Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) 2020 clinical practice recommendations for the management of severe gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities from checkpoint inhibitors

Anti-PD-L1 antibody retains antitumour effects while mitigating immunotherapy-related colitis in bladder cancer-bearing mice after CT-mediated intratumoral delivery

Drug local delivery system that directly supply anti-cancer drugs to the tumor microenvironment (TME) results in excellent tumor control and minimizes side effects associated with the anti-cancer drugs. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been the mainstay of cancer immunotherapy. However, the systemic administration of ICIs is accompanied by considerable immunotherapy-related toxicity. To explore whether an anti-PD-L1 antibody administered locally via a sustained-release gel-forming carrier retains its effective anticancer function while causing fewer colitis-like side effects, CT, a previously reported depot system, was used to locally deliver an anti-PD-L1 antibody together with curcumin to the TME in bladder cancer-bearing ulcerative colitis model mice. We showed that CT-mediated intratumoral coinjection of an anti-PD-L1 antibody and curcumin enabled sustained release of both the loaded anti-PD-L1 antibody and curcumin, which contributed to substantial anticancer effects with negligible side effects on the colons of the UC model mice. However, although the anti-PD-L1 antibody administered systemically synergized with the CT-mediated intratumoral delivery of curcumin in inhibiting tumour growth, colitis was significantly worsened by intraperitoneal administration of anti-PD-L1 antibody. These findings suggested that CT is a promising agent for the local delivery of anticancer drugs, as it can allow effective anticancer functions to be retained while sharply reducing the adverse side effects associated with the systemic administration of these drugs.

Hepatobiliary complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the landscape of cancer therapy. Over the last decade, both their primary focus in trials and clinical application have exponentially risen, with repeated demonstrations of their efficacy in improving survival in various cancer types. The adverse effects of these drugs on various organ systems were recognised in early phase studies. Given their relatively new emergence on the market, there has been increasing interest into short- and long-term effects and management of ICIs in real-world settings. ICI-related hepatobiliary toxicities are often challenging to diagnose and difficult to distinguish from other causes of deranged liver biochemical tests. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date and detailed exploration of the hepatobiliary complications of ICIs, including pathogenesis and approaches to diagnosis and management.

Psoriasis de novo or exacerbation by PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1 (programmed Death-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have provided significant benefits to tumor patients. However, a considerable proportion of the patients develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs), of which cutaneous irAEs (cirAEs, e.g., psoriasis) occur relatively early. This review provides an overview of the current progress in psoriasis de novo or exacerbation by PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. It not only describes the relevant influencing factors but also theoretically analyzes the immunological mechanisms that lead to the onset or exacerbation of psoriasis. Finally, the authors present guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis de novo or exacerbation by PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. The review is intended to assist dermatologists in the early recognition and effective individualized management of such cirAE, which is helpful to continue or adjust the tumor-targeted immunotherapy on the basis of ensuring the quality of life of tumor patients.

Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation following camrelizumab monotherapy or combination therapy for multi-cancers: a large-scale pooled analysis of 10 studies in China

Background

Skin toxicities are the most common adverse events related to immunotherapy, such as reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) following treatment with the anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody camrelizumab.

Objective

This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the clinical features and prognostic value of RCCEP in patients with malignancies who received camrelizumab alone (Camre) or in combination with the angiogenesis-targeted agent apatinib (Camre-Apa) or chemotherapy (Camre-Chemo).

Design

A large-scale pooled analysis.

Methods

Individual patient-level data were derived from 10 clinical trials of camrelizumab monotherapy, camrelizumab plus apatinib, or camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 1305).

