A prospective study of quality of life including fatigue and pulmonary function after stereotactic body radiotherapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer

Optimizing lung cancer radiation therapy: A systematic review of multifactorial risk assessment for radiation-induced lung toxicity

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy (RT) is essential in treating advanced lung cancer, but may lead to radiation pneumonitis (RP). This systematic review investigates the use of pulmonary function tests (PFT) and other parameters to predict and mitigate RP, thereby improving RT planning.

METHODS

A systematic review sifted through PubMed and on BioMed Central, targeting articles from September 2005 to December 2022 containing the keywords: Lung Cancer, Radiotherapy, and pulmonary function test.

RESULTS

From 1153 articles, 80 were included. RP was assessed using CTCAEv.4 in 30 % of these. Six studies evaluated post-RT quality of life in lung cancer patients, reporting no decline. Patients with RP and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) generally exhibited poorer overall survival. Notably, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) declined 24 months post-RT, while forced vital capacity (FVC) stayed stable. In the majority of studies, age over 60, tumors located in the lower part of the lung, and low FEV1 before RT were associated with a higher risk of RP. Dosimetric factors (V5, V20, MLD) and metabolic imaging emerged as significant predictors of RP risk. A clinical checklist blending patient and tumor characteristics, PFT results, and dosimetric criteria was proposed for assessing RP risk before RT.

CONCLUSION

The review reveals the multifactorial nature of RP development following RT in lung cancer. This approach should guide individualized management and calls for a prospective study to validate these findings and enhance RP prevention strategies.

Patient-reported outcomes and functional exercise capacity in a real-life setting in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy: the Lung PLUS study

Introduction

To better understand the impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and its treatment-related toxicity on early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) patients, we conducted the Lung PLUS study in a real-world setting.

Methods

This is a monocentric prospective longitudinal study up to 12 months post-treatment, evaluating clinician- and patient-reported toxicity (resp. CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13), activities of daily living (HAQ-DI) and functional exercise capacity (6 Minute Walking Test (6MWT)). A mixed model approach was applied to analyze the data.

Results

At baseline, clinicians and patients (n=51) reported mostly fatigue (63% vs 79%), cough (49% vs 75%) and dyspnea (65% vs 73%) of any grade. Dyspnea (p=.041) increased over time. Meaningful clinical improvements were particularly seen in pain, fatigue, and cough. Clinician reported clinically meaningful improvements and deteriorations over time in fatigue, cough, and dyspnea. Almost at every timepoint, more people reported deterioration to the clinician than improvement in aforementioned toxicities. Overall HRQoL (p=.014), physical (p=.011) and emotional (p<.001) functioning improved over time. At baseline, patients had a moderate daily functioning score and walked an average distance of 360 meters. No statistically significant differences were found in daily functioning and exercise capacity over time.

Conclusion

Our study showed an increase in patient-reported toxicity and dyspnea, without impacting functional status, following SBRT. Overall HRQoL, physical and emotional functioning improved over time. Understanding the impact of treatment on patient-reported outcomes is crucial to identify the needs/problems of patients to enhance their HRQoL.

Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Ventilation Image-Guided Lung Functional Avoidance Radiation Therapy: A Single-Arm Prospective Pilot Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this prospective pilot trial was to assess the safety and feasibility of lung functional avoidance radiation therapy (RT) with 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) ventilation imaging.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with primary lung cancer or metastatic disease to the lungs to receive conventionally fractionated RT (CFRT) or stereotactic body RT (SBRT) were eligible. Standard-of-care 4D-CT scans were used to generate ventilation images through image processing/analysis. Each patient required a standard intensity modulated RT plan and ventilation image guided functional avoidance plan. The primary endpoint was the safety of functional avoidance RT, defined as the rate of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) that occurred ≤12 months after treatment. Protocol treatment was considered safe if the rates of grade ≥3 pneumonitis and esophagitis were <13% and <21%, respectively for CFRT, and if the rate of any grade ≥3 AEs was <28% for SBRT. Feasibility of functional avoidance RT was assessed by comparison of dose metrics between the 2 plans using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Between May 2015 and November 2019, 34 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled, and 33 patients were evaluable (n = 24 for CFRT; n = 9 for SBRT). Median follow-up was 14.7 months. For CFRT, the rates of grade ≥3 pneumonitis and esophagitis were 4.2% (95% confidence interval, 0.1%-21.1%) and 12.5% (2.7%-32.4%). For SBRT, no patients developed grade ≥3 AEs. Compared with the standard plans, the functional avoidance plans significantly (P < .01) reduced the lung dose-function metrics without compromising target coverage or adherence to standard organs at risk constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, representing one of the first prospective investigations on lung functional avoidance RT, demonstrated that the 4D-CT ventilation image guided functional avoidance RT that significantly reduced dose to ventilated lung regions could be safely administered, adding to the growing body of evidence for its clinical utility.

