1
|
Duarte BN, Alem CER, da Silva Cabello AER, Teixeira SRC, Cabello C. Risk-reducing surgeries for breast cancer in Brazilian patients undergoing multigene germline panel: impact of results on decision making. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07476-7. [PMID: 39254767 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07476-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the behavior change of high-risk breast cancer patients regarding the intention to undergo risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM) before and after genetic testing results and to identify the main influencing factors in decision-making. METHODS Prospective cohort study conducted between November 2021 and October 2022 with women under follow-up at the high-risk outpatient clinic of the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP). Patients were referred for genetic testing, followed by counseling according to the test result. RESULTS A total of 373 women were included. In the pre-genetic testing analysis, 54.1% of patients intended to undergo RRMs. After testing, 42.2% opted for the procedure. Behavior change occurred in 26.2%, mainly from "yes" to "no/don't know" (72,6%) (p < 0.001). The genetic test result was positive (LPV or PV) in 29.7% of patients. Among the 90 patients with positive results, 62 (68.9%) agreed to RRM, while 22 (24.4%) remained unwilling to accept RRM, regardless of the positive test. Significant influencing factors for behavior change pre- and post-genetic testing (in favor of surgery) in multivariate analysis were: positive genetic test result (OR 2.94, p < 0.001), personal cancer history (OR 2.7, p = 0.008), and ages between 40 and 49 years (OR 2.07, p = 0.008) and ≥ 50 years (OR 3.47, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In a Brazilian population at high-risk for breast cancer and users of the public health system, it was observed that most desired RRM, however, when genetic testing and counseling were performed, behavior change was observed, especially when the result was positive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bárbara Narciso Duarte
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da UNICAMP, Departamento de Tocoginecologia da FCM/UNICAMP, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101. Cidade Universitária 13081-940, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Christine Elisabete Rubio Alem
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da UNICAMP, Departamento de Tocoginecologia da FCM/UNICAMP, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101. Cidade Universitária 13081-940, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Ana Elisa Ribeiro da Silva Cabello
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da UNICAMP, Departamento de Tocoginecologia da FCM/UNICAMP, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101. Cidade Universitária 13081-940, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Sandra Regina Campos Teixeira
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da UNICAMP, Departamento de Tocoginecologia da FCM/UNICAMP, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101. Cidade Universitária 13081-940, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Cesar Cabello
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da UNICAMP, Departamento de Tocoginecologia da FCM/UNICAMP, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101. Cidade Universitária 13081-940, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yadav S, Couch FJ, Domchek SM. Germline Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Current Concepts in Risk Evaluation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2024; 14:a041318. [PMID: 38151326 PMCID: PMC11293548 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Our understanding of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has significantly improved over the past two decades. In addition to BRCA1/2, pathogenic variants in several other DNA-repair genes have been shown to increase the risks of breast and ovarian cancer. The magnitude of cancer risk is impacted not only by the gene involved, but also by family history of cancer, polygenic risk scores, and, in certain genes, pathogenic variant type or location. While estimates of breast and ovarian cancer risk associated with pathogenic variants are available, these are predominantly based on studies of high-risk populations with young age at diagnosis of cancer, multiple primary cancers, or family history of cancer. More recently, breast cancer risk for germline pathogenic variant carriers has been estimated from population-based studies. Here, we provide a review of the field of germline genetic testing and risk evaluation for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in high-risk and population-based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhartha Yadav
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55901, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kaidar-Person O, Faermann R, Polikar D, Cohen K, Bernstein-Molho R, Morrow M, Boersma LJ, Offersen BV, Poortmans P, Sklair-Levy M, Anaby D. A BRILLIANT-BRCA study: residual breast tissue after mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07425-4. [PMID: 38980506 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07425-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Different types of mastectomies leave different amounts of residual breast tissue. The significance of the residual breast volume (RBV) is not clear. Therefore, we developed an MRI tool that allows to easily assess the RBV. In this study we evaluated factors associated with RBV after skin or nipple sparing mastectomy (SSM/NSM) in breast cancer BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) carriers who underwent both therapeutic and risk reducing SSM/NSM and its relation to breast cancer outcomes using an innovative MRI-based tool. METHODS Data of breast cancer BRCA PV who were treated between 2006 and 2020 were retrieved from of the oncogenetics unit databases. Only patients who underwent SSM/NSM and had a postoperative breast MRI available for analysis were included. Data collected included demographics, clinicopathological features, and outcomes. The MRI tool was developed by a breast cancer imaging laboratory. A logistic regression test and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the associated risk of increased RBV. A forward stepwise linear regression was used to correlate tumour-patient specific factors and RBV, and a Kaplan-Meier curve to show the probability of locoregional relapse. RESULTS A total of 84 patients undergoing 89 mastectomies were included. At a median follow-up of 98 months, 5 local, 2 regional, and 4 distant recurrences were observed. RBV was not significantly related with breast cancer outcomes (p value = NS). A higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with a higher RBV (p < 0.0001). A larger number of involved axillary nodes was associated with a smaller RBV (p = 0.025). The RBV on the risk-reducing mastectomy side was significantly higher compared to the breast cancer side (p value = 0.007). Local recurrences occurred in the vicinity of the primary tumour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
- Breast Radiation Unit, The Jusidman Cancer Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Renata Faermann
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- The Merav High-Risk Clinic - Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Dor Polikar
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Kfir Cohen
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Rinat Bernstein-Molho
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- Breast Cancer Institute, The Jusidman Cancer Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
- Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Liesbeth Jorinne Boersma
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Miri Sklair-Levy
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- The Merav High-Risk Clinic - Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Debbie Anaby
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ntowe KW, Thomas SM, Dalton JC, Olunuga E, Wang T, Chiba A, Plichta JK. Demographics and Clinical Decision Making in Patients with Germline Moderate Penetrance Non-BRCA Mutations in Breast Cancer Related Genes. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15793-w. [PMID: 38976158 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15793-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of pathogenic variants in high penetrance genes related to breast cancer (BC), such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are well established. However, moderate penetrance mutations are understudied. We aim to compare risk reduction decision-making patterns in patients with a moderate penetrance BC-related genetic mutations, without a prior BC diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Female patients aged ≥ 18 years who tested positive for a BRCA1/2, high penetrance, or moderate penetrance mutation related to BC between 1996 and 2023 without a concurrent or prior BC diagnosis were retrospectively identified from a single academic center's database. Groups were stratified by mutation type: BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCA1, BRCA2), high penetrance mutations (HPM; CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, TP53), or moderate penetrance mutations (MPM; ATM, BARD1, CHEK2, NF1, RAD51C, RAD51D). Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS A total of 528 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 66% (n = 350) having a BRCA1/2 mutation, 8% (n = 44) having HPM, and 25% (n = 134) having MPM; the median follow-up was 56.0 months. In our cohort, 20.9% of patients with BRCA mutations, 9.1% with HPM, and 7.5% with MPM chose to undergo risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM). Within the moderate penetrance cohort, patients who chose to undergo RRM were younger at the time of genetic testing (39.4 vs. 47.5 years, p = 0.03) and had a higher number of family members with BC (2 vs. 1, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide insights into the demographic characteristics and family history of patients with moderate penetrance mutations and those who pursue risk-reducing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koumani W Ntowe
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Samantha M Thomas
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Juliet C Dalton
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ebunoluwa Olunuga
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ton Wang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Akiko Chiba
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer K Plichta
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Elia A, Pataccini G, Saldain L, Ambrosio L, Lanari C, Rojas P. Antiprogestins for breast cancer treatment: We are almost ready. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2024; 241:106515. [PMID: 38554981 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2024.106515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
The development of antiprogestins was initially a gynecological purpose. However, since mifepristone was developed, its application for breast cancer treatment was immediately proposed. Later, new compounds with lower antiglucocorticoid and antiandrogenic effects were developed to be applied to different pathologies, including breast cancer. We describe herein the studies performed in the breast cancer field with special focus on those reported in recent years, ranging from preclinical biological models to those carried out in patients. We highlight the potential use of antiprogestins in breast cancer prevention in women with BRCA1 mutations, and their use for breast cancer treatment, emphasizing the need to elucidate which patients will respond. In this sense, the PR isoform ratio has emerged as a possible tool to predict antiprogestin responsiveness. The effects of combined treatments of antiprogestins together with other drugs currently used in the clinic, such as tamoxifen, CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors or pembrolizumab in preclinical models is discussed since it is in this scenario that antiprogestins will be probably introduced. Finally, we explain how transcriptomic or proteomic studies, that were carried out in different luminal breast cancer models and in breast cancer samples that responded or were predicted to respond to the antiprogestin therapy, show a decrease in proliferative pathways. Deregulated pathways intrinsic of each model are discussed, as well as how these analyses may contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés Elia
- Laboratory of Hormonal Carcinogenesis, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gabriela Pataccini
- Laboratory of Hormonal Carcinogenesis, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Leo Saldain
- Laboratory of Hormonal Carcinogenesis, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luisa Ambrosio
- Laboratory of Hormonal Carcinogenesis, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Claudia Lanari
- Laboratory of Hormonal Carcinogenesis, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Paola Rojas
- Laboratory of Hormonal Carcinogenesis, Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lautz Z, Kautz-Freimuth S, Shukri A, Redaèlli M, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Stock S. Predictors of knowledge and knowledge gain after decision aid use among women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 124:108248. [PMID: 38513456 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors contributing to baseline knowledge in women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) and knowledge gain after decision aid (DA) use. METHODS Women with PVs in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) receiving DAs or a control group (CG). Of the total sample, 417 completed the baseline survey and were included in this analysis. Two multiple regression analyses were conducted: baseline data on socio-demographic, medical, decision-related and psychological variables were used to identify predictors for (1) baseline knowledge within the total group and (2) knowledge gain within the IG after DA use three months post study inclusion. RESULTS At baseline, higher education status, no breast cancer history, and lower decisional conflict related to higher knowledge within the total group. After DA use within the IG, higher baseline scores for decisional conflict predicted higher knowledge gain, and higher baseline scores for depression and intrusion predicted lower knowledge gain. CONCLUSIONS This study identified predictors of baseline knowledge and knowledge gain after DA use in women with BRCA1/2 PVs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Awareness of facilitating and hindering factors on these women's knowledge can improve understanding of their health literacy and enable further targeted support interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoë Lautz
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Arim Shukri
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Marcus Redaèlli
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Centre for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Centre for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ntowe KW, Lee MS, Plichta JK. Clinical genetics in breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2024; 130:16-22. [PMID: 38557982 PMCID: PMC11246818 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
