Adherence to Daily Oral TDF/FTC for PrEP in Community Health Center Populations: The Sustainable Health Center Implementation PrEP Pilot (SHIPP) Study

Costs of Providing Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention at Community Health Centers in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is recommended for people at risk of acquiring HIV. We assessed billable costs associated with PrEP delivery at community health centers.

METHODS

The Sustainable Health Center Implementation PrEP Pilot (SHIPP) study is an observational cohort of people receiving daily oral PrEP at participating federally qualified health centers and other community health centers. We assessed health care utilization and billable costs of providing PrEP at 2 health centers, 1 in Chicago, Illinois, and 1 in Washington, DC, from 2014 to 2018. The health centers followed the clinical practice guidelines for PrEP provision, including regular visits with health care providers and ongoing laboratory monitoring. Using clinic billing records and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding, we retrospectively extracted data on the frequency and costs (in 2017 US dollars) of PrEP clinic visits and laboratory screening, for each patient, for 12 months since first PrEP prescription.

RESULTS

The average annual number of PrEP clinic visits and associated laboratory screens per patient was 5.1 visits and 25.2 screens in Chicago (n = 482 patients) and 5.4 visits and 24.8 screens in Washington, DC (n = 56 patients). The average annual PrEP billable cost per patient was $583 for clinic visits and $1070 for laboratory screens in Chicago and $923 for clinic visits and $1018 for laboratory screens in Washington, DC. The average annual total cost per patient was $1653 (95% CI, $1639-$1668) in Chicago and $1941 (95% CI, $1811-$2071) in Washington, DC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis, which provides PrEP billable cost estimates based on empirical data, may help inform health care providers who are considering implementing this HIV prevention strategy.

HIV Incidence Among Individuals Accessing Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Jackson, Mississippi

Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an efficacious biomedical intervention, the effectiveness of same-day PrEP programs has not been widely studied. We utilized data from three of the four largest PrEP providers in Mississippi from September 2018 to September 2021 linked to the Mississippi State Department of Health's Enhanced HIV/AIDS reporting system. HIV diagnosis was defined as testing newly positive for HIV at least 2 weeks after the initial PrEP visit. We calculated the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of HIV per 100 person-years (PY). Person-time was calculated as time from the initial PrEP visit to (1) HIV diagnosis or (2) December 31, 2021 (HIV surveillance data end date). We did not censor individuals if they discontinued PrEP to obtain an estimate of PrEP effectiveness rather than efficacy. Among the 427 clients initiating PrEP during the study period, 2.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9-3.8] subsequently tested positive for HIV. The HIV incidence rate was 1.18 per 100 PY (95% CI: 0.64-2.19) and median time to HIV diagnosis after the initial PrEP visit was 321 days (95% CI: 62-686). HIV incidence rates were highest among transgender and nonbinary individuals [10.35 per 100 PY (95% CI: 2.59-41.40)] compared with cisgender men and women, and among people racialized as Black [1.45 per 100 PY (95% CI: 0.76-2.80)] compared with White and other racialized groups. These findings indicate a need for more clinical and community interventions that support PrEP persistence and restarts among those at high risk of HIV acquisition.

PrEP Use and Adherence among Transgender Persons in Chicago, IL (SHIPP Study, 2014-2018, USA)

Few studies investigating daily oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) focus on transgender persons. The Sustainable Health Center Implementation PrEP Pilot (SHIPP) Study included a large observational cohort of transgender persons with implications for PrEP in the United States. We examined data from SHIPP's observational cohort and its Medication Adherence Substudy (MAS) to understand adherence among transgender participants in Chicago, IL. We assessed adherence by the proportion of days covered (PDC) for PrEP medication prescriptions, self-reported interview data, and concentrations of intracellular tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) in dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Between 2014 and 2018, there were 510 transgender participants, 349 (68.4%) transgender women and 152 (29.8%) transgender men. Forty-five of these participants were enrolled in the MAS, 31 (68.9%) transgender women and 9 (20.0%) transgender men. By the 3-month follow up, 100% of MAS participants who completed an interview reported taking 4 or more doses of PrEP in the previous week. At 6, 9, and 12 months, taking 4 or more doses in the past week was reported by 81.0%, 94.1%, and 83.3% of participants, respectively. Results from TFV-DP DBS indicated that fewer participants reached the same level of adherence (4 or more doses/week) at clinical visits compared to self-report and even fewer participants reached this level of adherence based on the calculated PDC. Among participants who remained on PrEP throughout the study, DBS adherence levels declined after the first three months. There remains a critical need to develop strategies to address barriers and interventions that support PrEP adherence among transgender people.

PrEP Acceptance among Eligible Patients Attending the Largest PrEP Clinic in Jackson, Mississippi

Compared to other states in the United States, Mississippi has the lowest uptake of PrEP relative to the number of people newly diagnosed with HIV in the state. Open Arms Healthcare Center is the largest provider of PrEP in Mississippi, and has systematically documented PrEP eligibility, offers, and acceptance (ie, agreed to undergo a clinical PrEP evaluation) from 2017 to mid-2020. In encounter-based analyses, we examined factors associated with PrEP acceptance. Among 721 encounters where patients were eligible for PrEP, staff offered PrEP at 680 (94%) of encounters (526 unique individuals); individuals accepted a PrEP offer at 58% of encounters. Accepting a PrEP offer was lowest (15.8%) among transgender/non-binary individuals and highest (93.3%) among individuals who reported having sex partners living with HIV. This clinic's model worked to offer PrEP to a highly impacted population, though there is a need to enhance PrEP acceptance for key groups such as transgender/non-binary individuals.