Biomechanical study of anterior spinal instrumentation configurations

Enhancing spinal bone anchor pull-out resistance with an L-shaped anchor

The success rate of spinal fusion surgery is mainly determined by the fixation strength of the spinal bone anchors. This study explores the use of an L-shaped spinal bone anchor that is intended to establish a macro-shape lock with the posterior cortical layer of the vertebral body, thereby increasing the pull-out resistance of the anchor. The performance of this L-shaped anchor was evaluated in lumbar vertebra phantoms (L1-L5) across four distinct perpendicular orientations (lateral, medial, superior, and inferior). During the pull-out experiments, the pull-out force, and the displacement of the anchor with respect to the vertebra was measured which allowed the determination of the maximal pull-out force (mean: 123 N ± 25 N) and the initial pull-out force, the initial force required to start motion of the anchor (mean: 23 N ± 16 N). Notably, the maximum pull-out force was observed when the anchor engaged the cortical bone layer. The results demonstrate the potential benefits of utilising a spinal bone anchor featuring a macro-shape lock with the cortical bone layer to increase the pull-out force. Combining the macro shape-lock fixation method with the conventional pedicle screw shows the potential to significantly enhance the fixation strength of spinal bone anchors.

The Influence of Screw Positioning on Cage Subsidence in Patients with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Anterolateral Fixation

OBJECTIVES

Cage subsidence (CS) has been reported to be one of the most common complications following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). To reduce the incidence of CS and improve intervertebral fusion rates, anterolateral fixation (AF) has been gradually proposed. However, the incidence of CS in patients with oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation (OLIF-AF) is still controversial. Additionally, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal placement of screws for OLIF-AF, and the impact of screw placement on the incidence of CS has yet to be thoroughly investigated and validated. The objective of this investigation was to examine the correlation between screw placements and CS and to establish an optimized approach for implantation in OLIF-AF.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken. From October 2017 to December 2020, a total of 103 patients who received L4/5 OLIF-AF for lumbar spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis or degenerative instability in our department were followed up for more than 12 months. Demographic and radiographic data of these patients were collected. Additionally, screw placement related parameters, including trajectory and position, were measured by anterior-posterior X-ray and axial CT. Analysis was done by chi-square, independent t-test, univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression to explore the correlation between screw placements and CS. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive ability of screw placement-related parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were included, and CS was found in 28 (27.18%) patients. Univariable analysis was firstly performed for each parameter. Next, variables with p-value of <0.05, including bone mineral density (BMD), concave morphology, and screw placement-related parameters were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Significant predictor factors for subsidence were coronal plane angle (CPA) (OR 0.580 ± 0.208, 95% CI 1.187-2.684), implantation point (IP) (L4) (OR 5.732 ± 2.737, 95% CI 1.445-12.166), and IP (L5) (OR 7.160 ± 3.480, 95% CI 1.405-28.683). Furthermore, ROC curves showed that the predictive accuracy of CS was 88.1% for CPA, 77.6% for IP (L4) and 80.9% for IP (L5).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that the trajectory of vertebral screws, including angle and position, was closely related to CS. Inserting screws parallel to each other and as close to the endplate as possible while keeping the cage inside the range of the superior and inferior screws are an optimal implantation strategy for OLIF-AF.

Tsetse fly inspired steerable bone drill-a proof of concept

The fixation strength of pedicle screws could be increased by fixating along the much stronger cortical bone layer, which is not possible with the current rigid and straight bone drills. Inspired by the tsetse fly, a single-plane steerable bone drill was developed. The drill has a flexible transmission using two stacked leaf springs such that the drill is flexible in one plane and can drill along the cortical bone layer utilizing wall guidance. A proof-of-principle experiment was performed which showed that the Tsetse Drill was able to successfully drill through 5, 10 and 15 PCF cancellous bone phantom which has similar mechanical properties to severe osteoporotic, osteoporotic and healthy cancellous bone. Furthermore, the Tsetse Drill was able to successfully steer and drill along the cortical wall utilizing wall guidance for an insertion angle of 5°, 10° and 15°. The experiments conclude that the tsetse fly-inspired drilling method is successful and even allows the drilling along the cortical bone layer. The Tsetse Drill can create curved tunnels utilizing wall guidance which could increase the fixation strength of bone anchors and limit the risk of cortical breach and damage to surrounding anatomy.