As genetic testing becomes increasingly more accessible and more applicable with a broader range of clinical implications, it may also become more challenging for breast cancer providers to remain up-to-date. This review outlines some of the current clinical guidelines and recent literature surrounding germline genetic testing, as well as genomic testing, in the screening, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer, while identifying potential areas of further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koumani W. Ntowe
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael S. Lee
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer K. Plichta
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cortina CS, Purdy A, Brazauskas R, Stachowiak SM, Fodrocy J, Klement KA, Sasor SE, Krucoff KB, Robertson K, Buth J, Lakatos AEB, Petroll AE, Doren EL. The Impact of a Breast Cancer Risk Assessment on the Decision for Gender-Affirming Chest Masculinization Surgery in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals: A Pilot Single-Arm Educational Intervention Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15701-2. [PMID: 38940898 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15701-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persons assigned female or intersex at birth and identify as transgender and/or gender-diverse (TGD) may undergo gender-affirming chest masculinization surgery (GACMS); however, GACMS is not considered equivalent to risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of elevated breast cancer (BC) risk in TGD persons, compare self-perceived versus calculated risk, and determine how risk impacts the decision for GACMS versus RRM. METHODS A prospective single-arm pilot educational intervention trial was conducted in individuals assigned female or intersex at birth, age ≥ 18 years, considering GACMS, without a BC history or a known pathogenic variant. BC risk was calculated using the Tyrer-Cuzik (all) and Gail models (age ≥ 35 years). Elevated risk was defined as ≥ 17%. RESULTS Twenty-five (N = 25) participants were enrolled with a median age of 24.0 years (interquartile range, IQR 20.0-30.0 years). All were assigned female sex at birth, most (84%) were Non-Hispanic (NH)-White, 48% identified as transgender and 40% as nonbinary, and 52% had a first- and/or second-degree family member with BC. Thirteen (52%) had elevated risk (prevalence 95% confidence interval (CI) 31.3-72.2%). Median self-perceived risk was 12% versus 17.5% calculated risk (p = 0.60). Of the 13 with elevated risk, 5 (38.5%) underwent/are scheduled to undergo GACMS, 3 (23%) of whom underwent/are undergoing RRM. CONCLUSIONS Over half of the cohort had elevated risk, and most of those who moved forward with surgery chose to undergo RRM. A BC risk assessment should be performed for TGD persons considering GACMS. Future work is needed to examine BC incidence and collect patient-reported outcomes. Trial Registration Number ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT06239766).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandler S Cortina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
- Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| | - Anna Purdy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Ruta Brazauskas
- Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Samantha M Stachowiak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Jessica Fodrocy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kristen A Klement
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sarah E Sasor
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kate B Krucoff
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kevin Robertson
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Jamie Buth
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Annie E B Lakatos
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Andrew E Petroll
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Erin L Doren
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gootzen TA, Kalra A, Sarig K, Sobočan M, Oxley SG, Dworschak N, Georgiannakis A, Glynou S, Taniskidi A, Ganesan S, Ferris M, Legood R, Eeles R, Evans DGR, Fierheller CT, Manchanda R. Online Provision of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Health Information: A Search Engine Driven Systematic Web-Based Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2324. [PMID: 39001386 PMCID: PMC11240379 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 06/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BRCA genetic testing is available for UK Jewish individuals but the provision of information online for BRCA is unknown. We aimed to evaluate online provision of BRCA information by UK organisations (UKO), UK Jewish community organisations (JCO), and genetic testing providers (GTP). Google searches for organisations offering BRCA information were performed using relevant sets of keywords. The first 100 website links were categorised into UKOs/JCOs/GTPs; additional JCOs were supplemented through community experts. Websites were reviewed using customised questionnaires for BRCA information. Information provision was assessed for five domains: accessibility, scope, depth, accuracy, and quality. These domains were combined to provide a composite score (maximum score = 5). Results were screened (n = 6856) and 45 UKOs, 16 JCOs, and 18 GTPs provided BRCA information. Accessibility was high (84%,66/79). Scope was lacking with 35% (28/79) addressing >50% items. Most (82%, 65/79) described BRCA-associated cancers: breast and/or ovarian cancer was mentioned by 78%(62/79), but only 34% (27/79) mentioned ≥1 pancreatic, prostate, melanoma. Few websites provided carrier frequencies in the general (24%,19/79) and Jewish populations (20%,16/79). Only 15% (12/79) had quality information with some/minimal shortcomings. Overall information provision was low-to-moderate: median scores UKO = 2.1 (IQR = 1), JCO = 1.6 (IQR = 0.9), and GTP = 2.3 (IQR = 1) (maximum-score = 5). There is a scarcity of high-quality BRCA information online. These findings have implications for UK Jewish BRCA programmes and those considering BRCA testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar A Gootzen
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention & Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Ashwin Kalra
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention & Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Katrina Sarig
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention & Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Monika Sobočan
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention & Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborksa ul, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Samuel George Oxley
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention & Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - Nina Dworschak
- Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AD, UK
| | - Ariadni Georgiannakis
- Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AD, UK
| | - Sevasti Glynou
- Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AD, UK
| | - Angeliki Taniskidi
- Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AD, UK
| | - Subhasheenee Ganesan
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention & Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | | | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK
| | - D Gareth R Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, MAHSC, 6th Floor Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Caitlin T Fierheller
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention & Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention & Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stock S, Isselhard A, Shukri A, Kautz-Freimuth S, Redaèlli M, Berger-Höger B, Dikow N, Kiechle M, Köberlein-Neu J, Meisel C, Schmutzler R, Steckelberg A, van Mackelenbergh MT, Vitinius F, Wöckel A, Rhiem K. Decision Coaching for Healthy Women With BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2024; 121:393-400. [PMID: 38629689 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with pathogenic variants (PV) of the genes BRCA1/2 have a choice of preventive options. To help these women decide for themselves, we developed and implemented a decision coaching (DC) program and evaluated it for congruence between the participants' desired and actual roles in decision-making. METHODS Healthy BRCA1/2 PV carriers (25-60 years of age) were recruited at six centers in Germany. Those who returned baseline (T1) questionnaires were randomly assigned to the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG). The IG attended a nurse-led DC program. The primary outcome was congruence between the participants' preferred and actual roles in decision-making. The secondary outcomes were an active role, satisfaction, decisional conflict, and knowledge. The follow-up questionnaires were administered at 12 weeks (T2) and 6 months (T3). RESULTS Of the 413 women who were recruited, 389 returned the T1 questionnaires. At T2, the groups did not differ significantly in congruence between their preferred and actual roles in decision-making (0.12, 95% confidence interval [-0.03; 0.28], p = 0.128), with a slightly higher congruence in the CG. Women in both groups played a more active role at T2 than their stated preference at T1, with a notably higher percentage in the IG than the CG (IG: 40%, CG: 24.4% [-25.1; -6.1]). IG participants were more satisfied with their role and had less decisional conflict and greater knowledge. CONCLUSION This DC program can help women who are carriers of BRCA1/2 PV participate actively in decision-making with regard to preventive measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Stock
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne and Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Cologne; Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne and Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne; Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne and Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Cologne; Institute for Public Health and Healthcare Research, University of Bremen; Institute for Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rechts der Isar Hospital Technical University of Munich; Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, Competence Center for Health Economics and Healthcare Research, University of Wuppertal; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden; Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne and Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne; Institute for Health and Healthcare Science, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel; Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne and Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Robert Bosch Hospital, Stuttgart; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Würzburg
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kiljańczyk A, Matuszczak M, Marciniak W, Derkacz R, Stempa K, Baszuk P, Bryśkiewicz M, Cybulski C, Dębniak T, Gronwald J, Huzarski T, Lener MR, Jakubowska A, Cheriyan A, Szwiec M, Stawicka-Niełacna M, Godlewski D, Prusaczyk A, Jasiewicz A, Kluz T, Tomiczek-Szwiec J, Kilar-Kobierzycka E, Siołek M, Wiśniowski R, Posmyk R, Jarkiewicz-Tretyn J, Sun P, Scott RJ, Narod SA, Lubiński J. Blood Iodine as a Potential Marker of the Risk of Cancer in BRCA1 Carriers. Nutrients 2024; 16:1788. [PMID: 38892720 PMCID: PMC11174800 DOI: 10.3390/nu16111788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer and ovarian cancer pose a significant risk for BRCA1 carriers, with limited risk-reduction strategies. While improved screening helps in the early detection of breast cancer, preventive measures remain elusive. Emerging evidence suggests a potential link between iodine levels and modulation of cancer risk, but comprehensive studies are scarce. We conducted a prospective study among 989 BRCA1 carriers to assess the association between blood iodine levels and breast and ovarian cancer risk. Using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, we measured blood iodine levels and observed a negative association with breast cancer risk, with a significantly lower risk observed in quartile 4 (iodine > 38.0 µg/L) compared with quartile 1 (iodine < 30 µg/L) (HR = 0.49; 95%CI: 0.27-0.87; p = 0.01). Conversely, a suggestive increase in ovarian cancer risk was observed at higher iodine levels (HR = 1.91; 95%CI: 0.64-5.67; p = 0.25). No significant association was found between iodine levels and overall cancer risk. Our results suggest the potential of iodine to reduce breast cancer risk in BRCA1 carriers after prophylactic oophorectomy but require further validation and investigation of its effect on ovarian cancer risk and overall mortality. These findings highlight the need for personalized strategies to manage cancer risk in BRCA1 carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Kiljańczyk
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Milena Matuszczak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
| | | | - Róża Derkacz
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra, Poland
| | - Klaudia Stempa
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Piotr Baszuk
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra, Poland
| | - Marta Bryśkiewicz
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra, Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Dębniak
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra, Poland
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra, Poland
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, ul. Zyty 28, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Marcin R. Lener
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Angela Cheriyan
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1N8, Canada
| | - Marek Szwiec
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Małgorzata Stawicka-Niełacna
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, ul. Zyty 28, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland
| | | | | | - Andrzej Jasiewicz
- Genetic Counseling Center, Subcarpatian Oncological Hospital, 18 Bielawskiego St, 36-200 Brzozów, Poland
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Obstetrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rejtana 16c, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
| | - Joanna Tomiczek-Szwiec
- Department of Histology, Department of Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Opole, 45-040 Opole, Poland
| | - Ewa Kilar-Kobierzycka
- Department of Oncology, District Specialist Hospital, Leśna 27-29 St, 58-100 Świdnica, Poland
| | - Monika Siołek
- Holycross Cancer Center, Artwińskiego 3 St, 25-734 Kielce, Poland
| | - Rafał Wiśniowski
- Regional Oncology Hospital, Wyzwolenia 18 St, 43-300 Bielsko Biała, Poland
| | - Renata Posmyk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland
| | | | - Ping Sun
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1N8, Canada
| | - Rodney J. Scott
- Medical Genetics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research, Innovation and Translation, School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Pathology North, John Hunter Hospital, King and Auckland Streets, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia;
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1N8, Canada
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (M.M.)