Psychosocial Interventions for the Treatment of Cancer-Related Fatigue: An Umbrella Review

Cancer-related fatigue is one of the most common symptoms of cancer and one of those referred by patients as the most disabling. However, we still do not have enough evidence to allow us to recommend effective and personalized approaches. Goal: To provide evidence on the efficacy of ASCO-recommended psychosocial interventions for reducing cancer-related fatigue. Methodology: A general quantitative systematic review for nonprimary clinical interventions that allows the collection, synthesis and analysis of already published reviews. Systematic reviews of RTCs were selected as these make up the body of knowledge that provides the most evidence in an umbrella format. The results do not provide clear or comparable evidence regarding the different interventions, with moderate evidence standing out for cognitive interventions and mindfulness. Conclusions: Research gaps, study biases and the need for further research to ask more precise questions and to make reliable recommendations to mitigate the impact of cancer-related fatigue are evident.

Brachial Plexopathy After Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Apical Lung Tumors

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of brachial plexus injury (BPI) after single-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to apical lung tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of all patients treated with single-fraction lung SBRT at our institution from 2007 to 2022. Apical tumors were identified as those with an epicenter located above the arch of the aorta. Dosimetric analysis of dose to the brachial plexus (BP) was done using both the subclavian vessel (SCV) surrogate structure and anatomic BP. BPI was assessed per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, as regional paresthesia, marked discomfort and muscle weakness, and limited movement of the arm or hand.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients met inclusion criteria with median follow-up of 21 months. There were 9 patients who exceeded the BP dose constraint using the SCV or anatomic BP volume. Only 1 patient (2.2%) developed grade 2 BPI, occurring 7 months after SBRT. Dose to the anatomic BP for the affected patient was 26.39 Gy. For the entire cohort, the median SCV and anatomic maximum BP doses were 8.44 and 7.14 Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variability in dose delivered to the BP after SBRT to apical lung tumors. BPI after single-fraction SBRT to apical tumors is rare and rates are comparable with those reported with multifraction regimens.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 4: systematic review of evidence involving SBRT and ablation

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options [lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), thermal ablation], weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after SBRT or thermal ablation vs. resection is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

Short-term outcomes are meaningfully better after SBRT than resection. SBRT doesn't affect quality-of-life (QOL), on average pulmonary function is not altered, but a minority of patients may experience gradual late toxicity. Adjusted non-randomized comparisons demonstrate a clinically relevant detriment in long-term outcomes after SBRT vs. surgery. The short-term benefits of SBRT over surgery are accentuated with increasing age and compromised patients, but the long-term detriment remains. Ablation is associated with a higher rate of complications than SBRT, but there is little intermediate-term impact on quality-of-life or pulmonary function tests. Adjusted comparisons show a meaningful detriment in long-term outcomes after ablation vs. surgery; there is less difference between ablation and SBRT.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or thermal ablation vs. resection with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation for a framework for individualized decision-making.

An Analysis of Clinical Toxic Effects and Quality of Life as a Function of Radiation Dose and Volume After Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Purpose

To analyze clinical toxicity and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes among patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a function of radiation dose and volume parameters.

Methods and Materials

In this institutional review board-approved study, 55 patients with stage I NSCLC who received SBRT (12 Gy × 4) and completed QOL forms were analyzed. Clinical symptoms and QOL outcomes were measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after SBRT. Clinical toxicity was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Quality of life was followed using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung-Trial Outcome Index (FACT-L-TOI) instrument. Dosimetric parameters including the mean lung radiation dose and the volume of normal lung receiving greater than 5, 10, 13, or 20 Gy (V₅, V₁₀, V₁₃, and V₂₀) were measured from the radiation treatment plan. Student t tests and Pearson correlation analyses were used to examine the relationships between radiation lung metrics and clinically meaningful changes in QOL and/or clinical toxic effects. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate rates of local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

With a median follow-up of 24 months, the 3-year LC, DFS, and OS were 93%, 65%, and 84%, respectively, with a 5.5% rate of grade-3 toxic effects and no grade 4 or 5 toxic effects. Clinically meaningful declines in patient-reported QOL (FACT-L-TOI, lung cancer subscale, physical well-being, and/or functional well-being) posttreatment significantly correlated with increased dosimetric parameters such as V₁₀, V₁₃, and V₂₀.

