1
|
Conforti F, Pala L, Sala I, Oriecuia C, De Pas T, Specchia C, Graffeo R, Pagan E, Queirolo P, Pennacchioli E, Colleoni M, Viale G, Bagnardi V, Gelber RD. Evaluation of pathological complete response as surrogate endpoint in neoadjuvant randomised clinical trials of early stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2021; 375:e066381. [PMID: 34933868 PMCID: PMC8689398 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for disease-free survival and overall survival in regulatory neoadjuvant trials of early stage breast cancer. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Scopus to 1 December 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION Randomised clinical trials that tested neoadjuvant chemotherapy given alone or combined with other treatments, including anti-human epidermal growth factor 2 (anti-HER2) drugs, targeted treatments, antivascular agents, bisphosphonates, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Trial level associations between the surrogate endpoint pathological complete response and disease-free survival and overall survival. METHODS A weighted regression analysis was performed on log transformed treatment effect estimates (hazard ratio for disease-free survival and overall survival and relative risk for pathological complete response), and the coefficient of determination (R2) was used to quantify the association. The secondary objective was to explore heterogeneity of results in preplanned subgroups analysis, stratifying trials according treatment type in the experimental arm, definition used for pathological complete response (breast and lymph nodes v breast only), and biological features of the disease (HER2 positive or triple negative breast cancer). The surrogate threshold effect was also evaluated, indicating the minimum value of the relative risk for pathological complete response necessary to confidently predict a non-null effect on hazard ratio for disease-free survival or overall survival. RESULTS 54 randomised clinical trials comprising a total of 32 611 patients were included in the analysis. A weak association was observed between the log(relative risk) for pathological complete response and log(hazard ratio) for both disease-free survival (R2=0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.29) and overall survival (R2 =0.08, 0.00 to 0.22). Similar results were found across all subgroups evaluated, independently of the definition used for pathological complete response, treatment type in the experimental arm, and biological features of the disease. The surrogate threshold effect was 5.19 for disease-free survival but was not estimable for overall survival. Consistent results were confirmed in three sensitivity analyses: excluding small trials (<200 patients enrolled), excluding trials with short median follow-up (<24 months), and replacing the relative risk for pathological complete response with the absolute difference of pathological complete response rates between treatment arms. CONCLUSION A lack of surrogacy of pathological complete response was identified at trial level for both disease-free survival and overall survival. The findings suggest that pathological complete response should not be used as primary endpoint in regulatory neoadjuvant trials of early stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Conforti
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas and Rare Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Pala
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas and Rare Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Isabella Sala
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Oriecuia
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Tommaso De Pas
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas and Rare Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Specchia
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rossella Graffeo
- Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Eleonora Pagan
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Queirolo
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas and Rare Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Pennacchioli
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas and Rare Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Colleoni
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Richard D Gelber
- Medical School, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, and Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pathak M, Deo SVS, Dwivedi SN, Thakur B, Sreenivas V, Rath GK. Regimens of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer: A systematic review & network meta-analysis with PRISMA-NMA compliance. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 153:103015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
|
3
|
Pathak M, Dwivedi SN, Deo SVS, Thakur B, Sreenivas V, Rath GK. Effectiveness of taxanes over anthracyclines in neoadjuvant setting: A systematic-review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2019; 7:170-183. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v7.i4.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 04/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anthracyclines and taxanes are more active group of chemotherapy regimen. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported variable evidences regarding efficacy of taxanes over anthracyclines for tumor response and survival outcomes. The present study compares the relative efficacy of taxanes over anthracyclines using pathological complete response (pCR), clinical responses, breast-conserving surgeries and survival outcomes in female breast cancer patients by systematic review and meta-analysis of available RCTs.
AIM To assess the effectiveness of taxanes over anthracyclines in neoadjuvant setting in terms of tumor response and survival outcomes.
METHODS All RCTs assessing efficacy of taxanes over anthracyclines in neoadjuvant setting for management of breast cancer searched through PubMed and Cochrane register of controlled trials on 28 April 2017 and published in English language were considered. Following PRISMA guideline, retrieved records were screened and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed using fixed effect or random effect method depending on heterogeneity assessed using I2 statistic. Subgroup meta-analyses on the basis of taxane alone or taxane along with anthracycline in comparison to anthracycline alone were also performed for each considered outcomes.
RESULTS A total of 16 RCTs involving 6752 breast cancer patients were found eligible. Taxanes based chemotherapy significantly improved pCR (n = 7, RR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.04-2.12), disease free survival [n = 6, RR = 0.89 (0.80-0.99)] and loco-regional recurrence free survival [n = 4, RR = 0.74 (0.59-0.94)]. Interestingly in subgroup analysis, addition of taxane to anthracyclines showed better effectiveness regarding these survivals over anthracyclines than taxane alone over anthracycline.