- Read-Gene, Grzepnica, ul. Alabastrowa 8, 72-003 Dobra, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huber D, Hatzipanagiotou M, Schüler-Toprak S, Ortmann O, Treeck O. Effects of Endocrine Interventions Targeting ERα or PR on Breast Cancer Risk in the General Population and Carriers of BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:5894. [PMID: 38892081 PMCID: PMC11172552 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
There is evidence suggesting that endocrine interventions such as hormone replacement therapy and hormonal contraception can increase breast cancer (BC) risk. Sexual steroid hormones like estrogens have long been known for their adverse effects on BC development and progression via binding to estrogen receptor (ER) α. Thus, in recent years, endocrine interventions that include estrogens have been discussed more and more critically, and their impact on different BC subgroups has increasingly gained interest. Carriers of pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 genes are known to have a high risk of developing BC and ovarian cancer. However, there remain open questions to what extent endocrine interventions targeting ERα or the progesterone receptor further increase cancer risk in this subgroup. This review article aims to provide an overview and update on the effects of endocrine interventions on breast cancer risk in the general population in comparison to BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Finally, future directions of research are addressed, to further improve the understanding of the effects of endocrine interventions on high-risk pathogenic variant carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Huber
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (D.H.); (M.H.); (S.S.-T.); (O.O.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Hatzipanagiotou
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (D.H.); (M.H.); (S.S.-T.); (O.O.)
| | - Susanne Schüler-Toprak
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (D.H.); (M.H.); (S.S.-T.); (O.O.)
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (D.H.); (M.H.); (S.S.-T.); (O.O.)
| | - Oliver Treeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (D.H.); (M.H.); (S.S.-T.); (O.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sanabria-Salas MC, Pedroza-Duran A, Díaz-Casas SE, Nuñez Lemus M, Grillo-Ardila CF, Briceño-Morales X, García-Mora M, Ángel-Aristizábal J, Mariño Lozano IF, Suarez Rodríguez RA, Guzmán Abisaab LH. Management and Clinical Outcomes of Breast Cancer in Women Diagnosed with Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in a Clinic-Based Sample from Colombia. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2020. [PMID: 38893140 PMCID: PMC11171067 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate prognosis and survival differences in 82 breast cancer patients with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs) treated and followed at the Breast Unit of the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Colombia (INC-C) between 2018 and 2021. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years, with 62.2% presenting locally advanced tumors, 47.6% histological grade 3, and 35.4% with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. Most carriers, 74.4% (61/82), had PVs in known breast cancer susceptibility genes (i.e., "associated gene carriers" group, considered inherited breast cancer cases): BRCA2 (30), BRCA1 (14), BARD1 (4), RAD51D (3), TP53 (2), PALB2 (2), ATM (2), CHEK2 (1), RAD51C (1), NF1 (1), and PTEN (1). BRCA1-2 represented 53.7%, and homologous recombination DNA damage repair (HR-DDR) genes associated with breast cancer risk accounted for 15.9%. Patients with PVs in non-breast-cancer risk genes were combined in a different category (21/82; 25.6%) (i.e., "non-associated gene carriers" group, considered other breast cancer cases). Median follow-up was 38.1 months, and 24% experienced recurrence, with 90% being distant. The 5-year Disease-Free Survival (DFS) for inherited breast cancer cases was 66.5%, and for other breast cancer cases it was 88.2%. In particular, for carriers of PVs in the BRCA2 gene, it was 37.6%. The 5-year Overall Survival (OS) rates ranged from 68.8% for those with PVs in BRCA2 to 100% for those with PVs in other HR-DDR genes. Further studies are crucial for understanding tumor behavior and therapy response differences among Colombian breast cancer patients with germline PVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Carolina Sanabria-Salas
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Ana Pedroza-Duran
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Sandra E. Díaz-Casas
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Marcela Nuñez Lemus
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Carlos F. Grillo-Ardila
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Avenida Carrera 30 N. 45-3, Bogotá 111321, Colombia;
| | - Ximena Briceño-Morales
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Mauricio García-Mora
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Javier Ángel-Aristizábal
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Iván Fernando Mariño Lozano
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Raúl Alexis Suarez Rodríguez
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Luis Hernán Guzmán Abisaab
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Greenberger C, Mor P. Underpinnings of the Halachic Approach to BRCA Screening and Intervention: Facilitating Provider Counseling for Observant Jewish Populations. Rambam Maimonides Med J 2024; 15:RMMJ.10522. [PMID: 38717180 PMCID: PMC11065093 DOI: 10.5041/rmmj.10522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Halacha is the corpus of Jewish law which serves as a life blueprint for observant Jewish individuals. Health professionals counseling halachically observant populations at risk for breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations should be well informed of the halachic approach to screening for BRCA mutations and subsequent interventions. AIM To address the intersection of halacha with ethical norms and current medical evidence-based data as they relate to potential and identified BRCA mutation carriers at their various stages of decision-making. RESULTS Halacha, ethics, and medicine have much in common, but there are specific principles which guide halacha; decision-making in light of halacha is complex and varies with respect to the multi-faceted aspects of screening and intervention. Halacha encourages the exercise of autonomy regarding situations in which beneficence is not clear-cut and dependent on subjective perceptions. CONCLUSIONS Health professionals knowledgeable of halacha are better equipped to counsel the observant Jewish population at risk of BRCA mutations or identified as mutation carriers, enabling them to present targeted questions to halachic authorities and thus achieve optimal decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaya Greenberger
- Adjunct Professor of Nursing, Lev Academic Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Pnina Mor
- Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Davey MG, Tormey S. Implications of Highly Penetrant Genetic Variants on Breast Surgery. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:180-183. [PMID: 38218718 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
It seems the most probable beneficiaries from the molecular era are those harboring hereditary genetic variants, which are responsible for 5% to 10% of all breast cancer diagnoses. There are several key implications of such variants on clinical practice, from expedited anticipation of primary cancer diagnoses, which can have their risk mitigated by risk reduction surgery, to pragmatism surrounding the management of male breast cancer patients. This communication discusses the implications of highly penetrant (or pathogenic) hereditary variants in contemporary breast surgery practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Davey
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Breast Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Shona Tormey
- Department of Breast Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
An J, McDougall J, Lin Y, Lu SE, Walters ST, Heidt E, Stroup A, Paddock L, Grumet S, Toppmeyer D, Kinney AY. Randomized trial promoting cancer genetic risk assessment when genetic counseling cost removed: 1-year follow-up. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae018. [PMID: 38490263 PMCID: PMC11006111 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) is recommended for women with ovarian and high-risk breast cancer. However, the underutilization of CGRA has long been documented, and cost has been a major barrier. In this randomized controlled trial, a tailored counseling and navigation (TCN) intervention significantly improved CGRA uptake at 6-month follow-up, compared with targeted print (TP) and usual care (UC). We aimed to examine the effect of removing genetic counseling costs on CGRA uptake by 12 months. METHODS We recruited racially and geographically diverse women with breast and ovarian cancer from cancer registries in Colorado, New Jersey, and New Mexico. Participants assigned to TCN received telephone-based psychoeducation and navigation. After 6 months, the trial provided free genetic counseling to participants in all arms. RESULTS At 12 months, more women in TCN obtained CGRA (26.6%) than those in TP (11.0%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.56 to 4.89) and UC (12.2%; OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.41 to 4.29). There were no significant differences in CGRA uptake between TP and UC. The Kaplan-Meier curve shows that the divergence of cumulative incidence slopes (TCN vs UC, TCN vs TP) appears primarily within the initial 6 months. CONCLUSION TCN significantly increased CGRA uptake at the 12-month follow-up. Directly removing the costs of genetic counseling attenuated the effects of TCN, highlighting the critical enabling role played by cost coverage. Future policies and interventions should address multilevel cost-related barriers to expand patients' access to CGRA. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered with the NIH clinical trial registry, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03326713. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03326713.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinghua An
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Yong Lin
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Shou-En Lu
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Scott T Walters
- University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Emily Heidt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Lisa Paddock
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Sherry Grumet
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Anita Y Kinney
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Metcalfe K, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, Kotsopoulos J, Kim R, Moller P, Pal T, Aeilts A, Eisen A, Karlan B, Bordeleau L, Tung N, Olopade O, Zakalik D, Singer CF, Foulkes W, Couch F, Neuhausen SL, Eng C, Sun P, Lubinski J, Narod SA. Risk-reducing mastectomy and breast cancer mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant: an international analysis. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:269-274. [PMID: 38030749 PMCID: PMC10803363 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02503-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is offered to women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant, however, there are limited data on the impact on breast cancer mortality. METHODS Participants were identified from a registry of women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. We used a pseudo-randomised trial design and matched one woman with a RRM to one woman without a RRM on year of birth, gene, and country. We estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dying of breast cancer in the follow-up period. RESULTS There were 1654 women included; 827 assigned to the RRM arm and 827 assigned to the control arm. After a mean follow-up of 6.3 years, there were 20 incident breast cancers (including 15 occult cancers) and two breast cancer deaths in the RRM arm, and 100 incident breast cancers and 7 breast cancer deaths in the control arm (HR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.05-1.35; p = 0.11). The probability of dying of breast cancer within 15 years after RRM was 0.95%. CONCLUSIONS In women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant, RRM reduces the risk of breast cancer, and the probability of dying of breast cancer is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Metcalfe
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raymond Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pal Moller
- The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Department for Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Amber Aeilts
- Division of Human Genetics, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Beth Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Louise Bordeleau
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Cancer Risk and Prevention Program, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olufunmilayo Olopade
- Department of Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dana Zakalik
- Cancer Genetics Program, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - William Foulkes
- McGill Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Fergus Couch
- Division of Experimental Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Charis Eng
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Center for Personalized Genetic Healthcare, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wong SM, Apostolova C, Eisenberg E, Foulkes WD. Counselling Framework for Germline BRCA1/2 and PALB2 Carriers Considering Risk-Reducing Mastectomy. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:350-365. [PMID: 38248108 PMCID: PMC10814079 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31010023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Female BRCA1/2 and PALB2 germline pathogenic variant carriers have an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer and may wish to consider risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) for surgical prevention. Quantifying the residual lifetime risk and absolute benefit from RRM requires careful consideration of a patient's age, pathogenic variant, and their personal history of breast or ovarian cancer. Historically, patients have been counselled that RRM does not necessarily prolong survival relative to high-risk surveillance, although recent studies suggest a possible survival benefit of RRM in BRCA1 carriers. The uptake of RRM has increased dramatically over the last several decades yet varies according to sociodemographic factors and geographic region. The increased adoption of nipple-sparing mastectomy techniques, ability to avoid axillary staging, and availability of reconstructive options for most germline pathogenic variant carriers has helped to minimize the morbidity of RRM. Preoperative discussions should include evidence regarding postmastectomy sensation, the potential for supplemental surgery, pregnancy-related chest wall changes, and the need for continued clinical surveillance. Approaches that include sensation preservation and robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy are an area of evolving research that may be more widely adopted in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M. Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada
