Diagnostic value of ultrasound versus dual-energy computed tomography in patients with different stages of acute gouty arthritis

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Applications in Rheumatology

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has emerged as a transformative tool in the past decade. Initially employed in gout within the field of rheumatology to distinguish and quantify monosodium urate crystals through its dual-material discrimination capability, DECT has since broadened its clinical applications. It now encompasses various rheumatic diseases, employing advanced techniques such as bone marrow edema assessment, iodine mapping, and collagen-specific imaging. This review article aims to examine the unique characteristics of DECT, discuss its strengths and limitations, illustrate its applications for accurately evaluating various rheumatic diseases in clinical practice, and propose future directions for DECT in rheumatology.

Ultrasound Features in Gout: An Overview

The accurate diagnosis of gout frequently constitutes a challenge in clinical practice, as it bears a close resemblance to other rheumatologic conditions. An undelayed diagnosis and an early therapeutic intervention using uric acid lowering therapy (ULT) is of the utmost importance for preventing bone destruction, the main point of managing gout patients. Advanced and less invasive imaging techniques are employed to diagnose the pathology and ultrasonography (US) stands out as a non-invasive, widely accessible and easily reproducible method with high patient acceptability, enabling the evaluation of the full clinical spectrum in gout. The 2023 EULAR recommendations for imaging in diagnosis and management of crystal-induced arthropathies in clinical practice state that US is a fundamental imagistic modality. The guidelines underline its effectiveness in detecting crystal deposition, particularly for identifying tophi and the double contour sign (DCS). Its utility also arises in the early stages, consequent to synovitis detection. US measures of monosodium urate (MSU) deposits are valuable indicators, sensitive to change consequent to even short-term administration of ULT treatment, and can be feasibly used both in current daily practice and clinical trials. This paper aimed to provide an overview of the main US features observed in gout patients with reference to standardized imaging guidelines, as well as the clinical applicability both for diagnosis accuracy and treatment follow-up. Our research focused on summarizing the current knowledge on the topic, highlighting key data that emphasize gout as one of the few rheumatological conditions where US is recognized as a fundamental diagnostic and monitoring tool, as reflected in the most recent classification criteria.

Advanced Imaging of Gout and Other Inflammatory Diseases Around the Knee

The knee is one of the most commonly affected joints in the course of inflammatory arthropathies, such as crystal-induced and autoimmune inflammatory arthritis. The latter group includes systemic connective tissue diseases and spondyloarthropathies. The different pathogenesis of these entities results in their varied radiologic images. Some lead quickly to joint destruction, others only after many years, and in the remaining, destruction will not be a distinguishing radiologic feature.Radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging have traditionally been the primary modalities in the diagnosis of noninflammatory and inflammatory arthropathies. In the case of crystallopathies, dual-energy computed tomography has been introduced. Hybrid techniques also offer new diagnostic opportunities. In this article, we discuss the pathologic findings and imaging correlations for crystallopathies and inflammatory diseases of the knee, with an emphasis on recent advances in their imaging diagnosis.

The Independent Value of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Gouty Arthritis: A Narrative Review

Since the incidence of gouty arthritis (GA) exhibits yearly increases, accurate assessment and early treatment have significant values for improving disease conditions and monitoring prognosis. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a common indicator in blood routine, which has the characteristics of easy access and low cost. In recent years, NLR has been proven to be an effective indicator for guiding the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of various diseases. Moreover, NLR has varying degrees of relationship with various inflammatory biomarkers, which can affect and reflect the inflammatory response in the body. This paper reviews the independent value of NLR for GA and its underlying molecular pathological mechanisms, intending to contribute to the further application of NLR.

Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of dual-energy CT and ultrasound in gouty arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the performance and effect of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound in the diagnosis of gouty arthritis and to provide a reference for the clinical diagnosis of gouty arthritis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 76 patients with gouty arthritis admitted to the hospital from June 2020 to June 2022 was conducted. Patients were diagnosed with gouty arthritis using ultrasound and dual-energy CT technology. The accuracy of diagnosis by different imaging techniques was analyzed along with the imaging findings of ultrasound and dual-energy CT.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients, 60 men and 16 women, ranging in age from 20 to 77 years (mean age 50.8 ± 10.92 years), presented with uric acid levels of 254.1-720.05 μmol/L (mean 482.17 ± 105.06 μmol/L) and C-reactive protein levels ranging from 4.25 to 10.3 mg/L. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve and specificity of serum uric acid were higher by dual-energy CT than those of ultrasound in the diagnosis of gouty arthritis. The dual-energy CT detection rate of tophi was significantly higher than the ultrasound detection rate (p < .05). For inflammatory effusion and synovial thickening, the ultrasound detection rates were significantly higher than the dual-energy CT detection rates (p < .05). Regarding soft-tissue edema, the detection rate of the two methods was not significantly different (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with ultrasound, dual-energy CT has increased accuracy in the diagnosis of gouty arthritis.

