1
|
Kitago M, Endo Y, Aiura K, Takigawa Y, Tani N, Matsui J, Suzuki K, Nishiyama R, Nakano Y, Abe Y, Yagi H, Shinoda M, Itano O, Tanabe M, Kitagawa Y. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and portal vein infusion chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7459. [PMID: 39030993 PMCID: PMC11258433 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy improves the overall survival (OS) of patients with resected pancreatic cancer, its efficacy requires further improvement. This multicenter, phase II study investigated the efficacy of adjuvant portal vein infusion (PVI) chemotherapy followed by GEM therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/day) and heparin (2000 IU/day) PVI chemotherapy were combined with systemic administration of mitomycin C (4 mg; days 6, 13, 20, and 27) and cisplatin (10 mg; days 7, 14, 21, and 28) for 4 weeks (PI4W), followed by GEM (1000 mg/m2; days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for 6 months). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoints were OS and treatment completion. RESULTS Between November 2010 and August 2013, 53 patients who underwent complete resection were enrolled, including 30, 20, and 3 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies and distal and total pancreatectomies, respectively. In total, 51 (96.2%) patients underwent R0 resection, of whom 3, 2, 12, 35, 0, and 1 had stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III, and IV cancer, respectively, and 47 (88.7%) patients completed PI4W. The median RFS was 22.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years RFS: 64.9%, 38.1%, 38.1%, and 38.1%, respectively), whereas the median OS was 32.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years OS:86.6%, 47.2%, 44.4%, and 44.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION Treatment with PI4W followed by GEM for 6 months after surgery may be beneficial in patients undergoing curative resection of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minoru Kitago
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Koichi Aiura
- Department of SurgeryKawasaki Municipal HospitalKawasakiJapan
| | - Yutaka Takigawa
- Department of SurgeryAshikaga Red Cross HospitalTochigiJapan
- Department of SurgeryTokyo Dental College Ichikawa General HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Noriyuki Tani
- Department of SurgeryTachikawa Kyosai HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Junichi Matsui
- Department of SurgeryTokyo Dental College Ichikawa General HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Keiichi Suzuki
- Department of SurgeryKitasato Institute HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Ryo Nishiyama
- Department of SurgeryIsehara Kyodo HospitalKawasakiKanagawaJapan
| | - Yutaka Nakano
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Yagi
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Masahiro Shinoda
- Digestive Diseases CenterInternational University of Health and Welfare, Mita HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Osamu Itano
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic & Gastrointestinal SurgeryInternational University of Health and Welfare School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of SurgeryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rehlinghaus M, Rehker P, Che Y, Grunewald CM, Niegisch G. [Neutropenia - when is GCSF support indicated?]. Aktuelle Urol 2024; 55:38-43. [PMID: 37607583 DOI: 10.1055/a-2128-4965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Many systemic treatments used in genitourinary oncology negatively affect haematopoiesis, thus leading to neutropenia. Neutropenic patients are vulnerable to bacterial, and other infections. Often fever is the only symptom in these patients. Neutropenic fever is a major threat for these patients, as it may lead to life-threatening therapy complications that significantly impair the patient's quality of life, Moreover, it may also worsen the prognosis due to therapy delays or necessary dose modifications. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (GCSF), which can improve neutrophil granulocyte formation, are used both for supportive treatment in febrile neutropenia and for its prophylaxis. The correct indication for such GCSF support depends on the general risk of febrile neutropenia of the therapy used, as well as on individual patient factors and the treatment intent (palliative vs. curative). Based on the current recommendations both of the German and international guidelines, this article aims to provide an up-to-date and practice-oriented overview of the use of GCSF in uro-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Rehlinghaus
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Düsseldorf, CIO Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Philipp Rehker
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Düsseldorf, CIO Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Yue Che
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Düsseldorf, CIO Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Camilla Marisa Grunewald
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Düsseldorf, CIO Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Günter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Düsseldorf, CIO Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maeda O, Furune S, Kanda M, Miyata K, Shimizu D, Sugita S, Nishida K, Ando M, Kodera Y, Ando Y. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with pegfilgrastim on day 3 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6974. [PMID: 38348961 PMCID: PMC10831909 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) from neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) for esophageal cancer has been reported. The optimal timing of prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim remains to be elucidated. To evaluate the effect of pegfilgrastim administered on day 3, we conducted a feasibility study. METHODS Chemotherapy consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1-5. Pegfilgrastim was given as a single subcutaneous injection at a dose of 3.6 mg on day 3 during each treatment course. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for up to a maximum of three courses. Prophylactic antibiotics were not needed but were allowed to be given at the discretion of the physician. The primary endpoint was the incidence of FN. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were administered DCF in combination with pegfilgrastim on day 3. After the first course of DCF, 10 out of 26 patients (38.5%) experienced grade 4 neutropenia, and two patients (7.7%) experienced FN. Of the 14 patients who did not receive prophylactic antibiotics, four had grade 4 neutropenia, including two who developed FN. On the contrary, of the 12 patients who received prophylactic levofloxacin, six had grade 4 neutropenia, but no cases of FN were observed. CONCLUSION Administration of pegfilgrastim on day 3 was not sufficient to prevent FN due to DCF treatment, and prophylactic administration of both pegfilgrastim and antibiotics could be a solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Maeda
- Department of Clinical Oncology and ChemotherapyNagoya University HospitalNagoyaJapan
| | - Satoshi Furune
- Department of Clinical Oncology and ChemotherapyNagoya University HospitalNagoyaJapan
| | - Mitsuro Kanda
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
| | - Kazushi Miyata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of SurgeryNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
| | - Dai Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
| | - Shizuki Sugita
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of SurgeryNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
| | - Kazuki Nishida
- Department of Advanced MedicineNagoya University HospitalNagoyaJapan
| | - Masahiko Ando
- Department of Advanced MedicineNagoya University HospitalNagoyaJapan
| | - Yasuhiro Kodera
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
| | - Yuichi Ando
- Department of Clinical Oncology and ChemotherapyNagoya University HospitalNagoyaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hobbs J, Lowe J, Ferdinand A, Shook A, Beck B, Blais D, Borchardt C, Xu B. Efficacy of same-day versus next-day administration of pegfilgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: A retrospective multi-site analysis. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2023; 29:1853-1861. [PMID: 36579812 DOI: 10.1177/10781552221148116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Administering pegfilgrastim on the same day as chemotherapy can improve patient satisfaction through convenience and may increase the utilization of cost-effective biosimilars compared to next-day administration, but the effect on clinical outcomes with commonly used breast cancer regimens is unclear. METHODS This multi-site, retrospective cohort study included breast cancer patients age 18 years or older who received dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC) and pegfilgrastim between 1 June 2016 and 31 May 2020. Pegfilgrastim was given on the same day as chemotherapy at one site and the day after chemotherapy at the other two sites. The primary endpoint compared the incidence of febrile neutropenia associated with pegfilgrastim administration timing. RESULTS A total of 360 patients were reviewed (146 same-day administration and 214 next-day administration). In the same-day group 36 patients (24.6%) developed FN compared to 25 patients (11.7%) in the next-day group (p = 0.002). Same-day administration also significantly increased the incidences of additional acute care visits (11.6% vs 2.8%, p = 0.0016), grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (38.4% vs 13.6%, p < 0.0001), chemotherapy dose reductions (21.2% vs 6.1%, p < 0.0001), and antibiotic use (26.7% vs 12.6%, p = 0.001). Same-day administration did not significantly increase the rate of hospitalization (15% vs 11.2%, p = 0.36) and delay of next chemotherapy cycle by ≥1 day (8.2% vs 6.1%, p = 0.57) due to neutropenic complications. CONCLUSIONS Administering pegfilgrastim on the same day as ddAC led to a significant increase in neutropenic complications. This study confirms the need to administer pegfilgrastim the day after chemotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving ddAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Hobbs