Results

RCCEP occurred in 77.0% (516/670) of patients with Camre, 23.6% (70/296) with Camre-Apa, and 67.8% (230/339) with Camre-Chemo. Most RCCEP lesions were grade 1 or 2 in severity. The median time to onset was 0.8 months [interquartile range (IQR), 0.6-1.2] with Camre, 5.0 months (IQR, 2.7-8.0) with Camre-Apa, and 1.6 months (IQR, 1.0-4.2) with Camre-Chemo; and the median duration was 4.8 months (IQR, 2.6-8.8), 4.4 months (IQR, 1.7-8.9), and 7.2 months (IQR, 4.1-14.3), respectively. In all the three groups, patients with RCCEP showed significantly better clinical outcomes compared with those without [objective response rate: 23.8% versus 1.9% with Camre, 48.6% versus 21.2% with Camre-Apa, and 78.7% versus 54.1% with Camre-Chemo; median progression-free survival: 3.2 versus 1.7 months (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.36), 10.2 versus 4.5 months (HR = 0.39), and 12.7 versus 7.3 months (HR = 0.38); median overall survival: 13.3 versus 3.8 months (HR = 0.34), 29.2 versus 13.5 months (HR = 0.46), and not reached versus 12.8 months (HR = 0.19); all p < 0.0001].

Conclusion

Although RCCEP occurred frequently with camrelizumab, most lesions were mild and self-limiting. The occurrence of RCCEP was strongly associated with the antitumor activity and survival of camrelizumab, both as monotherapy and in combination therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and risk of immune-mediated adverse events: a cohort study comparing extended versus standard interval administration

The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated the implementation of extended interval immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in an effort to limit hospital visits, but few studies have examined their safety. This study aimed to compare in oncology outpatients, immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs) in terms of total number, incidence, severity, and time to occurrence, based on exposure to standard or extended interval ICIs. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients who received at least one dose of an ICI between 2015 and 2021. Data were collected from patient records and pharmacy software. Adjusted logistic, Poisson, and Cox regression models were estimated. A total of 310 patients with a mean age of 67.1 years were included, 130 of whom had the extended interval. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. With the standard and extended intervals, the mean total number of IMAE per participant was 1.02 and 1.18, respectively; the incidence of an IMAE was 62% and 64%. Of the 147 IMAE episodes in the standard interval group, 14 (9.5%) were grade 3 or higher, while there were 15 (12.4%) among the 121 IMAE episodes in the extended interval group. Compared with standard interval, the use of extended interval did not increase the risk of having a first IMAE (adjusted hazard ratio 0.92 (95% CI 0.67-1.26)). This study suggests that the administration of an ICI according to extended interval is as safe as the administration according to standard interval in oncology outpatients.

Innate and adaptive immune cell interaction drives inflammasome activation and hepatocyte apoptosis in murine liver injury from immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoints (CTLA4 & PD-1) are inhibitory pathways that block aberrant immune activity and maintain self-tolerance. Tumors co-opt these checkpoints to avoid immune destruction. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) activate immune cells and restore their tumoricidal potential, making them highly efficacious cancer therapies. However, immunotolerant organs such as the liver depend on these tolerogenic mechanisms, and their disruption with ICI use can trigger the unintended side effect of hepatotoxicity termed immune-mediated liver injury from ICIs (ILICI). Learning how to uncouple ILICI from ICI anti-tumor activity is of paramount clinical importance. We developed a murine model to recapitulate human ILICI using CTLA4+/- mice treated with either combined anti-CTLA4 + anti-PDL1 or IgG1 + IgG2. We tested two forms of antisense oligonucleotides to knockdown caspase-3 in a total liver (parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells) or in a hepatocyte-specific manner. We also employed imaging mass cytometry (IMC), a powerful multiplex modality for immunophenotyping and cell interaction analysis in our model. ICI-treated mice had significant evidence of liver injury. We detected cleaved caspase-3 (cC3), indicating apoptosis was occurring, as well as Nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation, but no necroptosis. Total liver knockdown of caspase-3 worsened liver injury, and induced further inflammasome activation, and Gasdermin-D-mediated pyroptosis. Hepatocyte-specific knockdown of caspase-3 reduced liver injury and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. IMC-generated single-cell data for 77,692 cells was used to identify 22 unique phenotypic clusters. Spatial analysis revealed that cC3+ hepatocytes had significantly closer interactions with macrophages, Kupffer cells, and NLRP3hi myeloid cells than other cell types. We also observed zones of three-way interaction between cC3+ hepatocytes, CD8 + T-cells, and macrophages. Our work is the first to identify hepatocyte apoptosis and NLRP3 inflammasome activation as drivers of ILICI. Furthermore, we report that the interplay between adaptive and innate immune cells is critical to hepatocyte apoptosis and ILICI.