CONCLUSION Addition of taxanes to anthracyclines based chemotherapy significantly improves pCR, disease free survival and loco-regional recurrence free survival but with no significant impact on breast conservation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Pathak
- Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
- Division of Biostatistics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar 751024, India
| | - Sada Nand Dwivedi
- Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - SVS Deo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, BRAIRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Bhaskar Thakur
- Division of Biostatistics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar 751024, India
| | - Vishnubhatla Sreenivas
- Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Goura Kishor Rath
- Department of Radiotherapy, BRAIRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Treatment-induced cell cycle kinetics dictate tumor response to chemotherapy. Oncotarget 2016; 6:7040-52. [PMID: 25749523 PMCID: PMC4466668 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy fails to provide durable cure for the majority of cancer patients. To identify mechanisms associated with chemotherapy resistance, we identified genes differentially expressed before and after chemotherapeutic treatment of breast cancer patients. Treatment response resulted in either increased or decreased cell cycle gene expression. Tumors in which cell cycle gene expression was increased by chemotherapy were likely to be chemotherapy sensitive, whereas tumors in which cell cycle gene transcripts were decreased by chemotherapy were resistant to these agents. A gene expression signature that predicted these changes proved to be a robust and novel index that predicted the response of patients with breast, ovarian, and colon tumors to chemotherapy. Investigations in tumor cell lines supported these findings, and linked treatment induced cell cycle changes with p53 signaling and G1/G0 arrest. Hence, chemotherapy resistance, which can be predicted based on dynamics in cell cycle gene expression, is associated with TP53 integrity.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gandhi S, Fletcher GG, Eisen A, Mates M, Freedman OC, Dent SF, Trudeau ME. Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 22:S82-94. [PMID: 25848343 DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) of Cancer Care Ontario recently created an evidence-based consensus guideline on the systemic treatment of early breast cancer. The evidence for the guideline was compiled using a systematic review to answer the question "What is the optimal systemic therapy for patients with early-stage, operable breast cancer, when patient and disease factors are considered?" The question was addressed in three parts: cytotoxic chemotherapy, endocrine treatment, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2)-directed therapy. METHODS For the systematic review, the medline and embase databases were searched for the period January 2008 to May 2014. The Standards and Guidelines Evidence directory of cancer guidelines and the Web sites of major oncology guideline organizations were also searched. The basic search terms were "breast cancer" and "systemic therapy" (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted agents, ovarian suppression), and results were limited to randomized controlled trials (rcts), guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. RESULTS Several hundred documents that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved. The Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group meta-analyses encompassed many of the rcts found. Several additional studies that met the inclusion criteria were retained, as were other guidelines and systematic reviews. Chemotherapy was reviewed mainly in three classes: anti-metabolite-based regimens (for example, cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil), anthracyclines, and taxane-based regimens. In general, single-agent chemotherapy is not recommended for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in any patient population. Anthracycline-taxane-based polychemotherapy regimens are, overall, considered superior to earlier-generation regimens and have the most significant impact on patient survival outcomes. Regimens with varying anthracycline and taxane doses and schedules are options; in general, paclitaxel given every 3 weeks is inferior. Evidence does not support the use of bevacizumab in the adjuvant setting; other systemic therapy agents such as metformin and vaccines remain investigatory. Adjuvant bisphosphonates for menopausal women will be discussed in later work. CONCLUSIONS The results of this systematic review constitute a comprehensive compilation of the high-level evidence that is the basis for the 2014 pebc guideline on systemic therapy for early breast cancer. Use of cytotoxic chemotherapy is presented here; the results addressing endocrine therapy and her2-targeted treatment, and the final clinical practice recommendations, are published separately in this supplement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gandhi
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - G G Fletcher
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario; and Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - A Eisen
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - M Mates
- Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kinston General Hospital; and Queen's University, Kingston, ON
| | | | - S F Dent
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - M E Trudeau