- Department of Pharmacy, Avera Cancer Institute at Sioux Falls, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
| | - Jan Lowe
- John T. Vucurevich Cancer Care Institute Pharmacy, Monument Health, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA
| | - Abigale Ferdinand
- John T. Vucurevich Cancer Care Institute Pharmacy, Monument Health, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA
| | - Anna Shook
- Cancer Center Pharmacy, MercyOne North Iowa, Mason City, Iowa, USA
| | - Bradley Beck
- Department of Pharmacy, Avera Cancer Institute at Sioux Falls, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
| | - Danielle Blais
- Department of Pharmacy, Avera Cancer Institute at Sioux Falls, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
| | - Cole Borchardt
- Department of Pharmacy, Avera Cancer Institute at Sioux Falls, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
| | - Bing Xu
- Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute at Sioux Falls, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Niu X, Chen D, He W, Tang Y, Zhao J. Development and Validation of a Novel UHPLC-MS/MS Method for the Quantification of Plinabulin in Plasma and Its Application in a Pharmacokinetic Study with Leukopenic Rats. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:1153. [PMID: 37631067 PMCID: PMC10459361 DOI: 10.3390/ph16081153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Plinabulin, a new antitumor drug developed from marine natural products that targets microtubules in cancer cells, is currently being tested in a phase III clinical study. Plinabulin has been clinically proven to be effective on leukopenia. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports investigating the pharmacokinetics of plinabulin in individuals with leukopenia and healthy individuals. In this study, we developed a rapid and sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method for the detection of plinabulin for the first time. Using a novel cyclophosphamide-induced leukopenia model, we investigated the differences in the pharmacokinetic characteristics of plinabulin between rats with leukopenia and normal rats. Plinabulin and propranolol (IS) peaks were separated by gradient elution for a total run time of 5 min. The methodological validation showed a good accuracy (101.96-109.42%) and precision (RSD ≤ 5.37%) with the lower limit of quantification at 0.5 ng/mL. The recovery of plinabulin was between 91.99% and 109.75% (RSD ≤ 7.92%). The values of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t) for leukopenia groups and control groups at doses of 0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 3 mg/kg were 148.89 ± 78.74 h·μg/L and 121.75 ± 31.56 h·μg/L; 318.15 ± 40.00 h·μg/L and 272.06 ± 42.85 h·μg/L; and 1432.43 ± 197.47 h·μg/L and 1337.12 ± 193.56 h·μg/L; respectively. The half-lives (t1/2s) of plinabulin were 0.49-0.72 h for leukopenia groups and 0.39-0.70 h for control groups at three doses, and the clearance rates (CLs) of plinabulin were 2.13-3.87 L/h/kg for leukopenia groups and 2.29-4.23 L/h/kg for control groups. Pharmacokinetic results showed that there was no significant pharmacokinetic difference between the normal group and the leukopenia group. Based on the power model, plinabulin exhibits a lack of dose proportionality over the dose range of 0.5-3 mg/kg after intravenous administration. This study provides guidance for the development of plinabulin as a potential candidate for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced leukopenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaochen Niu
- School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
| | - Dan Chen
- School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
| | - Wei He
- School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
| | - Yu Tang
- School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
- Marine Biomedical Research Institute of Qingdao, Qingdao 266073, China
| | - Jianchun Zhao
- School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
- Marine Biomedical Research Institute of Qingdao, Qingdao 266073, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Endo Y, Ishikawa T, Oka K, Sakakida T, Matsumura S, Mizushima K, Doi T, Okayama T, Katada K, Kamada K, Uchiyama K, Takagi T, Fujiwara H, Konishi H, Naito Y, Itoh Y. Effect of concomitant use of G-CSF and myelosuppressive chemotherapy on bone marrow and peripheral granulocytes in a mouse model. Med Oncol 2022; 39:110. [PMID: 35666320 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-022-01725-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulates bone marrow progenitor cell proliferation and enhances neutrophil production. Exogenous G-CSF administration is indicated for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia management. However, there is a paucity of basic research examining the effects of the concomitant use of G-CSF and chemotherapy on myeloid cells in vivo. Whether concomitant G-CSF and chemotherapy adversely affect myeloid cell proliferation have not been determined. Herein, we examined the effects of the concomitant use of pegfilgrastim and 5-fluorouracil on myeloid cells and peripheral blood cells in mouse models. Balb/c mice were treated intraperitoneally with 5-fluorouracil (20 μg/g b.w.) or a vehicle as a control for 5 days, and pegfilgrastim was administered subcutaneously at 1 μg/g b.w. on day 3. As a result, we demonstrated that the concomitant use of pegfilgrastim suppressed the 5-fluorouracil-induced decrease of granulocytic cells in both bone marrow and peripheral blood in mice. To assess the clinical efficacy of early administration of pegfilgrastim during docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil therapy in patients with esophageal cancer, we retrospectively identified 42 consecutive patients treated with this regimen. The incidence of both febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia was significantly lower in patients who received pegfilgrastim than in those who did not receive it (P = 0.002 and P = 0.002, respectively). These results suggest that the concomitant use of pegfilgrastim and chemotherapy, consisting of continuous infusions of 5-fluorouracil, improved chemotherapy-induced neutropenia without detrimental effects on proliferating myeloid granulocytic cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Endo
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ishikawa
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan. .,Outpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Kaname Oka
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Tomoki Sakakida
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Shinya Matsumura
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Katsura Mizushima
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Doi
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Okayama
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Katada
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Kamada
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Uchiyama
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Takagi
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Fujiwara
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Konishi
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Yuji Naito
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Yoshito Itoh
- Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Blayney DW, Schwartzberg L. Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia and Emerging Agents for Prevention and Treatment: A Review. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 109:102427. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
9
|
Alrawashdh N, Vraney J, Choi BM, Almutairi AR, Abraham I, McBride A. Retrospective evaluation of safety and effectiveness of same-day pegfilgrastim in patients with lung cancer. Future Oncol 2022; 18:2381-2390. [PMID: 35477322 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To determine the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) and related outcomes after same-day pegfilgrastim in lung cancer. Materials & methods: This single-center, retrospective study evaluated electronic health records of patients with lung cancer treated between 2013-2018. The main end points were incidence of FN and grade 3/4 neutropenia after the first and across all chemotherapy cycles. Results: A total of 114 patients received same-day pegfilgrastim in 384 cycles. The incidence of FN and grade 3/4 neutropenia was 2.3 and 25% after the first chemotherapy cycle and 1.6 and 10.4% across all cycles, respectively. Conclusion: Same-day prophylactic pegfilgrastim in patients with lung cancer may be a suitable option, owing to its low incidence of FN and related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neda Alrawashdh
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,Department of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| | - Jamie Vraney
- The University of Arizona College of Pharmacy/Banner, University Medical Center Tucson, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
| | - Briana M Choi
- Center for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
| | - Abdulaali R Almutairi
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,Drug Sector, Saudi Food & Drug Authority, Riyadh, 13513-7148, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ivo Abraham
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,Center for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,The University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.,Clinical Translational Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.,Matrix45, Tucson, AZ 85743, USA
| | - Ali McBride