PD-1 Blockade Induces Reactivation of Nonproductive T-Cell Responses Characterized by NF-κB Signaling in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) trials have evaluated CTLA-4 and/or PD-(L)1 blockade in patients with advanced disease in which bulky tumor burden and limited time to develop antitumor T cells may have contributed to poor clinical efficacy. Here, we evaluated peripheral blood and tumor T cells from patients with PDAC receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation plus anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab) versus chemoradiation alone. We analyzed whether PD-1 blockade successfully reactivated T cells in the blood and/or tumor to determine whether lack of clinical benefit could be explained by lack of reactivated T cells versus other factors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We used single-cell transcriptional profiling and TCR clonotype tracking to identify TCR clonotypes from blood that match clonotypes in the tumor.

RESULTS

PD-1 blockade increases the flux of TCR clonotypes entering cell cycle and induces an IFNγ signature like that seen in patients with other GI malignancies who respond to PD-1 blockade. However, these reactivated T cells have a robust signature of NF-κB signaling not seen in cases of PD-1 antibody response. Among paired samples between blood and tumor, several of the newly cycling clonotypes matched activated T-cell clonotypes observed in the tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytotoxic T cells in the blood of patients with PDAC remain sensitive to reinvigoration by PD-1 blockade, and some have tumor-recognizing potential. Although these T cells proliferate and have a signature of IFN exposure, they also upregulate NF-κB signaling, which potentially counteracts the beneficial effects of anti-PD-1 reinvigoration and marks these T cells as non-productive contributors to antitumor immunity. See related commentary by Lander and DeNardo, p. 474.

The JAK-STAT Pathway as a Therapeutic Strategy in Cancer Patients with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis: A Narrative Review

Immunotherapy has emerged as a pivotal component in the treatment of various malignancies, encompassing lung, skin, gastrointestinal, and head and neck cancers. The foundation of this therapeutic approach lies in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). While ICIs have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in impeding the neoplastic progression of these tumours, their use may give rise to substantial toxicity, notably in the gastrointestinal domain, where ICI colitis constitutes a significant aspect. The optimal positioning of Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway inhibitors in the therapeutic management of ICI colitis remains unclear. Numerous reports have highlighted notable improvements in ICI colitis through the application of pan-JAK-STAT inhibitors, with tofacitinib, in particular, reporting evident clinical remission of colitis. The precise mechanism by which JAK-STAT inhibitors may impact the pathogenetic process of ICI colitis remains inadequately understood. However, there is speculation regarding their potential role in modulating memory resident CD8+ T lymphocytes. The elucidation of this mechanism requires further extensive and robust evidence, and ongoing JAK-STAT-based trials are anticipated to contribute valuable insights.

Updates in toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a pillar of treatment for numerous cancers with increasing use in combination with other ICIs and in earlier stages of disease treatment. Although effective, ICI use is accompanied by a milieu of potentially bothersome or even life-threatening toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), necessitating careful monitoring and early intervention.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of recent advances surrounding toxicity pathophysiology and treatment in the context of relevant organ systems. An emphasis on current treatments by toxicity, as well as updates on steroid-refractory toxicities, chronic toxicities, and biomarkers will be a focus of this update on the current understanding of irAEs.

