Bevel toric multicurve rigid gas-permeable lens for keratoconus

Management of Keratoconus With Corneal Rigid Gas-Permeable Contact Lenses

ABSTRACT

Vision correction using a corneal rigid gas-permeable contact lens, which is relatively safe, easy to replace, and economical, is still the basis of the management for keratoconus. For eyes with keratoconus, two fitting strategies have traditionally been used in Japan: apical touch fitting with spherical lenses and parallel fitting with multicurve lenses. These two techniques have different success rates depending on the type and severity of keratoconus. Therefore, it is important to classify eyes with keratoconus into four types according to the shape of the cornea and select the prescription techniques according to this classification. If the corneal GPs prescribed by these fitting methods cannot be used because of mechanical irritation to the corneal epithelium, the "piggyback lens system" is an effective option. Furthermore, proper lens care must be instructed to patients to prevent contact lens-related complications and maintain visual function. If these fittings and introductions can be performed properly, corneal GPs can safely provide effective and comfortable vision for many patients with keratoconus, even for those with severe keratoconus.

Clinical evaluation of flat peripheral curve design with aspherical-curve and multi-curve hard contact lenses for keratoconus

Aspherical- and multi-curve rigid gas-permeable hard contact lenses (HCLs) have a flattened curve in the peripheral zone and are mostly used for patients with keratoconus who cannot wear glasses, soft contact lenses, or spherical HCLs. In this retrospective study, a total of 95 eyes of 77 patients who used aspherical- or multi-curve HCLs (mean age: 40.0 ± 11.0 years) were evaluated. This study examined the types of aspherical- and multi-curve HCLs, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) values before and after wearing HCLs, the association with the Amsler-Krumeich classification, duration of wear, corneal/conjunctival disorder, and the frequency of changing HCLs. There were 78 eyes that used aspherical-curve HCLs and 17 that used multi-curve HCLs. BCVA significantly improved from 0.42 logMAR to 0.06 logMAR after wearing either form of HCL. The Amsler-Krumeich classification showed that aspherical-curve HCLs were commonly used for patients with stage 2 keratoconus, and multi-curve HCLs were commonly used for stage 4 patients. The BCVA values were worse when the disease stage was more severe (stages 3 and 4) regardless of HCL type. The mean base curve of the lenses was steeper in multi-curve HCLs than in aspherical-curve HCLs. The more severe the disease stage, the steeper the base curve in both aspherical- and multi-curve HCLs. The duration of wear significantly improved from 2.1 h to 10.2 h, and corneal/conjunctival disorder similarly improved. The mean frequency of changing HCL types was 1.1 times. This study suggests that a flat peripheral curve design with aspherical- and multi-curve HCLs is useful for patients with keratoconus.