Bifurcated endovascular grafting for abdominal aortic aneurysm

A Systematic Review of the Recruitment and Outcome Reporting by Sex and Race/Ethnicity in Stent Device Development Trials for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Women and racial/ethnic minority groups have been shown to experience poor outcomes after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). One potential reason is the rare inclusion of these populations in initial phases of device development. The objective of this systematic review is to understand enrollment and outcome reporting by sex and race/ethnicity in industry-funded EVAR device development trials.

METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase were searched from inception to January 2022 without language restrictions using the following terminology: "stent", "graft", "endograft", "device", and "abdominal aortic aneurysm" (AAA).

CLINICALTRIALS

gov was also searched from inception to January 2022 for "AAA." Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data. All phase I-III and postmarket evaluation trials that included patients ≥18 years of age, who underwent EVAR were assessed. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated to estimate representation of participants by sex and race/ethnicity in trials compared with their share of disease burden.

RESULTS

Among the 4,780 retrieved articles, 55 industry-funded trials met inclusion criteria for this review. A total of 51 trials (93%) reported enrollment by sex/gender, and only 7 trials (13%) reported enrollment by race/ethnicity of the participants. A median of 19 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.5, 51) women participants were recruited compared to 171 (IQR: 57, 311.5) men, and 17 (IQR: 7.5, 21.5) racial/minority patients were recruited compared to 241 (IQR: 123, 463.5) White participants. Women represent 16.6% of the disease population, and the median PPR is 0.62 (IQR: 0.42, 0.88), which has remained constant over time (Figure 1). None of the device trials reported outcomes based on sex/gender or race/ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights the disparities in recruitment and outcome reporting based on sex and race/ethnicity in EVAR device development trials. While most trials may be underpowered to study these differences, recent registry studies show differential outcomes based on sex and race/ethnicity of vascular patients. Therefore, it is imperative to include and report outcomes in these participants, starting from the initial device development phases to improve generalizability of device-use and understand sources of variation in device performance.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 12 Years of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair (ER) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a new technique, and reported rates of endoleak, conversion to open repair, rupture and mortality vary widely. The aim of this study was to estimate these rates from the published data, and examine how this has changed as more patients have undergone ER.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of publications identified through searches of the electronic databases EMBASE and Medline. All publications quoting endoleak, conversion to open repair, rupture and mortality rates for a series of patients undergoing ER were included.

RESULTS

163 studies pertaining to 28,862 patients undergoing ER were identified as relevant for the review and meta-analysis. The pooled estimate for operative mortality was 3.3% (95% confidence interval 2.9 to 3.6%). The pooled estimate for type 1 endoleaks was 10.5% (95% confidence interval 9.0 to 12.1%), with an annual rate of 8.4% (95% confidence interval 5.7% to 12.2%). The pooled estimate of type 2,3 and 4 endoleaks was 13.7% (95% confidence interval 12.3 to 15.3%), with an annual rate of 10.2% (95% confidence interval 7.4% to 14.1%). The pooled estimate for primary conversion to open repair was 3.8% (95% confidence interval 3.2 to 4.4%), and for secondary conversion to open repair 3.4% (95% confidence interval 2.8 to 4.2%). The pooled estimate for post-operative rupture was 1.3% (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.7%), with an annual rupture rate of 0.6% (95% confidence interval 0.5% to 0.8%). Multivariate meta-regression analysis showed that rates of operative mortality, post-operative rupture and total number of endoleaks all fell significantly (p<0.05) over time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a low mortality and a gradual reduction in vascular morbidity and mortality associated with endovascular repair since it was first introduced.