EXPERT OPINION

ICI toxicities are a major limitation on the deployment of multi-agent ICI regimens and are thus a major priority to understand, treat, and prevent. Recent developments have led to greater understanding of the pathophysiology of these events, which may lead to improved prevention or mitigation strategies. Further, early studies have also suggested steroid-sparing approaches that may be useful. Ultimately, preventing and managing irAEs will be a key goal toward successful ICI treatment across a broader range of patients with cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors: maximizing benefit whilst minimizing toxicity

INTRODUCTION

The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer; anti-tumor efficacy has been observed with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in ~20 different cancer types with durable responses in some cases. However, the risk of toxicity in the form of immune-related adverse events (irAE) partially counterbalances these benefits, and there are no FDA-approved biomarkers to categorize patients by likelihood of response or risk of irAEs.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a thorough review of the literature of clinical studies regarding ICI and their toxicities. In this review, we synthesize the current body of literature about ICI treatment and irAE by summarizing the classes and uses of ICI, how to identify patients at risk for irAE, present the current understanding of irAE development, describe ongoing research into biomarkers of irAE, examine opportunities for irAE prevention, described management of steroid refractory irAE, and highlight future directions for development of prevention and management strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

While ongoing biomarker studies are promising, it is unlikely that there will be a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to categorizing irAE risk. In contrast, improved management and irAE prophylaxis are potentially in reach, and ongoing trials will help elucidate best practices.

An updated review of gastrointestinal toxicity induced by PD-1 inhibitors: from mechanisms to management

PD-1 inhibitors, as one of commonly used immune checkpoint inhibitors, enable T-cell activation and prevent immune escape by blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway. They have transformed the treatment landscape for cancer in recent years, due to the advantages of significantly prolonging patients' survival and improving their life quality. However, the ensuing unpredictable immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) plague clinicians, such as colitis and even potentially fatal events like intestinal perforation and obstruction. Therefore, understanding the clinical manifestations and grading criteria, underlying mechanisms, available diverse therapies, accessible biomarkers, and basis for risk stratification is of great importance for the management. Current evidence suggests that irAEs may be a marker of clinical benefit to immunotherapy in patients, so whether to discontinue PD-1 inhibitors after the onset of irAEs and rechallenge after remission of irAEs requires further evaluation of potential risk-reward ratios as well as more data from large-scale prospective studies to fully validate. At the end, the rare gastrointestinal toxicity events caused by PD-1 inhibitors are also sorted out. This review provides a summary of available data on the gastrointestinal toxicity profile caused by PD-1 inhibitors, with the aim of raising clinicians' awareness in daily practice, so that patients can safely benefit from therapy.

[Drug induced gastro-intestinal tract lesions: A pathologist point of view]

The number of drugs available to clinicians, especially targeted therapies, grows continuously. Some drugs are known to cause frequent digestive adverse effects, which may affect the gastro-intestinal tract in a diffuse or localized manner. Some treatments may leave relatively pathognomonic deposits, but histological lesions of iatrogenic origin are mostly non-specific. The diagnostic and etiological approach is often complex because of these non-specific aspects and also because (1) a single type of drug may cause different histological lesions, (2) different drugs may cause identical histological lesions, (3) the patient may receive different drugs, and (4) drug-induced lesions may mimic other pathological entities such as inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, or graft versus host disease. The diagnosis of iatrogenic gastrointestinal tract injury therefore requires close anatomic-clinical correlation. The iatrogenic origin can only be formally established if the symptomatology improves when the incriminating drug is stopped. This review aims to present the different histological patterns of gastrointestinal tract iatrogenic lesions, the potentially incriminate drugs, as well as the histological signs to look for in order to help the pathologist to distinguish an iatrogenic injury from another pathology of the gastrointestinal tract.

The Current status of steroid-refractory immune-checkpoint-inhibitor-related hepatotoxicity

ICI-related hepatotoxicity (IRH) is becoming more and more common as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have begun to be increasingly approved and used in combination with other anti-tumor drugs worldwide. Steroids are the first choice for the treatment of IRH, but the subsequent optimal treatment algorithm remains unclear if the disease progresses to steroid-refractory IRH. Therefore, in this paper we reviewed all the pertinent literature on steroid-refractory IRH to the greatest extent possible in an attempt to provide information on which to base an update of the treatment algorithm for steroid-refractory IRH.

Systematic comparison with autoimmune liver disease identifies specific histological features of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a mainstay of cancer treatment. Their immune-boosting quality has one major drawback, their proclivity to induce a broad array of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) affecting, among others, the liver and sharing some similarities with classic autoimmune liver diseases (AILD).We aimed to compare clinical, laboratory and histological features of patients with liver-related irAEs and AILD.

