Efficiency of the Cepheid Xpert vanA/vanB assay for screening of colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci during hospital outbreak

Evaluation of GeneXpert vanA/vanB in the early diagnosis of vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection

PURPOSE

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection is a worrying worldwide clinical problem. To evaluate the accuracy of GeneXpert vanA/vanB in the diagnosis of VRE, we conducted a systematic review in the study.

METHODS

Experimental data were extracted from publications until May 03 2021 related to the diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert vanA/vanB for VRE in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The accuracy of GeneXpert vanA/vanB for VRE was evaluated using summary receiver to operate characteristic curve, pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio.

RESULTS

8 publications were divided into 3 groups according to two golden standard references, vanA and vanB group, vanA group, vanB group, including 6 researches, 5 researches and 5 researches, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of group vanA and vanB were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.98) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.91) respectively. The DOR was 440.77 (95% CI, 37.92-5123.55). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of group vanA were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.90) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-0.99) respectively, and those of group vanB were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.80-0.83) respectively.

CONCLUSION

GeneXpert vanA/vanB can diagnose VRE with high-accuracy and shows greater accuracy in diagnosing vanA.

Incidence of genes encoding vanA/vanB vancomycin resistance in rectal swabs of patients with diagnosed cancer, on the day of admission to hospital, in a non-epidemic period

Introduction

Rapid diagnosis is important for preventing infections due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Aim

To evaluate the status of gastrointestinal colonisation with strains containing vanA/vanB genes in oncological patients.

Material and methods

A total of 167 samples of rectal swabs taken from 161 patients (mean age: 63, range: 29-93 years) were examined, including 113 patients from surgical wards (70.2%) and 48 patients from non-surgical wards (29.8%), with diagnosed cancer. The tests were carried out within 24 h of admitting the patient to the department, using the Cepheid Xpert vanA/vanB test, with a CE marked GeneXpert^® Instrument Systems analyser. Samples with positive vanB gene results were additionally seeded on chromogenic media.

Results

The presence of the vanA gene was found in 2.7% and 6.3% of the examined patients, respectively, from the surgical and non-surgical departments, which accounted for 3.7% of all the patients examined. The presence of the vanB gene was detected in 21.1% of the patients, but in no case was there any growth of vancomycin-resistant enterococci on the chromogenic medium.

Conclusions

Patients admitted to non-surgical wards were more often colonised with vanA/vanB genes than were patients admitted to surgical wards, but the differences were not statistically significant.

Real-time PCR for the rapid detection of vanA, vanB and vanM genes

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of quadruple Taqman probe real-time PCR to the detection of vanA, vanB and vanM in enterococcal isolates.

METHODS

A total of 343 strains, including 253 vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) strains and 90 non-VRE strains, were tested by both quadruple Taqman probe real-time PCR and gel-based PCR assay.

RESULTS

When differentiating among three genotypes of vanA, vanB and vanM in VRE strains, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy and consistency of the quadruple Taqman probe real-time PCR were all 100%. Minimum. Inhibitory concentration (MIC) results showed that there was a wide MIC range of vancomycin and teicoplanin for the strains that harboring vanA/vanM gene respectively or harboring vanA and vanM genes simultaneously. However, the VRE strains with vanB genotype all were sensitive to teicoplanin.

CONCLUSION

Considering the excellent PPV and low NPV, real-time PCR would be useful to monitor VRE-colonized or infected patients. However, further evaluation of the assay's performance in the clinical specimens is required, especially when considering that high level of PCR inhibitors present in these samples.

Screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci with Xpert® vanA/vanB: diagnostic accuracy and impact on infection control decision making

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are increasingly important nosocomial pathogens and screening for colonization status is a mainstay in infection control. We implemented PCR-based screening during vanA-positive Enterococcus faecium outbreaks in four university hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark. Xpert®vanA/vanB was performed directly on rectal swabs and the vanA PCR result was used to guide infection control measures. Concurrently, all samples were selectively cultured including an overnight enrichment step. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated as well as turnaround time and the impact of the earlier available PCR results on infection control decision making. In all, 1110 samples were analysed. The vanA PCR positivity rate was 13.8% and culture positivity rate was 15.2%. The diagnostic accuracy of the vanA part of the assay was high with a sensitivity of 87.1%, a specificity of 99.7%, and positive and negative predictive values of 98.0% and 97.7%, respectively. The vanB PCR had a considerably lower specificity of 77.6% and a positive predictive value of 0.4%. In 1067 (96.1%) samples, PCR results were reported within 1 day, whereas median culture turnaround time was 3 days. The saving of time to available results corresponded to 141 saved isolation days and 292 saved transmission risk days. False-negative or false-positive PCR results led to six additional transmission risk days and 13 additional isolation days, respectively. The vanA PCR had high diagnostic accuracy and the prompt availability of results gave a considerable benefit for infection control decision making.

Automatic Digital Plate Reading for Surveillance Cultures

The automation of specimen processing and culture workup has rapidly emerged in clinical microbiology laboratories throughout the world and more recently in the United States. While many U.S. laboratories have implemented some form of automated specimen processing and some have begun performing digital plate reading, automated colony analysis is just beginning to be utilized clinically. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, M. L. Faron et al. (J Clin Microbiol 54:2470-2475, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01040-16) report the results of their evaluation of the performance of the WASPLab Chromogenic Detection Module (CDM) for categorizing chromogenic agar plates as negative or "nonnegative" for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Their major finding was 100% sensitivity for detection of "nonnegative" specimens using CDM compared to manual methods for specimens plated on two different types of VRE chromogenic agar plates. Additionally, utilization of digital plate reading in conjunction with automated colony analysis was predicted to result in significant savings based on greatly reduced labor costs.