Conclusion

Although lung SBRT was associated with excellent LC and minimal clinical toxic effects for early-stage NSCLC, clinically meaningful declines in QOL were significantly correlated with increasing lung dose and volume parameters.

Potential Morbidity Reduction for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using Respiratory Gating

Simple Summary

Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard of care for early-stage lung cancer and oligometastases. For SBRT, motion has to be considered to avoid misdosage. Respiratory phase gating, meaning to irradiate the target volume only in a predefined gating motion phase window, can be applied to mitigate motion-induced effects. The aim of this study was to exploit the clinical benefit of gating for lung SBRT. For the majority of 14 lung tumor patients and various gating windows, we could prove a reduced dose to normal tissue by gating simulation. A normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model analysis revealed a major reduction of normal tissue toxicity for moderate gating window sizes. The most beneficial effect of gating was found for those patients with the highest prior toxicity risk. The presented results are useful for personalized risk assessment prior to treatment and may help to select patients and optimal gating windows.

Abstract

We investigated the potential of respiratory gating to mitigate the motion-caused misdosage in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). For fourteen patients with lung tumors, we investigated treatment plans for a gating window (GW) including three breathing phases around the maximum exhalation phase, GW40–60. For a subset of six patients, we also assessed a preceding three-phase GW20–40 and six-phase GW20–70. We analyzed the target volume, lung, esophagus, and heart doses. Using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models, we estimated radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis risks. Compared to plans without gating, GW40–60 significantly reduced doses to organs at risk without impairing the tumor doses. On average, the mean lung dose decreased by 0.6 Gy (p < 0.001), treated lung V20Gy by 2.4% (p = 0.003), esophageal dose to 5cc by 2.0 Gy (p = 0.003), and maximum heart dose by 3.2 Gy (p = 0.009). The model-estimated mean risks of 11% for pneumonitis and 12% for esophagitis without gating decreased upon GW40–60 to 7% and 9%, respectively. For the highest-risk patient, gating reduced the pneumonitis risk from 43% to 32%. Gating is most beneficial for patients with high-toxicity risks. Pre-treatment toxicity risk assessment may help optimize patient selection for gating, as well as GW selection for individual patients.

Patient individual phase gating for stereotactic radiation therapy of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) applies high doses and requires advanced techniques to spare surrounding tissue in the presence of organ motion. In this work patient individual phase gating is investigated. We studied peripheral and central primary lung tumors. The internal target volume (ITV) was defined including different numbers of phases picked from a 4D Computed tomography (CT) defining the gating window (gw). Planning target volume (PTV) reductions depending on the gw were analyzed. A treatment plan was calculated on a reference phase CT (rCT) and the dose for each breathing phase was calculated and accumulated on the rCT. We compared the dosimetric results with the dose calculated when all breathing phases were included for ITV definition. GWs including 1 to 10 breathing phases were analyzed. We found PTV reductions up to 38.4%. The mean reduction of the lung volume receiving 20 Gy due to gating was found to be 25.7% for peripheral tumors and 16.7% for central tumors. Gating considerably reduced esophageal doses. However, we found that simple reduction of the gw does not necessarily influence the dose in a clinically relevant range. Thus, we suggest a patient individual definition of the breathing phases included within the gw.

Choosing the right survey: the lung cancer surgery

Radical and palliative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have faced a significant evolution during last decades, which in turn has modified their effects on the patient quality of life (QoL). QoL data collection is becoming methodologically rigorous, with published recommendations and societal statements. In lung cancer surgery, there is no standardization in collecting and analyzing this outcome yet. However, to face the evolution in lung cancer therapies, few initiatives like the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) lung cancer module update project or the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), have now the potential to help thoracic surgeons to collect QoL data with validated dynamic instruments to make this outcome comparable to the clinical ones. This review aims to give an overview of the available and most commonly used QoL questionnaires in lung cancer surgery in order to facilitate future research and practical implementation.

