1
|
Ji R, Wang C, Cui A, Jia M, Liao S, Wang W, Chen N. Assessing terrestrial water storage dynamics and multiple factors driving forces in China from 2005 to 2020. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 370:122464. [PMID: 39265495 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
In the context of global warming, comprehending the dynamics of terrestrial water storage (TWS) and its responses to natural and anthropogenic factors is paramount for hydrological research and the management of water resources in China. This study utilized GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment)/GRACE-Follow On (GRACE-FO) satellite data to analyze terrestrial water storage across nine basins in China from 2005 to 2020 at multiple temporal and spatial scales. Subsequently, employing a Geographic detector model, potential influencing factors were identified, and an enhanced Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) method was proposed for attributing changes in TWS in China. The findings reveal a consistent declining trend in TWS based on GRACE/GRACE-FO data across different temporal scales, with the most pronounced decreases observed in August and September. Geographic Detector analysis unveils significant interactions among various environmental factors, with climate variables playing a pivotal role in modulating hydrological characteristics of major river basins, where rising temperatures can exacerbate the severity of precipitation events, thus increasing the risk of floods and droughts. Moreover, analysis of the primary influencing factors indicates significant impacts of population density and topography on water resources in the southeastern and southwestern regions, particularly amidst increasing human activities and urbanization expansion. The results of this study are crucial for comprehending the dynamic changes and mechanisms of TWS in China, as well as for formulating water resource management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renke Ji
- State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China
| | - Chao Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China; Key Laboratory of Basin Water Resources and Eco-Environmental Science in Hubei Province, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan, 430010, China; National Engineering Research Center of Geographic Information System, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, China.
| | - Aoxue Cui
- State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China
| | - Mingming Jia
- State Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 4888, Shengbei Street, Changchun, 130102, China
| | - Siyuan Liao
- State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China
| | - Wei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430079, China
| | - Nengcheng Chen
- National Engineering Research Center of Geographic Information System, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430074, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang J, Pan Y, Zhang C, Gong H, Xu L, Huang Z, Lu S. Comparison of groundwater storage changes over losing and gaining aquifers of China using GRACE satellites, modeling and in-situ observations. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 938:173514. [PMID: 38802015 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Groundwater depletion in intensively exploited aquifers of China has been widely recognized, whereas an overall examination of groundwater storage (GWS) changes over major aquifers remains challenging due to limited data and notable uncertainties. Here, we present a study to explore GWS changes over eighteen major aquifers covering an area of 1,680,000 km2 in China using data obtained from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiments (GRACE), global models, and in-situ groundwater level observations. The analysis aims to reveal the discrepancy in annual trends, amplitudes, and phases associated with GWS changes among different aquifers. It is found that GWS changes in the studied aquifers represent a spatial pattern of 'Wet-gets-more, Dry-gets-less'. An overall decreasing trend of -4.65 ± 0.34 km3/yr is observed by GRACE from 2005 to 2016, consisting of a significant (p < 0.05) increase of 47.28 ± 3.48 km3 in 7 aquifers and decrease of 103.56 ± 2.4 km3 (∼2.6 times the full storage capacity of the Three Gorges Reservoir) in 10 aquifers summed over the 12 years. The annual GWS normally reaches a peak in late July with an area-weighted average annual amplitude of 19 mm, showing notable discrepancy in phases and amplitudes between the losing aquifers (12 mm in middle August) in northern China and gaining aquifers (28 mm in early July) mostly in southern China. GRACE estimates are generally comparable, but can be notably different, with the results obtained from model simulations and in-situ observations at aquifer scale, with the area-weighted average correlation coefficients of 0.6 and 0.5, respectively. This study highlights different GWS changes of losing and gaining aquifers in response to coupled impacts of hydrogeology, climate and human interventions, and calls for divergent adaptions in regional groundwater management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiawen Yang
- Beijing Laboratory of Water Resources Security, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Mechanism, Prevention and Mitigation of Land Subsidence, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Hebei Cangzhou Groundwater and Land Subsidence National Observation and Research Station, Cangzhou 061000, China
| | - Yun Pan
- Beijing Laboratory of Water Resources Security, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Mechanism, Prevention and Mitigation of Land Subsidence, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Hebei Cangzhou Groundwater and Land Subsidence National Observation and Research Station, Cangzhou 061000, China.