An ultrasonographic study of gouty arthritis: Synovitis and its relationship to clinical symptoms: A retrospective analysis

Background and Aims

Joint pain is the main symptom of acute attacks in patients with gout, which if not managed properly, can develop into chronic gout. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between ultrasound (US) features of gouty arthritis (GA) and its clinical manifestations to provide a basis for diagnosing and evaluating the disease.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 182 sites in 139 patients with GA diagnosed by the Rheumatology and Immunology Department. Degree of pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS). Patients with GA were divided into active and inactive arthritis groups. Statistical differences between the two groups and the correlation between US features and clinical manifestations of the affected joints in patients with GA were analyzed.

Results

The groups had statistical significance in joint effusion, power Doppler ultrasonography (PDS), double contour sign, and bone erosion (p = 0.02, 0.001, 0.04, 0.04, respectively). Correlation analysis in this study showed that joint effusion and PDS were positively correlated with degree of pain (r _s = 0.275, 0.269; p < 0.001, <0.001, respectively). Additionally, PDS was positively correlated with synovitis, joint effusion, bone erosion, and aggregates (r _s = 0.271, 0.281, 0.222, 0.281; p < 0.001, <0.001, 0.003, <0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Pathological US features, such as joint effusion, synovitis, PDS and bone erosion were more likely to be detected in GA with clinical signs and symptoms. PDS was positively correlated with joint effusion and synovitis, pain was closely related to PDS and joint effusion, which suggested that the clinical symptoms of GA were related to inflammation, reflecting the patient's condition to some extent. Therefore, musculoskeletal US is a useful clinical tool for managing patients with GA and can provide a reliable reference for diagnosing and treating GA.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Extremity Joint Pain-Suspected Inflammatory Arthritis, Crystalline Arthritis, or Erosive Osteoarthritis: 2022 Update

Evaluation for suspected inflammatory arthritis as a cause for chronic extremity joint pain often relies on imaging. It is essential that imaging results are interpreted in the context of clinical and serologic results to add specificity because there is significant overlap of imaging findings among the various types of arthritis. This document provides recommendations for imaging evaluation of specific types of inflammatory arthritis, including rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy, gout, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate disease (or pseudogout), and erosive osteoarthritis. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Gout of feet and ankles in different stages: The potentiality of a new semiquantitative DECT scoring system in monitoring urate deposition

The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of a novel semi-quantitative dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scoring system in monitoring urate deposition. This study included 287 patients with gout. All patients underwent ankle/foot DECT scans. DECT scores at different stages were compared and their diagnostic efficacies evaluated. Associations between DECT scores and clinical variables were evaluated. Gouts with positive DECT results in early, middle, and late stages were 78.5 %, 81.4 %, and 95.8 %, respectively (all P > .05). The total and ankle/midfoot DECT scores at different stages significantly increased with disease duration (all P < .05). DECT scores of 4 regions excluding the first metatarsophalangeal joint in early and middle stages were lower than those in late stage (all P < .05). DECT scores achieved excellent diagnostic performance for differentiating gout in early stage from middle and late stages (area under the curve, 0.923 and 0.949), with high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (all > 85 %). Total DECT score was highly positively correlated with the volume of urate crystals (R = 0.873, P < .001). Disease duration, serum uric acid level, bone erosion, and Achilles tendon involvement significantly affected total DECT scores (all P < .01). In conclusion, longer disease duration, higher serum uric acid levels, bone erosion, and Achilles tendon involvement were closely associated with total DECT scores. DECT scoring system may be an invaluable tool for gout diagnosis owing to its high detection efficacy and a surrogate method to evaluate the amount of urate crystals and erosion of surrounding tissues.

