1
|
Odemer R, Friedrich E, Illies I, Berg S, Pistorius J, Bischoff G. Potential Risk of Residues From Neonicotinoid-Treated Sugar Beet Flowering Weeds to Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.). ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY 2023; 42:1167-1177. [PMID: 36861216 DOI: 10.1002/etc.5602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
In 2018 the European Union (EU) banned the three neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid, clothianidin (CLO), and thiamethoxam (TMX), but they can still be used if an EU Member State issues an emergency approval. Such an approval went into effect in 2021 for TMX-coated sugar beet seeds in Germany. Usually, this crop is harvested before flowering without exposing non-target organisms to the active ingredient or its metabolites. In addition to the approval, strict mitigation measures were imposed by the EU and the German federal states. One of the measures was to monitor the drilling of sugar beet and its impact on the environment. Hence we took residue samples from different bee and plant matrices and at different dates to fully map beet growth in the German states of Lower Saxony, Bavaria, and Baden-Württemberg. A total of four treated and three untreated plots were surveyed, resulting in 189 samples. Residue data were evaluated using the US Environmental Protection Agency BeeREX model to assess acute and chronic risk to honey bees from the samples, because oral toxicity data are widely available for both TMX and CLO. Within treated plots, we found no residues either in pools of nectar and honey crop samples (n = 24) or dead bee samples (n = 21). Although 13% of beebread and pollen samples and 88% of weed and sugar beet shoot samples were positive, the BeeREX model found no evidence of acute or chronic risk. We also detected neonicotinoid residues in the nesting material of the solitary bee Osmia bicornis, probably from contaminated soil of a treated plot. All control plots were free of residues. Currently, there are insufficient data on wild bee species to allow for an individual risk assessment. In terms of the future use of these highly potent insecticides, therefore, it must be ensured that all regulatory requirements are complied with to mitigate any unintentional exposure. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:1167-1177. © 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Odemer
- Institute for Bee Protection, Julius Kühn-Institut-Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Elsa Friedrich
- Apicultural State Institute, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Ingrid Illies
- Institute for Bee Research and Beekeeping, Bavarian State Institute for Viticulture and Horticulture, Veitshöchheim, Germany
| | - Stefan Berg
- Institute for Bee Research and Beekeeping, Bavarian State Institute for Viticulture and Horticulture, Veitshöchheim, Germany
| | - Jens Pistorius
- Institute for Bee Protection, Julius Kühn-Institut-Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Gabriela Bischoff
- Institute for Bee Protection, Julius Kühn-Institut-Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jack CJ, Kleckner K, Demares F, Rault LC, Anderson TD, Carlier PR, Bloomquist JR, Ellis JD. Testing new compounds for efficacy against Varroa destructor and safety to honey bees (Apis mellifera). PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2022; 78:159-165. [PMID: 34464499 DOI: 10.1002/ps.6617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Varroa destructor is among the greatest threats to honey bee health worldwide. Acaricides used to control Varroa are becoming increasingly ineffective due to resistance issues, prompting the need for new compounds that can be used for control purposes. Ideally, such compounds would exhibit high toxicity to Varroa while maintaining relatively low toxicity to bees and beekeepers. We characterized the lethal concentrations (LC50 ) of amitraz, matrine, FlyNap®, the experimental carbamates 2-((2-ethylbutyl)thio)phenyl methylcarbamate (1) and 2-(2-ethylbutoxy)phenyl methylcarbamate (2), and dimethoate (positive control) for Varroa using a glass vial assay. The test compounds also were applied to honey bees using an acute contact toxicity assay to determine the adult bee LD50 for each compound. RESULTS Amitraz was the most toxic compound to Varroa, but carbamate 2 was nearly as active (within 2-fold) and the most selective due to its lower bee toxicity, demonstrating its promise as a Varroa control. While carbamate 1 was less toxic to honey bees than was amitraz, it was also 4.7-fold less toxic to the mites. Both matrine and FlyNap® were relatively ineffective at killing Varroa and were moderately toxic to honey bees. CONCLUSION Additional testing is required to determine if carbamate 2 can be used as an effective Varroa control. As new chemical treatments are identified, it will be necessary to determine how they can be utilized best alongside other control techniques as part of an integrated pest management program. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J Jack
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kaylin Kleckner
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Fabien Demares