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,The University of Arizona College of Pharmacy/Banner, University Medical Center Tucson, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,Center for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,The University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mahtani RL, Belani R, Crawford J, Dale D, DeCosta L, Gawade PL, Huynh C, Lawrence T, Lewis S, MacLaughlin WW, Narang M, Rifkin R. A prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector versus other options for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia: breast cancer subgroup analysis. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:6135-6144. [PMID: 35426046 PMCID: PMC9009498 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07025-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer chemotherapy often carries a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN); guidelines recommend prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), such as pegfilgrastim. Neulasta® Onpro® on-body injector (OBI) is a delivery device administering pegfilgrastim approximately 27 h after application. METHODS This prospective study examined patients with breast cancer who received chemotherapy with a high risk of FN, receiving OBI ("OBI") or other options (other G-CSF or none; "other"). The primary endpoint was FN incidence; secondary endpoints included chemotherapy delivery, adherence (G-CSF in all cycles), compliance (G-CSF day after chemotherapy), and FN incidence in patients receiving curative or palliative treatment. RESULTS A total of 1776 patients with breast cancer were enrolled (OBI, n = 1196; other, n = 580). Across all cycles, FN incidence was lower for OBI (4.4% [95% CI, 3.3-5.6%]) than other (7.4% [5.3-9.6%]). For curative treatment, the FN incidence across all cycles was lower for OBI (4.6% [3.4-5.8%]) than for other (7.1% [5.0-9.3%]). For palliative treatment (OBI, n = 33; other, n = 20), 3 patients (15%) in the other and none in the OBI group had FN. After adjusting for baseline covariates, FN incidence remained lower for OBI (4.6% [3.5-6.1%]) versus other (7.8% [5.7-10.5%]). Adherence was higher for OBI (93.8%) than for other G-CSF (69.8%), as was compliance (90.5 and 53.2%, respectively). Chemotherapy dose delays/reductions were similar for OBI (4.7%/32.3%, respectively) and other (4.7%/30.0%) groups. CONCLUSION Pegfilgrastim OBI was associated with a lower FN incidence in patients with breast cancer compared to other options for FN prophylaxis. TRIAL REGISTRATION www. CLINICALTRIALS gov , NCT02178475, registered 30 June, 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reshma L Mahtani
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
| | | | | | - David Dale
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Chanh Huynh
- Cancer Care Associates of York, York, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert Rifkin
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Maeda O, Fukaya M, Koike M, Miyata K, Kanda M, Nishida K, Ando M, Kodera Y, Ando Y. Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2022; 18:578-585. [PMID: 35043574 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5-FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study. METHODS The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m2 per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5-FU (750 mg/m2 per day) on days 1-5. A single 3.6-mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade-2/3 histopathological response rate. RESULTS Thirty-seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty-four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle. CONCLUSIONS Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Maeda
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masahide Fukaya
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masahiko Koike
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazushi Miyata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Mitsuro Kanda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazuki Nishida
- Center for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masahiko Ando
- Center for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kodera
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuichi Ando
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
[G-CSF for prophylaxis of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, anemia in cancer : Guidelines on supportive treatment part 1]. Urologe A 2022; 61:537-551. [PMID: 35476110 PMCID: PMC9044390 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01831-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Infections in patients with neutropenia following chemotherapy are mostly manifested as fever (febrile neutropenia, FN). Some of the most important determinants of the risk of FN are the type of chemotherapy, the dose intensity and patient-specific factors. When the risk of FN is 20% or more granulopoiesis is prophylactically stimulated with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) after the treatment. Anemia should always be clarified and if necessary be treated according to the cause when symptomatic. If an absolute or functional iron deficiency is present, intravenous iron substitution is mostly necessary. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents can be used after chemotherapy with hemoglobin (Hb) levels less than 10 g/dl (6.2 mmol/l). In cases of chronic anemia and Hb levels less than 7-8 g/dl (<4.3-5.0 mmol/l) the indications for transfusion of erythrocyte concentrates should be assessed primarily based on the individual clinical symptoms.
Collapse
|
13
|
Schlenker L, Manworren RCB. Timing of Pegfilgrastim: Association with Febrile Neutropenia in a Pediatric Solid and CNS Tumor Population. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 2021; 38:375-384. [PMID: 34402328 DOI: 10.1177/10434542211037729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: While recommended timing of pegfilgrastim administration is ≥24 h after chemotherapy, patient barriers to next day administration, available adult evidence, and pharmacokinetic data have led to earlier administration in some pediatric patients with solid and central nervous system tumors. The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes by timing of pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review examined timing of 932 pegfilgrastim administrations to 182 patients, 0-29 years of age. The primary outcome was febrile neutropenia (FN); the secondary outcome was neutropenic delays (ND) ≥7 days to next chemotherapy cycle. To account for multiple pegfilgrastim administrations per patient, a generalized mixed model was used with a logit link for the dichotomous outcomes (FN & ND), timing as the dichotomous independent variable, and random effect for patient. Results: FN occurred in 196 of 916 cycles (21.4%); and ND in 19 of 805 cycles (2.4%). The fixed effect of pegfilgrastim administration < or ≥24 h after chemotherapy was not significant, p = .50; however, earlier or later than 20 h was significant, p = .005. FN odds were significantly higher when pegfilgrastim was given <20 h (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.19-2.65) after chemotherapy, which may be attributable to differences in chemotherapy toxicity regardless of pegfilgrastim timing. Discussion: While attempts should be made to administer pegfilgrastim ≥24 h after chemotherapy, if barriers exist, modified timing based on individual patient characteristics should be considered. Prospective randomized trials are needed to identify lower risk patients for early pegfilgrastim administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Schlenker
- Department of Nursing, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Renee C B Manworren
- Department of Nursing, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, 12244Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McBride A, Alrawashdh N, Bartels T, Moore L, Persky D, Abraham I. Same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim-cbqv in patients with lymphoma receiving CHOP-like chemotherapy. Future Oncol 2021; 17:3485-3497. [PMID: 34241542 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To compare the incidence of febrile neutropenia and related outcomes of prophylactic same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim/pegfilgrastim-cbqv in patients with lymphoma receiving cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP)-like chemotherapy. Methods: Retrospective, real-world, single-institution study. Results: 93 patients received 460 cycles of CHOP-like chemotherapy. The incidence of febrile neutropenia and grade 3/4 chemotherapy-induced neutropenia was 5 and 16.5%, respectively. In 401 cycles pegfilgrastim was administered same-day versus 12 cycles next-day. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 17 cycles versus 0 cycles (p = 1.00) and grade 3/4 chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in 65 cycles (16.2%) versus 1 cycle (16.7%; p = 1.00) with same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim administration, respectively. Conclusion: Pegfilgrastim may be safely administered on the same day as chemotherapy in patients with lymphoma receiving CHOP-like chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali McBride
- Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.,Center for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
| | - Neda Alrawashdh
- Center for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,Clinical Translational Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA
| | - Trace Bartels
- Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
| | - Logan Moore
- Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
| | - Daniel Persky
- Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
| | - Ivo Abraham