| | - Chong Zhang
- Beijing Laboratory of Water Resources Security, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Mechanism, Prevention and Mitigation of Land Subsidence, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Hebei Cangzhou Groundwater and Land Subsidence National Observation and Research Station, Cangzhou 061000, China.
| | - Huili Gong
- Beijing Laboratory of Water Resources Security, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Mechanism, Prevention and Mitigation of Land Subsidence, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; Hebei Cangzhou Groundwater and Land Subsidence National Observation and Research Station, Cangzhou 061000, China
| | - Li Xu
- Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada; School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Zhiyong Huang
- School of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China; Key Laboratory of Dongting Lake Aquatic Eco-Environmental Control and Restoration of Hunan Province, Changsha 410114, China; Key Laboratory of Water-Sediment Sciences and Water Disaster Prevention of Hunan Province, Changsha 410114, China
| | - Shanlong Lu
- International Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals, Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ludwigsen CB, Andersen OB, Marzeion B, Malles JH, Müller Schmied H, Döll P, Watson C, King MA. Global and regional ocean mass budget closure since 2003. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1416. [PMID: 38360958 PMCID: PMC10869725 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45726-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
In recent sea level studies, discrepancies have arisen in ocean mass observations obtained from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its successor, GRACE Follow-On, with GRACE estimates consistently appearing lower than density-corrected ocean volume observations since 2015. These disparities have raised concerns about potential systematic biases in sea-level observations, with significant implications for our understanding of this essential climate variable. Here, we reconstruct the global and regional ocean mass change through models of ice and water mass changes on land and find that it closely aligns with both GRACE and density-corrected ocean volume observations after implementing recent adjustments to the wet troposphere correction and halosteric sea level. While natural variability in terrestrial water storage is important on interannual timescales, we find that the net increase in ocean mass over 20 years can be almost entirely attributed to ice wastage and human management of water resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Bjerre Ludwigsen
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Space, Lyngby, Denmark.
- The Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.
| | | | - Ben Marzeion
- Institute of Geography and MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Jan-Hendrik Malles
- Institute of Geography and MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Hannes Müller Schmied
- Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Senckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Petra Döll
- Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Senckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christopher Watson
- The Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia
- School of Geography, Planning, and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia
| | - Matt A King
- The Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia
- School of Geography, Planning, and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Uz M, Akyılmaz O, Shum CK, Atman KG, Olgun S, Güneş Ö. High-resolution temporal gravity field data products: Monthly mass grids and spherical harmonics from 1994 to 2021. Sci Data 2024; 11:71. [PMID: 38218975 PMCID: PMC10787793 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02887-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Since April 2002, Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE-FO (FollowOn) satellite gravimetry missions have provided precious data for monitoring mass variations within the hydrosphere, cryosphere, and oceans with unprecedented accuracy and resolution. However, the long-term products of mass variations prior to GRACE-era may allow for a better understanding of spatio-temporal changes in climate-induced geophysical phenomena, e.g., terrestrial water cycle, ice sheet and glacier mass balance, sea level change and ocean bottom pressure (OBP). Here, climate-driven mass anomalies are simulated globally at 1.0° × 1.0° spatial and monthly temporal resolutions from January 1994 to January 2021 using an in-house developed hybrid Deep Learning architecture considering GRACE/-FO mascon and SLR-inferred gravimetry, ECMWF Reanalysis-5 data, and normalized time tag information as training datasets. Internally, we consider mathematical metrics such as RMSE, NSE and comparisons to previous studies, and externally, we compare our simulations to GRACE-independent datasets such as El-Nino and La-Nina indexes, Global Mean Sea Level, Earth Orientation Parameters-derived low-degree spherical harmonic coefficients, and in-situ OBP measurements for validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Metehan Uz
