Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Anterior Locking Plate for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture.
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021;
2021:2949419. [PMID:
34671672 PMCID:
PMC8523228 DOI:
10.1155/2021/2949419]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
The finite element analysis method was used to explore the biomechanical stability of a novel locking plate for thoracolumbar burst fracture fusion fixation.
Methods
The thoracolumbar CT imaging data from a normal volunteer was imported into finite software to build a normal model and three different simulated surgical models (the traditional double-segment fixation model A, the novel double-segment fixation model B, and the novel single-segment fixation model C). An axial pressure (500 N) and a torque (10 Nm) were exerted on the end plate of T12 to simulate activity of the spine. We recorded the range of motion (ROM) and the maximum stress value of the simulated cages and internal fixations.
Results
Model A has a larger ROM in all directions than model B (flexion 5.63%, extension 38.21%, left rotation 46.51%, right rotation 39.76%, left bending 9.45%, and right bending 11.45%). Model C also has a larger ROM in all directions than model B (flexion 555.63%, extension 51.42%, left rotation 56.98%, right rotation 55.42%, left bending 65.67%, and right bending 59.47%). The maximum stress of the cage in model A is smaller than that in model B except for the extension direction (flexion 96.81%, left rotation 175.96%, right rotation 265.73%, left bending 73.73%, and right bending 171.28%). The maximum stress value of the internal fixation in model A is greater than that in model B when models move in flexion (20.23%), extension (117.43%), and left rotation (21.34%).
Conclusion
The novel locking plate has a smaller structure and better performance in biomechanical stability, which may be more compatible with minimally invasive spinal tubular technology.
Collapse