- Center for Health Outcomes & PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.,University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA.,Clinical Translational Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.,Matrix45, Tucson, AZ 85743, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shayne M, Harvey RD, Lyman GH. Prophylaxis and treatment strategies for optimizing chemotherapy relative dose intensity. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:1145-1159. [PMID: 34114525 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1941891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A decrease in relative-dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy has been shown to be associated with poor patient outcomes in solid tumors and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The actual delivered chemotherapy dose received by patients can be influenced by dose reductions and treatment delays, often due to toxicities, most commonly chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). AREAS COVERED We review seminal evidence and more recent studies that have shown an association between higher RDI and improved patient survival. A smaller number of studies has shown no association between RDI and outcomes. These differences may be due to study limitations, including low power, differences in patient and disease characteristics, or the chemotherapeutic regimen. We describe guidelines recommendations to prevent and treat CIN with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and describe novel approaches to prevent neutropenia that are being developed that may provide greater value and be associated with fewer adverse events than standard G-CSF options. EXPERT OPINION Maintaining RDI is important to ensure optimal patient outcomes. This can be achieved through the proper administration of G-CSF prophylaxis and treatment. Newer agents in development to treat and/or prevent CIN are entering regulatory review and may potentially change the treatment landscape for CIN in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R Donald Harvey
- Winship Cancer Institute and Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Gary H Lyman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu C, Hao Y, Wang L, Meng F, Wen F, Zhong D. Safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factors in patients treated with cisplatin and etoposide for small cell carcinoma: A retrospective study. Thorac Cancer 2021; 12:1154-1161. [PMID: 33590721 PMCID: PMC8046050 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to discuss the safety and efficacy of administering reduced doses (3 mg) of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) at approximately 24 h or up to three days following treatment with etoposide and cisplatin (EP). METHODS A total of 104 cycles from 31 patients were divided into a PEG-rhG-CSF prophylaxis group (PP-Group) and a control group (No-PP-Group). The PP-Group received a reduced dose of 3 mg of PEG-rhG-CSF within a minimum of 15 h and a maximum of 72 h following EP chemotherapy, while the rest did not receive any G-CSF prophylaxis (No-PP-Group). For both groups, complete blood counts, incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), grade III or IV neutropenia, and the use of antibiotics to treat neutropenia were recorded. RESULTS There was statistically no significant difference in the incidence of FN (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 1), antibiotic use due to neutropenia (0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.881), estimated lowest mean marginal (EM) platelet (106.56 × 109 /L vs. 127.70 × 109 /L, p = 0.056) and hemoglobin (110.48 g/L vs. 110.14 g/L, p = 0.906) levels between the two groups. However, when compared with the No-PP-group, the white blood cell count in the PP-group was significantly higher (EM means: 4.95 × 109 /L vs. 2.80 × 109 /L, p < 0.01), while the incidence of grade III or IV neutropenia was significantly lower (9.1% vs. 68.1%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The administration of a low dose (3 mg) of PEG-rhG-CSF within approximately 24 h or up to three days following EP treatment is safe and effective at reducing the risk of neutropenia. These findings bring a more flexible administration interval between PEG-rhG-CSF and EP treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Liu
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ying Hao
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Fanlu Meng
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Fuyu Wen
- Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Becker PS, Griffiths EA, Alwan LM, Bachiashvili K, Brown A, Cool R, Curtin P, Dinner S, Gojo I, Hicks A, Kallam A, Kidwai WZ, Kloth DD, Kraut EH, Landsburg D, Lyman GH, Miller R, Mukherjee S, Patel S, Perez LE, Poust A, Rampal R, Rosovsky R, Roy V, Rugo HS, Shayani S, Vasu S, Wadleigh M, Westbrook K, Westervelt P, Burns J, Keller J, Pluchino LA. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hematopoietic Growth Factors, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 18:12-22. [PMID: 31910384 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Management of febrile neutropenia (FN) is an integral part of supportive care for patients undergoing cancer treatment. The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Growth Factors provide suggestions for appropriate evaluation, risk determination, prophylaxis, and management of FN. These NCCN Guidelines are intended to guide clinicians in the appropriate use of growth factors for select patients undergoing treatment of nonmyeloid malignancies. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight important updates to the NCCN Guidelines regarding the incorporation of newly FDA-approved granulocyte-colony stimulating factor biosimilars for the prevention and treatment of FN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laura M Alwan
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | - Anna Brown
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
| | - Rita Cool
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | - Shira Dinner
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Ivana Gojo
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | | | | | - Eric H Kraut
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | - Gary H Lyman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | - Sudipto Mukherjee
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Shiven Patel
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hope S Rugo
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | - Sumithira Vasu
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Peter Westervelt
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine; and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moore L, Bartels T, Persky DO, Abraham I, Kumar A, McBride A. Outcomes of primary and secondary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced and febrile neutropenia in bendamustine plus rituximab regimens in patients with lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: real-world, single-center experience. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:4867-4874. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05982-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
19
|
Yucel A, Skalicky A, Eseyin OR, Yucel E, Belani R, Bensink M. Development and content validation of the Satisfaction and Experience Questionnaire for Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (SEQ-G-CSF). J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:10. [PMID: 33459887 PMCID: PMC7813942 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00277-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several options for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia are available to patients worldwide. We have developed a novel patient-reported outcome measure, the Satisfaction and Experience Questionnaire for G-CSF (SEQ-G-CSF), to help understand patients' perspectives of and satisfaction with different G-CSF options. RESULTS Three oncology nurses and 40 adult oncology patients in the United States were enrolled and participated in focus group discussions to develop and refine the SEQ-G-CSF. Nurses had ≥ 5 years of experience treating oncology patients and were currently involved in the management of oncology patients receiving G-CSF prophylaxis. The patients had breast cancer, lung cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or prostate cancer (10 patients in each group) and were receiving G-CSF prophylaxis via injection or the on-body injector (OBI) device. The preliminary SEQ-G-CSF contained an item relevance questionnaire and three SEQ modules (sociodemographic, medical history, and G-CSF-related healthcare characteristics questionnaires). Twenty-one patients (53% of total sample size) discussed their experience and satisfaction with G-CSF. Their most common experiences were G-CSF effectiveness, convenience and benefits of the OBI, and relationships with healthcare providers. Side effects and having to undergo additional treatment were also reported. Satisfaction with aspects of G-CSF included the OBI and effectiveness of G-CSF treatment; dissatisfaction included inconvenience (having to return to the clinic the next day and administration of the injection) and the insurance approval process. The SEQ-G-CSF was finalized after three rounds of cognitive interviews and includes five domains related to general satisfaction (one item), treatment burden (four items), travel burden (two items), time burden (four items), and treatment compliance (two items). CONCLUSIONS The SEQ-G-CSF is a novel instrument that quantifies a patient's experience and satisfaction with different G-CSF options using 13 easy-to-understand items. This study provides evidence for the content validity of SEQ-G-CSF. Although further psychometric testing is required, the SEQ-G-CSF may be a useful addition to clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aylin Yucel
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Emre Yucel
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Rajesh Belani
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - Mark Bensink