| | - Carla Apostolova
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Elisheva Eisenberg
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - William D. Foulkes
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Record SM, Thomas SM, Ntowe K, Chiba A, Plichta JK. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers & risk reducing mastectomy: Who undergoes surgery and potential benefits. Am J Surg 2024; 227:146-152. [PMID: 37827871 PMCID: PMC10842097 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is the most effective breast cancer risk-reduction strategy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. We examined factors associated with RRM and its relationship with overall survival (OS). METHODS Patients aged 18-80y at diagnosis of their BRCA1/2 mutation were selected from our institutional database and stratified by RRM receipt. Differences were tested; unadjusted OS was estimated. RESULTS Of the 306 patients, median age was 43y; median follow-up was 41.6mo. Patients undergoing RRM were more often married with a history of pregnancy (both p ≤ 0.05). Of female patients, 23.1% underwent RRM. Two patients had malignancy detected at RRM, and one developed breast cancer after RRM. Higher unadjusted OS was observed with RRM (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Our analyses suggest that family-structure may play a role in a patient's decision to undergo RRM. We also demonstrated RRM is likely associated with improved survival, potentially underscoring the importance of this option for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney M Record
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Samantha M Thomas
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Koumani Ntowe
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Akiko Chiba
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer K Plichta
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liu T, Yu J, Gao Y, Ma X, Jiang S, Gu Y, Ming WK. Prophylactic Interventions for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks and Mortality in BRCA1/2 Carriers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:103. [PMID: 38201529 PMCID: PMC10778044 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hereditary breast and ovarian cancers (HBOCs) pose significant health risks worldwide and are mitigated by prophylactic interventions. However, a meta-analysis of their efficacy and the impact of different genetic variants on their effectiveness is lacking. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, adhering to Cochrane guidelines. The review encompassed studies that involved prophylactic interventions for healthy women with BRCA variants, focusing on cancer incidence and mortality outcomes. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for risk of bias assessment. We pooled the extracted outcomes using random effects models and conducted subgroup analyses stratified by intervention, variant, and cancer types. RESULTS A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that prophylactic interventions significantly reduced cancer risk and mortality. The subgroup analysis showed a greater protective effect for BRCA2 than BRCA1 variant carriers. Risk-reducing surgeries (RRS) were more effective than chemoprevention, with RRS notably reducing cancer risk by 56% compared to 39% for chemoprevention. Prophylactic oophorectomy significantly reduced HBOC risks, while the effect of prophylactic mastectomy and chemoprevention on mortality was less conclusive. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic interventions significantly reduce the risk of HBOC and associated mortality. This comprehensive analysis provides insights for future economic evaluations and clinical decision-making in HBOC interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taoran Liu
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Jing Yu
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Yangyang Gao
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Xinyang Ma
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Shan Jiang
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School and Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Yuanyuan Gu
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School and Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Wai-kit Ming
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Speiser D, Bick U. Primary Prevention and Early Detection of Hereditary Breast Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:448-454. [PMID: 38125920 PMCID: PMC10730103 DOI: 10.1159/000533391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Primary prevention and early detection of hereditary breast cancer has been one of the main topics of breast cancer research in recent decades. The knowledge of risk factors for breast cancer has been increasing continuously just like the recommendations for risk management. Pathogenic germline variants (mutations, class 4/5) of risk genes are significant susceptibility factors in healthy individuals. At the same time, germline mutations serve as biomarkers for targeted therapy in breast cancer treatment. Therefore, management of healthy mutation carriers to enable primary prevention is in the focus as much as the consideration of pathogenic germline variants for therapeutic decisions. Since 1996, the German Consortium has provided quality-assured care for counselees and patients with familial burden of breast and ovarian cancer. Summary Currently, there are 23 university centers with over 100 cooperating DKG-certified breast and gynecological cancer centers. These centers provide standardized, evidence-based, and knowledge-generating care, which includes aspects of primary as well as secondary and tertiary prevention. An important aspect of quality assurance and development was the inclusion of the HBOC centers in the certification system of the German Cancer Society (GCS). Since 2020, the centers have been regularly audited and their quality standards continuously reviewed according to quality indicators adapted to the current state of research. The standard of care at GC-HBOC' centers involves the evaluation as well as evolution of various aspects of care like inclusion criteria, identification of new risk genes, management of variants of unknown significance (class 3), evaluation of risk-reducing options, intensified surveillance, and communication of risks. Among these, the possibility of intensified surveillance in the GC-HBOC for early detection of breast cancer is an important component of individual risk management for many counselees. As has been shown in recent years, in carriers of pathogenic variants in high-risk genes, this approach enables the detection of breast cancer at very early, more favorable stages although no reduction of mortality has been demonstrated yet. The key component of the intensified surveillance is annual contrast-enhanced breast MRI, supplemented by up to biannual breast ultrasound and mammography usually starting at age 40. Key Messages Apart from early detection, the central goal of care is the prevention of cancer. By utilizing individualized risk calculation, the optimal timeframe for risk-reducing surgery can be estimated, and counselees can be supported in reaching preference-sensitive decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothee Speiser
- HBOC-Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bick
- HBOC-Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Narod SA. Choices for cancer prevention for women with a BRCA1 mutation? a personal view. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2023; 21:26. [PMID: 38031144 PMCID: PMC10685461 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-023-00271-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
With widespread testing for susceptibility genes, increasing numbers of women are being identified to carry a mutation in one of many genes which renders them susceptible to cancer. The first gene to be identified (in 1994) was BRCA1 which increases a woman's risk for breast cancer (70%) and ovarian cancer (40%). The prevalence of BRCA1 gene mutations has been studied widely and in many countries, mostly in women affected with cancer. In many settings testing is offered routinely to women with serous ovarian cancer or early-onset or triple-negative breast cancer. It is preferable to identify a mutation in a healthy women prior to the diagnosis of cancer. The basic strategies for prevention include surgical prevention, chemoprevention and screening (early detection). Much progress has been made in the past two decades evaluating the benefits of these three approaches. In this commentary I provide my personal views regarding these various interventions in the context of counselling a newly diagnosed health woman with a BRCA1 mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, 790 Bay Street, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kautz-Freimuth S, Redaèlli M, Shukri A, Kentenich H, Simic D, Mildenberger V, Schmutzler R, Rhiem K, Stock S. Effectiveness of evidence-based decision aids for women with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants in the german health care context: results from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:223. [PMID: 37845719 PMCID: PMC10580583 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02327-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants are at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Preventive options include risk-reducing breast and ovarian surgeries and intensified breast surveillance. However, individual decision-making is often associated with decisional conflicts. Two evidence-based decision aids have recently been developed for these women (healthy or with unilateral breast cancer) for the German context to support them in their decision-making process. This study evaluated their effectiveness. METHODS In a randomized controlled study, women (aged 18-70 years) with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the intervention (IG, n = 230) or control (CG, n = 220) group. All participants received usual care. After baseline survey (t0), IG participants additionally received the DAs. Follow-up surveys were at three (t1) and six (t2) months. Primary outcome was decisional conflict at t1. Secondary analyses included decision status, decision regret, knowledge on risks and preventive options, self-reported psychological symptoms, acceptability of DAs, and preparation for decision-making. RESULTS Of 450 women recruited, 417 completed t0, 398 completed t1 and 386 completed t2. Compared to CG, IG participants had lower decisional conflict scores at t1 (p = 0.049) and t2 (p = 0.006) and higher scores for knowledge (p = 0.004), acceptability (p = 0.000), and preparation for decision-making (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS These DAs can help improve key parameters of decision-making in women with pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants and, thus, provide a useful add-on to the current counseling and care concept for these women in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00015823, retrospectively registered 14/06/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Marcus Redaèlli
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Arim Shukri
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hannah Kentenich
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dusan Simic
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vanessa Mildenberger
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mooghal M, Vohra LM, Khan W, Akbar F. Prophylactic Risk-Reducing Mastectomy (PRRM): A Set Practice or Catch-22 Situation in LMIC. A Single-Centre Prospective Cohort Study. World J Surg 2023; 47:2154-2160. [PMID: 37145137 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07033-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Pakistan's hereditary breast cancer has a higher-than-average prevalence. Our acceptability of prophylactic risk-reducing mastectomy (PRRM) still needs to be determined, and genetic testing still needs to be offered to all eligible. The aim is to determine the number of women presenting to our centre who availed of PRRM after positive genetic tests and the main reasons restraining them from considering PRRM.Materials and methods This study is a single-centre, prospective cohort. We collected data from 2017 to 2022 on BRCA1/2 and other (P/LP) gene-positive patients. Continuous variables are presented as means (±SD) and categorical variables in percentages, with a significant P-value of ≤ 0.05.Results Out of 477 tested individuals, only 95(20.12%) had a positive result. BRCA1/2 was positive in 70 cases, while P/LP variants were in 24 cases. Only 32.6% of eligible families underwent genetic testing, with 54.8% positivity. Altogether, 92.6% of patients had BRCA1/2-related cancers. Only 25/95(26.3%) individuals availed of PRRM, the majority had contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy 68% with a 20% reconstruction rate. The main reasons to decline PRRM were false belief of not having any disease 57.44%, followed by family/spouse pressure 51%, body appearance/societal perception, fear of complications/quality of life and financial constraints.Conclusion Genetic testing and its implications are still a grey area for LMICs, primarily due to the scarcity of centres offering genetic testing to eligible populations, followed by prevalent perceptions about prophylactic surgeries among the masses. Addressing relevant issues in LMICs is the need of time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehwish Mooghal
- Section Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, 74800, Sindh, Pakistan.