Endoaortic stent grafting of a giant infected hepatic-celiac pseudoaneurysm

A 72-year-old man was admitted because of progressive right upper-abdominal distension and pain as well as concurrent remittent fever for 5 months. He had undergone a radical gastrectomy and catheter intubation in the common hepatic artery for chemotherapy 12 months before admission. The diagnosis of giant infected hepatic-celiac artery pseudoaneurysm was established. Coils embolotherapy was given in another hospital, but it failed. After admission, a computed tomographic aortogram showed a mass 10.3 x 8.5 x 8.1 cm in size in the right upper abdomen that originated from the common hepatic artery and the celiac artery. A celiac-super mesenteric artery (SMA) double catheter simultaneous digital subtraction angiography (DSA) further revealed that the entrance of the aneurysm opened directly from the abdominal aorta, the distance between the orifice of SMA and celiac axis was only 0.5 cm, and the diameter of the celiac trunk had been aneurysmally enlarged to 2.0 cm. A blood culture was positive for Bacillus pyocyaneus. After detailed discussion and preparation, a stent-graft complex was negotiated through the left femoral artery and deployed successfully into the abdominal aorta to seal the orifice of celiac trunk under the dynamic supervision of DSA. Completion angiography revealed that the hepatic-celiac pseudoaneurysm was completely excluded from aortic flow by the endoluminal stent-graft complex, while the SMA and renal arteries remained perfectly patent. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged without any residual symptoms. At a 5-year follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic and was leading a normal life.

Successful treatment of aortic endograft thrombosis with rheolytic thrombectomy

PURPOSE

To report the benefits of rheolytic thrombectomy for treating aortic endograft thrombosis.

METHODS

Of 40 patients who received the Ancure bifurcated endograft to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) during a 9-month period, 6 (15%) patients (6 men; mean age 62.6 years, range 53-77) developed thrombosis of the endograft at an average of 9 weeks (range 1-20 months). Five patients were taking aspirin, and 3 were on warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation. Immediately after angiography, rheolytic thrombectomy was used to remove the thrombus, followed by adjunctive procedures to treat the underlying pathology.

RESULTS

Causes were kinking or extrinsic compression of the graft limb in 5 cases and thrombosis of the surgical closure site in a common femoral artery. Mechanical thrombectomy was successful in restoring circulation in all cases; thrombolysis was used in 1. All 6 patients had additional stents placed in the graft limbs, re-establishing patency. There was no mortality or recurrent thrombosis in a follow-up that has extended to 26 months, but 1 patient required additional stenting for subsequent focal kinking of a graft limb above the previously implanted stent.

CONCLUSIONS

Rheolytic thrombectomy can safely and effectively treat endograft thrombosis after endovascular AAA repair. Additional thrombolytic agents, angioplasty, and stenting may be needed to correct the underlying causes of the thrombosis. Prophylactic stenting of iliac limbs at the time of implantation in patients with complex anatomy may prevent thrombosis of unsupported bifurcated endografts.

Endoluminal graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms by vascular surgeons at a nonclinical trial center

The purpose of this study was to compare the early results and complication rates of commercially available endoluminal grafts (ELG) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by a team of vascular surgeons at a nontrial center with those of published results from trial centers. A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing endoluminal graft repair of AAA was made at the medical center. From October 1, 1999, to December 31, 2000, a team of vascular surgeons electively repaired AAAs in 100 patients at a regional referral center. Of these patients, 49 underwent repair with a commercially available ELG (35 AneuRx, 14 Ancure) whereas the remaining were repaired with an open operation. In the ELG group, the primary technical success rate was 100% with a 30-day mortality rate of 2.0%. The average hospital length of stay was 3.28 days with ICU stay of 1.20 days. The average operative estimated blood loss was 501 mL (100-2,500) with average transfusions of 0.49 unit packed red blood cells (prbc) (0-6). Eighty-eight percent of ELG patients left the hospital without complication. Seven patients (14%) required 11 follow-up procedures for complications including endoleak, limb or graft thrombosis, graft stenosis, distal embolization, or wound complications. Three of 26 patients (11%) with 6-month computed tomography follow-up had evidence of endoleak (2 have subsequently undergone lumbar embolization). Only 1 6-month follow-up patient had shown increased aneurysm size before endoleak treatment. A team of board-certified vascular surgeons at a nonclinical trial center can safely perform ELG for AAA with results similar to those of published series from trial centers.