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ba Y, Shi Y, Jiang W, Feng J, Cheng Y, Xiao L, Zhang Q, Qiu W, Xu B, Xu R, Shen B, Luo Z, Xie X, Chang J, Wang M, Li Y, Shuang Y, Niu Z, Liu B, Zhang J, Zhang L, Yao H, Xie C, Huang H, Liao W, Chen G, Zhang X, An H, Deng Y, Gong P, Xiong J, Yao Q, An X, Chen C, Shi Y, Wang J, Wang X, Wang Z, Xing P, Yang S, Zhou C. Current management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in adults: key points and new challenges: Committee of Neoplastic Supportive-Care (CONS), China Anti-Cancer Association Committee of Clinical Chemotherapy, China Anti-Cancer Association. Cancer Biol Med 2020; 17:896-909. [PMID: 33299642 PMCID: PMC7721096 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a potentially fatal and common complication in myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The timing and grade of CIN may play prognostic and predictive roles in cancer therapy. CIN is associated with older age, poor functional and nutritional status, the presence of significant comorbidities, the type of cancer, previous chemotherapy cycles, the stage of the disease, specific chemotherapy regimens, and combined therapies. There are many key points and new challenges in the management of CIN in adults including: (1) Genetic risk factors to evaluate the patient's risk for CIN remain unclear. However, these risk factors urgently need to be identified. (2) Febrile neutropenia (FN) remains one of the most common reasons for oncological emergency. No consensus nomogram for FN risk assessment has been established. (3) Different assessment tools [e.g., Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), the Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) score model, and other tools] have been suggested to help stratify the risk of complications in patients with FN. However, current tools have limitations. The CISNE score model is useful to support decision-making, especially for patients with stable FN. (4) There are still some challenges, including the benefits of granulocyte colony stimulating factor treatment and the optimal antibiotic regimen in emergency management of FN. In view of the current reports, our group discusses the key points, new challenges, and management of CIN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Ba
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Yuankai Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Wenqi Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Jifeng Feng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Ying Cheng
- Department of Oncology, Jilin Province Cancer Hospital, Changchun 130012, China
| | - Li Xiao
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen 361004, China
| | - Qingyuan Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Hospital Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| | - Wensheng Qiu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ruihua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Zhiguo Luo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiaodong Xie
- Department of Oncology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Jianhua Chang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Mengzhao Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Yufu Li
- Department of Hematology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Yuerong Shuang
- Lymphoma and Myeloma Department, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang 330029, China
| | - Zuoxing Niu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
| | - Bo Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Herui Yao
- Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Conghua Xie
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Huiqiang Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Wangjun Liao
- Department of Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Gongyan Chen
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Hospital Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| | - Xiaotian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Hanxiang An
- Department of Medical Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China
| | - Yanhong Deng
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
| | - Ping Gong
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi 832000, China
| | - Jianping Xiong
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
| | - Qinghua Yao
- Department of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Science, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
| | - Xin An
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Cheng Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Yanxia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Jialei Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiaohua Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Zhiqiang Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Puyuan Xing
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Sheng Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Chenfei Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rawlley B, Diab O, Al-Rajabi R, Carroll E, Melancon T, Kasi A. Dual deficiency of DPD and UGT1A1 in a case of colon cancer. Pharmacogenomics 2020; 21:1265-1269. [PMID: 33203301 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2020-0097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bharat Rawlley
- University College of Medical Sciences & GTB Hospital, New Delhi, 110095, India
| | - Osama Diab
- Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Raed Al-Rajabi
- Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Erin Carroll
- Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Tina Melancon
- Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Anup Kasi
- Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gerberich AJ, Attilio MR, Svoboda A. Revisiting same day administration of pegfilgrastim in the age of biosimilars: A review of literature. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 26:1970-1976. [DOI: 10.1177/1078155220956305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Since 2018, several pegfilgrastim biosimilars were approved, which may affect insurance reimbursement. Guidelines recommend pegfilgrastim be administered the days following chemotherapy to prevent hematopoietic toxicity. To date, only the reference pegfilgrastim product has an available autoinjector-device. This has contributed to logistical issues in administering biosimilar agents per guideline recommendations. Administration on the same day as chemotherapy may be a potential alternative when logistical issues are present. This review will assess current evidence on this practice to inform clinical decisions. Data sources: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline for studies examining the administration of pegfilgrastim on the same day as chemotherapy. Data summary: Several studies were identified, including a systematic review, retrospective reviews, and insurance claim data. Studies had significant limitations, and chemotherapy regimens and cancer types varied among studies. Studies showed inconsistent results in terms of incidence, duration, and severity of febrile neutropenia. In studies with patients with head and neck, urothelial, gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and prostate cancer, no difference in outcomes was detected or outcomes supported the feasibility of same-day administration. In patients with breast cancer, outcomes were worse with same-day administration. Outcomes were mixed in studies with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and various solid tumors. Conclusion Administration of pegfilgrastim on the same day as chemotherapy may be safe and an acceptable alternative, if logistics prohibit a patient from receiving administration the days after chemotherapy. Clinicians should consider patient risk factors and prescribed chemotherapy regimens, along with available evidence when contemplating administration of same-day pegfilgrastim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Gerberich
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark R Attilio
- Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alison Svoboda
- Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Umoru GO, Zaghloul H, El-Rahi C, Ensor JE. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim when given less than two weeks from dose-dense chemotherapy regimens. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 27:1119-1124. [PMID: 32787561 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220948937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In clinical practice, waiting 14 days between the administration of pegfilgrastim and subsequent chemotherapy cycle (as recommended by the prescribing information) is sometimes not feasible with multi-cycle dose-dense regimens. This study evaluated the practice related to the use of pegfilgrastim in oncology patients at a multi-hospital health system. METHODS Patients who received pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis following dose-dense chemotherapy scheduled every 14 days were included. The primary endpoint was the impact of <14 elapsed days between pegfilgrastim administration and next chemotherapy cycle on the change in mean absolute neutrophil counts (ANC). A generalized linear mixed-effects model with fixed effects for pegfilgrastim delivery method, elapsed days between pegfilgrastim and chemotherapy (fixed categorical effect for 12, 13, 14 days), and ANC at subsequent cycle was fitted to the change in ANC between chemotherapy cycles. RESULTS One hundred and sixty four patients with breast cancer who received pegfilgrastim support for dose dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC) qualified for the model. The mean age was 52 ± 12 years. Eighty-eight percent received pegfilgrastim on-body injector while 13% received pegfilgrastim injection. The mean number of elapsed days between pegfilgrastim and subsequent chemotherapy was 13 ± 0.5 days. The method of pegfilgrastim delivery and elapsed days between pegfilgrastim and chemotherapy administration had no significant effect on the change in ANC (p = 0.8663 and p = 0.8434 respectively); however, patient's age (p = 0.0125) had a significant effect on the change in ANC. CONCLUSION The study findings suggest safety and efficacy when chemotherapy is administered 12-14 days from pegfilgrastim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hanna Zaghloul
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cynthia El-Rahi
- Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joe E Ensor
- Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Draper AS, Lafollette J, Kim C, Wu CS. Retrospective study evaluating the safety of administering pegfilgrastim on the final day of 5-fluorouracil continuous intravenous infusion. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 27:1159-1164. [PMID: 32762293 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220945771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pegfilgrastim, a long-acting granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor used to prevent neutropenia, is not indicated for administration within 24 h of completion of chemotherapy. The safety of administering pegfilgrastim in gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy regimens containing continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FUCI) on the day of completion of 5-fluorouracil has not been adequately studied. METHODS An institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis of patients with a gastrointestinal malignancy receiving pegfilgrastim on the final day of 5-FUCI was conducted. The primary end point was to determine the incidence of grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia when pegfilgrastim was administered on the final day of 5-FUCI. The secondary endpoint was to determine rate of dose reductions and treatment delays. RESULTS A total of 300 patients were reviewed from January 2010 to May 2017. The most common cancers were colorectal (25%) and pancreatic (60%), with 77% of patients having late stage disease. The risk of a patient developing grade 3 neutropenia was 0.010 (95% CI 0.002-0.029) and grade 4 neutropenia was 0.007 (95% CI 0.001-0.024). The risk of febrile neutropenia was 0.007 (95% CI 0.001-0.024). The risks of treatment delay and treatment reduction were 0.013 (95% CI 0.004-0.034) and 0.010 (95% CI 0.002-0.029), respectively. CONCLUSION The low risk of grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, as well as dose delays and/or reduction suggests that pegfilgrastim can be administered on the final day of 5-FUCI. Limitations of this study were that it was retrospective in nature and was conducted at a single institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber S Draper
- Emory Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Chaejin Kim
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christina S Wu
- Emory Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Edelsberg J, Weycker D, Bensink M, Bowers C, Lyman GH. Prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia with colony-stimulating factors: the first 25 years. Curr Med Res Opin 2020; 36:483-495. [PMID: 31834830 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1703665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Filgrastim prophylaxis, both primary and secondary, was rapidly incorporated into clinical practice in the 1990s. When pegfilgrastim became available in 2002, it quickly replaced filgrastim as the colony-stimulating factor (CSF) of choice for prophylaxis. Use of prophylaxis increased markedly in the first decade of this century and has stabilized during the present decade. Data concerning real-world CSF prophylactic practice patterns are limited but suggest that both primary and secondary prophylaxis are common, and that use is frequently inappropriate according to guidelines. The extent of inappropriate use is controversial, as are issues concerning the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis and the cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis. Nevertheless, CSF prophylaxis is firmly established as a valuable adjunct to chemotherapy and will almost certainly continue to be widely used for the foreseeable future. In this article, we chronicle the use and impact of CSF prophylaxis in US patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for non-myeloid malignancies. We emphasize the interplay of expert opinion, clinical evidence, and economic factors in shaping the use of CSFs in clinical practice over time, and, with the recent introduction of new CSF agents and options, we aim to provide useful clinical and economic information for healthcare decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Gary H Lyman
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
A rapid and sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of ziyuglycoside I and its application in a preliminary pharmacokinetic study in healthy and leukopenic rats. Biomed Pharmacother 2020; 123:109756. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
|
27
|
Wang Y, Chen L, Liu F, Zhao N, Xu L, Fu B, Li Y. Efficacy and tolerability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients after chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019; 9:15374. [PMID: 31653961 PMCID: PMC6814815 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51982-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The optimum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment for cancer patients after being treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy remains unknown. Therefore, a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of 11 G-CSF drugs on patients after chemotherapy. A total of 73 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) containing 15,124 cancer patients were included for the final network meta-analysis. Compared with pegfilgrastim, there were a higher risk with filgrastim for incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) (OR [95% CI]: 1.63 [1.07, 2.46]), and a higher risk with short-acting G-CSF (S-G-CSF) biosimilar and lenograstim for incidence of bone pain (BP) (OR [95% CI]: 6.45 [1.10, 65.73], 5.12 [1.14, 26.12], respectively). Mecapegfilgrastim, lipegfilgrastim and balugrastim were best G-CSF drugs in reducing FN (cumulative probabilities: 58%, 15%, 11%, respectively). S-G-CSF biosimilar, empegfilgrastim, and long-acting G-CSF (L-G-CSF) biosimilar were best G-CSF drugs in reducing severe neutropenia (SN) (cumulative probabilities: 21%, 20%, 15%, respectively). Mecapegfilgrastim, balugrastim, lipegfilgrastim and L-G-CSF biosimilar were best G-CSF drugs in reducing BP (cumulative probabilities: 20%, 14%, 8%, 8%, respectively). Mecapegfilgrastim, lipegfilgrastim and balugrastim might be the most appreciate G-CSF drugs with both good efficacy and tolerability when treating cancer patients after cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 Yongwai Zheng Road, Nanchang, 330000, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University (Ganzhou People's Hospital), 18 Meiguan Road, Ganzhou, 341000, China
| | - Lin Chen
- Department of Internal Neurology, The Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital of Nanchang University (Ganzhou People's Hospital), 18 Meiguan Road, Ganzhou, 341000, China
| | - Fen Liu
- Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 Yongwai Zheng Road, Nanchang, 330000, China
| | - Ning Zhao
- Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 Yongwai Zheng Road, Nanchang, 330000, China
| | - Liyao Xu
- Department of paediatrics, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 57 Zugan Road, Hangzhou, 310000, China
| | - Biqi Fu
- Department of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 Yongwai Zheng Road, Nanchang, 330000, China
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 Yongwai Zheng Road, Nanchang, 330000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Li L, Ma S, Wu M, Tan X, Zhong S, Lang J. The prophylactic effects of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in newly diagnosed patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a randomised controlled study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019; 9:373-380. [PMID: 31467066 PMCID: PMC6923945 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Objective This study explored the prophylactic effects of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for febrile neutropenia (FN) in newly diagnosed patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods Patients were randomised into a study group (long-acting G-CSF for all chemotherapy cycles) and a control group (short-acting G-CSF for first cycle and treatment per physician discretion for subsequent cycles) at a ratio of 1:2. The incidences of FN and myelosuppression and the number of clinical visits, medication doses, complete blood count (CBC) tests and adverse events were compared between the two groups. A regression model was used to determine the risk factors for FN. Results From 30 November 2018 to 1 April 2019, 84 cases were included in the final analysis; there were 24 (28.6%) and 60 (71.4%) patients in the study and control groups, respectively, and 605 chemotherapy cycles. The study group or chemotherapy cycles utilising long-acting G-CSF had significantly fewer utilisations and doses of short-acting G-CSF; clinical visits; CBC tests; and incidences of FN and myelosuppression; and less G-CSF-associated pain. The utilisation of G-CSF was the only independent factor for FN in a binary regression model. Conclusion Long-acting G-CSF could effectively reduce the incidences of FN and myelosuppression and had mild adverse effects in newly diagnosed patients with EOC receiving chemotherapy. Trial registration number NCT03740464.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shuiqing Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xianjie Tan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Sen Zhong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jinghe Lang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shevchuk OO, Todor IM, Lukianova NY, Rodionova NK, Nikolaev VG, Chekhun VF. EFFICACY OF GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR AND ENTEROSORPTION IN MELPHALAN-INDUCED BONE MARROW SUPPRESSION IN GUERIN CARCINOMA GRAFTED RATS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND MEDICAL RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.11603/ijmmr.2413-6077.2019.1.10307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Side effects of antineoplastic agents (especially leukopenia and neutropenia) could be the main limiting factors for efficient treatment.