| | - Lubna M Vohra
- Section Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, 74800, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Wajiha Khan
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Fizza Akbar
- Division of Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Torres S, Peleteiro B, Magalhães A, Garrido L, Costa S, Fougo JL. Differences among a Portuguese cohort of BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants carriers choosing risk-reducing mastectomy or intensive breast surveillance. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:7529-7538. [PMID: 36971799 PMCID: PMC10374730 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04663-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants have a higher risk to develop breast and ovarian cancer. In structured high-risk clinics, risk-reducing measures are adopted. This study aimed at characterizing these women and identify factors that may have influenced their choice between risk reduction mastectomy (RRM) and intensive breast surveillance (IBS). METHODS This study reviewed retrospectively 187 clinical records of affected and unaffected women with P/LP variants of the BRCA1/2 genes, from 2007 to 2022, of which 50 chose RRM, while 137 chose IBS. The research focused on personal and family history and tumor characteristics and their relation with the preventive option chosen. RESULTS Among women with personal history of breast cancer, a higher proportion opted for RRM compared to those asymptomatic (34.2% vs 21.3%, p = 0.049), with younger age determining the option for RRM (38.5 years vs 44.0 years, p < 0.001). Among women with personal history of ovarian cancer, a higher proportion opted for RRM compared to those without that history (62.5% vs 25.1%, p = 0.033), with younger age determining the option for RRM (42.6 years vs 62.7 years, p = 0.009). Women who had bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were more likely to choose RRM than those who did not (37.3% vs 18.3%, p = 0.003). Family history was not associated with preventive option (33.3% vs 25.3, p = 0.346). CONCLUSIONS The decision for the preventive option is multifactorial. In our study, personal history of breast or ovarian cancer, younger age at diagnosis, and previous bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were associated with the choice of RRM. Family history was not associated with the preventive option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Torres
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Bárbara Peleteiro
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Breast Center, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- EPI Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translation Research in Population Health, University of Porto, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal
| | - André Magalhães
- Breast Center, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luzia Garrido
- Breast Center, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Medical Genetics Service, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - Susy Costa
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Breast Center, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - José Luís Fougo
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Breast Center, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schiaffino S, Cozzi A, Pompei B, Scarano AL, Catanese C, Catic A, Rossi L, Del Grande F, Harder Y. MRI-Conditional Breast Tissue Expander: First In-Human Multi-Case Assessment of MRI-Related Complications and Image Quality. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4410. [PMID: 37445444 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to assess potential complications and effects on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image quality of a new MRI-conditional breast tissue expander (Motiva Flora®) in its first in-human multi-case application. Twenty-four patients with 36 expanders underwent non-contrast breast MRI with T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences on a 3 T unit before breast tissue expander exchange surgery, being monitored during and after MRI for potential complications. Three board-certified breast radiologists blindly and independently reviewed image quality using a four-level scale ("poor", "sufficient", "good", and "excellent"), with inter-reader reliability being assessed with Kendall's τb. The maximum diameters of RFID-related artifacts on T1-weighted and DWI sequences were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. All 24 examinations were completed without patient-related or device-related complications. The T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences of all the examinations had "excellent" image quality and a median 11 mm (IQR 9-12 mm) RFID artifact maximum diameter, significantly lower (p < 0.001) than on the DWI images (median 32.5 mm, IQR 28.5-34.5 mm). DWI quality was rated at least "good" in 63% of the examinations, with strong inter-reader reliability (Kendall's τb 0.837, 95% CI 0.687-0.952). This first in-human study confirms the MRI-conditional profile of this new expander, which does not affect the image quality of T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences and moderately affects DWI quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Schiaffino
- Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Cozzi
- Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Pompei
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Angela Lia Scarano
- Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Carola Catanese
- Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Armin Catic
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Lorenzo Rossi
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland (CSSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Filippo Del Grande
- Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Yves Harder
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Witjes VM, Ligtenberg MJL, Vos JR, Braspenning JCC, Ausems MGEM, Mourits MJE, de Hullu JA, Adang EMM, Hoogerbrugge N. The most efficient and effective BRCA1/2 testing strategy in epithelial ovarian cancer: Tumor-First or Germline-First? Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:121-128. [PMID: 37182432 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Genetic testing in epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) is essential to identify a hereditary cause like a germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV). An efficient strategy for genetic testing in OC is highly desired. We evaluated costs and effects of two strategies; (i) Tumor-First strategy, using a tumor DNA test as prescreen to germline testing, and (ii) Germline-First strategy, referring all patients to the clinical geneticist for germline testing. METHODS Tumor-First and Germline-First were compared in two scenarios; using real-world uptake of testing and setting implementation to 100%. Decision analytic models were built to analyze genetic testing costs (including counseling) per OC patient and per family as well as BRCA1/2 detection probabilities. With a Markov model, the life years gained among female relatives with a germline BRCA1/2 PV was investigated. RESULTS Focusing on real-world uptake, with the Tumor-First strategy more OC patients and relatives with a germline BRCA1/2 PV are detected (70% versus 49%), at lower genetic testing costs (€1898 versus €2502 per patient, and €2511 versus €2930 per family). Thereby, female relatives with a germline BRCA1/2 PV can live on average 0.54 life years longer with Tumor-First compared to Germline-First. Focusing on 100% uptake, the genetic testing costs per OC patient are substantially lower in the Tumor-First strategy (€2257 versus €4986). CONCLUSIONS The Tumor-First strategy in OC patients is more effective in identifying germline BRCA1/2 PV at lower genetic testing costs per patient and per family. Optimal implementation of Tumor-First can further improve detection of heredity in OC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera M Witjes
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Janet R Vos
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jozé C C Braspenning
- Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Eddy M M Adang
- Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Isselhard A, Lautz Z, Rhiem K, Stock S. Assessing Psychological Morbidity in Cancer-Unaffected BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:3590-3608. [PMID: 37185387 PMCID: PMC10136916 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30040274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Female BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers have an increased lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer-unaffected women who are newly diagnosed with this pathogenic variant may experience psychological distress because of imminent health threat. No comprehensible review on psychological morbidity in cancer-unaffected BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers is currently available. This review aims to give an overview about all available the studies in which psychological outcomes have been assessed in cancer-unaffected BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, whether as a primary outcome or secondary measurement. A systematic search across four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO) was conducted. Studies had to report on cancer-unaffected pathogenic variant carriers (exclusively or separately) and use a validated measure of psychological morbidity to be eligible. Measures were only included if they were used in at least three studies. The final review consisted of 45 studies from 13 countries. Distress measures, including anxiety and cancer worry, were most often assessed. Most studies found a peak of distress immediately after genetic test result disclosure, with a subsequent decline over the following months. Only some studies found elevated distress in carriers compared to non-carriers in longer follow-ups. Depression was frequently investigated but largely not found to be of clinical significance. Quality of life seemed to be largely unaffected by a positive genetic test result, although there was some evidence that younger women, especially, were less satisfied with their role functioning in life. Body image has been infrequently assessed so far, but the evidence suggested that there may be a decrease in body image after genetic test result disclosure that may decrease further for women who opt for a prophylactic mastectomy. Across all the outcomes, various versions of instruments were used, often limiting the comparability among the studies. Hence, future research should consider using frequently used instruments, as outlined by this review. Finally, while many studies included cancer-unaffected carriers, they were often not reported on separately, which made it difficult to draw specific conclusions about this population.
Collapse
|
29
|
Gaba F, Blyuss O, Tan A, Munblit D, Oxley S, Khan K, Legood R, Manchanda R. Breast Cancer Risk and Breast-Cancer-Specific Mortality following Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in BRCA Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051625. [PMID: 36900415 PMCID: PMC10001253 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the gold standard method of ovarian cancer risk reduction, but the data are conflicting regarding the impact on breast cancer (BC) outcomes. This study aimed to quantify BC risk/mortality in BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers after RRSO. METHODS We conducted a systematic review (CRD42018077613) of BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers undergoing RRSO, with the outcomes including primary BC (PBC), contralateral BC (CBC) and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) using a fixed-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses stratified by mutation and menopause status. RESULTS RRSO was not associated with a significant reduction in the PBC risk (RR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.59-1.21) or CBC risk (RR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.65-1.39) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined but was associated with reduced BC-specific mortality in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined (RR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.18-0.39). Subgroup analyses showed that RRSO was not associated with a reduction in the PBC risk (RR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.68-1.17) or CBC risk (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.59-1.24) in BRCA1 carriers nor a reduction in the CBC risk in BRCA2 carriers (RR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.07-1.74) but was associated with a reduction in the PBC risk in BRCA2 carriers (RR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.41-0.97) and BCSM in BC-affected BRCA1 carriers (RR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.30-0.70). The mean NNT = 20.6 RRSOs to prevent one PBC death in BRCA2 carriers, while 5.6 and 14.2 RRSOs may prevent one BC death in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined and BRCA1 carriers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS RRSO was not associated with PBC or CBC risk reduction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined but was associated with improved BC survival in BC-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers combined and BRCA1 carriers and a reduced PBC risk in BRCA2 carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiza Gaba
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| | - Oleg Blyuss
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child’s Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 29 Shmitovskiy Proezd, 123337 Moscow, Russia
| | - Alex Tan
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Daniel Munblit
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child’s Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 29 Shmitovskiy Proezd, 123337 Moscow, Russia
- Care for Long Term Conditions Division, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London SE1 8WA, UK
- Solov’ev Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, 43 Ulitsa Donskaya, 115419 Moscow, Russia
| | - Samuel Oxley
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Khalid Khan
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, 90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
- Department of Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van Bommel MHD, IntHout J, Veldmate G, Kets CM, de Hullu JA, van Altena AM, Harmsen MG. Contraceptives and cancer risks in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2023; 29:197-217. [PMID: 36383189 PMCID: PMC9976973 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of BReast CAncer (BRCA) 1 or 2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers, who have an inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer, are being identified. Among these women, data regarding the effects of contraception on cancer risks are unclear and various guidelines provide various recommendations. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE We aim to optimize counselling regarding contraception for BRCA1/2-PV carriers. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We investigated the risk ratio for developing breast cancer or ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2-PV carriers who have used any form of contraception versus non-users. Second, we analysed breast and ovarian cancer risk among BRCA1/2-PV carriers as influenced by the duration of contraceptive use and by the time since last use. In addition, we provide an overview of all relevant international guidelines regarding contraceptive use for BRCA1/2-PV carriers. SEARCH METHODS A systematic search in the Medline database and Cochrane library identified studies describing breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2-PV carriers as modified by contraception until June 2021. The search included medical subject headings, keywords and synonyms related to BRCA and contraceptives (any kind). PRISMA guidance was followed. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations assessments were performed. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled effects for breast and ovarian cancer risk separately. Subgroup analyses were conducted for BRCA1 versus BRCA2 and for the various contraceptive methods. OUTCOMES Results of the breast cancer risk with oral contraceptive pill (OCP) analysis depended on the outcome measure. Meta-analyses of seven studies with 7525 women revealed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.55 (95% CI: 1.36-1.76) and of four studies including 9106 women resulted in an odds ratio (OR) of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.90-1.25), heterogeneity (I2) 0% and 52%, respectively. Breast cancer risk was still increased in ever-users compared with never-users >10 years after last OCP use. In contrast, ovarian cancer risk was decreased among OCP users: HR 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.74) based on two studies including 10 981 women (I2: 0%), and OR 0.49 (95% CI: 0.38-0.63) based on eight studies including 10 390 women (I2: 64%). The protective effect vanished after cessation of use. Tubal ligation also protects against ovarian cancer: one study including 3319 women (I2: 0%): HR: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.26-0.74) and three studies with 7691 women (I2: 44%): OR: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.53-1.03). Data regarding other contraceptives were unavailable. No differences were observed between BRCA1 and BRCA2-PV carriers. The quality of evidence was either low or very low. WIDER IMPLICATIONS The OCP potentially increases breast cancer risk, while ovarian cancer risk decreases with either the OCP and tubal ligation in BRCA1/2-PV carriers. Counselling of BRCA1/2-PV carriers should be personalized; the genetic and non-genetic factors (like prior risk-reducing surgeries, prior breast cancer and age) and patients' preferences (reversibility, ease of use, reliability and effect on menstrual cycle) should be balanced. To further optimize counselling for high-risk women, future research should focus on other (commonly used) contraceptive methods and cancer risks in this specific population, and on the potential impact of changing formulations over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majke H D van Bommel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanna IntHout