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Quality of life after pulmonary stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SBRT): Results of the phase II STRIPE trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Preserving health related quality of life (HRQOL) plays an important role in considering stereotactic body fractionated radiotherapy (SBRT). The prospective monocenter phase II STRIPE trial investigated long-term HRQOL after SBRT, efficacy and toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with ≤2 pulmonary lesions ≤5 cm were treated with 4DPET/CT-based SBRT (3 × 12.5 Gy or risk-adapted 5 × 7 Gy, to 60% isodose). Follow up (FU) was performed 2 and 7 weeks after SBRT, then 3-monthly for 2 years with assessment of response (primary endpoint: 2-year cumulative incidence of local progression (LP); secondary endpoints: local progression free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity (CTCAE)). Impact of predefined patient and treatment related factors on HRQOL (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Between 02/2011 and 11/2014, 100 patients were given SBRT for 56 NSCLC and 44 pulmonary metastases (M1). Long-term FU overall revealed stable Quality of Life (QoL)/Global health status (GHS), functions-scores and symptoms. For QoL/GHS, patients with low (<median) initial QoL/GHS-Score revealed significantly stronger improvement than those with good QoL/GHS-scores (p < 0.001). Probability for LP, LPFS and OS 2 years after SBRT was 8.1% (NSCLC: 7.3%, M1:9.2%), 53.3% (NSCLC: 50.7%, M1: 56.0%) and 62.2% (NSCLC: 57.2%, M1: 68.4%). ≥G3-Toxicity was <4%, but ≥G3 dyspnea was 6% at baseline and 14.5% 2 years after SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

These prospective data on representative pulmonary SBRT patients confirm stable preservation of HRQOL after SBRT and demonstrate a QoL/GHS-benefit for patients with low initial QoL/GHS-scores, the regimen of 3 × 12.5 Gy SBRT being efficient and well tolerated. This result may inform shared decision making when discussing SBRT for frail patients.

[Stereotactic body radiotherapy: Prospective study to evaluate asthenia and quality of life]

PURPOSE

To evaluate prospectively asthenia and the quality of life in patients treated by stereotactic body irradiation and to determine their predictive factors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Quality of life was assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and asthenia was evaluated with the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), on the first day (T1), last day (T2) and 1-3 weeks after the end of treatment (T3).

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were treated with stereotactic body irradiation from February 2017 to May 2017 and 41 were included in the analysis (22 patients excluded for lack of understanding, organization, psychologic disorders or refusal). The mean number of fractions was 5 (±2). The compliance to quality of life assessment was 98%, 95% was 81% at T1, T2 and T3, respectively. An increase of asthenia and a worsened quality of life were found in 12 (29%) and 14 (34%) patients between T1 and T2. Univariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between asthenia and quality of life were correlated with performans status (P=0.03 and 0.05 respectively), hemoglobin level (p=0.01 and 0.004), albumin level (P=0.01 and 0.06), distance between home and radiotherapy department (P=0.05 and 0.02). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between female gender (P=0.012), albumin level (P<0.001), distance over 25km (P<0.001) with asthenia, and albumin level (P=0.003), hemoglobin level (P=0.004) and previous chemotherapy (P=0.003) with quality of life. No influence of stereotactic body ratiotherapy parameters was seen.

CONCLUSION

Despite hypofractionation, stereotactic body radiotherapy induced asthenia and deterioration of quality of life.

Questionnaire survey comparing surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer: lessons from patients with experience of both modalities

Background

Currently, there is some controversy regarding indications for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer patients. We investigated the treatment preferences of patients with experience of both surgery and SBRT using a questionnaire survey.

Methods

Of lung cancer patients treated with SBRT between 2005 and 2017, we identified those who also previously underwent surgery for lung cancer. These patients were asked about their experiences of surgery and SBRT including perceived condition, distress, stress, convenience, adverse effects, and satisfaction during and after treatment. Participants were also asked about treatment decision-making for hypothetical scenarios.

Results

Of 653 lung cancer patients treated with SBRT, 149 also underwent surgery for lung cancer, 52 of whom participated in this questionnaire. The median age at the time of this survey was 76 years (range, 59-91 years). Significantly more participants had a favorable impression of SBRT during and after treatment (all question items; P<0.01). In terms of overall satisfaction, 27 patients preferred SBRT and three patients preferred surgery. In a hypothetical scenario (equivalent treatment outcomes) aged 70 years and faced with decision-making for first-time lung cancer treatment, significantly more patients selected SBRT (P<0.01): 38 patients selected SBRT. In a scenario with 20% better survivals for surgical resection, 14 patients selected SBRT, 12 selected surgery, and 26 were indecisive (P=0.47). In a scenario at age 80 years, significantly more patients selected SBRT (P<0.01).

