood transfusion, R0 resection, resection margin, hospital stay, and mortality were not found different among the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Notwithstanding their highly demanding nature, LLR in PS segments are safe and efficient procedures in the hands of experienced surgeons. Further studies are mandatory to evaluate their effect in these challenging liver resections.
Collapse
|
32
|
Yin Z, Jin H, Ma T, Wang H, Huang B, Jian Z. Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy in the management of posterosuperior segments of the Liver: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 60:101-110. [PMID: 30389536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous guidance and consensus have well-addressed the advantages of laparoscopic procedures in the anterolateral segments of II, III, IVb and V of the liver, as for lesions located in the posterosuperior segments of I, IVa, VII and VIII is challenging but has become more practical recently due to progress in operative techniques. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LH and OH patients with tumors located in posterosuperior segments. The primary sources of the reviewed studies through April 2018, with restriction on the language of English, were Pubmed and Embase. RESULTS A total of 5 studies qualified for inclusion in this quantified meta-analysis with a total of 647 patients. LH was associated with significantly less overall complication (OR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.28-0.65; P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) and non-significantly less severe complication significantly (P = 0.06) compared with OH. Shorter length of hospital stay of 2.08day (95%CI: -3.68day to -0.49day; P = 0.01, I2 = 81%) was observed in LH. As for mortality, transfusion, R0 resection, tumor-free margin and operative time the pooled outcomes were comparable. Long-term survivals were similar between LH and OH for the posterosuperior segments. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic hepatectomy could be the preferred option for posterosuperior segments for selected patients. Future well designed and large studies should focus on the impacts of underlined liver chronic diseases such as cirrhosis on patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi Yin
- General Surgery Department of Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Haosheng Jin
- General Surgery Department of Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tingting Ma
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongxu Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yingde People's Hospital, Qingyuan, China
| | - Bowen Huang
- General Surgery Department of Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhixiang Jian
- General Surgery Department of Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Morikawa T, Ishida M, Takadate T, Aoki T, Ohtsuka H, Mizuma M, Hayashi H, Nakagawa K, Motoi F, Naitoh T, Unno M. Laparoscopic partial liver resection improves the short-term outcomes compared to open surgery for liver tumors in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Today 2018; 49:214-223. [DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1719-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
34
|
Guerra F, Di Marino M, Coratti A. Robotic Surgery of the Liver and Biliary Tract. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 29:141-146. [PMID: 30118390 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The laparoscopic methods for major abdominal surgery are gaining increasing acceptance worldwide. Despite its relatively recent introduction in clinical practice, robotics has been accepted as an effective option to perform high-demanding procedures such as those required in hepatobiliary surgery. Some potential advantages over conventional laparoscopy have been suggested, but its actual role in clinical practice is still to be defined. METHODS The objective of this work is to critically review the available evidence on the application of robotic surgery to the liver and biliary tract. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were systematically searched for studies reporting on robotic hepatobiliary surgery with or without comparison with open surgery or conventional laparoscopy. RESULTS This review provides a comprehensive snapshot of the current application of the robot to the surgery of the liver and biliary tract. The overall available data show the noninferiority of the robotic system to conventional open and laparoscopic surgery. A number of studies suggest some potential advantages in performing high-demanding procedures in a minimally invasive fashion. CONCLUSIONS The robot can be used to perform various types of liver surgeries quite safely and competently, although the lack of randomized control trials, comparing it with open and laparoscopic surgery, precludes the possibility to reach definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Guerra
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital , Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Di Marino
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital , Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital , Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Liu F, Li Q, Wei Y, Li B. Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Difficult Lesions: A Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28:1428-1436. [PMID: 29878858 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The value of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for difficult lesions (located in segments I, IVa, VII, and VIII) is still controversial nowadays. The aim of this study was to summarize quantitatively the evidence related to this issue. Materials and Methods: Two investigators independently searched the Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Cochrane Library databases for eligible studies published before December 2017. The RevMan 5.3 software was utilized for statistical meta-analysis. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Results: Five studies with a total number of 638 patients were included in the present meta-analysis, with 274 patients in the LLR group and 364 in the open liver resection (OLR) group. The LLR did not increase the operative time (WMD 12.42 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI] -8.54 to 33.38 minutes; P = .25) or blood transfusion requirement (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.40-1.64; P = .57) compared with OLR. Conversely, LLR was associated with significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (WMD -140.57 mL; 95% CI -203.39 to -77.76 mL; P < .001), shorter hospital stay (WMD -2.88 days; 95% CI -4.84 to -0.92 days; P = .004), and lower overall morbidity (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.28-0.65; P < .001). The oncologic outcomes of R0 resection rate, surgical margin, and tumor recurrence were comparable in the two groups. Conclusion: LLR for difficult lesions in selected patients is safe, technically feasible, and advantageous when performed by experienced surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Qin Li
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Liver Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|