A glance into the future of gout

Gout is characterized by monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposits in and within joints. These deposits result from persistent hyperuricaemia and most typically lead to recurrent acute inflammatory episodes (gout flares). Even though some aspects of gout are well characterized, uncertainties remain; this upcoming decade should provide further insights into many of these uncertainties. Synovial fluid analysis allows for the identification of MSU crystals and unequivocal diagnosis. Non-invasive methods for diagnosis are being explored, such as Raman spectroscopy and imaging modalities. Both ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) allow the detection of MSU crystals; this not only provides a mean of diagnosis, but also has furthered gout knowledge defining the presence of a preclinical deposition in asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. Scientific consensus establishes the beginning of gout as the beginning of symptoms (usually the first flare), but the concept is currently under review. For effective long-term gout management, the main goal is to promote crystal dissolution treatment by reducing serum urate below 6 mg/dL (or 5 mg/dL if faster crystal dissolution is required). Current urate-lowering therapies' (ULTs) options are limited, with allopurinol and febuxostat being widely available, and probenecid, benzbromarone, and pegloticase available in some regions. New xanthine oxidase inhibitors and, especially, uricosurics inhibiting urate transporter URAT1 are under development; it is probable that the new decade will see a welcomed increase in the gout therapeutic armamentarium. Cardiovascular and renal comorbidities are common in gout patients. Studies determining whether optimal treatment of gout will positively impact these comorbidities are currently lacking, but will hopefully be forthcoming. Overall, the single change that will most impact gout management is greater uptake of international rheumatology society recommendations. Innovative strategies, such as nurse-led interventions based on these recommendations have recently demonstrated treatment success for people with gout.

Dual-energy computed tomography in crystalline arthritis: knowns and unknowns

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an overview of what can reasonably be considered as known about dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in crystal-related arthropathies, and what still needs to be explored.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies suggest an overall superiority of DECT over ultrasound in gout in terms of sensitivity (89 vs. 84%) and specificity (91 vs. 84%), except in early disease. Additional studies are needed to optimize DECT postprocessing settings in order to improve the specificity of the technique and eliminate all artifacts. Evidence has been controversial concerning DECT's ability to detect monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposits on vessel walls, or whether or not MSU-coded plaques are artifacts. DECT can be used to monitor MSU crystal depletion during urate-lowering treatment; MSU crystal volume is associated with cardiovascular risk and disease activity. There are some reports on calcium-containing crystal deposition diseases (calcium pyrophosphate and basic calcium phosphate) demonstrating that DECT can characterize and discriminate between the different types of crystals.

SUMMARY

Our knowledge about the use of DECT in crystal-related arthropathies continues to expand. Some unknowns have been clarified but there's still lots to learn, particularly concerning gout management and the potential use of DECT in calcium-containing crystal-related arthropathies.

Diagnostic Performance of Dual-energy CT Versus Ultrasonography in Gout: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), along with ultrasound (US), has been increasingly utilized for the diagnosis of gout because of its noninvasive advantages. However, the superiority of DECT over US remains controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether DECT is superior to US in the diagnosis of gout.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted for potentially eligible articles. Studies that evaluated the utility of DECT or US for gout diagnosis were qualified. Two distinctive ultrasonographic features of gout, namely, the double contour sign and the presence of tophus, were also assessed. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 criteria. Besides, the subgroup analyses of early disease duration (≤ 2 years) was also performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DECT were 0.89 (0.80-0.94) and 0.91 (0.88-0.94), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US were 0.70 (0.58-0.79) and 0.95 (0.87-0.98), respectively, for double contour sign; 0.57 (0.38-0.74) and 0.99 (0.88-1.00), respectively, for tophus; and 0.84 (0.73-0.91) and 0.84 (0.78-0.89), respectively, for overall consideration of US signs. At the early disease duration (≤ 2 years), the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (0.60-0.86) and 0.85 (0.75-0.91), respectively, for DECT; 0.93 (0.72-0.99) and 0.80 (0.71-0.86), respectively, for overall consideration of US signs.

CONCLUSION

DECT and US showed promising accuracy for gout diagnosis. DECT has higher sensitivity, specificity, and AUC than overall consideration of US signs and thus has a better diagnostic ability in diagnosing gout. Moreover, the diagnostic sensitivity of DECT is lower than that of overall consideration of US signs at less than 2 years' disease duration.