- Entomology and Nematology Department, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Leslie C Rault
- 109D Entomology Hall, Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Troy D Anderson
- 109D Entomology Hall, Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Paul R Carlier
- Virginia Tech Center for Drug Discovery, Department of Chemistry, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Bloomquist
- Entomology and Nematology Department, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - James D Ellis
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bruckner S, Straub L, Neumann P, Williams GR. Synergistic and Antagonistic Interactions Between Varroa destructor Mites and Neonicotinoid Insecticides in Male Apis mellifera Honey Bees. Front Ecol Evol 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2021.756027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pressures from multiple, sometimes interacting, stressors can have negative consequences to important ecosystem-service providing species like the western honey bee (Apis mellifera). The introduced parasite Varroa destructor and the neonicotinoid class of insecticides each represent important, nearly ubiquitous biotic and abiotic stressors to honey bees, respectively. Previous research demonstrated that they can synergistically interact to negatively affect non-reproductive honey bee female workers, but no data exist on how concurrent exposure may affect reproductive honey bee males (drones). This is important, given that the health of reproductive females (queens), possibly because of poor mating, is frequently cited as a major driver of honey bee colony loss. To address this, known age cohorts of drones were obtained from 12 honey bee colonies—seven were exposed to field-relevant concentrations of two neonicotinoids (4.5 ppb thiamethoxam and 1.5 ppb clothianidin) during development via supplementary pollen patties; five colonies received patties not spiked with neonicotinoids. Artificially emerged drones were assessed for natural V. destructor infestation, weighed, and then allocated to the following treatment groups: 1. Control, 2. V. destructor only, 3. Neonicotinoid only, and 4. Combined (both mites and neonicotinoid). Adult drones were maintained in laboratory cages alongside attendant workers (1 drone: 2 worker ratio) until they have reached sexual maturity after 14 days so sperm concentration and viability could be assessed. The data suggest that V. destructor and neonicotinoids interacted synergistically to negatively affect adult drone survival, but that they interacted antagonistically on emergence mass. Although sample sizes were too low to assess the effects of V. destructor and combined exposure on sperm quality, we observed no influence of neonicotinoids on sperm concentration or viability. Our findings highlight the diverse effects of concurrent exposure to stressors on honey bees, and suggest that V. destructor and neonicotinoids can severely affect the number of sexually mature adult drones available for mating.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hrynko I, Kaczyński P, Łozowicka B. A global study of pesticides in bees: QuEChERS as a sample preparation methodology for their analysis - Critical review and perspective. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 792:148385. [PMID: 34153771 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
To this day, it remains unknown what the cause of decline of honey bee populations is and how to prevent this phenomenon efficiently. Poisonings with pesticides are assumed to be among the main causes for the decline of the honey bee population. Despite the significant progress observed in analytics over recent years, research aimed at improving methods applied in diagnostics of bee poisoning is still in progress. This is no easy task, since determination of the content of trace amounts (often equal to sublethal doses) of a wide range of compounds with diverse physico-chemical properties in honey bee samples with a complex matrix composition poses a serious challenge to modern analytics. This overview is the first to include a comprehensive critical assessment of analytical methods proposed for quantification of pesticides in honey bees over the last decade. Since the QuEChERS method is currently of great significance to ensuring accurate and reliable results of pesticide quantification in honey bees, the present overview focuses on the major aspects of this method, which will provide a comprehensive reference for scientists. The review focuses on the limitations of methods and on potential future prospects. It also contains information on the detection of pesticides in honey bees between 2010 and 2020 and characterizes the pesticide classes which are most toxic to these insects. This is extremely important, not just in the context of understanding the potential adverse impact of pesticides, manifesting as losses in bee colonies; it is also intended to facilitate decision-making in future research related to this difficult yet very important subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izabela Hrynko
- Institute of Plant Protection - National Research Institute, Laboratory of Food and Feed Safety, Chelmonskiego 22, Bialystok, Poland.