Conclusions

Most patients with experience of both surgery and SBRT for lung cancer prefer SBRT. This information would be helpful at treatment decision-making.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in early-stage NSCLC: historical review, contemporary evidence and future implications

Clinical use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has increased dramatically over the last 2 decades and is the current standard-of-care in cases of inoperable early stage non-small-cell lung cancer. While surgical resection remains the standard-of-care for operable patients, several ongoing clinical trials are investigating the role of SBRT in these operative candidates as well. Taking into consideration the expanding role and utility of SBRT, this paper will: review the historical basis of SBRT; examine landmark trials establishing the framework for the current body of evidence; discuss areas of active and future research; and identify epidemiological trends that are likely to further increase the use of SBRT.

Early Impact of Pulmonary Fractionated Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy on Quality of Life:Benefit for Patients With Low Initial Scores (STRIPE Trial)

INTRODUCTION

Quality of life (QoL) of comorbid patients with pulmonary malignancies is a key issue in considering fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) indication. This study investigates the early impact of SBRT on QoL.

METHODS

One hundred patients with pulmonary lesions were treated with SBRT from February 2011 to December 2014 within the prospective, monocenter, phase II STRIPE trial. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core module (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the QLQ-LC13 lung cancer-specific questionnaire were used to evaluate QoL before, 2 and 7 weeks after SBRT, then every 3 months for 2 years. We report on the analysis of early changes from baseline to 7-week follow-up exam. Impact of patient- and treatment-related factors on the change in QoL was analyzed.

RESULTS

QoL was assessed in 97 patients; compliance was 92% and 85% at baseline and 7 weeks after SBRT, respectively. No clinically relevant changes greater than or equal to 10 in the QoL/global health status (GHS), function scores and inquired symptoms were observed. Patients with baseline QoL below the median showed clinically relevant improvement in QoL/GHS (Δ16.7 ± 25.3, p = 0.003), emotional function (Δ14.4 ± 25.4, p = 0.013), and fatigue (Δ -10.1 ± 26.5, p = 0.089) in contrast to patients with high initial scores. No changes were observed in the dichotomized subgroups of initial Karnofsky index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, diagnosis, and tumor localization.

CONCLUSIONS

In short-term follow-up, QoL is well maintained after pulmonary SBRT. Especially patients with low initial QoL/GHS scores show benefit from SBRT with respect to QoL.

Are quality of life outcomes comparable following stereotactic radiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery for stage I lung cancer patients?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was produced in accordance with published guidelines. The question addresses the effect of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and minimally-invasive anatomical lung resection on quality of life (QoL) in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Altogether more than 428 papers were found using the reported search. Only one small RCT of 22 patients was identified that addressed the effect of SABR and surgery on QoL and found global health status to be statistically significantly worse for surgical patients when compared to SABR. Sixteen further studies provided some supporting evidence, but not directly compared QoL between the two treatment modalities. Consequently, there is no general consensus currently available from the literature. Among the nine SABR-only studies, only five specified the percentage of patients who were medically operable but refused surgery. None of the studies identified significant difference in most of the QoL domains 12 months after treatment. Within the surgical papers, patients recovered well after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical (VATS) anatomical lung resection for stage-I NSCLC. Confirming previous evidence of open surgery, three studies demonstrated worsening of QoL domains from 8 weeks to 3 months and a return to baseline after 12 months. Emotional functioning (EF) showed an improvement across both treatments, often superseding baseline scores. Given the different population characteristics of all the available evidence, further appropriately powered and randomised studies are necessary to clarify this issue.

Clinical outcomes following advanced respiratory motion management (respiratory gating or dynamic tumor tracking) with stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

To report the outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to respiratory motion management method.

Methods

Patients with stage I NSCLC who received SBRT from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) simulation with four-dimensional CT was performed for respiratory motion assessment. Tumor motion >1 cm in the craniocaudal direction was selectively treated with advanced respiratory management: either respiratory gating to a pre-specified portion of the respiratory cycle or dynamic tracking of an implanted fiducial marker. Comparisons were made with internal target volume approach, which treated all phases of respiratory motion.