Percutaneous repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using the AneuRx stent graft and the percutaneous vascular surgery device

Endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) was developed in an effort to treat patients who were at high risk for complications following standard surgical repair. Stent grafts used for endovascular repair of AAAs require the use of large-bore sheaths and surgical exposure of the common femoral arteries (CFAs). To decrease the invasiveness of AAA repair, we attempted to perform the procedure percutaneously utilizing the Prostar XL Percutaneous Vascular Surgery Device and the preclose technique. Thirty patients underwent an attempted percutaneous AAA repair. These patients were followed prospectively to assess the success of the procedure. Twenty-eight patients (93%) had successful percutaneous repair of both CFA access sites. One patient had inadequate hemostasis of the 22 Fr CFA entry site and one patient had inadequate hemostasis of the 16 Fr CFA entry site. Both of these CFA sites underwent open surgical repair. The rate of successful repair of the 22 Fr CFA access site was 29 of 30 (96%); for the 16 Fr CFA access site, 29 of 30 (96%). No in-hospital groin complications were seen. The procedure time was 105 +/- 21 min. The estimated blood loss was 90.6 +/- 50 cc. The hemoglobin loss was 1.54 +/- 0.89 mg/dL and the hematocrit loss was 5.04% +/- 2.8%. Complete percutaneous endoluminal AAA repair is feasible using the preclose technique. CFAs with sheaths up to 22 Fr can be safely and successfully accessed and repaired percutaneously using this technique. This method provides secure hemostasis and reduces the invasiveness of procedures requiring large-bore sheaths.

Outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the frequencies of complications and risk factors for complications following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR).

METHODS

Thirty-nine articles published between October 1995 and October 1999 in English, German, French, or Dutch were identified in electronic databases. All articles reported perioperative (30-day) complications on 2387 patients, while postoperative complications (>30 days) were reported on 1645 patients in 30 of 39 studies. Data were pooled and subjected to multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for death, endoleak, rupture, conversion, and local and systemic complications. Effects of risk factors were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 13.9 months (range 4-29). The perioperative death rate (3.7%) was lower than postoperative mortality (5.0% per annum). The risks for both endoleak (13.1%) and conversion (5.0%) were higher in the perioperative period than postoperatively (5.4% and 1.4% per annum, respectively). Independent risk factors for perioperative complications were: general anesthesia (death: OR = 5.1, 95% CI 1.9-13.3); EVT graft (endoleak: OR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-7.0); female sex (rupture: OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.8); hypertension (conversion: OR = 0.03, 95% CI 0.0-0.3); age >70 years (conversion: OR = 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.2); and team experience >30 patients (conversion: OR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-1.6). Independent risk factors for postoperative complications were: predischarge examination (death: OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.0-0.7); follow-up 30 days after operation (death: OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-1.0); and female sex (rupture: OR = 1.4, 95% CI 0.5-4.4; conversion: OR 6.8, 95% CI 2.0-23.4; and systemic complications: OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of complications after EVAR is high, supporting the cautious use of EVAR. Both patient characteristics and procedural variables were independent risk factors for complications. To avoid the limitations of this study, the results of randomized clinical trials must determine if EVAR offers a safe and durable alternative to open AAA repair.

Exclusion of accessory renal arteries during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Adequate proximal neck length is important for proper endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Placement of endografts in AAAs with relatively short proximal necks may require covering the origin of accessory renal arteries. Exclusion of these arteries carries the theoretical concern of regional renal ischemia associated with loss of parenchyma or worsening hypertension. We reviewed our experience with accessory renal exclusions during endovascular AAA repair to determine the frequency and severity of complications.