| | - Piotr Kaczyński
- Institute of Plant Protection - National Research Institute, Laboratory of Food and Feed Safety, Chelmonskiego 22, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Bożena Łozowicka
- Institute of Plant Protection - National Research Institute, Laboratory of Food and Feed Safety, Chelmonskiego 22, Bialystok, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jack CJ, Ellis JD. Integrated Pest Management Control of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae), the Most Damaging Pest of (Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)) Colonies. JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE (ONLINE) 2021; 21:6. [PMID: 34536080 PMCID: PMC8449538 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieab058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Varroa destructor is among the greatest biological threats to western honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) health worldwide. Beekeepers routinely use chemical treatments to control this parasite, though overuse and mismanagement of these treatments have led to widespread resistance in Varroa populations. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is an ecologically based, sustainable approach to pest management that relies on a combination of control tactics that minimize environmental impacts. Herein, we provide an in-depth review of the components of IPM in a Varroa control context. These include determining economic thresholds for the mite, identification of and monitoring for Varroa, prevention strategies, and risk conscious treatments. Furthermore, we provide a detailed review of cultural, mechanical, biological, and chemical control strategies, both longstanding and emerging, used against Varroa globally. For each control type, we describe all available treatments, their efficacies against Varroa as described in the primary scientific literature, and the obstacles to their adoption. Unfortunately, reliable IPM protocols do not exist for Varroa due to the complex biology of the mite and strong reliance on chemical control by beekeepers. To encourage beekeeper adoption, a successful IPM approach to Varroa control in managed colonies must be an improvement over conventional control methods and include cost-effective treatments that can be employed readily by beekeepers. It is our intention to provide the most thorough review of Varroa control options available, ultimately framing our discussion within the context of IPM. We hope this article is a call-to-arms against the most damaging pest managed honey bee colonies face worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J Jack
- Honey Bee Research and Extension Laboratory, Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - James D Ellis
- Honey Bee Research and Extension Laboratory, Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sublethal concentrations of clothianidin affect honey bee colony growth and hive CO 2 concentration. Sci Rep 2021; 11:4364. [PMID: 33623125 PMCID: PMC7902615 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83958-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The effects of agricultural pesticide exposure upon honey bee colonies is of increasing interest to beekeepers and researchers, and the impact of neonicotinoid pesticides in particular has come under intense scrutiny. To explore potential colony-level effects of a neonicotinoid pesticide at field-relevant concentrations, honey bee colonies were fed 5- and 20-ppb concentrations of clothianidin in sugar syrup while control colonies were fed unadulterated syrup. Two experiments were conducted in successive years at the same site in southern Arizona, and one in the high rainfall environment of Mississippi. Across all three experiments, adult bee masses were about 21% lower among colonies fed 20-ppb clothianidin than the untreated control group, but no effects of treatment on brood production were observed. Average daily hive weight losses per day in the 5-ppb clothianidin colonies were about 39% lower post-treatment than in the 20-ppb clothianidin colonies, indicating lower consumption and/or better foraging, but the dry weights of newly-emerged adult bees were on average 6–7% lower in the 5-ppb group compared to the other groups, suggesting a nutritional problem in the 5-ppb group. Internal hive CO2 concentration was higher on average in colonies fed 20-ppb clothianidin, which could have resulted from greater CO2 production and/or reduced ventilating activity. Hive temperature average and daily variability were not affected by clothianidin exposure but did differ significantly among trials. Clothianidin was found to be, like imidacloprid, highly stable in honey in the hive environment over several months.