Results

Of 297 patients treated with SBRT at our institution, 51 underwent advanced respiratory management (48 with respiratory gating and three with tumor tracking) and 246 underwent all-phase treatment. Groups were similarly balanced with regard to mean age (P=0.242), tumor size (P=0.315), and histology (P=0.715). Tumor location in the lower lung lobes, as compared to middle or upper lobes, was more common in those treated with advanced respiratory management (78.4%) compared to all-phase treatment (25.6%, P<.0001). There were 17 local recurrences in the treated lesions. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that there were no differences with regard to mean time to local failure (91.5 vs 98.8 months, P=0.56), mean time to any failure (73.2 vs 78.7 months, P=0.73), or median overall survival (43.3 vs 45.5 months, P=0.56) between patients who underwent advanced respiratory motion management and all-phase treatment.

Conclusion

SBRT with advanced respiratory management (the majority with respiratory gating) showed similar efficacy to all-phase treatment approach for stage I NSCLC.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer in the elderly

Early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is on the rise due to the implementation of screening guidelines for patients at risk for developing lung cancer. It is anticipated that as the US population continues to age, there will be a higher percentage of medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer patients. For this reason, noninvasive ablative therapies are necessary. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective modality in addressing early-stage NSCLC. SBRT consists of high-dose radiation delivered over 3-5 treatments. Several randomized trials comparing surgery to SBRT in early-stage operable patients have unfortunately closed early due to poor accrual. However, a recent pooled analysis from 2 randomized trials (StereoTActic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Or Surgery for operable Early-stage non-small cell Lung cancer) comparing surgery to SBRT did show comparable local control and overall survival rates between surgery and SBRT, offering a very effective, noninvasive modality for older adult patients with early-stage NSCLC. In this review, we summarize the role of SBRT in early-stage NSCLC, in particularly applied to the older adult population.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer: Clinical impact and patient perspectives

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a new technology in radiotherapy delivery, allowing for potentially curative treatment in many patients previously felt not to be candidates for radical surgical resection of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several studies have demonstrated very high local control rates using SBRT, and more recent data have suggested overall survival may approach that of surgery in operable patients. However, SBRT is not without unique toxicities, and the balance of toxicity, and effect on patient-reported quality of life need to be considered with respect to oncologic outcomes. We therefore aim to review SBRT in the context of important patient-related factors, including quality of life in several domains (and in comparison to other therapies such as conventional radiation, surgery, or no treatment). We will also describe scenarios in which SBRT may be reasonably offered (i.e. elderly patients and those with severe COPD), and where it may need to be approached with some caution due to increased risks of toxicity (i.e. tumor location, patients with interstitial lung disease). In total, we hope to characterize the physical, emotional, and functional consequences of SBRT, in relation to other management strategies, in order to aid the clinician in deciding whether SBRT is the optimal treatment choice for each patient with early stage NSCLC.

Lung segmentectomy: does it offer a real functional benefit over lobectomy?

Anatomical segmentectomy has been developed to offer better pulmonary function preservation than lobectomy, in stage IA lung cancer. Despite the retrospective nature of most of the studies and the lack of randomised studies, a substantial body of literature today allows us to evaluate to what extent lung function decreases after segmentectomy and whether segmentectomy offers a real functional benefit over lobectomy. From the available series, it emerges that the mean decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) is low, ranging from −9% to −24% of the initial value within 2 months and −3 to −13% 12 months after segmentectomy. This reduction in lung function is significantly lower than that induced by lobectomy, but saves only a few per cent of pre-operative FEV1. Moreover, the published results do not firmly establish the functional benefit of segmentectomy over lobectomy in patients with poor lung function. Some issues remain to be addressed, including whether video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy may preserve lung function better than VATS lobectomy in patients with poor lung function, especially within the early days after surgery, and whether this may translate to lowering the functional limit for surgery. Eventually, trials comparing stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy, radiofrequency ablation and segmentectomy functional consequences are warranted.

Pulmonary function after lung tumor stereotactic ablative radiotherapy depends on regional ventilation within irradiated lung

PURPOSE

To determine if regional ventilation within irradiated lung volume predicts change in pulmonary function test (PFT) measurements after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of lung tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 27 patients treated from 2007 to 2014 at our institution who received: (1) SABR without prior thoracic radiation; (2) pre-treatment 4-dimensional computed tomography (4-D CT) imaging; (3) pre- and post-SABR PFTs <15months from treatment. We defined the ventilation ratio (VR_20BED3) as the quotient of mean ventilation (mean Jacobian-based per-voxel volume change on deformably registered inhale/exhale 4-D CT phases) within the 20Gy biologically effective dose (α/β=3Gy) isodose volume and that of the total lung volume (TLV).