Evaluation of the Xpert vanA/vanB assay using enriched inoculated broths for direct detection of vanB vancomycin-resistant Enterococci

Rapid and accurate detection of VRE (vancomycin-resistant enterococci) is required for adequate antimicrobial treatment and infection prevention measures. Previous studies using PCR for the detection of VRE, including Cepheid's Xpert vanA/vanB assay, reported accurate detection of vanA VRE; however, many false-positive results were found for vanB VRE. This is mainly due to nonenterococcal vanB genes, which can be found in the gut flora. Our goal was to optimize the rapid and accurate detection of vanB VRE and to improve the positive predictive value (PPV) by limiting false-positive results. We evaluated the use of the Xpert vanA/vanB assay on rectal swabs and on enriched inoculated broths for the detection of vanB VRE. By adjusting the cycle threshold (CT) cutoff value to ≤ 25 for positivity by PCR on enriched broths, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 96.9%, 100%, 100%, and 99.5% for vanB VRE, respectively. As shown in this study, CT values of ≤ 25 acquired from enriched broths can be considered true positive. For broths with CT values between 25 and 30, we recommend confirming the results by culture. CT values of >30 appeared to be true negative. In conclusion, this study shows that the Cepheid's Xpert vanA/vanB assay performed on enriched inoculated broths with an adjusted cutoff CT value is a useful and rapid tool for the detection of vanB VRE.

Molecular analysis of vanA outbreak of Enterococcus faecium in two Warsaw hospitals: the importance of mobile genetic elements

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium represents a growing threat in hospital-acquired infections. Two outbreaks of this pathogen from neighboring Warsaw hospitals have been analyzed in this study. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of SmaI-digested DNA, multilocus VNTR analysis (MLVA), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) revealed a clonal variability of isolates which belonged to three main lineages (17, 18, and 78) of nosocomial E. faecium. All isolates were multidrug resistant and carried several resistance, virulence, and plasmid-specific genes. Almost all isolates shared the same variant of Tn1546 transposon, characterized by the presence of insertion sequence ISEf1 and a point mutation in the vanA gene. In the majority of cases, this transposon was located on 50 kb or 100 kb pRUM-related plasmids, which lacked, however, the axe-txe toxin-antitoxin genes. 100 kb plasmid was easily transferred by conjugation and was found in various clonal backgrounds in both institutions, while 50 kb plasmid was not transferable and occurred solely in MT159/ST78 strains that disseminated clonally in one institution. Although molecular data indicated the spread of VRE between two institutions or a potential common source of this alert pathogen, epidemiological investigations did not reveal the possible route by which outbreak strains disseminated.

Co-colonization of vanA and vanB Enterococcus faecium of clonal complex 17 in a patient with bacteremia due to vanA E. faecium

A 53-year-old Vietnamese man with liver cirrhosis was transferred from a Vietnamese hospital to our tertiary care hospital in Korea in order to undergo a liver transplantation. Bacteremia due to vanA Enterococcus faecium was diagnosed, and stool surveillance cultures for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were positive for both vanA and vanB E. faecium. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis revealed that the 2 vanA VRE isolates from the blood and stool were clonal, but the vanB VRE was unrelated to the vanA VRE. vanA and vanB VRE were ST64 and ST18, single-allele variations of clonal complex 17, respectively. This is the first case report of vanA VRE bacteremia in a Vietnamese patient and demonstrates the reemergence of vanB VRE since a single outbreak occurred 15years ago in Korea. The reemergence of vanB VRE emphasizes the importance of VRE genotyping to prevent the spread of new VRE strains.

Evaluation of iNtRON VRE vanA/vanB real-time PCR for follow-up surveillance of VRE-infected or colonized patients

The iNtRON vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) vanA/vanB real-time PCR assay was directly applied to stool surveillance (direct-PCR). direct-PCR was compared to 2 culture-based methods using Enterococcosel broth (enrichment-culture) and ChromID VRE media. The positive broth of the enrichment-culture was submitted to phenotypic confirmation of subcultured colonies and genotyping by Seeplex VRE PCR. From September 2011 to May 2012, 208 stool specimens from 188 patients previously positive for VRE were enrolled. Enrichment-culture and direct-PCR detected 178 and 158 positives, respectively. Among 129 specimens cultured with ChromID, direct-PCR and ChromID yielded 105 and 104 positives, respectively. Compared to the enrichment-culture, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of direct-PCR and ChromID were 86.0%, 83.3%, 96.8%, 50.0%, and 89.5%, 86.7%, 98.1%, 52.0%, respectively. Considering the excellent PPV and low NPV, direct-PCR would be useful to monitor VRE-colonized or infected patients on the day, but enrichment-culture is required for direct-PCR-negative specimens.

Performance characteristics of the Cepheid Xpert vanA assay for rapid identification of patients at high risk for carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococci

We compared the performance characteristics of culture and the Cepheid Xpert vanA assay for routine surveillance of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from rectal swabs in patients at high risk for VRE carriage. The Cepheid Xpert vanA assay had a limit of detection of 100 CFU/ml and correctly detected 101 well-characterized clinical VRE isolates with no cross-reactivity in 27 non-VRE and related culture isolates. The clinical sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Xpert vanA PCR assay were 100%, 96.9%, 91.3%, and 100%, respectively, when tested on 300 consecutively collected rectal swabs. This assay provides excellent predictive values for prompt identification of VRE-colonized patients in hospitals with relatively high rates of VRE carriage.