METHODS

We systematically compared liver irAEs with AILD, namely autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cholangitis, regarding their clinical, laboratory, and histological features.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with liver irAEs (ICI group) and 14 patients with AILD were identified. We observed three distinct ICI-induced histological liver injury patterns: hepatitic (52%), cholangitic (19%), and mixed (29%). When comparing the ICI and AILD groups, centrilobular injury as well as granuloma formation were more prevalent in the former (p=0.067 and 0.002, respectively). CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratios were heterogeneous between the two groups, without statistically significant difference but with a trend toward increased CD8+ T cells among hepatitic irAEs as compared with AIH. Pattern of liver function test alteration was predictive for the type of irAEs but did not correlate with histological severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver irAEs have broad clinical, laboratory and histological presentations. Histological features of irAEs and AILD are distinct, likely underpinning their different immunological mechanisms.

Corticosteroids in oncology: use, overuse, indications, contraindications. An Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)/ Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists (AMD)/ Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE)/ Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) multidisciplinary consensus position paper

Corticosteroids (CSs) are widely used in oncology, presenting several different indications. They are useful for induction of apoptosis in hematological neoplasms, for management of anaphylaxis and cytokine release/hypersensitivity reaction and for the symptomatic treatment of many tumour- and treatment-related complications. If the employment of CSs in the oncological setting results in several benefits for patients and satisfaction for clinicians, on the other hand, many potential adverse events (AEs), both during treatment and after withdrawal of CSs, as well as the duality of the effects of these compounds in oncology, recommend being cautious in clinical practice. To date, several gray zones remain about indications, contraindications, dose, and duration of treatment. In this article, a panel of experts provides a critical review on CSs therapy in oncology, focusing on mechanisms of action and pharmacological characteristics, current and emerging therapeutic indications/contraindications, AEs related to CSs treatment, and the impact on patient outcome.

Clinical application status and prospect of the combined anti-tumor strategy of ablation and immunotherapy

Image-guided tumor ablation eliminates tumor cells by physical or chemical stimulation, which shows less invasive and more precise in local tumor treatment. Tumor ablation provides a treatment option for medically inoperable patients. Currently, clinical ablation techniques are widely used in clinical practice, including cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and microwave ablation (MWA). Previous clinical studies indicated that ablation treatment activated immune responses besides killing tumor cells directly, such as short-term anti-tumor response, immunosuppression reduction, specific and non-specific immune enhancement, and the reduction or disappearance of distant tumor foci. However, tumor ablation transiently induced immune response. The combination of ablation and immunotherapy is expected to achieve better therapeutic results in clinical application. In this paper, we provided a summary of the principle, clinical application status, and immune effects of tumor ablation technologies for tumor treatment. Moreover, we discussed the clinical application of different combination of ablation techniques with immunotherapy and proposed possible solutions for the challenges encountered by combined therapy. It is hoped to provide a new idea and reference for the clinical application of combinate treatment of tumor ablation and immunotherapy.

Severe Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Case Series of Patients Needing Hospital Admission in a Spanish Oncology Referral Center and Review of the Literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment. Although several studies have shown that ICIs have a better safety profile than chemotherapy, some patients develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which require specialized and multidisciplinary management. Since ICI indications are rapidly increasing, it is crucial that clinicians involved in cancer care learn to identify irAEs and manage them properly. Here, we report a case series of 23 patients with severe irAEs requiring hospitalization over a period of 12 months and seize the opportunity to review and update different general features related to irAEs along with the management of the most frequent severe irAEs in our series.