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Guus Veldmate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - C Marleen Kets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M van Altena
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marline G Harmsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Imyanitov EN, Kuligina ES, Sokolenko AP, Suspitsin EN, Yanus GA, Iyevleva AG, Ivantsov AO, Aleksakhina SN. Hereditary cancer syndromes. World J Clin Oncol 2023; 14:40-68. [PMID: 36908677 PMCID: PMC9993141 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v14.i2.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary cancer syndromes (HCSs) are arguably the most frequent category of Mendelian genetic diseases, as at least 2% of presumably healthy subjects carry highly-penetrant tumor-predisposing pathogenic variants (PVs). Hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome make the highest contribution to cancer morbidity; in addition, there are several dozen less frequent types of familial tumors. The development of the majority albeit not all hereditary malignancies involves two-hit mechanism, i.e. the somatic inactivation of the remaining copy of the affected gene. Earlier studies on cancer families suggested nearly fatal penetrance for the majority of HCS genes; however, population-based investigations and especially large-scale next-generation sequencing data sets demonstrate that the presence of some highly-penetrant PVs is often compatible with healthy status. Hereditary cancer research initially focused mainly on cancer detection and prevention. Recent studies identified multiple HCS-specific drug vulnerabilities, which translated into the development of highly efficient therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evgeny N Imyanitov
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St.-Petersburg 197758, Russia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, St.-Petersburg 194100, Russia
| | - Ekaterina S Kuligina
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St.-Petersburg 197758, Russia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, St.-Petersburg 194100, Russia
| | - Anna P Sokolenko
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St.-Petersburg 197758, Russia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, St.-Petersburg 194100, Russia
| | - Evgeny N Suspitsin
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St.-Petersburg 197758, Russia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, St.-Petersburg 194100, Russia
| | - Grigoriy A Yanus
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St.-Petersburg 197758, Russia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, St.-Petersburg 194100, Russia
| | - Aglaya G Iyevleva
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St.-Petersburg 197758, Russia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, St.-Petersburg 194100, Russia
| | - Alexandr O Ivantsov
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St.-Petersburg 197758, Russia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, St.-Petersburg 194100, Russia
| | - Svetlana N Aleksakhina
- Department of Tumor Growth Biology, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, St.-Petersburg 197758, Russia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, St.-Petersburg 194100, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Clarijs ME, van Egdom LSE, Verhoef C, Vasilic D, Koppert LB. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: should we preserve the pectoral fascia? Protocol of a Dutch double blinded, prospective, randomised controlled pilot study with a within-subject design (PROFAS). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066728. [PMID: 36806067 PMCID: PMC9944307 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) in women with a high risk of developing breast cancer has shown to provide the greatest risk reduction. Many surgical guidelines recommend the removal of the pectoral fascia (PF) in mastectomies; however, there is no evidence to support this statement. Reported wound-related complications following mastectomy include seroma, flap necrosis, infection and haematoma. Seroma causes discomfort and may delay the reconstructive procedures. Whether removal or preservation of the PF influences drain volume, seroma formation and other postoperative complications following BPM remains unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of removal versus preservation of the PF on drain policy and seroma after BPM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a double blinded, prospective, randomised controlled pilot study with a within-subject design. The inclusion criteria are women >18 years, presenting in the Academic Breast Cancer Centre Rotterdam, who are opting for BPM. Patients with a history or diagnosis of breast cancer are excluded. According to the sample size calculation based on the difference in total drain volume, a number of 21 eligible patients will be included. Randomisation will occur within the patient, which means PF preservation in one breast and PF removal in the contralateral breast. The primary study endpoint is total drainage volume. Secondary study outcomes include time to drain removal, number of needle aspirations, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study is approved by the Erasmus Medical Center Review Board (REC 2020-0431). Results will be presented during international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed academic journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05391763; clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marloes E Clarijs
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Laurentine S E van Egdom
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Dalibor Vasilic
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Prophylactic Radical Fimbriectomy with Delayed Oophorectomy in Women with a High Risk of Developing an Ovarian Carcinoma: Results of a Prospective National Pilot Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041141. [PMID: 36831483 PMCID: PMC9954021 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is the gold standard for the prophylaxis of ovarian cancer in high-risk women. Due to significant adverse effects, 20-30% of women delay or refuse early oophorectomy. This prospective pilot study (NCT01608074) aimed to assess the efficacy of radical fimbriectomy followed by a delayed oophorectomy in preventing ovarian and pelvic invasive cancer (the primary endpoint) and to evaluate the safety of both procedures. The key eligibility criteria were pre-menopausal women ≥35 years with a high risk of ovarian cancer who refused a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. All the surgical specimens were subjected to the SEE-FIM protocol. From January 2012 to October 2014, 121 patients underwent RF, with 51 in an ambulatory setting. Occult neoplasia was found in two cases, with one tubal high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Two patients experienced grade 1 intraoperative complications. No early or delayed grade ≥3 post-operative complications occurred. After 7.3 years of median follow-up, no cases of pelvic invasive cancer have been noted. Three of the fifty-two patients developed de novo breast cancer. One BRCA1-mutated woman delivered twins safely. Twenty-five patients underwent menopause, including fifteen who had received chemotherapy for breast cancer, and twenty-three underwent menopause before the delayed oophorectomy, while two did not undergo a delayed oophorectomy at all. Overall, 46 women underwent a delayed oophorectomy. No abnormalities were found in any delayed oophorectomy specimens. Radical fimbriectomy followed by delayed oophorectomy appears to be a safe and well-tolerated risk-reducing approach, which avoids early menopause for patients with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
34
|
Zimovjanova M, Bielcikova Z, Miskovicova M, Vocka M, Zimovjanova A, Rybar M, Novotny J, Petruzelka L. Uptake and Effectiveness of Risk-Reducing Surgeries in Unaffected Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers: A Single Institution Experience in the Czech Republic. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041072. [PMID: 36831416 PMCID: PMC9954081 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Unnafected female carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) are at higher risk of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). In the retrospective single-institution study in the Czech Republic, we analyzed the rate, longitudinal trends, and effectiveness of prophylactic risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) on the incidence of BC and OC in BRCA1/2 carriers diagnosed between years (y) 2000 to 2020. The study included 496 healthy female BRCA1/2 carriers. The median follow-up was 6.0 years. RRM was performed in 156 (31.5%, mean age 39.3 y, range 22-61 y) and RRSO in 234 (47.2%, mean age 43.2 y, range 28-64 y) BRCA1/2 carriers. A statistically significant increase of RRM (from 12% to 29%) and RRSO (from 31% to 42%) was observed when comparing periods 2005-2012 and 2013-2020 (p < 0.001). BC developed in 15.9% of BRCA1/2 carriers without RRM vs. 0.6% of BRCA1/2 carriers after RRM (HR 20.18, 95% CI 2.78- 146.02; p < 0.001). OC was diagnosed in 4.3% vs. 0% of BRCA1/2 carriers without vs. after RRSO (HR not defined due to 0% occurrence in the RRSO group, p < 0.001). Study results demonstrate a significant increase in the rate of prophylactic surgeries in BRCA1/2 healthy carriers after 2013 and the effectiveness of RRM and RRSO on the incidence of BC and OC in these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Zimovjanova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +420-224-966-764
| | - Zuzana Bielcikova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michaela Miskovicova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Oncology, Nitra Faculty Hospital, Špitálska 6, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia
| | - Michal Vocka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Zimovjanova
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 601 77, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- International Clinical Research Center (ICRC) of St Anne’s University Hospital (FNUSA), Pekařská 664/53, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marian Rybar
- Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, náměstí Sítná 3105, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Novotny
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Surgery, Sunderby Hospital, Sjukhusvägen 10, 954 42 Sunderbyn, Sweden
| | - Lubos Petruzelka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ain Q, Richardson C, Mutebi M, George A, Kemp Z, Rusby JE. Does mainstream BRCA testing affect surgical decision-making in newly-diagnosed breast cancer patients? Breast 2023; 67:30-35. [PMID: 36577271 PMCID: PMC9982265 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline pathogenic variants mutations) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes cause an increased risk of breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Mainstream cancer genetic testing (MCG) was introduced for breast cancer patients in our unit in 2013. Non-geneticist clinicians have been trained to offer genetic testing during initial treatment planning. We assessed the impact of timely test results on surgical decision-making. METHODS Women who had undergone mainstream genetic testing for breast cancer between September 2013 and September 2018 were identified from a prospective database. Surgical data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS 580 eligible women had mainstream genetic testing. For 474 this was their first breast cancer diagnosis. The median age was 46 years (interquartile range (IQR) 38-57). The indications were: age ≤45 years for 233 (49%); triple negative disease for 192 women (40.5%); bilateral breast cancer age <60 for 39 (8%) and other for 72 (14%) women. The median time for test initiation to result was 18 days (IQR 15-21). 302 (64% received results before surgery. 88% of those found to have a BRCA mutation before surgery opted for bilateral mastectomy (compared to 5% with BRCA wild type). An additional 106 patients had a new diagnosis on a background of previous treatment. Of these all with a pathogenic variant chose bilateral mastectomy. CONCLUSION Timely BRCA gene testing influences surgeons' and patients' choice of surgery. It reassures women with a negative result and allows those with a positive result to take an active decision about the management of their future risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quratul Ain
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | - Miriam Mutebi
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Aga Khan University Hospital, Parklands, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Angela George
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, UK
| | - Zoe Kemp
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jennifer E Rusby
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cortina CS, Kong AL. Using the tools we have to improve perioperative outcomes for mastectomy patients with severe persistent mental illness. Am J Surg 2023:S0002-9610(23)00015-6. [PMID: 36697355 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Chandler S Cortina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Amanda L Kong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Psychological factors and the uptake of preventative measures in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: results of a prospective cohort study. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:38. [PMID: 36536421 PMCID: PMC9761978 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00244-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women carrying BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants are exposed to elevated risks of developing breast cancer (BC) and are faced by a complex decision-making process on preventative measures, i.e., risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM), and intensified breast surveillance (IBS). In this prospective cohort study we investigated the effect of anxiety, personality factors and coping styles on the decision-making process on risk management options in women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2. METHODS Breast cancer unaffected and affected women with a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene were psychologically evaluated immediately before (T0), 6 to 8 weeks (T1) and 6 to 8 months (T2) after the disclosure of their genetic test results. Uptake of RRM and IBS was assessed at T2. Psychological data were gathered using questionnaires on risk perception, personality factors, coping styles, decisional conflict, depression and anxiety, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). We performed tests on statistical significance and fitted a logistic regression based on significance level. RESULTS A total of 98 women were included in the analysis. Baseline anxiety levels in women opting for RRM were high but decreased over time, while they increased in women opting for intensified breast surveillance (IBS). Elevated levels of anxiety after genetic test result disclosure (T1) were associated with the decision to undergo RRM (p < 0.01; OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.05-1.42), while personal BC history and personality factors seemed to be less relevant. CONCLUSIONS Considering psychosocial factors influencing the decision-making process of women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 may help improving their genetic and psychological counselling. When opting for IBS they may profit from additional medical and psychological counselling. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register under DRKS00027566 on January 13, 2022.