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berruti A, Amoroso V, Gallo F, Bertaglia V, Simoncini E, Pedersini R, Ferrari L, Bottini A, Bruzzi P, Sormani MP. Pathologic complete response as a potential surrogate for the clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-regression of 29 randomized prospective studies. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3883-91. [PMID: 25349292 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.55.2836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the role of pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy as surrogate end point of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with breast cancer, we performed a trial-based meta-regression of randomized studies comparing different neoadjuvant systemic treatments. METHODS The systematic literature search included electronic databases and proceedings of oncologic meetings. Endocrine therapy trials were excluded. Treatment effects on DFS and OS were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs), and treatment effects on pCR were expressed as odds ratios (ORs). A weighted regression analysis was performed on log-transformed treatment effect estimates to test the association between treatment effects on the surrogate outcome and treatment effects on the clinical outcome. RESULTS Twenty-nine trials, 59 arms, and 30 comparisons, for a total of 14,641 patients, were included in the analysis. Using the complete set of data, the regression of either the log(HR) for DFS or the log(HR) for OS on the log(OR) for pCR demonstrated only weak associations (R(2) = 0.08; 95% CI, 0 to 0.47; and R(2) = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.41, respectively). Better associations were found in an exploratory analysis assessing a subset of trials comparing intensified/dose-dense chemotherapy versus standard-dose regimens (DFS: R(2) = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.95; P = .003; and OS: R(2) = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.93; P = .03). CONCLUSION This meta-regression analysis of 29 heterogeneous neoadjuvant trials does not support the use of pCR as a surrogate end point for DFS and OS in patients with breast cancer. However, pCR may potentially meet the criteria of surrogacy with specific systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Berruti
- Alfredo Berruti, Vito Amoroso, and Laura Ferrari, University of Brescia at Spedali Civili Hospital; Edda Simoncini and Rebecca Pedersini, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia; Fabio Gallo and Maria Pia Sormani, University of Genoa; Paolo Bruzzi, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Martino, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa; Valentina Bertaglia, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano; and Alberto Bottini, Istituti Ospitalieri Hospital, Cremona, Italy.
| | - Vito Amoroso
- Alfredo Berruti, Vito Amoroso, and Laura Ferrari, University of Brescia at Spedali Civili Hospital; Edda Simoncini and Rebecca Pedersini, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia; Fabio Gallo and Maria Pia Sormani, University of Genoa; Paolo Bruzzi, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Martino, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa; Valentina Bertaglia, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano; and Alberto Bottini, Istituti Ospitalieri Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - Fabio Gallo
- Alfredo Berruti, Vito Amoroso, and Laura Ferrari, University of Brescia at Spedali Civili Hospital; Edda Simoncini and Rebecca Pedersini, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia; Fabio Gallo and Maria Pia Sormani, University of Genoa; Paolo Bruzzi, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Martino, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa; Valentina Bertaglia, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano; and Alberto Bottini, Istituti Ospitalieri Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - Valentina Bertaglia
- Alfredo Berruti, Vito Amoroso, and Laura Ferrari, University of Brescia at Spedali Civili Hospital; Edda Simoncini and Rebecca Pedersini, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia; Fabio Gallo and Maria Pia Sormani, University of Genoa; Paolo Bruzzi, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Martino, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa; Valentina Bertaglia, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano; and Alberto Bottini, Istituti Ospitalieri Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - Edda Simoncini
- Alfredo Berruti, Vito Amoroso, and Laura Ferrari, University of Brescia at Spedali Civili Hospital; Edda Simoncini and Rebecca Pedersini, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia; Fabio Gallo and Maria Pia Sormani, University of Genoa; Paolo Bruzzi, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Martino, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa; Valentina Bertaglia, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano; and Alberto Bottini, Istituti Ospitalieri Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - Rebecca Pedersini
- Alfredo Berruti, Vito Amoroso, and Laura Ferrari, University of Brescia at Spedali Civili Hospital; Edda Simoncini and Rebecca Pedersini, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia; Fabio Gallo and Maria Pia Sormani, University of Genoa; Paolo Bruzzi, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Martino, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa; Valentina Bertaglia, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano; and Alberto Bottini, Istituti Ospitalieri Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - Laura Ferrari
- Alfredo Berruti, Vito Amoroso, and Laura Ferrari, University of Brescia at Spedali Civili Hospital; Edda Simoncini and Rebecca Pedersini, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia; Fabio Gallo and Maria Pia Sormani, University of Genoa; Paolo Bruzzi, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Martino, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa; Valentina Bertaglia, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano; and Alberto Bottini, Istituti Ospitalieri Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bottini
- Alfredo Berruti, Vito Amoroso, and Laura Ferrari, University of Brescia at Spedali Civili Hospital; Edda Simoncini and Rebecca Pedersini, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia; Fabio Gallo and Maria Pia Sormani, University of Genoa; Paolo Bruzzi, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Martino, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa; Valentina Bertaglia, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano; and Alberto Bottini, Istituti Ospitalieri Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - Paolo Bruzzi