METHODS

Complete records were available for review on 311 of 325 consecutive patients treated with endovascular grafts for AAAs from February 6, 1996, to March 15, 2001. The presence of accessory renal arteries was ascertained from preoperative/intraoperative aortography or from computed tomographic scanning. Sizes of the accessories were measured by using the main renal arteries as a reference. Considerations for excluding the accessory renal arteries were based on the likelihood of successful proximal attachment to healthy aorta, an accessory vessel whose size does not exceed the diameter of the main renal artery, and the absence of renal disease.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 11.5 months. Fifty-two accessory renal arteries were documented in 37 patients (12%), ranging from 1 to > or =3 per patient. Of these, 26 accessory renal arteries were covered in 24 patients. Patients ranged in age from 57 to 85 years (mean, 74.1 years), with 20 men and 4 women. The Ancure device was used in 23 patients and the Excluder device in one. Of the accessories excluded, 22 originated above the aneurysm and 4 originated directly from the aneurysm itself. There were no perioperative mortalities. One patient died 5 months after surgery from an unrelated condition. There was one type I (distal) endoleak and no type II endoleaks. Five patients (21%) had segmental renal infarction associated with the side of accessory renal artery exclusion. Only one patient with segmental infarction had significant postoperative hypertension that resulted in changes in blood pressure medication. The blood pressure reverted to normal 3 months later. One patient with a stenotic left main renal artery required exclusion of the accessory renal artery for successful proximal attachment. Serum creatinine levels remained unchanged throughout follow-up in all but one patient, in whom progressive postoperative renal failure developed despite normal renal flow scan, presumably from intraoperative manipulation and contrast nephropathy.

CONCLUSION

Exclusion of accessory renal arteries to facilitate endovascular AAA repair appears to be well tolerated. Long-term sequelae seem infrequent and mild.

Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing endovascular or conventional AAA repair

PURPOSE

To compare health-related quality of life outcomes in a cohort of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients treated concurrently with either a conventional or endoluminal intervention.

METHODS

Between December 1997 and April 1999, 51 AAA patients treated by either open or endovascular techniques were enrolled in this prospective study. Conventional therapy was performed in 26 patients (19 men; mean age 70.4 +/- 6.0 years) with anatomical features unsuitable for the endovascular approach. Twenty-five patients (23 men; mean age 70.7 +/- 7.2 years) underwent endoluminal AAA exclusion using either the Ancure or bifurcated Enduring stent-grafts. The Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item health survey was administered preoperatively and at 1, 4, 8, and > or = 52 weeks after discharge.

RESULTS

At 1 week, both groups showed significant reductions (p < 0.001) in mean scores compared to baseline in 4 dimensions (physical function, social function, role-physical, and vitality), but the decline was more pronounced in patients having open repair. Endoluminal patients returned to their baseline scores by the 4th postoperative week, whereas complete recovery to baseline in the conventional patients was delayed to the 8th week.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated endoluminally exhibit better physical and functional scores as early as 1 week after discharge; they also return to baseline status significantly earlier than the conventional group. These findings document the perceived advantage of endovascular therapy over conventional AAA treatment.

Endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

PURPOSE

We sought to assess the role of endovascular techniques in the management of perigraft flow (endoleak) after endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

METHOD

We performed endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 114 patients, using a variety of Gianturco Z-stent-based prostheses. Results were evaluated with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) at 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and every year after the operation. An endoleak that occurred 3 days after operation led to repeat CT scanning at 2 weeks, followed by angiography and attempted endovascular treatment.