Collapse
|
38
|
BREAST-Q Breast-Conserving Therapy Module: Normative Data from a Dutch Sample of 9059 Women. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:985-993. [PMID: 35994350 PMCID: PMC9586822 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BREAST-Q, a patient-reported outcome measure for cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery, is widely used in both clinical research and practice. The aim of this study was to acquire normative data of BREAST-Q's Breast-Conserving Therapy Module from a Dutch population sample and to compare it with existing normative BREAST-Q values. METHODS Flyers with QR codes, WhatsApp, and one academic center's Facebook and LinkedIn platforms were used to direct participants to self-complete an online version of four domains of the preoperative BREAST-Q Breast-Conserving Therapy Module. BREAST-Q domain scores were log transformed to normalize the distribution. Univariable regression analyses were used to assess (nonlinear) associations between age and BREAST-Q domain scores. RESULTS Overall, 9059 questionnaire responses were analyzed. Median (±SD) BREAST-Q domain scores were 64.0 ± 18.0 (satisfaction with breasts), 69.0 ± 21.0 (psychosocial well-being), 92.0 ± 20 (physical well-being), and 59.0 ± 15.0 (sexual well-being). Age as a linear term was associated with log-transformed satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being, and physical well-being; sexual well-being was a quadratic function of age. Previous breast surgery unrelated to breast cancer was a significant predictor for higher log-transformed satisfaction with breasts (β = 0.04, p < 0.001) and higher sexual well-being score (β = -0.05, p < 0.001). Compared with previously published normative data, small differences were found in mean BREAST-Q domain scores (mean differences ranging between 2.45 and 6.24). CONCLUSIONS Normative Dutch BREAST-Q scores follow similar patterns across domains in comparison with previously published normative data. Normative Dutch BREAST-Q data enable future comparisons in breast-related satisfaction and quality of life issues of Dutch patients with breast cancer compared with their age-matched peers.
Collapse
|
39
|
Interdisciplinary risk counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: real-world data from a specialized center. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 307:1585-1592. [PMID: 36307613 PMCID: PMC10110675 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06819-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has long been established to affect a considerable number of patients and their families. By identifying those at risk ideally before they have been diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer, access to preventive measures, intensified screening and special therapeutic options can be obtained, and thus, prognosis can be altered beneficially. Therefore, a standardized screening and counseling process has been established in Germany under the aegis of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC). As one of these specialized clinics, the HBOC-Center at Charité offers genetic counseling as well as genetic analysis based on the GC-HBOC standards. This analysis aims first at depicting this process from screening through counseling to genetic analysis as well as the patient collective and second at correlating the results of genetic analysis performed. Thus, real-world data from an HBOC-Center with a substantial patient collective and a high frequency of pathogenic variants in various genes shall be presented.
Methods
The data of 2531 people having been counseled at the HBOC-Center at Charité in 2016 and 2017 were analyzed in terms of patient and family history as well as pathogenic variants detected during genetic analysis with the TruRisk® gene panel when genetic analysis was conducted. This standardized analysis is compiled and regularly adjusted by the GC-HBOC. The following genes were included at time of research: BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, NBN, and TP53.
Results
Genetic analysis was conducted in 59.8% of all cases meeting the criteria for genetic analysis and 286 pathogenic variants were detected among 278 (30.3%) counselees tested using the TruRisk® gene panel. These were primarily found in the genes BRCA1 (44.8%) and BRCA2 (28.3%) but also in CHEK2 (12.2%), ATM (5.6%) and PALB2 (3.5%). The highest prevalence of pathogenic variants was seen among the families with both ovarian and breast cancer (50.5%), followed by families with ovarian cancer only (43.2%) and families with breast cancer only (35.6%)—these differences are statistically significant (p < 0.001). Considering breast cancer subtypes, the highest rate of pathogenic variants was detected among patients with triple-negative breast cancer (40.7%) and among patients who had had been diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer before the age of 40 (53.4%)—both observations proved to be statistically significant (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001).
Conclusion
Genetic counseling and analysis provide the foundation in the prevention and therapy of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The rate of pathogenic variants detected is associated with family history as well as breast cancer subtype and age at diagnosis, and can reach considerable dimensions. Therefore, a standardized process of identification, genetic counseling and genetic analysis deems mandatory.
Collapse
|
40
|
Rooney MM, Miller KN, Plichta JK. Genetics of Breast Cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2022; 103:35-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2022.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
41
|
Bernstein-Molho R, Friedman E, Evron E. Controversies and Open Questions in Management of Cancer-Free Carriers of Germline Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1/BRCA2. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194592. [PMID: 36230512 PMCID: PMC9559251 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Females harboring germline BRCA1/BRCA2 (BRCA) P/LPV are offered a tight surveillance scheme from the age of 25−30 years, aimed at early detection of specific cancer types, in addition to risk-reducing strategies. Multiple national and international surveillance guidelines have been published and updated over the last two decades from geographically diverse countries. We searched for guidelines published between 1 January 2015 and 1 May 2022. Differences between guidelines on issues such as primary prevention, mammography screening in young (<30 years) carriers, MRI screening in carriers above age 65 years, breast imaging (if any) after risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy, during pregnancy, and breastfeeding, and hormone-replacement therapy, are just a few notable examples. Beyond formal guidelines, BRCA carriers’ concerns also focus on the timing of risk-reducing surgeries, fertility preservation, management of menopausal symptoms in cancer survivors, and pancreatic cancer surveillance, issues that, for some, there are no data to support evidence-based recommendations. This review discusses these unsettled issues, emphasizing the importance of future studies to enable global guideline harmonization for optimal surveillance strategies. Moreover, it raises the unmet need for personalized risk stratification and surveillance in BRCA P/LPV carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinat Bernstein-Molho
- The Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 5265601, Israel
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel, The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 8436322, Israel
| | - Ella Evron
- Oncology, Kaplan Medical Institute, Rehovot, Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +972-502-056-171
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Saule C, Menu-Hespel S, Carton M, Malhaire C, Cherel P, Reyal F, Le Mentec M, Guillot E, Donnadieu A, Callet N, Frank S, Coussy F, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Mouret-Fourme E. Prevalent versus incident breast cancers: benefits of clinical and radiological monitoring in women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1060-1066. [PMID: 35217802 PMCID: PMC9436925 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01049-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Women with pathogenic germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants have a higher risk of breast cancer than in the general population. International guidelines recommend specific clinical and radiological breast follow-up. This specific breast screening program has already been shown to be of clinical benefit, but no information is available concerning the use of prognostic factors or specific survival to guide follow-up decisions. We evaluated "high-risk" screening in a retrospective single-center study of 520 women carrying pathogenic germline variants of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene treated for breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2016. We compared two groups of women: the incidental breast cancer group (IBCG) were followed before breast cancer diagnosis (N = 103), whereas the prevalent breast cancer group (PBCG) (N = 417) had no specific follow-up for high risk before breast cancer diagnosis. Breast cancers were diagnosed at an earlier stage in the IBCG than in the PBCG: T0 in 64% versus 19% of tumors, (p < 0.00001), and N0 in 90% vs. 75% (p < 0.00001), respectively. Treatment differed significantly between the 2 groups: less neoadjuvant chemotherapy (7.1% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.00001), adjuvant chemotherapy (47.7% vs. 61.9%, p = 0.004) and more mastectomies (60% vs. 42% p < 0.0001) in the IBCG vs PBCG groups respectively. Overall and breast cancer-specific mortality were similar between the two groups. However, the patients in the IBCG had a significantly longer metastasis-free survival than those in the PBCG, at three years (96.9% [95% CI 93.5-100] vs. 92.30% [95% CI 89.8-94.9]; p = 0.02), suggesting a possible long-term survival advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Saule
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | | | - Matthieu Carton
- Institut Curie, Department of Biometry, DRCI, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Malhaire
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Imaging, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, INSERM, LITO Laboratory, 91401, Orsay, France
| | - Pascal Cherel
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Imaging, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Institut Curie, Department of Surgery, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Residual Tumour & Response to Treatment Laboratory (RT2Lab), INSERM, U 932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Marine Le Mentec
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne Donnadieu
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Nasrine Callet
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Sophie Frank
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Florence Coussy
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, INSERM U830, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ohsumi S, Nakamura S, Miyata H, Watanabe C, Den H, Arai M. Risk-reducing mastectomy for women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): analytical results of data from the Japanese Organization of HBOC. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:1265-1269. [PMID: 35905458 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing mastectomy is one option for women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer to reduce the risk of breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed data of the Japanese Organization of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on women who were diagnosed as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer by BRCA germline genetic testing between 2010 and 2019 to reveal the rate and likelihood of risk-reducing mastectomy. RESULTS There were 412 women with BRCA1, 271 with BRCA2 and 4 with both female pathogenic variants. Ninety (13.1%) received risk-reducing mastectomy. The rates of risk-reducing mastectomy were statistically significantly higher in women with BRCA1 pathogenic variants than BRCA2, in women who had breast cancer than those who did not, in women with a breast cancer family history than in those without, in mothers than in those without children, in women who were receiving surveillance with MRI than those who were not and in women who received risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy than in those who did not on univariate analyses. The ages when they received the genetic testing were statistically significantly younger in the women receiving risk-reducing mastectomy than those who did not receive it. The women with BRCA1 pathogenic variants, personal history of breast cancer, mothers, those receiving MRI surveillance and younger women were independently significantly more likely to receive risk-reducing mastectomy based on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS The rate of risk-reducing mastectomy was not high in Japan; however, risk-reducing surgery was approved by the Japanese National Medical Insurance for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer in 2020, so this rate will increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shozo Ohsumi
- Department of Breast Oncology, NHO Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Seigo Nakamura
- Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chie Watanabe
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Den
- Department of Hygiene, Public Health, and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masami Arai
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Aristei C, Bölükbaşı Y, Kaidar-Person O, Pfeffer R, Arenas M, Boersma LJ, Ciabattoni A, Coles CE, Franco P, Krengli M, Leonardi MC, Marazzi F, Masiello V, Meattini I, Montero A, Offersen B, Trigo ML, Bourgier C, Genovesi D, Kouloulias V, Morganti AG, Meduri B, Pasinetti N, Pedretti S, Perrucci E, Rivera S, Tombolini V, Vidali C, Valentini V, Poortmans P. Ways to improve breast cancer patients' management and clinical outcome: The 2020 Assisi Think Tank Meeting. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 177:103774. [PMID: 35917884 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We report on the third Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer, a brainstorming project which involved European radiation and clinical oncologists who were dedicated to breast cancer research and treatment. Held on February 2020, the ATTM aimed at identifying key clinical questions in current clinical practice and "grey" areas requiring research to improve management and outcomes. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) managing patients with frailty due to either age and/or multi-morbidity; 2) stereotactic radiation therapy and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic disease; 3) contralateral breast tumour prevention in BCRA-mutated patients. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. In the lapse period between the survey and the meeting, the working groups reviewed data, on-going studies and the clinical challenges which were then discussed in-depth and subjected to intense brainstorming during the meeting; research protocols were also proposed. Methodology, outcome of discussions, conclusions and study proposals are summarized in the present paper. In conclusion, this report presents an in-depth analysis of the state of the art, grey areas and controversies in breast cancer radiation therapy and discusses how to confront them in the absence of evidence-based data to guide clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Yasemin Bölükbaşı
