ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition vs. classic ILM peeling for small and medium macula holes-a prospective randomized trial

Comparison of the use of internal limiting membrane flaps versus conventional ILM peeling on post-operative anatomical and visual outcomes in large macular holes

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (iFTMH) closure rates following conventional vitrectomy, gas tamponade and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling decrease when the minimum linear diameter (MLD) ≥ 500 microns. ILM flap creation has been proposed to improve closure in larger holes. This study evaluated the anatomical and functional impact of ILM flap introduction to routine practice in iFTMH ≥500 microns.

METHODS

Retrospective, interventional analysis of prospectively collected data of 191 eyes from consecutive surgeries for primary iFTMH ≥500 microns performed by two surgeons between June 2018 and June 2022, during which both surgeons replaced ILM peeling with ILM flap creation. Post-operative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomical closure were compared between Group 1 (ILM peel) and Group 2 (ILM flap) in an intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Rates of iFTMH closure were greater in the ILM flap group (77/80; 96.3%) than the ILM peel group (94/110; 85.5%) (OR = 4.37, 95% CI = 1.23-15.55, p = 0.023). A non-significant increase in post-operative BCVA improvement was observed in the ILM flap group (p = 0.084). There was no statistically significant difference in final BCVA (p = 0.83). Multivariate logistic regression found only MLD (OR = 0.993, 95% CI = 0.989-0.997, p = 0.001) and ILM flap group (OR = 5.795, 95% CI = 1.313-25.570, p = 0.020) predicted primary closure.

CONCLUSION

ILM flap creation improves closure rates in larger holes and should be considered routinely in iFTMH ≥500 microns. Whether ILM flaps affect post-operative visual function remains uncertain.

Efficacy of inverted inner limiting membrane flap technique for macular holes of ≤400 μm: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique in full-thickness macular holes (MHs) with a size of ≤400 μm compared to the ILM peeling technique.

METHODS

Related literatures that compared inverted ILM flap and ILM peeling in MHs ≤ 400 μm were reviewed by searching electronic databases including Pubmed, EMbase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library up to April 2023. The primary outcome measure was hole closure rate, and the secondary outcome measures were the mean postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal sensitivity, and outer status of the retinal layers, including the external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone. The quality of the articles was assessed according to the revised version of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. In the case of heterogeneity, a sensitivity analysis was conducted, and publication bias was visually evaluated using a funnel plot.

RESULTS

This review included six studies with 610 eyes for the primary outcome and 385 eyes for the secondary outcomes, which were two randomized control trials and four retrospective studies. Pooled data revealed that the overall MH closure rate was 99.4% in the inverted ILM flap group and 96.2% in the ILM peeling group, without significant difference between the two groups (odds ratio = 3.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.82~18.69; P = 0.09). The inverted ILM flap technique did not have a favorable effect on the BCVA, retinal sensitivity, or recovery of the outer retinal layers. These results were consistent with those of the subgroup analysis of the different follow-up periods. No significant publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSION

In eyes with MHs of ≤400 μm, both techniques demonstrated excellent surgical outcomes without significant differences. Therefore, surgical techniques can be selected according to surgeon preferences.

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for <400 μm Macular Hole: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique was initially developed for the closure of large macular holes (MHs). However, its efficacy in treating small holes has been a matter of debate. This study aimed to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of vitrectomy (PPV) combined with the inverted ILM flap and ILM peeling in cases of small and medium-sized MHs.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted by searching the relevant literature in databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search included articles published from the inception of the databases up until January 2023. The inclusion criteria limited the studies to only experimental-based research. The heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analysis were performed to ensure the statistical power and reliability of the analysis.

RESULTS

Five studies, including two non-randomized concurrent control trials and three non-randomized concurrent control trials, comprising a total of 269 eyes, were analysed. The results showed no significant difference in the MH closure rate between the two groups (odds ratio (OR) = 0.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.04-1.96, p = 0.33). Furthermore, there were no significant differences observed in visual acuity, external limiting membrane (ELM), and ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity at 3 months (ELM OR = 0.88, EZ OR = 0.85) or 12 months (ELM OR = 0.96, EZ OR = 1.39) post-operation between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The surgical repair of MHs smaller than 400 μm with ILM flap seems to be similar in visual acuity improvement and anatomical recovery compared to the traditional technique.