RESULTS

Endoleak was seen on the first postoperative CT scan in 21 (18%) patients and was still present at 2 weeks in 14 (12%). On the basis of angiographic localization of the inflow, the endoleak was pure type I in 3 cases, pure type II in 9, and mixed-pattern in 2. Of the 5 type I endoleaks, 3 were proximal and 2 were distal. All five resolved after endovascular implantation of additional stent-grafts, stents, and embolization coils. Although inferior mesenteric artery embolization was successful in 6 of 7 cases and lumbar embolization was successful in 4 of 7, only 1 of 11 primary type II endoleaks was shown to be resolved on CT scanning. There were no type III or type IV endoleaks (through the stent-graft). Endoleak was associated with aneurysm dilation two cases. In both cases, the aneurysm diameter stabilized after coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery. There were two secondary (delayed) endoleaks; one type I and one type II. The secondary type I endoleak and the associated aneurysm rupture were treated by use of an additional stent-graft. The secondary type II endoleak was not treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Type I endoleaks represent a persistent risk of aneurysm rupture and should be treated promptly by endovascular means. Type II leaks are less dangerous and more difficult to treat, but coil embolization of feeding arteries may be warranted when leakage is associated with aneurysm enlargement.

EVT endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

A variety of prostheses are now available for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Significant advantages of the EVT device are its unibody design, secure hook attachment system and graft fabric approximating that used in conventional surgery.

METHODS

Implantation of the EVT device was attempted in 60 patients who were studied prospectively with an analysis of subsequent problems encountered.

RESULTS

Conversion to open repair was required in four cases (6.7%). There were nine tube grafts inserted, 13 aorto-unilateral iliac with crossover grafts and 34 aorto-bi-iliac grafts. There was one death (mortality 1.7%). Endoleaks were identified in eight patients (14%), none of which were proximal; three sealed spontaneously, two were treated with coil embolization, two are being observed and one patient had an iliac attachment converted to an open anastomosis. Access vessel problems were seen in 21 patients (35%); two-thirds were corrected at the time of initial surgery. Seven patients (12%) had primary graft limb problems identified and treated before leaving the operating room. Nine patients (16%) developed secondary graft limb problems, which were diagnosed and treated after the initial surgery. Endovascular treatment was used in eight and was successful in six with surgical revision required in two. On review of these cases to assess if the problem could have been predicted at the time of initial surgery, it was felt that more aggressive treatment of intraoperatively diagnosed graft limb stenoses, even though considered mild, may have prevented 50% of subsequent secondary graft limb occlusions.

CONCLUSION

Although the EVT device has significant advantages in the endovascular management of aortic aneurysm, potential graft limb problems need to be actively identified with the majority able to be successfully managed by supplementary endovascular techniques.

Long-term fate of the aneurysmal sac after endoluminal exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms

PURPOSE

Shrinkage of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is the hallmark of successful endoluminal treatment. Our goal was to prospectively assess the midterm to long-term shrinkage of the AAA sac after endovascular repair.

METHODS

A total of 123 patients with AAA underwent endoluminal treatment with the Ancure device at our institution between February 1996 and February 2000. At least a 1-year follow-up was available for 70 of the 123 patients. AAA sac size, presence of endoleaks, calcifications, and outcome data were collected on these patients at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after repair and compared with the preoperative AAA size and characteristics. All endoleaks found at the 6-month follow-up visit were treated aggressively with embolotherapy. An AAA sac regression of 0.5 cm or more was considered the minimum measurable decrease. Regression of the sac diameter to 3.5 cm or less was considered a complete collapse of the sac.

RESULTS

Successful endoluminal repair was accomplished in 119 of 123 patients. The mortality rate was 0.8% (1/123). There was a steady decrease in AAA sac size from baseline (5.56 +/- 0.1 cm), to 6 months (5.0 +/- 0.14 cm, P =.0006), to 12 months (4.65 +/- 0.13 cm, P =.04), and to 24 months (4.26 +/- 0.16 cm, P =.03). At 24 months, 74% (29/39) had a decrease in sac size of 0.5 cm or more, with 28% (11/39) complete collapse. Patients with initial endoleaks had the same likelihood of regression of sac size (> or = 0.5 cm) when compared with the group of patients with no endoleaks at the 24-month evaluation (64% vs 76%, P =.09).