- Radiation Oncology Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Radiation Unit, Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Raphael Pfeffer
- Oncology Institute, Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion University Medical School, Israel
| | - Meritxell Arenas
- Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Hoan de Reus, IISPV, Spain
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Antonella Ciabattoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Rome 1, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Depatment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Krengli
- Depatment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Marazzi
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagine, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCSS Roma, Italy
| | - Valeria Masiello
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagine, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCSS Roma, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence & Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Angel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Birgitte Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Lurdes Trigo
- Service of Brachytherapy, Department of Image and Radioncology, Instituto Português Oncologia Porto Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Céline Bourgier
- Radiation Oncology, ICM-Val d'Aurelle, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Clinicizzato Chieti and University "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- 2(nd) Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna; DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University; Bologna, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Radiation Oncology Service, ASST Valcamonica Esine and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sara Pedretti
- Istituto del Radio "O.Alberti" - Spedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia
| | | | - Sofia Rivera
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, University "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- former Senior Assistant Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Herold N, Hellmich M, Lichtenheldt F, Ataseven B, Hillebrand V, Wappenschmidt B, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K. Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Healthy and Unilateral Diseased BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers after Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Reconstruction Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13081357. [PMID: 36011268 PMCID: PMC9407233 DOI: 10.3390/genes13081357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is the most efficient form of breast cancer (BC) risk reduction in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (pV) carriers. However, this intervention in physical integrity is associated with significant morbidity. We assessed long-term perception of satisfaction and health-related quality of life (QoL) after bilateral RRM and reconstruction using the validated BREAST-Q. We searched the prospective database of the Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cologne for previvors and survivors who underwent bilateral RRM from 1994 to 2015 and evaluated the results of their BREAST-Q scores. The study enrolled 43 previvors and 90 survivors after a mean follow-up of 46.3 ± 45.3 months after RRM. Satisfaction and QoL were independent of the technique of RRM or type of reconstruction but depended on the time of RRM. Compared to survivors, previvors had significantly higher mean satisfaction scores in their psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being (chest) in both modules. Among previvors and survivors, higher psychological well-being correlated with a higher satisfaction with information and higher satisfaction with outcome. As psychological well-being correlated with satisfaction with information and outcome, we developed decision aids to improve shared decision making and long-term satisfaction with the decision and the postoperative outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Herold
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Frank Lichtenheldt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Vanessa Hillebrand
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Rita Katharina Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-221-478-98409
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Satisfaction with Long-Term Aesthetic and 10 Years Oncologic Outcome following Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with or without Nipple Preservation. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153607. [PMID: 35892866 PMCID: PMC9331253 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Incidence of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomies (RRMs) is increasing. The aim of this study was to compare satisfaction, aesthetic and oncological outcomes in women undergoing RRM with implant-based reconstruction comparing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) (sacrificing the nipple +/− nipple reconstruction). Women who had undergone bilateral RRM between 1997 and 2016 were invited. Aesthetic outcome and nipple symmetry were evaluated using standardized anthropometric measurements. The oncological outcome was assessed at last documented follow up. Ninety-three women (186 breasts) participated, 60 (64.5%) had NSM, 33 (35.5%) SSM. Median time between surgery and participation was 98.4 months (IQR: 61.7−133.9). Of the women, 23/33 (69.7%) who had SSM underwent nipple reconstruction. Nipple projection was shorter in the reconstructed SSM group than the maintained NSM group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in overall symmetry (p = 0.670), satisfaction regarding nipple preservation (p = 0.257) or overall nipple satisfaction (p = 0.074). There were no diagnoses of breast cancer at a median follow up of 129 months (IQR: 65−160.6). Women who undergo nipple-sparing RRM maintain long-term nipple symmetry. Nipple projection was less maintained after nipple reconstruction. Although satisfaction with the nipples was higher in the NSM group, this did not reach statistical significance. No breast cancers developed after RRM with long-term follow up.
Collapse
|
47
|
Acea-Nebril B, García-Novoa A, García Jiménez L. The PreQ-20 TRIAL: A prospective cohort study of the oncologic safety, quality of life and cosmetic outcomes of patients undergoing prepectoral breast reconstruction. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269426. [PMID: 35834508 PMCID: PMC9282436 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Mastectomy currently constitutes a necessary surgical procedure in the oncologic setting and in the context of high risk. Prepectoral breast reconstruction (PBR) has been proposed as a surgical alternative to retropectoral techniques by providing less postoperative morbidity and a better cosmetic result. However, there is a lack of prospective studies that have evaluated its safety and patient-reported satisfaction.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the safety, quality of life and cosmetic sequelae of PBR in women with breast cancer and high risk. The study’s main objective is to assess the safety of PBR in terms of postsurgical complications and the feasibility of reconstruction (loss of implants). The secondary objectives are to evaluate oncologic safety (local relapses, residual glandular tissue) and to identify factors related to quality of life and cosmetic sequelae. The evaluation of residual tissue will be conducted by MRI 12 to 18 months after the surgery, and the quality-of-life assessment will be performed using the Breast-Q questionnaire. An initial patient evaluation will be conducted 12–18 months after the surgery, and a second evaluation will be performed at 5 years. The estimated sample size is 81 patients.
Discussion
The PreQ-20 study will analyze the impact of PBR on 3 separate measures: safety, quality of life and cosmetic sequelae. Unlike other studies that analyzed these three measures jointly for women with breast cancer and high risk, this study will individualize the results for these 2 patient groups. This differentiation is necessary from the methodological point of view, given that the 2 patient groups have separate clinical and emotional implications. The assessment of these groups will focus on the following aspects: postoperative complications, local relapses, evaluation of residual glandular tissue and incidence rate of primary tumors in the same, the cosmetic sequelae and the satisfaction and the quality-of-life assessment by the patients.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04642508.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benigno Acea-Nebril
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Complex A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Alejandra García-Novoa
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Complex A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Lourdes García Jiménez
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Complex A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Patuleia SIS, Moelans CB, Koopman J, van Steenhoven JEC, van Dalen T, van der Pol CC, Jager A, Ausems MGEM, van Diest PJ, van der Wall E, Suijkerbuijk KPM. Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer? BMC Cancer 2022; 22:705. [PMID: 35761221 PMCID: PMC9235076 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09795-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nipple fluid aspiration (NFA) is a technique to acquire nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), which is considered a rich source of breast-specific biomarkers. Originating directly from the mammary ducts, this liquid biopsy can offer insight into the process of carcinogenesis at its earliest stage and therefore could be of added value to the current imaging-based breast cancer screening tools. With that in mind, it is necessary to know how well NFA is tolerated. Aim To evaluate the participants’ tolerability of NFA compared to breast imaging screening methods and blood draws. Materials and methods Three cohorts of women underwent NFA: healthy women (n = 190), women diagnosed with breast cancer (n = 137) and women at high risk of developing breast cancer (n = 48). A 0–10 discomfort score of NFA, mammography, breast MRI and blood draws, was filled in at the study visits, which took place once or annually. Results The median discomfort rate of NFA was 1, which was significantly lower than the median discomfort of mammography and breast MRI (5 and 3, respectively, p < 0.001), but significantly higher than median discomfort for blood draws (0, p < 0.001). The great majority of women would undergo the procedure again (98%) and recommend it to others (97%). Conclusion This study shows that NFA was well tolerated by healthy women, women diagnosed with breast cancer and high-risk women. This makes NFA a feasible method to pursue as a potential future breast cancer early detection tool, based on resident biomarkers. Trial registration NL41845.041.12, NL57343.041.16 and NL11690.041.06 in trialregister.nl. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09795-8.
Collapse
|
49
|
Rhiem K, Auber B, Briest S, Dikow N, Ditsch N, Dragicevic N, Grill S, Hahnen E, Horvath J, Jaeger B, Kast K, Kiechle M, Leinert E, Morlot S, Püsken M, Schäfer D, Schott S, Schroeder C, Siebers-Renelt U, Solbach C, Weber-Lassalle N, Witzel I, Zeder-Göß C, Schmutzler RK. Consensus Recommendations of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:199-207. [PMID: 35702495 PMCID: PMC9149395 DOI: 10.1159/000516376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) has established a multigene panel (TruRisk®) for the analysis of risk genes for familial breast and ovarian cancer. SUMMARY An interdisciplinary team of experts from the GC-HBOC has evaluated the available data on risk modification in the presence of pathogenic mutations in these genes based on a structured literature search and through a formal consensus process. KEY MESSAGES The goal of this work is to better assess individual disease risk and, on this basis, to derive clinical recommendations for patient counseling and care at the centers of the GC-HBOC from the initial consultation prior to genetic testing to the use of individual risk-adapted preventive/therapeutic measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bernd Auber
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Susanne Briest
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Neda Dragicevic
- Institute of Human Genetics, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Grill
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Judit Horvath
- Institute for Human Genetics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Bernadette Jaeger
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Elena Leinert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Susanne Morlot
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Püsken
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dieter Schäfer
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christopher Schroeder
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Christine Solbach
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nana Weber-Lassalle
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christine Zeder-Göß
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Simões Corrêa Galendi J, Kautz-Freimuth S, Stock S, Müller D. Uptake Rates of Risk-Reducing Surgeries for Women at Increased Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Applied to Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Scoping Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1786. [PMID: 35406563 PMCID: PMC8997187 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The cost-effectiveness of genetic screen-and-treat strategies for women at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer often depends on the women's willingness to make use of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) or salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). To explore the uptake rates of RRM and RRSO applied in health economic modeling studies and the impact of uptake rates on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), we conducted a scoping literature review. In addition, using our own model, we conducted a value of information (VOI) analysis. Among the 19 models included in the review, the uptake rates of RRM ranged from 6% to 47% (RRSO: 10% to 88%). Fifty-seven percent of the models applied retrospective data obtained from registries, hospital records, or questionnaires. According to the models' deterministic sensitivity analyses, there is a clear trend that a lower uptake rate increased the ICER and vice versa. Our VOI analysis showed high decision uncertainty associated with the uptake rates. In the future, uptake rates should be given more attention in the conceptualization of health economic modeling studies. Prospective studies are recommended to reflect regional and national variations in women's preferences for preventive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Simões Corrêa Galendi
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; (S.K.-F.); (S.S.)
| | | | | | - Dirk Müller
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; (S.K.-F.); (S.S.)
| |
Collapse
|