Characteristics of monosodium urate crystal deposition in the foot in the different stages of gout by dual-energy computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

To compare the characteristics of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition at specific anatomical sites of the foot detected by dual-energy computed tomography in patients with different stages of gout.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 101 patients with gout, 64 had early gout (<3 years) and 37 had late gout (>3 years). We retrospectively compared the total volumes of MSU crystals, the detection rates, and the morphology of MSU crystals at specific anatomical sites in the foot of the patients with different gout durations.

RESULTS

The total volume of MSU crystals in patients with early gout was significantly smaller than that in patients with late gout (P < 0.05). The detection rates and morphology of MSU crystals in the anterior calf tendons, ankle joints, tarsometatarsal joints, and metatarsophalangeal joints differed significantly between the patients with early and late gout (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the detection rates of submillimeter MSU crystals at the other specific anatomical sites, except for the tendons of the anterior calf, the ankle joint, and the metatarsal joint (P > 0.05). The submillimeter MSU crystal deposition was most common in the tendons of the posterior calf, the proportions in patients with early gout and late gout were 85.9% and 70.3%. Only submillimeter deposition existed in 52 patients (81.3%) with early gout and 11 patients (29.7%) with late gout at all sites of the foot.

CONCLUSION

Dual-energy computed tomography detection of submillimeter MSU crystal deposits in the foot is of great significance for the diagnosis of gout, especially along tendons.

Diagnostic value of different imaging features for patients with suspected gout: A network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Microscopic identification of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals is the gold standard for gout diagnosis. However, joint aspiration is not always practical, and imaging is increasingly used in clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of imaging features for gout compared with microscopy, using network meta-analysis methodology.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting on the use of imaging modalities to diagnose gout in patients with an unclear diagnosis or suspected gout, which was later confirmed by microscopy. A combination of direct and indirect comparisons were performed by network meta-analysis to evaluate the combined odds ratios for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. To assist interpretation, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) scores were calculated to provide a ranking of the imaging features.

RESULTS

Fifteen eligible studies were included. Compared to the gold standard microscopic identification of MSU crystals, dual energy computed tomography (DECT) MSU crystal deposition and ultrasound double contour had greater sensitivity than ultrasound tophus. DECT, ultrasound double contour sign and ultrasound tophus all had greater specificity than ultrasound aggregates. The SUCRA scores ranked DECT as highest for overall accuracy, followed by ultrasound double contour, aggregates, and tophus, while ultrasound snowstorm was ranked the lowest. However, there were no significant differences in the odds ratios for overall accuracy between these imaging features.

CONCLUSION

DECT and ultrasound are both useful modalities for the detection of imaging features of MSU crystal deposition, and have a similar overall diagnostic accuracy for gout diagnoses.

Dual-energy computed tomography vs ultrasound, alone or combined, for the diagnosis of gout: a prospective study of accuracy

OBJECTIVE

To examine the accuracy of dual-energy CT (DECT) vs ultrasound or their combination for the diagnosis of gout.

METHODS

Using prospectively collected data from an outpatient rheumatology clinic at a tertiary-care hospital, we examined the diagnostic accuracy of either modality alone or their combination, by anatomical site (feet/ankles and/or knees), for the diagnosis of gout. We used two standards: (i) demonstration of monosodium urate crystals in synovial fluid (gold), and (ii) modified (excluding DECT and ultrasound) 2015 ACR-EULAR gout classification criteria (silver).

RESULTS

Of the 147 patients who provided data, 48 (33%) had synovial fluid analysis performed (38 were monosodium urate-crystal positive) and mean symptom duration was 9.2 years. One hundred (68%) patients met the silver standard. Compared with the gold standard, diagnostic accuracy statistics for feet/ankles DECT, feet/ankles ultrasound, knees DECT and knees ultrasound were, respectively: sensitivity: 87%, 84%, 91% and 58%; specificity: 100%, 60%, 87% and 80%; positive predictive value: 100%, 89%, 97% and 92%; negative predictive value: 67%, 50%, 70% and 33%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.93, 0.72, 0.89 and 0.66. Combining feet/ankles DECT with ultrasound or knees DECT with ultrasound led to a numerically higher sensitivity compared with DECT alone, but overall accuracy was lower. Similarly, combining imaging knees to feet/ankles also yielded a numerically higher sensitivity and negative predictive values compared with feet/ankles DECT alone, without differences in overall accuracy. Findings were replicated compared with the silver standard, but with lower numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

Feet/ankles or knees DECT alone had the best overall accuracy for gout diagnosis. The DECT-US combination or multiple joint imaging offered no additional increase in overall diagnostic accuracy.

