Surgical resection of the primary tumor prevents an undesirable locoregional condition and improves the quality of life in patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer

Initial Management of BRAF V600E-Variant Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer: The FAST Multidisciplinary Group Consensus Statement

Importance

BRAF/MEK inhibitors revolutionized the treatment of BRAF V600E-variant anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (BRAFv-ATC), offering improved outcomes for patients with this previously incurable disease.

Observations

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) accounts for approximately half of thyroid cancer-related deaths. It presents as a rapidly growing tumor that often invades locoregional structures and spreads to distant sites early; therefore, prompt diagnosis, staging, and treatment initiation are of the essence in the treatment of ATC. Although most oncologists will encounter a patient with ATC in their practice, the rarity of this disease makes treatment challenging, particularly because those with BRAFv-ATC no longer have a dismal prognosis. BRAF/MEK kinase inhibitors have transformed the outlook and treatment of BRAFv-ATC. Therefore, molecular profiling to identify these patients is critical. More recently, the addition of immunotherapy to BRAF/MEK inhibitors as well as the use of the neoadjuvant approach were shown to further improve survival outcomes in BRAFv-ATC. Many of these recent advances have not yet been incorporated in the currently available guidelines, allowing for disparities in the treatment of patients with BRAFv-ATC across the US. With the increasing complexity in the management of BRAFv-ATC, this Consensus Statement aims to formulate guiding recommendations from a group of experts to facilitate therapeutic decision-making.

Conclusions and Relevance

This Consensus Statement from the FAST (Facilitating Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Specialized Treatment) group at MD Anderson Cancer Center emphasizes that rapid identification of a BRAF V600E pathogenic variant and timely initiation of sequential therapy are critical to avoid excess morbidity and mortality in patients with BRAFv-ATC. In the past decade, remarkable progress has been made in the treatment of patients with BRAFv-ATC, justifying these new evidence-based recommendations reached through a consensus of experts from a high-volume center.

Recent advances in anaplastic thyroid cancer management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent developments in the diagnosis and management of patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC).

RECENT FINDINGS

An updated edition of the Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors was released by the World Health Organization (WHO), in which squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid are now a subtype of ATC. Broader access to next generation sequencing has allowed better understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving ATC and improved prognostication. BRAF-targeted therapies revolutionized the treatment of advanced/metastatic BRAFV600E -mutated ATC, offering significant clinical benefit and allowing better locoregional control of disease through the neoadjuvant approach. However, inevitable development of resistance mechanisms represents a major challenge. Addition of immunotherapy to BRAF/MEK inhibition has shown very promising results and significant improvement in survival outcomes.

SUMMARY

Major advancements took place in the characterization and management of ATC in recent years, especially in patients with a BRAF V600E mutation. Still, no curative treatment is available, and options are limited once resistance to currently available BRAF-targeted therapies develops. Additionally, there is still a need for more effective treatments for patients without a BRAF mutation.

Impact of Local Control on Clinical Course in Stage IVC Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The present study investigated the association between local resection and cause of death in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) patients with stage IVC disease.

METHODS

A total of 54 ATC patients with stage IVC disease were included in the study. Information including patient characteristics, laboratory data including complete blood count, treatment, and death were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) for patients with or without resection was 8.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9-14.4)] and 4.2 (95% CI 2.5-6.2) months, respectively (p < 0.001). No patients survived without resection at 1 year. Univariate analysis revealed that resection (p < 0.001) and radiotherapy (p = 0.018) were significantly associated with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that resection (hazard ratio 0.257; 95% CI 0.115-0.575; p < 0.001) was the only independent prognostic factor of OS. In ATC patients with known resection status, the median OS for the patients with a resection status of R0/1 (n = 28) and R2 (n = 7) were 13.0 (95% CI 7.5-18.7) and 1.7 (95% CI 0.1-6.2) months, respectively (p < 0.001). The most common specific cause of death was respiratory insufficiency (35%), followed by airway obstruction (25%) and cerebral cardiovascular-related death (5%). The frequency of airway obstruction was significantly lower in patients with resection (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection probably impacts on clinical course in ATC patients despite the presence of distant metastasis. However, R2 resection is likely to be harmful and surgeons should carefully consider the resectability of thyroid tumors.