Objective. The research is aimed at the study of myeloprotective capability of biosimilars of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granular carbon oral adsorbent C2 in melphalan-induced bone marrow suppression in Guerin carcinoma-grafted rats.
Methods. Melphalan at the dose of 5.5 mg/kg was used to promote bone marrow suppression in the Guerin carcinoma grafted rats. To fight myelosuppression, we used filgrastim and its analogue, designed and produced by IEPOR, a recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (r-GCSF). Carbon granulated enterosorbent C2 was used for enteral sorption therapy (bulk density γ=0.18 g/cm3, diameter of granules 0.15-0.25 mm, BET pore surface – 2162 m2/g). All rats were sacrificed on the 17th day after carcinoma cells inoculation or on the 8th day after Melphalan injection.
Results. Alkylating cytostatic agent caused severe leukopenia (by 95.7%), neutropenia (by 73.9%), and thrombocytopenia (by 84.9%) in the experimental rats. Mortality rate was 57%. Filgrastim and enterosorption with carbon oral adsorbent C2 increased the studied indices, but the most prominent results were observed when combination of both factors was used. Studied means did not affect the anti-tumor efficacy of Melphalan alone and in combination.
Conclusions. Our results are perspective for further investigation of the efficacy of the combination of carbon oral adsorbents and hematopoietic cytokines in cases of ameliorate anti-cancer chemotherapy side effects, and its implementation into clinics.
Collapse
|
30
|
Oncology nurse phone calls halve the risk of reduced dose intensity of immunochemotherapy: results of the randomized FORTIS study in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ann Hematol 2019; 98:931-939. [DOI: 10.1007/s00277-019-03631-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
31
|
Stephens JM, Bensink M, Bowers C, Hollenbeak CS. Risks and consequences of travel burden on prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration and incidence of febrile neutropenia in an aged Medicare population. Curr Med Res Opin 2019; 35:229-240. [PMID: 29661043 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1465906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. This study examines the impact patient travel burden has on administration of prophylactic G-CSFs and the subsequent impact on FN incidence. METHODS Medicare claims data were used to identify a cohort of beneficiaries age 65+ with non-myeloid cancers at high risk for FN between January 2012 and December 2014. Driving distance and time were calculated from patient residence ZIP code to the location of G-CSF and/or chemotherapy administration. Regression models were used to estimate the odds of G-CSF prophylaxis relative to patient driving distance and time, and odds of FN incidence relative to timing of G-CSF administration (optimal [days 2-4 after chemotherapy], sub-optimal [same day], or none). RESULTS The 52,389 study patients had a mean age of 73.5 years, and were 82% female and 89% white race; 49% had female breast cancer, 12% lung cancer, 15% ovarian cancer, and 24% non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Of these high FN risk patients, 69% had at least one prophylactic G-CSF administration within at least one chemotherapy cycle. The percentage of patients receiving prophylactic G-CSFs in the first cycle was 56%. Median travel time was slightly longer for patients who did not receive G-CSFs and patients receiving short-acting vs long-acting G-CSFs. The odds of receiving no G-CSFs were 26-52% higher (depending on cancer type) for patients with a >80-min one-way travel time, compared to patients traveling <20-min. Concurrently, the odds of FN (using a "narrow" definition) were 18-93% higher for patients who did not receive G-CSFs in the first cycle of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Travel burden, linked to clinic visits for G-CSF administration following myelosuppressive chemotherapy, is associated with sub-optimal use of G-CSF prophylaxis, which may result in a higher incidence of FN.
Collapse
|
32
|
Thunström Salzer A, Niemiec MJ, Hosseinzadeh A, Stylianou M, Åström F, Röhm M, Ahlm C, Wahlin A, Ermert D, Urban CF. Assessment of Neutrophil Chemotaxis Upon G-CSF Treatment of Healthy Stem Cell Donors and in Allogeneic Transplant Recipients. Front Immunol 2018; 9:1968. [PMID: 30254629 PMCID: PMC6141688 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Neutrophils are crucial for the human innate immunity and constitute the majority of leukocytes in circulation. Thus, blood neutrophil counts serve as a measure for the immune system's functionality. Hematological patients often have low neutrophil counts due to disease or chemotherapy. To increase neutrophil counts and thereby preventing infections in high-risk patients, recombinant G-CSF is widely used as adjunct therapy to stimulate the maturation of neutrophils. In addition, G-CSF is utilized to recruit stem cells (SCs) into the peripheral blood of SC donors. Still, the actual functionality of neutrophils resulting from G-CSF treatment remains insufficiently understood. We tested the ex vivo functionality of neutrophils isolated from blood of G-CSF-treated healthy SC donors. We quantified chemotaxis, oxidative burst, and phagocytosis before and after treatment and detected significantly reduced chemotactic activity upon G-CSF treatment. Similarly, in vitro treatment of previously untreated neutrophils with G-CSF led to reduced chemotactic activity. In addition, we revealed that this effect persists in the allogeneic SC recipients up to 4 weeks after neutrophil engraftment. Our data indicates that neutrophil quantity, as a sole measure of immunocompetence in high-risk patients should be considered cautiously as neutrophil functionality might be affected by the primary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Thunström Salzer
- Department of Radiation Sciences, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Microbiology & Laboratory of Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Maria J Niemiec
- Department of Clinical Microbiology & Laboratory of Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ava Hosseinzadeh
- Department of Clinical Microbiology & Laboratory of Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Marios Stylianou
- Department of Clinical Microbiology & Laboratory of Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Åström
- Department of Radiation Sciences, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Marc Röhm
- Department of Clinical Microbiology & Laboratory of Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Clas Ahlm
- Department of Clinical Microbiology & Laboratory of Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Anders Wahlin
- Department of Radiation Sciences, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
| | - David Ermert
- Department of Clinical Microbiology & Laboratory of Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Constantin F Urban
- Department of Clinical Microbiology & Laboratory of Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Stephens JM, Bensink M, Bowers C, Hollenbeak CS. Travel burden associated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration in a Medicare aged population: a geospatial analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2018; 34:1351-1360. [PMID: 28722536 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1358158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) is recommended for patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens with a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). G-CSFs should be administered starting the day after chemotherapy, necessitating return trips to the oncology clinic at the end of each cycle. We examined the travel burden related to prophylactic G-CSF injections after chemotherapy in the US. METHODS We used 2012-2014 Medicare claims data to identify a national cohort of beneficiaries age 65+ with non-myeloid cancers who received both chemotherapy and prophylactic G-CSFs. Patient travel origin was based on residence ZIP code. Oncologist practice locations and hospital addresses were obtained from the Medicare Physician Compare and Hospital Compare websites and geocoded using the Google Maps Application Programming Interface (API). Driving distance and time to the care site from each patient ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA) were calculated using Open Street Maps road networks. Geographic and socio-economic characteristics of each ZCTA from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey were used to stratify and analyze travel estimates. RESULTS The mean one-way driving distance to the G-CSF provider was 23.8 (SD 30.1) miles and the mean one-way driving time was 33.3 (SD 37.8) minutes. When stratified by population density, the mean one-way travel time varied from 12.1 (SD 10.1) minutes in Very Dense Urban areas to 76.7 (SD 72.1) minutes in Super Rural areas. About 48% of patients had one-way travel times of <20 minutes, but 19% of patients traveled ≥50 minutes one way for G-CSF prophylaxis. Patients in areas with above average concentrations of aged, poor or disabled residents were more likely to experience longer travel. CONCLUSIONS Administration of G-CSF therapy after chemotherapy can present a significant travel burden for cancer patients. Technological improvements in the form and methods of drug delivery for G-CSFs might significantly reduce this travel burden.