- Alfredo Berruti, Vito Amoroso, and Laura Ferrari, University of Brescia at Spedali Civili Hospital; Edda Simoncini and Rebecca Pedersini, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia; Fabio Gallo and Maria Pia Sormani, University of Genoa; Paolo Bruzzi, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Martino, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa; Valentina Bertaglia, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano; and Alberto Bottini, Istituti Ospitalieri Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Sormani
- Alfredo Berruti, Vito Amoroso, and Laura Ferrari, University of Brescia at Spedali Civili Hospital; Edda Simoncini and Rebecca Pedersini, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia; Fabio Gallo and Maria Pia Sormani, University of Genoa; Paolo Bruzzi, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Martino, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa; Valentina Bertaglia, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano; and Alberto Bottini, Istituti Ospitalieri Hospital, Cremona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Qin YY, Li H, Guo XJ, Ye XF, Wei X, Zhou YH, Zhang XJ, Wang C, Qian W, Lu J, He J. Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without taxanes, in early or operable breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 19 randomized trials with 30698 patients. PLoS One 2011; 6:e26946. [PMID: 22069477 PMCID: PMC3206064 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2011] [Accepted: 10/06/2011] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Taxanes have been extensively used as adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of early or operable breast cancer, particularly in high risk, node-negative breast cancer. Previous studies, however, have reported inconsistent findings regarding their clinical efficacy and safety. We investigated disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and drug-related toxicities of taxanes by a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials, proceedings of major meetings, and reference lists of articles for studies conducted between January 1980 and April 2011. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy with and without taxanes in the treatment of patients with early-stage or operable breast cancer were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The primary endpoint was DFS. Nineteen RCTs including 30698 patients were identified, including 8426 recurrence events and 3803 deaths. Taxanes administration yielded a 17% reduction of hazard ratio (HR) for DFS (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.88, p<0.001) and a 17% reduction of HR for OS (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90, p<0.001). For high risk, node-negative breast cancer, the pooled HR also favoured the taxane-based treatment arm over the taxane-free treatment arm (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.87, p = 0.022). A significantly increased rate of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, fatigue, diarrhea, stomatitis, and oedema was observed in the taxane-based treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE Adjuvant chemotherapy with taxanes could reduce the risk of cancer recurrence and death in patients with early or operable breast cancer, although the drug-related toxicities should be balanced. Furthermore, we also demonstrated that patients with high risk, node-negative breast cancer also benefited from taxanes therapy, a result that was not observed in previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Yi Qin
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gwak G, Kim JY, Park K, Shin YJ, Cho H, Park SJ, Yang GH, Bae BN, Kim KW, Han S. Comparison of Doxorubicin plus docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Doxorubicin plus vinorelbine in primary breast cancer. J Breast Cancer 2011; 14:129-34. [PMID: 21847408 PMCID: PMC3148544 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.2.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2010] [Accepted: 03/24/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study was performed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin plus docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) with doxorubicin plus vinorelbine NC. Methods Fifty-three patients underwent 4 cycles of NC consisted of intravenous injection of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2) administered every 3 weeks (AD), while 49 patients underwent 4 cycles of NC consisted of intravenous injection of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) administered every 3 weeks (AN). Response rate and treatment-related toxicities were analyzed by administered chemotherapeutics. Response to NC was also analyzed according to clinicobiological characteristics of the primary tumors. Results Clinical response was observed in 66% with AN and 81.6% with AD chemotherapy. A complete pathologic response (pCR) was confirmed in 6 patients (11.3%) with AN and in 7 patients (14.3%) with AD after the surgery. Response rate was significantly higher in AD compared with AN (p=0.038), but there was no significant difference between the two group regard to pCR rate. Breast conserving surgery (BCS) was performed in 35.8% of AN group, whereas 20 patients (40.8%) of AD group underwent BCS. The patients with HER2-amplified tumor showed significantly increased response to both types of NC. Pathologic complete response was confirmed in 9 (39.1%) out of 23 HER2-amplified tumors, whereas only 4 (5.1%) of 79 HER2-nonamplified tumors showed pathologic complete response. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 22.6% of total 212 cycles in AN and 38.8% of total 196 cycles in AD. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 39.6% in AN and 43.9% in AD. Grade 3 mucositis was observed in 26.4% with AN and in 40.8% with AD. Conclusion There was no significant increase of pCR by AD compared with AN. Long-term follow-up results of our study indicate that clinical outcome after NC was significantly associated with initial response to NC regardless of therapeutic regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geumhee Gwak
- Department of Surgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|