Collapse
|
7
|
Flores JM, Gámiz V, Gil-Lebrero S, Rodríguez I, Navas FJ, García-Valcárcel AI, Cutillas V, Fernández-Alba AR, Hernando MD. A three-year large scale study on the risk of honey bee colony exposure to blooming sunflowers grown from seeds treated with thiamethoxam and clothianidin neonicotinoids. CHEMOSPHERE 2021; 262:127735. [PMID: 32777610 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Despite the restriction of the use of neonicotinoids in the EU, including thiamethoxam and clothianidin, the debate over their risk on honey bees has not been fully settled. This study presents results of a three-year study working with 180 honey bee colonies in ten replicates. Colonies were sorted into three treatments (60 colonies per treatment) exposed to sunflower blooms grown from seeds treated with thiamethoxam, clothianidin and a non-treated control. Each colony was assessed at six moments: one before to exposition to sunflower, two during the exposition (short-time risk), two after exposition (medium-time risk) and one after wintering (long-time risk). The health and development of the colonies were assessed by monitoring adult bee population, brood development, status of the queen, food reserves and survival. No significant difference among treatments when raw data was considered. However, when evolution from initial status of the colony was evaluated, a significant difference was observed from the first week of exposure to sunflower blooms. In this period, the number of adult bees and the amount of brood were slightly lower in the bee hives exposed to neonicotinoids, although such differences disappeared in subsequent evaluations. The concentration of residues in samples of beebread and adult bees was at the level of ng·g-1. Magnitude of the effect of the treatment factor on the variability of colony health and development related parameters was low. The most important factor was the hive, followed by the replicate and year, and to a lesser extent the initial strength of the colonies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Flores
- Department of Zoology, University of Córdoba, Campus of Rabanales, 14071, Córdoba, Spain.
| | - Victoria Gámiz
- Department of Zoology, University of Córdoba, Campus of Rabanales, 14071, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Sergio Gil-Lebrero
- Department of Zoology, University of Córdoba, Campus of Rabanales, 14071, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Rodríguez
- Department of Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Córdoba, Campus of Rabanales, 14071, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Francisco J Navas
- Department of Genetic, University of Córdoba, Campus of Rabanales, 14071, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Ana I García-Valcárcel
- National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - V Cutillas
- Agrifood Campus of International Excellence (ceiA3), Department of Chemistry and Physics, University of Almeria, European Union Reference Laboratory for Pesticide Residues in Fruit & Vegetables, 04120, Almería, Spain
| | - Amadeo R Fernández-Alba
- Agrifood Campus of International Excellence (ceiA3), Department of Chemistry and Physics, University of Almeria, European Union Reference Laboratory for Pesticide Residues in Fruit & Vegetables, 04120, Almería, Spain
| | - M Dolores Hernando
- National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Combined Effects of Varroa destructor Parasitism and Exposure to Neonicotinoids Affects Honey Bee ( Apis mellifera L.) Memory and Gene Expression. BIOLOGY 2020; 9:biology9090237. [PMID: 32825259 PMCID: PMC7565275 DOI: 10.3390/biology9090237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) are exposed biotic and abiotic stressors but little is known about their combined effect and impact on neural processes such as learning and memory, which could affect behaviours that are important for individual and colony survival. This study measured memory with the proboscis extension response (PER) assay as well as the expression of neural genes in bees chronically exposed to three different sublethal doses of the insecticide clothianidin and/or the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. The proportion of bees that positively responded to PER at 24 and 48 h post-training (hpt) was significantly reduced when exposed to clothianidin. V. destructor parasitism reduced the proportion of bees that responded to PER at 48 hpt. Combined effects between the lowest clothianidin dose and V. destructor for the proportion of bees that responded to PER were found at 24 hpt. Clothianidin, V. destructor and their combination differentially affected the expression of the neural-related genes, AmNrx-1 (neurexin), AmNlg-1 (neuroligin), and AmAChE-2 (acetylcholinesterase). Different doses of clothianidin down-regulated or up-regulated the genes, whereas V. destructor tended to have a down-regulatory effect. It appears that clothianidin and V. destructor affected neural processes in honey bees through different mechanisms.