Collapse
|
34
|
Kanbayashi Y, Ishikawa T, Kanazawa M, Nakajima Y, Kawano R, Tabuchi Y, Yoshioka T, Ihara N, Hosokawa T, Takayama K, Shikata K, Taguchi T. Predictive factors in patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis focusing on RDI using ordered logistic regression analysis. Med Oncol 2018; 35:55. [PMID: 29549536 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1116-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Although pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is expected to maintain the relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy and improve safety, information is limited. However, the optimal selection of patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is an important issue from a medical economics viewpoint. Therefore, this retrospective study identified factors that could predict these eligible patients to maintain the RDI. The participants included 166 cancer patients undergoing pegfilgrastim prophylaxis combined with chemotherapy in our outpatient chemotherapy center between March 2015 and April 2017. Variables were extracted from clinical records for regression analysis of factors related to maintenance of the RDI. RDI was classified into four categories: 100% = 0, 85% or < 100% = 1, 60% or < 85% = 2, and < 60% = 3. Multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors in patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis to maintain the RDI. Threshold measures were examined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curve. Age [odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.11; P < 0.0001], anemia (grade) (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.10-2.84; P = 0.0184), and administration 24-72 h after chemotherapy (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.89; P = 0.0224) were factors that significantly correlated with RDI maintenance. ROC curve analysis of the group that failed to maintain the RDI indicated that the threshold for age was 70 years and above, with a sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 80.2% (area under the curve: 0.74). In conclusion, younger age, anemia (less), and administration of pegfilgrastim 24-72 h after chemotherapy were significant factors for RDI maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Kanbayashi
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
- Outpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
- Pain Treatment and Palliative Care Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Ishikawa
- Outpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Motohiro Kanazawa
- Outpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuki Nakajima
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
- Outpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Rumi Kawano
- Outpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Nursing Department, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tabuchi
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Tomoko Yoshioka
- Outpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Pain Treatment and Palliative Care Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Nursing Department, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Norihiko Ihara
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
- Outpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toyoshi Hosokawa
- Pain Treatment and Palliative Care Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Pain Management and Palliative Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koichi Takayama
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Keisuke Shikata
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Taguchi
- Outpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
McCullough RW. US oncology-wide incidence, duration, costs and deaths from chemoradiation mucositis and antimucositis therapy benefits. Future Oncol 2017; 13:2823-2852. [PMID: 29192505 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximate oncology-wide incidence, duration, costs and deaths associated with mucositis and identify health economic benefits of antimucositis therapies. Review the literature relevant to the clinical experience of mucositis by pathophysiology, incidence, duration, costs and deaths. Use US insurance actuarial and epidemiology on cancer to generalize an oncology-wide impact of toxic mucositis. Toxic mucositis causes oropharyngoesophageal ulcerations, chemo-induced nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Acutely, it lasts 102 days/six cycles of chemotherapy, 60 days in human stem-cell transplantation patients and 70-84 days in head and neck cancer patients at annual costs of US$13.23 billion/522,166 treated patients (US$20,892/erosive-type mucositis patient, US$25,337/physiologic mucositis patient) and 46,699 deaths. Using antimucositis therapies prior to 2013 provided fractional benefits at high costs. By completely preventing and rapidly reversing mucositis, high-potency polymerized cross-linked sucralfate promises superior health economic benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricky W McCullough
- Translational Medicine Clinic & Research Center, Department of Medical Research, 1768 Storrs Road, Storrs, CT 06268, USA.,Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center Providence, Brown University Teaching Affliate, 830 Chaulkstone Ave, Providence, RI 02804, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Duncan R. Polymer therapeutics at a crossroads? Finding the path for improved translation in the twenty-first century. J Drug Target 2017; 25:759-780. [PMID: 28783978 DOI: 10.1080/1061186x.2017.1358729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Despite the relatively small early investment, first generation 'polymer therapeutics' have been remarkably successful with more than 25 products licenced for human use as polymeric drugs, sequestrants, conjugates, and as an imaging agent. Many exhibit both clinical and commercial success with new concepts already in clinical trials. Nevertheless after four decades of evolution, this field is arriving at an important crossroads. Over the last decade, the landscape has changed rapidly. There are an increasing number of failed clinical trials, the number of 'copy' and 'generic' products is growing (danger of ignoring the biological rationale for design and suppression of innovation), potential drawbacks of PEG are becoming more evident, and the 'nanomedicine' boom has brought danger of loss of scientific focus/hype. Grasping opportunities provided by advances in understanding of the patho-physiology and molecular basis of diseases, new polymer/conjugate synthetic and analytical methods, as well as the large database of clinical experience will surely ensure a successful future for innovative polymer therapeutics. Progress will, however, be in jeopardy if polymer safety is overlooked in respect of the specific route of administration/clinical use, poorly characterised materials/formulations are used to define biological or early clinical properties, and if clinical trial protocols fail to select patients most likely to benefit from these macromolecular therapeutics. Opportunities to improve clinical trial design for polymer-anticancer drug conjugates are discussed. This short personal perspective summarises some of the important challenges facing polymer therapeutics in R&D today, and future opportunities to improve successful translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Duncan
- a Polymer Therapeutics Laboratory , Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe , Valencia , Spain.,b Intracellular Delivery Solutions Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Science , University of Greenwich , Kent , UK
| |
Collapse
|