- Dept. of Geomatics Eng., Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Orhan Akyılmaz
- Dept. of Geomatics Eng., Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - C K Shum
- Division of Geodetic Science, School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kazım Gökhan Atman
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
- Department of Physics, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Sevda Olgun
- Dept. of Geomatics Eng., Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Özge Güneş
- Dept. of Geomatics Eng., Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Humphrey V, Rodell M, Eicker A. Using Satellite-Based Terrestrial Water Storage Data: A Review. SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS 2023; 44:1489-1517. [PMID: 37771629 PMCID: PMC10522521 DOI: 10.1007/s10712-022-09754-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Land water storage plays a key role for the Earth's climate, natural ecosystems, and human activities. Since the launch of the first Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission in 2002, spaceborne observations of changes in terrestrial water storage (TWS) have provided a unique, global perspective on natural and human-induced changes in freshwater resources. Even though they have become much used within the broader Earth system science community, space-based TWS datasets still incorporate important and case-specific limitations which may not always be clear to users not familiar with the underlying processing algorithms. Here, we provide an accessible and illustrated overview of the measurement concept, of the main available data products, and of some frequently encountered technical terms and concepts. We summarize concrete recommendations on how to use TWS data in combination with other hydrological or climatological datasets, and guidance on how to avoid possible pitfalls. Finally, we provide an overview of some of the main applications of GRACE TWS data in the fields of hydrology and climate science. This review is written with the intention of supporting future research and facilitating the use of satellite-based terrestrial water storage datasets in interdisciplinary contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Humphrey
- Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Matthew Rodell
- Earth Sciences Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
| | - Annette Eicker
- HafenCity University Hamburg, Überseeallee 16, 20457 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang F, Shen Y, Chen Q, Geng J. Revisiting sea-level budget by considering all potential impact factors for global mean sea-level change estimation. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10251. [PMID: 35715517 PMCID: PMC9205883 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14173-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate estimates of global sea-level change from the observations of Altimetry, Argo and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-on (GRACE-FO) are of great value for investigating the global sea-level budget. In this study, we analyzed the global sea-level change over the period from January 2005 to December 2019 by considering all potential impact factors, i.e. three factors for Altimetry observations (two Altimetry products, ocean bottom deformation (OBD) and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA)), three factors for Argo observations (four Argo products, salinity product error and deep-ocean steric sea-level change), and seven factors for GRACE/GRACE-FO observations including three official RL06 solutions, five spatial filtering methods, three GIA models, two C20 (degree 2 order 0) products, Geocenter motion, GAD field and global mass conservation. The seven impact factors of GRACE/GRACE-FO observations lead to ninety combinations for the post-procession of global mean barystatic sea-level change estimation, whose rates range from 2.00 to 2.45 mm/year. The total uncertainty of global barystatic sea-level change rate is ± 0.27 mm/year at the 95% confidence level, estimated as the standard deviation of the differences between the different datasets constituting the ensembles. The statistical results show that the preferred GIA model developed by Caron et al. in 2018 can improve the closure of the global sea-level budget by 0.20-0.30 mm/year, which is comparable with that of neglecting the halosteric component. About 30.8% of total combinations (GRACE/GRACE-FO plus Argo) can close the global sea-level budget within 1-sigma (0.23 mm/year) of Altimetry observations, 88.9% within 2-sigma. Once the adopted factors including GRACE/GRACE-FO solutions from Center for Space Research (CSR), Caron18 GIA model, SWENSON filtering and Argo product from China Second Institute of Oceanography, the linear trend of global sterodynamic sea-level change derived from GRACE/GRACE-FO plus Argo observations is 3.85 ± 0.14 mm/year, nearly closed to 3.90 ± 0.23 mm/year of Altimetry observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengwei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunzhong Shen
- College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | - Qiujie Chen
- College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianhua Geng
- School of Ocean and Earth Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|