CONCLUSION

Endoluminal AAA repair resulted in a significant reduction in sac size that continues up to 2 years. Significant shrinkage occurs as early as 6 months after placement. The initial presence of endoleaks does not predict the lack of sac regression.

Which factors increase the risk of conversion to open surgery following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? The EUROSTAR collaborators

OBJECTIVE

to identify factors that increase the risk of conversion to open surgery following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to assess their outcome. Design analysis of 1871 patients enrolled in the EUROSTAR collaborators registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

patient characteristics, anatomic features of the aneurysm, type of endovascular device, institutional experience and the year in which the procedure was performed were related to risk of conversion.

RESULTS

forty-nine patients (2.6%) required conversion. In 38 patients conversion was performed during the first postoperative month (primary conversions) and in 11 patients during follow-up (secondary conversions). Primary conversion was mostly due to access problems and device migration. Secondary conversions were performed for rupture in six and for a persistent endoleak, with or without aneurysmal growth, in five patients. Patients who were converted were significantly older, had a lower body weight, and had a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Conversion was associated with shorter, wider infrarenal necks and larger aneurysms. The conversion rate was lower when a team had performed more than 30 procedures, and in procedures performed during the last two years of the study period. The conversion rate was higher with EVT or Talent devices. Patients who required primary conversion had an 18% mortality rate, compared to 2.5% mortality in patients without conversion (p<0.01). Secondary conversion was associated with a perioperative mortality of 27%, and when performed for rupture 50%.

CONCLUSION

both primary conversion and secondary conversion for rupture carry a high operative mortality. Awareness of the risk factors may reduce conversion rate as well as early and medium term mortality.

Early complications and endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: report of a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was the identification of risk factors for adverse events and the assessment of the early success rate in 1554 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) who underwent treatment with endovascular technique between January 1994 and March 1999. For this purpose, the clinical and procedural data were correlated with observed complications and endoleaks.

METHODS

The data were collected from 56 European centers and submitted to a central registry. Patient characteristics, aortoiliac anatomic features, operative technical details, types of devices used, and experience of the teams of physicians were correlated with the occurrence of complications and endoleaks. The technical success rate was assessed according to the Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter, guidelines. For the assessment of correlations between risk factors and adverse events, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

The operative complications were grouped into three categories: failure to complete the procedure (39 patients, of which 27 underwent a conversion to an open AAA repair; 2.5%); device-related or procedure-related complications (149 patients; 10%); and arterial complications (51 patients; 3%). The most important risk factors for failure to complete the procedure included an aneurysm diameter of 60 mm or more and the need for adjuvant procedures. The factors that predicted device-related and arterial complications were the experience of the team with endovascular AAA treatment and the need for adjuvant procedures. Forty patients (2.6%) died within 30 days after operation. American Society of Anesthesiologists III and IV operative risk classification results predicted higher mortality rates than did American Society of Anesthesiologists operative risk classification I and II results. The patients who underwent operation in 1994, the first year documented in this registry, and those who required adjuvant procedures also had an increased risk of perioperative death. The incidence rate of systemic complications within the first 30 days (279 patients; 18%) was higher in patients aged 75 years or more, in patients with an impaired cardiac status, and in patients considered unfit for an open procedure. An endoleak was detected at the completion of the procedure in 16% of the cases and was still present after 1 month in 9%. The risk factors for primary endoleaks were female gender and age of 75 years and older. The observed technical success rate in this patient series was 72%.

CONCLUSION

The learning curve of the doctors and the need for adjuvant procedures were independent risk factors of operative device-related and arterial complications. The importance of proper instruction during an institution's initial phase with this treatment is emphasized by these observations. Although the endovascular management of AAAs is less stressful than open surgery, systemic complications were still the most common adverse events during the first postoperative month. These complications were associated with several patient-related factors, including advanced age, impaired cardiac status, and poor general medical condition. These observations may be a guide for improved patient selection for endovascular AAA repair.