Immunotherapy-induced Colitis: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Workup, and Management Plan

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of a variety of malignancies including advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancers among others. Since their introduction, there has been significant improvement in survival and prognosis in patients with advanced malignancies. Unfortunately, improved outcomes have come at a price of significant immune-related adverse events, with those of the gastrointestinal tract being the most common. Gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events frequently present as diarrhea and colitis, the severity of which can range from mild diarrhea to fulminant colitis with intestinal perforation. Currently, management of ICI-induced colitis is primarily guided by retrospective studies and expert opinion. A significant number of ICI-induced colitis responds to high-dose corticosteroids; however, some patients require further therapy with biologics. There is limited information on the factors which may predispose patients to ICI-induced colitis. Future research elucidating these risk factors along with development of a scoring system could allow for risk-stratification of patients before initiation of ICI therapy. Such a system may help clinicians and patients keep a high index of suspicion regarding ICI-induced colitis and could hopefully reduce the incidence of severe cases. Similarly, future studies should investigate protective factors against ICI-induced colitis, which could potentially allow more patients to safely benefit from ICI therapy.

Checkpoint Inhibitors and Induction of Celiac Disease-like Condition

Immune checkpoint inhibitors herald a new era in oncological therapy-resistant cancer, thus bringing hope for better outcomes and quality of life for patients. However, as with other medications, they are not without serious side effects over time. Despite this, their advantages outweigh their disadvantages. Understanding the adverse effects will help therapists locate, apprehend, treat, and perhaps diminish them. The major ones are termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), representing their auto-immunogenic capacity. This narrative review concentrates on the immune checkpoint inhibitors induced celiac disease (CD), highlighting the importance of the costimulatory inhibitors in CD evolvement and suggesting several mechanisms for CD induction. Unraveling those cross-talks and pathways might reveal some new therapeutic strategies.

Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Resumption after Interruption for Immune-Related Adverse Events, a Narrative Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for several types of cancer due to their superiority in terms of survival benefits in first- and second-line treatments compared to conventional therapies, and they present a better safety profile (lower absolute number of grade 1-5 adverse events), especially if used in monotherapy. However, the pattern of ICI-related adverse events is totally different, as they are characterized by the development of specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that are unique in terms of the organs involved, onset patterns, and severity. The decision to resume ICI treatment after its interruption due to irAEs is challenged by the need for tumor control versus the risk of occurrence of the same or different irAEs. Studies that specifically assess this point remain scarce, heterogenous and mostly based on small samples of patients or focused only on the recurrence rate of the same irAE after ICI resumption. Moreover, patients with grade ≥3 irAEs were excluded from many of these studies. Herein, we provide a narrative review on the field of safety of ICI resumption after interruption due to irAE(s).

Dermatologic immune-related adverse events: The toxicity spectrum and recommendations for management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a new class of oncologic drugs that act via the inhibition of checkpoints, thereby unlocking the immune system to attack cancer cells. Their emergence has radically changed the concept of therapy in oncologic patients. However, despite their overall favorable profile, their use has been associated with specific toxicities that may potentially affect treatment. The so-called immune-related adverse events (irAEs) mostly correspond to dysimmune reactions that can affect nearly every organ system, in theory, notably with the development of colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, or thyroiditis. Dermatologic irAEs are also among the most common, reaching a rate of approximately 40%. They are characterized by a wide phenotypic range, including mainly eczematous or lichenoid rashes, psoriasis, or autoimmune bullous disorders. Pruritus may accompany the aforementioned rashes or develop as an isolated symptom without the presence of skin changes. Depigmentation and hair/nail changes can be also observed in association with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. In the current article, we present an overview of the clinical spectrum of irAEs and provide tips for early recognition and management of dermatologic irAEs. We highlight the role that dermatologists can play in relieving patients and allowing for oncologic treatment to be maintained and administered more safely.

Risk of selected gastrointestinal toxicities in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with immuno-TKI combinations: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Recent years have registered the advent of novel treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), including combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Immuno-TKI combinations have been suggested to improve clinical outcomes but may also result in increased toxicity, including gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events.