RESULTS

Most patients had moderate to very severe COPD by GOLD criteria (n=19, 70.1%). Higher VR_20BED3 significantly predicted worse change in Forced Expiratory Volume/s normalized by baseline value (ΔFEV₁/FEV_1pre, p=0.04); n=7 had VR_20BED3>1 (high regional ventilation) and worse ΔFEV₁/FEV_1pre (median=-0.16, range=-0.230 to -0.20). Five had VR_20BED3<1 (low regional ventilation) and improved ΔFEV₁/FEV_1pre (median=0.13, range=0.07 to 0.20). In a multivariable linear model, increasing VR_20BED3 and time to post-SABR PFT predicted decreasing ΔFEV₁/FEV_1pre (R²=0.25, p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

After SABR to high versus low functioning lung regions, we found worsened or improved global pulmonary function, respectively. If pre-SABR VR_20BED3 is validated as a predictor of eventual post-SABR PFT in larger studies, it may be used for individualized treatment planning to preserve or even improve pulmonary function after SABR.

Patient Preferences in Treatment Choices for Early-Stage Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Decision-making for lung cancer treatment can be complex because it involves both provider recommendations based on the patient's clinical condition and patient preferences. This study describes the relative importance of several considerations in lung cancer treatment from the patient's perspective.

METHODS

A conjoint preference experiment began by asking respondents to imagine that they had just been diagnosed with lung cancer. Respondents then chose among procedures that differed regarding treatment modalities, the potential for treatment-related complications, the likelihood of recurrence, provider case volume, and distance needed to travel for treatment. Conjoint analysis derived relative weights for these attributes.

RESULTS

A total of 225 responses were analyzed. Respondents were most willing to accept minimally invasive operations for treatment of their hypothetical lung cancer, followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT); they were least willing to accept thoracotomy. Treatment type and risk of recurrence were the most important attributes from the conjoint experiment (each with a relative weight of 0.23), followed by provider volume (relative weight of 0.21), risk of major complications (relative weight of 0.18), and distance needed to travel for treatment (relative weight of 0.15). Procedural and treatment preferences did not vary with demographics, self-reported health status, or familiarity with the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Survey respondents preferred minimally invasive operations over SBRT or thoracotomy for treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Treatment modality and risk of cancer recurrence were the most important factors associated with treatment preferences. Provider experience outweighed the potential need to travel for lung cancer treatment.

Impact of Sublobar Resection on Pulmonary Function: Long-Term Results from American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4032 (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

Sublobar resection (SR) in high-risk operable patients may result in a long-term decrease in pulmonary function. We previously reported 3-month pulmonary function outcomes from a randomized phase III study of SR alone compared with SR with brachytherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. We now report long-term pulmonary function after SR.

METHODS

Pulmonary function was measured at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 months. A decline of 10% or more from baseline in the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume of 1 percentage or in the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was considered clinically meaningful. The effect of study arm, tumor location, size, approach (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs thoracotomy), and SR type (wedge vs segmentectomy) on pulmonary function was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. A generalized estimating equation model was used to assess the effect of each factor on longitudinal data, including all four time points.

RESULTS

Complete pulmonary function data at all time points was available in 69 patients. No significant differences were observed in pulmonary function between SR and SR with brachytherapy, thus the study arms were combined for all analyses. A decline of 10% or more (p = 0.02) in the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was demonstrated for lower-lobe resections at 3 months but was not at 12 or 24 months. A decline of 10% or more (p = 0.05) in the percentage predicted diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was seen for thoracotomy at 3 months but was not at 12 or 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically meaningful declines in pulmonary function occurred after lower lobe resection and after thoracotomy at 3 months but subsequently recovered. This study suggests that SR does not result in sustained decreased pulmonary function in high-risk operable patients.

Quality of life during 5 years after stereotactic radiotherapy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

To determine the long-term impact of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) on the quality of life (QoL) of inoperable patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods and materials

From January 2006 to February 2008, 39 patients with pathologically confirmed T1-2N0M0 NSCLC were treated with SRT. QoL, overall survival and local tumor control were assessed. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 and the lung cancer-specific questionnaire QLQ-LC13 were used to investigate changes in QoL. Assessments were done before treatment, at 3 weeks, every 2–3 months during the first two years, and then every 6 months until 5 years after the treatment or death or progressive disease. The median follow up was 38 months.