Collapse
|
9
|
Larson NR, O’Neal ST, Bernier UR, Bloomquist JR, Anderson TD. Terpenoid-Induced Feeding Deterrence and Antennal Response of Honey Bees. INSECTS 2020; 11:E83. [PMID: 31979399 PMCID: PMC7074330 DOI: 10.3390/insects11020083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Multiple interacting stressors negatively affect the survival and productivity of managed honey bee colonies. Pesticides remain a primary concern for beekeepers, as even sublethal exposures can reduce bee immunocompetence, impair navigation, and reduce social communication. Pollinator protection focuses on pesticide application guidelines; however, a more active protection strategy is needed. One possible approach is the use of feeding deterrents that can be delivered as an additive during pesticide application. The goal of this study was to validate a laboratory assay designed to rapidly screen compounds for behavioral changes related to feeding or feeding deterrence. The results of this investigation demonstrated that the synthetic Nasonov pheromone and its terpenoid constituents citral, nerol, and geraniol could alter feeding behavior in a laboratory assay. Additionally, electroantennogram assays revealed that these terpenoids elicited some response in the antennae; however, only a synthetic Nasonov pheromone, citral, and geraniol elicited responses that differed significantly from control and vehicle detections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Scott T. O’Neal
- Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA;
| | - Ulrich R. Bernier
- USDA Agricultural Research Service, Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA;
| | - Jeffrey R. Bloomquist
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA;
| | - Troy D. Anderson
- Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dong X, Tong Z, Chu Y, Sun M, Wang M, Gao T, Duan J. Dissipation of Prothioconazole and Its Metabolite Prothioconazole-Desthio in Rice Fields and Risk Assessment of Its Dietary Intake. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY 2019; 67:6458-6465. [PMID: 31090421 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Rice is an important food crop, with a long history of cultivation in China, and is one of the important staple foods for Chinese today. However, the occurrence of rice diseases has had a substantial impact on its yield. At present, chemical control is the main means of prevention and control of rice diseases. As a high-efficacy and broad-spectrum fungicide, prothioconazole shows an ideal effect on the prevention and control of common rice diseases, but the residuals that remain after its use may have an impact on human health. In this paper, ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was used to develop a residue analysis method and explore the dissipation of prothioconazole and its metabolite prothioconazole-desthio in rice grain, rice husk, and rice plants, and the risks of chronic and acute dietary intake of prothioconazole in different Chinese populations were evaluated. The results showed that at a concentration range of 0.005-5.0 μg/mL, prothioconazole and its metabolites showed good linear correlations, and the correlation coefficients were all above 0.9992. The average recoveries of prothioconazole in three matrixes ranged from 80.0% to 99.7%, the RSD was between 1.54% and 11.0%, and the limit of quantitation was less than 0.01 μg/g. The sensitivity, accuracy, and precision of the established method all met the measurement requirements. The dissipation experimental results showed that the parent compound prothioconazole was rapidly metabolized to prothioconazole-desthio in the rice field environment, and the dissipation half-life in rice plants after application was 2.5-10.1 d. According to the results of dietary risk assessment, under the standardized residue test conditions, the residual level of rice at the sampling interval of 7 days was within the acceptable range for the chronic and acute dietary risks of different populations in China. Our research is important for directing the scientific application of pesticides in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Dong
- Institute of Plant Protection and Agro-Product Safety , Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Hefei 230031 , China
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Safety Risk Evaluation (Hefei) , Ministry of Agriculture , Hefei 230031 , China
| | - Zhou Tong
- Institute of Plant Protection and Agro-Product Safety , Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Hefei 230031 , China
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Safety Risk Evaluation (Hefei) , Ministry of Agriculture , Hefei 230031 , China
| | - Yue Chu
- Institute of Plant Protection and Agro-Product Safety , Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Hefei 230031 , China
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Safety Risk Evaluation (Hefei) , Ministry of Agriculture , Hefei 230031 , China
| | - MingNa Sun
- Institute of Plant Protection and Agro-Product Safety , Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Hefei 230031 , China
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Safety Risk Evaluation (Hefei) , Ministry of Agriculture , Hefei 230031 , China
| | - Mei Wang
- Institute of Plant Protection and Agro-Product Safety , Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Hefei 230031 , China
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Safety Risk Evaluation (Hefei) , Ministry of Agriculture , Hefei 230031 , China