METHODS

Herein, we performed a meta-analysis aimed at comparing the risk of certain GI toxicities in mRCC patients treated with immuno-TKI combinations versus sunitinib monotherapy. Overall, four phase III trials (KEYNOTE-426, JAVELIN Renal 101, CheckMate 9ER, CLEAR) involving 3059 mRCC patients were available.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis suggested an increased risk of all-grade diarrhea, grade 3-4 diarrhea and grade 3-4 decreased appetite in patients treated with immuno-TKI combinations. Conversely, an apparently higher risk of all-grade nausea was observed in the sunitinib group.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis suggested that immuno-TKI combinations are associated with higher risk of GI toxicities compared with sunitinib. Beyond the efficacy of immuno-TKI combinations in mRCC patients, careful consideration should be given to treatment-related adverse events, including GI toxicities. Early recognition and treatment are critical to maximize recovery.

Simultaneously Combined Cancer Cell- and CTLA4-Targeted NIR-PIT Causes a Synergistic Treatment Effect in Syngeneic Mouse Models

Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) is a new cancer treatment that utilizes antibody-IRDye700DX (IR700) conjugates. The clinical use of NIR-PIT has recently been approved in Japan for patients with inoperable head and neck cancer targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor (hEGFR). Previously, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4)-targeted NIR-PIT has been shown to strongly inhibit tumor progression and prolonged survival was seen in different tumor models due to enhanced T-cell-mediated antitumor immunity. In this study, combined NIR-PIT targeting CTLA4 expressing cells and cancer cells was investigated in four tumor models including a newly established hEGFR-expressing murine oropharyngeal cancer cell (mEERL-hEGFR). While single molecule-targeted therapy (NIR-PIT targeting hEGFR or CTLA4) did not inhibit tumor progression in poorly immunogenic mEERL-hEGFR tumor, dual (CTLA4/hEGFR)-targeted NIR-PIT significantly suppressed tumor growth and prolonged survival resulting in a 38% complete response rate. After the dual-targeted NIR-PIT, depletion of CTLA4 expressing cells, which were mainly regulatory T cells (Tregs), and an increase in the CD8⁺/Treg ratio in the tumor bed were observed, suggesting enhanced host antitumor immunity. Furthermore, dual-targeted NIR-PIT showed antitumor immunity in distant untreated tumors of the same type. Thus, simultaneous cancer cell-targeted NIR-PIT and CTLA4-targeted NIR-PIT is a promising new cancer therapy strategy, especially in poorly immunogenic tumors where NIR-PIT monotherapy is suboptimal.

Supportive care for new cancer therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The past decade has witnessed unprecedented delivery to the clinical arena of a range of novel, innovative, and effective targeted anticancer therapies. These include immunotherapies, most prominently immune checkpoint inhibitors, as well as agents that target growth factors and cancer-related mutations. Many of these new cancer therapies are, however, associated with an array of toxicities, necessitating insight and vigilance on the part of attending physicians to achieve high-quality supportive care alongside toxicity management. In this review, we consider some of the key supportive care issues in toxicity management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although both supportive care and targeted therapies have brought significant benefits to cancer care, the management of novel cancer therapy toxicities is nevertheless often complex. This is due in large part to the fact that target organs differ widely, particularly in the case of checkpoint inhibitors, with minor dermatological disorders being most common, while others, such as pneumonitis, are more severe and potentially life threatening. Accordingly, efficient management of these immune-related adverse events requires collaboration between multiple medical specialists.

SUMMARY

Supportive care is a key component in the management of new cancer therapy toxicities and needs to be incorporated into treatment pathways.

Refractory Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis Improved by Tacrolimus: A Case Report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) increase T-cell activity and antitumor immune response. However, they also have immune-related adverse effects that can affect the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. A 62-year-old male patient who had undergone right lung upper lobectomy for adenocarcinoma of the lung received chemotherapy with pemetrexed sodium hydrate, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab to prevent postoperative recurrence of liver metastasis. However, the patient experienced severe diarrhea four months after the start of chemotherapy. Although a corticosteroid and two biological preparations were administered to alleviate the diarrhea, no improvement was observed. Eventually, remission was achieved when tacrolimus was administered. Treatment with corticosteroids is recommended for patients with GI adverse effects of ICIs. Rapid introduction of infliximab is necessary for refractory patients. Nevertheless, for refractory cases such as that of our patient, for whom even this regimen is inefficacious, tacrolimus might be recommended to induce remission as with cases of ulcerative colitis.