Results

During the 5 years after treatment with SRT for stage I NSCLC, the level of QoL was maintained: There was a slow decline (slope: −0.015) of the global health status over the 5 years (p < 0.0001). The physical functioning and the role functioning improved slowly (slope: 0.006 and 0.004, resp.) over the years and this was also significant (p < 0.0001). The emotional functioning (EF) improved significantly at 1 year compared to the baseline. Two years after the treatment dyspnea slowly increased (slope: 0.005, p = 0.006). The actuarial overall survival was 62% at 2 years and 31% at 5-years.

Conclusion

QoL was maintained 5 years after SRT for stage I NSCLC and EF improved significantly. Dyspnea slowly increased 2 years after the treatment.

Analysis of longitudinal quality-of-life data in high-risk operable patients with lung cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance) multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have suggested that low baseline quality-of-life (QOL) scores predict worse survival in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. However, these studies involved average-risk patients undergoing lobectomy. We report QOL results from a multicenter trial, American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4032, which randomized high-risk operable patients to sublobar resection (SR), or SR with brachytherapy, and included longitudinal QOL assessments.

METHODS

Global QOL, using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF36), and the dyspnea score from the University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ) scale, was measured at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months. SF36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were standardized and adjusted for age and gender normals, with scores <50 indicating below-average health status. SOBQ scores were transformed to a 0-100 (poor-excellent) scale. Aims were to: (1) determine the impact of baseline scores on recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and 30-day adverse events (AEs); and (2) identify subgroups (surgical approach, resection type. tumor location, tumor size, respiratory function) with a ≥ 10-point decline or improvement in QOL after SR.

RESULTS

Two hundred twelve eligible patients were included. There were no significant differences in baseline QOL scores between arms. Median baseline PCS, MCS, and SOBQ scores were 42.7, 51.1, and 70.8, respectively. There were no differences in grade-3+ AEs, overall survival, or recurrence-free survival in patients with baseline scores ≤ median versus > median values, except for a significantly worse overall survival for patients with baseline SOBQ scores ≤ median value. There were no significant differences between the study arms in percentage change of QOL scores from baseline to 3, 12, or 24 months. Further comparison combining the 2 arms demonstrated a higher percentage of patients with a ≥ 10-point decline in SOBQ scores with segmentectomy compared with wedge resection (40.5% vs 21.9%, P = .03) at 12 months, with thoracotomy versus video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) (38.8% vs 20.4%, P = .03) at 12 months, and T1b versus T1a tumors (46.9% vs 23.5%, P = .020) at 24 months. A ≥ 10-point improvement in PCS score was seen at 3 months with VATS versus thoracotomy (16.5% vs 3.6%, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk operable patients, poor baseline QOL scores were not predictive for worse overall or recurrence-free survival, or for higher risk for AEs following SR. VATS was associated with improvement in physical function at 3 months, and improved dyspnea scores at 12 months, lending support for the preferential use of VATS when SR is undertaken.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy

Extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been developed and refined over the last 25 years as a means to precisely deliver ablative doses of hypofractionated radiotherapy to small targets located outside of the cranial vault. SBRT has armed the radiation oncologist with a therapeutic approach that allows for intensification of both dose delivered and fractionation regimen employed. As a consequence, tumor control rates have improved to levels that previously have been associated only with surgical resection. Several prospective phase I and II studies have evaluated the use of SBRT for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), liver tumors, and spinal metastases. This article will give an overview of SBRT and evidence for its use in the most common sites of disease for which it is employed today.

Is stereotactic ablative radiotherapy an alternative to surgery in operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer?

Surgery is the gold therapeutic standard for patients affected with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is currently considered the preferred treatment option for inoperable patients, representing approximately 25%. Limited data are available directly comparing surgery and SABR in operable patients, none of them prospective. Preliminary results are encouraging, showing that the two treatment modalities are equally effective in terms of tumour control, with expected similar survival projections. Moreover, in elderly patients SABR could represent a valid treatment alternative in comparison to surgery due to the lower morbidity. We here review and discuss the potential role of SABR as an alternative to surgery in operable early stage lung cancer patients.