A Japanese multi-institutional phase II study of moderate hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with image-guided technique for prostate cancer

Significance of androgen-deprivation therapy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated with high-dose radiotherapy: A literature review

The real-world benefits of adding androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and its optimal duration when combined with current standard high-dose radiation therapy (RT) remain unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy of and toxicities associated with ADT in the setting of combination with high-dose RT for intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa). This article is a modified and detailed version of the commentary on Clinical Question 8 described in the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prostate Cancer (ver. 2023). A qualitative systematic review was performed according to the Minds Guide. All relevant published studies between September 2010 and August 2020, which assessed the outcomes of IR or HR PCa treated with high-dose RT, were screened using two databases (PubMed and ICHUSHI). A total of 41 studies were included in this systematic review, mostly consisting of retrospective studies (N = 34). The evidence basically supports the benefit of adding ADT to high-dose RT to improve tumor control. Regarding IR populations, many studies suggested the existence of a subgroup for which adding ADT had no impact on either overall survival or the BF-free duration. On the other hand, regarding HR populations, several studies suggested the positive impact of adding ADT for ≥1 year on overall survival. Adding ADT increases not only the risk of sexual dysfunction but also that of cardiovascular toxicities or bone fracture. Although the benefit of adding ADT was basically suggested for both IR and HR populations, further investigations are warranted to identify subgroups of patients for whom ADT has no benefit, as well as the appropriate duration of ADT for those who do derive benefit.

Spatial Pattern of Intraprostatic Recurrence after Definitive External-Beam Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Implications for Focal Boost to Intraprostatic Dominant Lesion

Purpose

We retrospectively investigated spatial pattern associations between primary and recurrent tumor sites after definitive external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer, using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted probe, 18F-FSU-880.

Methods and Materials

We used data from our prior phase 2 trial involving patients who received PET/CT with 18F-FSU-880, which was designed to evaluate the tumor detection efficacy of PSMA-PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer. Data from patients with local intraprostatic recurrence detected by PSMA-PET/CT after definitive EBRT were retrospectively analyzed. The prostate and seminal vesicles were divided into 14 sections. Two diagnostic radiologists separately re-evaluated the intraprostatic location of the primary tumor on magnetic-resonance imaging and that of the recurrent tumor on PSMA-PET/CT, respectively, and the rate of overlap between primary and recurrent tumors was calculated. The overlap rate was defined as "the number of sections that overlapped between the primary tumor and recurrent tumor" divided by "the total number of sections of recurrent tumor". A recurrent tumor was considered to be at the same location as the primary tumor when the overlap rate was equal to or greater than 75%, and a partial overlap was defined as an overlap rate between 25 and 74%.

Results

Twelve patients had local recurrence detected by PSMA-PET/CT. The median time to diagnosis of local recurrence was 9.1 (range, 2.2-12.3) years after definitive EBRT. The recurrent tumor was detected at the same location in 25.0%, and a partial overlap was noted in 41.7%.

Conclusions

Local intraprostatic recurrence after definitive EBRT often occurs at the same site or at a partially overlapping site adjacent to the primary intraprostatic dominant lesion. Our results support the merit of focal dose-escalation for intraprostatic dominant lesions in definitive EBRT.