Risk factors for skeletal-related events in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with bone-modifying agents

Efficacy of submental island flap closing advanced mandibular MRONJ lesion in malignancy patients

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a submental island flap in closing advanced mandibular medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) wounds in patients with malignant tumors.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 85 patients with stage II and III MRONJ of mandible with malignant tumor as their primary disease were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent surgical treatment, and the soft tissue wound closure was performed either with a submental island flap (SIF) or mucoperiosteal flap (MF). Univariate and multifactorial models were applied to analyze the factors influencing patients' prognosis.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis (p = 0.004, OR 0.075-0.575, 95% CI) and binary logistic regression (p = 0.017, OR 0.032-0.713, 95% CI) suggested that the surgical prognosis of SIF wound closure was significantly better than that of MF.

CONCLUSION

Closure of wound after resection of mandibular MRONJ lesions in patients with malignant tumors using SIF had a better clinical prognosis compared with MF.

Analysis of the Mechanism and Safety of Bisphosphonates in Patients with Lung Cancer and Bone Metastases

OBJECTIVE

To explore the mechanism and safety of bisphosphonates in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases.

METHOD

A total of 104 patients with lung cancer and bone metastases in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups: control group (n = 54) and research group (n = 50). Chemotherapy was given to the control group, and the research group was treated with bisphosphonate drugs. The quality of life, HAMA, HAMD score, VAS score, treatment effect, serum calcium and KPS score, inflammatory factor levels, and immune function were compared between the two groups.

RESULT

The quality of life in both groups was significantly increased (P < 0.05). The HAMA and HAMD scores of the research group decreased significantly than those of the control group after treatment (P < 0.05). The VAS scores of the two groups were significantly reduced (P < 0.05). The effective rates of treatment in the control group and the research group were 81.5% and 96.0%, respectively. Serum calcium was significantly decreased, and KPS score was significantly increased at weeks 1 and 6 after treatment, and the change was more obvious in the research group (P < 0.05). The levels of inflammatory factors in the two groups were significantly reduced, and the immune indicators were significantly increased.

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonates have good effect on patients with lung cancer and bone metastases, which can improve anxiety and depression, reduce pain score, improve serum calcium level and immune function, and reduce inflammatory response. Therefore, bisphosphonate drug therapy is worth widely used.

Risk evaluation of denosumab and zoledronic acid for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with bone metastases: a propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients with cancer who received denosumab or zoledronic acid (ZA) for treating bone metastasis.

METHODS

The medical records of patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who did not undergo a dental examination at baseline were excluded. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the risk of developing MRONJ between the denosumab and ZA groups. Propensity score matching was used to control for baseline differences between patient characteristics and compare outcomes for both groups.

RESULTS

Among the 799 patients enrolled, 58 (7.3%) developed MRONJ. The incidence of MRONJ was significantly higher in the denosumab group than in the ZA group (9.6% [39/406] vs. 4.8% [19/393], p = 0.009). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that denosumab treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-5.25; p < 0.001) and tooth extraction after starting ZA or denosumab (HR, 4.26; 95% CI, 2.38-7.44; p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for MRONJ. Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed that the risk of developing MRONJ was significantly higher in the denosumab group than in the ZA group (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.17-5.01; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that denosumab poses a significant risk for developing MRONJ in patients treated for bone metastasis, and thus these patients require close monitoring.