| | - TongChun Gao
- Institute of Plant Protection and Agro-Product Safety , Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Hefei 230031 , China
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Safety Risk Evaluation (Hefei) , Ministry of Agriculture , Hefei 230031 , China
| | - JinSheng Duan
- Institute of Plant Protection and Agro-Product Safety , Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Hefei 230031 , China
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Safety Risk Evaluation (Hefei) , Ministry of Agriculture , Hefei 230031 , China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Iqbal J, Alqarni AS, Raweh HSA. Effect of Sub-lethal Doses of Imidacloprid on Learning and Memory Formation of Indigenous Arabian Bee (Apis mellifera jemenitica Ruttner) Adult Foragers. NEOTROPICAL ENTOMOLOGY 2019; 48:373-380. [PMID: 30478776 DOI: 10.1007/s13744-018-0651-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The indigenous bee race Apis mellifera jemenitica Ruttner of Saudi Arabia can learn and retain memories established by the classical conditioning of proboscis extension response (PER). The insecticide imidacloprid has shown a drastic effect on the olfactory behavior of A. m. jemenitica in the harsh arid climatic conditions of central Saudi Arabia. The oral feeding of single imidacloprid sub-lethal doses (1.0 ng, 0.5 ng, or 0.1 ng) under laboratory conditions significantly impaired associative learning during the 2nd and 3rd conditioning trials compared to control bees (0 ng). The memory tests also revealed significant impairment in memory formation at 1 h, 2 h, and 24 h after conditioning compared to control bees. Even the lowest dose (0.1 ng/bee) can significantly impair the bees' ability to learn and memorize. This impairment effect was dose dependent and increased with increasing doses. The higher dose (1.0 ng) completely impaired the learning but still showed a little memory and reflected the potential recovery of bees from insecticide-induced impairment with the passage of time. To our knowledge, this is the first study in A. m. jemenitica that demonstrated the drastic effect of neonicotinoids on associative learning in indigenous bees. This study further expresses the possible severity of insecticidal exposure to bees in actual field conditions and its effect on the neural functions used in important behavior involved in the foraging of bees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Iqbal
- Melittology Research Lab, Dept of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud Univ, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- Dept of Entomology, MNS Univ of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.
| | - A S Alqarni
- Melittology Research Lab, Dept of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud Univ, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - H S A Raweh
- Melittology Research Lab, Dept of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud Univ, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thompson H, Overmyer J, Feken M, Ruddle N, Vaughan S, Scorgie E, Bocksch S, Hill M. Thiamethoxam: Long-term effects following honey bee colony-level exposure and implications for risk assessment. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019; 654:60-71. [PMID: 30439695 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Neonicotinoid insecticides have been used in a wide range of crops through seed treatment, soil and foliar applications and a large database exists on both their lethal and sub-lethal effects on honey bees under controlled laboratory conditions. However, colony-level studies on the effects of neonicotinoids in field studies are limited, primarily due to their complexity and the resources required. This paper reports the combined results of two large-scale colony-feeding studies, each with 6 weeks of continuous dosing of 12 colonies per treatment (24 control) to 12.5, 25, 37.5, 50 or 100 ng thiamethoxam/g sucrose solution. Exposure continued beyond dosing with residues present in stored nectar and bee-bread. The studies were conducted in an area with limited alternative forage and colonies were required to forage for pollen and additional nectar The studies provide colony-level endpoints: significant effects (reductions in bees, brood) were observed after exposure to the two highest dose rates, colony loss occurred at the highest dose rate, but colonies were able to recover (2-3 brood cycles after the end of dosing) after dosing with 50 ng thiamethoxam/g sucrose. No significant colony-level effects were observed at lower dose rates. The data reported here support the conclusions of previous colony-level crop-based field studies with thiamethoxam, in which residues in pollen and nectar were an order of magnitude below the colony-level NOEC of 37.5 ng thiamethoxam/g sucrose. The feeding study data are also compared to the outcomes of regulatory Tier 1 risk assessments conducted using guidance provided by the USA, Canada, Brazil and the EU regulatory authorities. We propose an adaptation of the European chronic adult bee risk assessment that takes into account the full dataset generated in laboratory studies while still providing an order of magnitude of safety compared with the colony feeding study NOEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Thompson
- Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Station, Bracknell, Berks RG42 6EY, UK.