Artificial atlanto-odontoid joint replacement through a transoral approach

Resection of the odontoid process and anterior arch of the atlas results in atlantoaxial instability, which if left uncorrected may lead to severe neurological complications. Currently, such atlantoaxial instability is corrected by anterior and/or posterior C1-C2 fusion. However, this results in considerable loss of rotation function of the atlantoaxial complex. From the viewpoint of retaining the rotation function and providing stability, we designed an artificial atlanto-odontoid joint based on anatomical measurements of 50 pairs of dry atlantoaxial specimens by digital calipers and 10 fresh cadaveric specimens by microsurgical techniques. The metal-on-metal titanium alloy joint has an arc-shaped atlas component, and a hollow cylindrical bushing into which fits a rotation axle of an inverted v-shaped axis component and is implanted through a transoral approach. After the joint was implanted onto specimens with anterior decompression, biomechanical tests were performed to compare the stability parameters in the intact state, after decompression, after artificial joint replacement, and after fatigue test. Compared to the intact state, artificial joint replacement resulted in a significant decrease in the range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) during flexion, extension, and lateral bending (P < 0.001); however, with regard to axial rotation, there was no significant difference in ROM (P = 0.405), a significant increase in NZ (P = 0.008), and a significant decrease in stiffness (P = 0.003). Compared to the decompressed state, artificial joint replacement resulted in a significantly decreased ROM (P B 0.021) and NZ (P B 0.002) and a significantly increased stiffness (P \ 0.001) in all directions. Following artificial joint replacement, there was no significant difference in ROM (P C 0.719), NZ (P C 0.580), and stiffness (P C 0.602) in all directions before and after the fatigue test. The artificial joint showed no signs of wear and tear after the fatigue test. This artificial atlanto-odontoid joint may be useful in cases of odontoid resection due to malunion or nonunion of odontoid fracture, atraumatic odontoid fracture, irreducible atlas dislocation, posterior atlantoaxial subluxation, or congenital skull base abnormalities.

Comparison between 4.0-mm stainless steel and 4.75-mm titanium alloy single-rod spinal instrumentation for anterior thoracoscopic scoliosis surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a consecutive, single surgeon case series.

OBJECTIVE

To compare minimum 2-year postoperative outcomes between 4.0-mm stainless steel and 4.75-mm titanium alloy single-rod anterior thoracoscopic instrumentation for the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Advances in anterior thoracoscopic spinal instrumentation for scoliosis have attempted to mitigate the postoperative complications of rod failure, pseudarthrosis, and deformity progression. Biomechanical data suggest that the 4.75-mm titanium construct has a lower risk of fatigue failure compared to the 4.0-mm stainless steel construct.

METHODS

Sixty-four consecutive anterior thoracoscopic spinal instrumentation cases in patients with thoracic scoliosis performed by a single surgeon and with minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The first 34 cases used a 4.0-mm stainless steel (SS) construct, whereas the subsequent 30 cases used a 4.75-mm titanium (Ti) alloy instrumentation system. The first 10 SS cases and the first 5 Ti cases were excluded from the statistical comparison to account for a potential learning curve effect. A multivariate analysis of variance (P < 0.05) was used to compare radiographic, perioperative, and postoperative complication data between patients surgically treated with the 2 different instrumentation systems.

RESULTS

Patients in the SS group (n = 24) underwent surgery from 2000 to 2001, whereas patients in the Ti group (n = 25) underwent surgery from 2002 to 2004. The mean age at surgery, gender ratio, length of hospitalization, estimated blood loss, and operative time were not statistically different between the 2 patient groups (P > 0.13). The average follow-up in the SS group was, however, significantly longer than in the Ti group (4.0 +/- 1.4 years vs. 2.3 +/- 1.0 years; P = 0.001). Preop main thoracic Cobb angles were similar between the 2 groups (P = 0.62); however, the 2-year main thoracic Cobb was significantly smaller (P = 0.03) and the 2-year percent correction was significantly greater in the Ti group (P = 0.03). Five patients (21%) in the SS group had a pseudarthrosis, 3 (13%) experienced rod failure, and 2 (8%) required a revision posterior spinal fusion. In the Ti group, 2 patients (8%) had a pseudarthrosis, and no patient experienced rod failure or required a revision procedure.

CONCLUSION

Although the average follow-up in the Ti group was significantly shorter than in the SS group, the 4.75-mm titanium alloy construct resulted in improved maintenance of deformity correction at 2-years postop and a lower incidence of instrumentation-related complications (pseudarthrosis, rod breakage, and surgical revisions) compared to the 4.0-mm stainless steel construct. Improved outcomes with the titanium alloy construct are likely because of the mechanical properties of the implant, refined patient selection criteria, and greater surgical experience gained with time.

Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Laboratory investigation

OBJECT

Increased structural stability is considered sufficient justification for higher-risk surgical procedures, such as circumferential fixation after severe spinal destabilization. However, there is little biomechanical evidence to support such claims, particularly after traumatic lumbar burst fracture. The authors sought out to compare the biomechanical performance of the following 3 fixation strategies for spinal reconstruction after decompression for an unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture: 1) short-segment anterolateral fixation; 2) circumferential fixation; and 3) extended anterolateral fixation.

METHODS

Thoracolumbar spines (T10-L4) from 7 donors (mean age at death 64+/-6 years; 1 female and 6 males) were tested in pure moment loading in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Thoracolumbar burst fractures were surgically induced at L-1, and testing was repeated sequentially for each of the following fixation techniques: short-segment anterolateral, circumferential, and extended anterolateral. Primary and coupled 3D motions were measured across the instrumented site (T12-L2) and compared across treatment groups.

RESULTS

Circumferential and extended anterolateral fixations were statistically equivalent for primary and off-axis range-of-motions in all loading directions, and short-segment anterolateral fixation offered significantly less rigidity than the other 2 methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study strongly suggest that extended anterolateral fixation is biomechanically comparable to circumferential fusion in the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior column and posterior ligamentous injury. In cases in which an anterior procedure may be favored for load sharing or canal decompression, extension of the anterior instrumentation and fusion one level above and below the unstable segment can result in near equivalent stability to a 2-stage circumferential procedure.