Gout of feet and ankles in different disease durations: diagnostic value of single-source DECT and evaluation of urate deposition with a novel semi-quantitative DECT scoring system

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic performance of single-source dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) based on gemstone spectral imaging technology (including Discovery CT750HD and Revolution CT) in patients with suspected feet/ankles gouty arthritis, and evaluate the urate deposition with a novel semi-quantitative DECT scoring system.

METHODS

A total of 196 patients were consecutively included. Feet and ankles were evaluated in all patients by single-source DECT scan. The 2015 EULAR/ACR criteria were used as the reference for the diagnosis of gout. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of DECT for the diagnosis of gout in the early (≤1 year), middle (1-3 years), and late (> 3 years) disease durations were calculated. Besides, a novel semi-quantitative DECT scoring system was assessed for the measurement of urate deposition, and the correlation between the scores and the clinical and serological data were also evaluated. Moreover, the influences of artifacts on the diagnostic performance of DECT were also determined.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of DECT in 196 patients were 38.10, 96.43%, and 0.673 in the early-stage group; 62.96, 100.00%, and 0.815 in the middle-stage group; and 77.55, 87.50%, and 0.825 in the late-stage group, respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracies in the AUC of DECT (Discovery CT750HD and Revolution CT) in the middle and late stages of gout were higher than that in the early stage of gout. Besides, the monosodium urate crystals were deposited on the first metatarsophalangeal joints and ankles/midfeet. Age, the presence of tophus, bone erosion, and disease duration considerably affected the total urate score. No statistical difference in the positive detection of nail artifact, skin artifact, vascular calcification, and noise artifact was found between the case and control groups.

CONCLUSION

DECT (Discovery CT750HD and Revolution CT) showed promising diagnostic accuracy for the detection of urate crystal deposition in gout but had limited diagnostic sensitivity for short-stage gout. Longer disease duration, the presence of tophus, and bone erosion were associated with the urate crystal score system. The artifacts do not remarkably affect the diagnostic performance of DECT in gout.

Imaging of crystalline arthropathy in 2020

Crystal-related arthropathies are the result of crystal deposition in joint and periarticular soft tissues. Identification of urate crystals is mandatory to distinguish gout from other crystalline arthropathies, including calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate and basic calcium phosphate crystal deposition diseases. ACR/EULAR classification criteria for gout included dual-energy computed tomography and ultrasound with equal impact to the final score. Different diagnostic strengths of these imaging modalities depend on disease duration and scanned anatomic site. While ultrasound has been indicated as the first-choice imaging technique, especially in the early stages of the disease, dual-energy computed tomography has shown to be highly specific, allowing the detection of crystal deposits in anatomic sites not accessible by ultrasound, such as the spine. At the spinal level, MRI findings are usually nonspecific. Finally, there is preliminary evidence that at the knee, dual-energy computed tomography may discriminate calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate from basic calcium phosphate crystal deposits.

Gout of ankle and foot: DECT versus US for crystal detection

OBJECTIVE

To compare dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and ultrasound (US) in detecting monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in the ankle and foot in patients with acute gouty arthritis.

METHODS

Bilateral ankle and foot were examined by DECT and US and the differences between the findings were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients underwent DECT and US examinations. At the patient level, the overall positivity of crystal deposition detected by DECT was higher than that by US (92% vs 68%, P = 0.005). The agreement of detecting crystal deposition between DECT and US was not very strong (К = 0.44, P = 0.003). At different joint/area levels, there were significant differences between the two examinations in the area of the dorsum (36% vs 12%, P = 0.009) and metatarsal bone (34% vs 12%, P = 0.017), but the sensitivity of DECT and US was similar in the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) and ankle areas (P>0.05). Agreement between the two examinations in the ankle and first MTP was very strong (К = 0.86, P < 0.001; К = 0.79, P < 0.001, respectively). However, agreement between the two examinations in other joints/areas was poor.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicated that DECT should be the first choice for acute gouty arthritis in patients with ankle and foot involvement. Key Points • There is little data regarding DECT and US in detecting MSU crystals in the ankle and foot in patients with acute gouty arthritis. • The overall positivity of crystal deposition detected by DECT was higher than that by US, but the sensitivity of DECT and US was similar in the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) and ankle areas. • Agreement between the two examinations in the ankle and first MTP was very strong; however, agreement between the two examinations in other joints/areas was poor.