| | - Jay Overmyer
- Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, 410 Swing Road, Greensboro, NC 27409, USA
| | - Max Feken
- Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, 410 Swing Road, Greensboro, NC 27409, USA
| | - Natalie Ruddle
- Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Station, Bracknell, Berks RG42 6EY, UK
| | - Sarah Vaughan
- Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Station, Bracknell, Berks RG42 6EY, UK
| | - Emily Scorgie
- Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Station, Bracknell, Berks RG42 6EY, UK
| | - Sigrun Bocksch
- Eurofins Agroscience Services GmbH, Eutinger Str. 24, 75223 Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany
| | - Marcus Hill
- Eurofins Agroscience Services, Inc., Cedar Grove Research Facility, 8909 Atkins Road, Mebane, NC 27302, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Osterman J, Wintermantel D, Locke B, Jonsson O, Semberg E, Onorati P, Forsgren E, Rosenkranz P, Rahbek-Pedersen T, Bommarco R, Smith HG, Rundlöf M, de Miranda JR. Clothianidin seed-treatment has no detectable negative impact on honeybee colonies and their pathogens. Nat Commun 2019; 10:692. [PMID: 30741934 PMCID: PMC6370849 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08523-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Interactions between multiple stressors have been implicated in elevated honeybee colony losses. Here, we extend our landscape-scale study on the effects of placement at clothianidin seed-treated oilseed rape fields on honeybees with an additional year and new data on honeybee colony development, swarming, mortality, pathogens and immune gene expression. Clothianidin residues in pollen, nectar and honeybees were consistently higher at clothianidin-treated fields, with large differences between fields and years. We found large variations in colony development and microbial composition and no observable negative impact of placement at clothianidin-treated fields. Clothianidin treatment was associated with an increase in brood, adult bees and Gilliamella apicola (beneficial gut symbiont) and a decrease in Aphid lethal paralysis virus and Black queen cell virus - particularly in the second year. The results suggest that at colony level, honeybees are relatively robust to the effects of clothianidin in real-world agricultural landscapes, with moderate, natural disease pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Osterman
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
- General Zoology, Institute for Biology, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Hoher Weg 8, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
- Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ Leipzig, ESCALATE, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Dimitry Wintermantel
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
- INRA, UE 1255 APIS, Le Magneraud, 17700, Surgères, France
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372, CNRS & Université de La Rochelle, 79360, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - Barbara Locke
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ove Jonsson
- Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
- Centre for Chemical Pesticides, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Emilia Semberg
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Piero Onorati
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Eva Forsgren
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter Rosenkranz
- Apicultural State Institute, University of Hohenheim, August-von-Hartmannstrasse 13, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | - Riccardo Bommarco
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Henrik G Smith
- Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maj Rundlöf
- Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Joachim R de Miranda
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wintermantel D, Locke B, Andersson GKS, Semberg E, Forsgren E, Osterman J, Rahbek Pedersen T, Bommarco R, Smith HG, Rundlöf M, de Miranda JR. Field-level clothianidin exposure affects bumblebees but generally not their pathogens. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5446. [PMID: 30575755 PMCID: PMC6303475 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07914-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Neonicotinoids are implicated in bee declines and laboratory studies imply that they impair the bee immune system, thereby precipitating a rise in pathogen levels. To establish whether such synergisms reduce bee performance in real-world agricultural landscapes, we analysed the microbial composition of the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) samples from our recent landscape study on the impacts of field-level clothianidin exposure. We related clothianidin exposure and microbial composition to both individual- and colony-level performance parameters, to better understand the direct and indirect mechanistic effects of neonicotinoid exposure on bumblebees. We show that exposure to clothianidin from seed-coated oilseed rape reduces bumblebee size and numbers, particularly of reproductives. However, exposure does not affect the levels of non-pathogenic bacteria or viruses, nor induce rises in the levels or virulence of intracellular parasites. We conclude that field exposure to the neonicotinoid clothianidin affects bumblebee performance but generally not their pathogenic or beneficial microbiota.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitry Wintermantel
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
- INRA, UE 1255 APIS, Le Magneraud, 17700, Surgères, France.
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372, CNRS & Université de La Rochelle, 79360, Villiers-en-Bois, France.
| | - Barbara Locke
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Georg K S Andersson
- Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
| | - Emilia Semberg
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Eva Forsgren
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Julia Osterman
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
- Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology, 06120, Halle, Germany
- Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ Leipzig, ESCALATE, 04318, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Riccardo Bommarco
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Henrik G Smith
- Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maj Rundlöf
- Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Joachim R de Miranda
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|