1
|
Zheng Y, Zhai CB. Performance of Bandage Contact Lens in Patients Post-ocular Surgeries: A Systematic Literature Review. Eye Contact Lens 2023; 49:449-458. [PMID: 37816246 PMCID: PMC10734785 DOI: 10.1097/icl.0000000000001021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study systematically reviewed the performance of bandage contact lenses (BCL) such as lotrafilcon A, lotrafilcon B, senofilcon A, balafilcon A, and comfilcon A as postoperative treatment in different ocular surgeries. A systematic search of English and Chinese databases (from inception to December 2021) was conducted for studies reporting the efficacy of BCLs after ocular surgeries. Postoperative symptoms, corneal healing, and visual outcomes were studied. Overall, 38 studies were identified. Bandage contact lens was applied as a postoperative aid in corneal refractive, cataract, and vitrectomy surgeries. Most studies were on photorefractive keratectomy. Reduced postoperative symptoms were observed within 4 hr to 3 days, whereas re-epithelization of the cornea and healing was complete within 3 to 7 days after ocular surgeries except for vitrectomy. In a vitrectomy, greater comfort and improved corneal epithelium were observed on the seventh day after surgery. An improvement in dry eye symptoms was observed at 7 days with considerable benefits observed after 1 month of cataract surgery. These findings indicate that BCLs are effective for improving postoperative symptoms and facilitation of early visual rehabilitation with a wear time of 8 hr to 7 days depending on the type of ocular surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Zheng
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center (Y.Z.), Beijing KEY Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; and Beijing Tongren Hospital (C.-B.Z.), Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chang-Bin Zhai
- Beijing Tongren Eye Center (Y.Z.), Beijing KEY Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; and Beijing Tongren Hospital (C.-B.Z.), Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steigleman WA, Rose-Nussbaumer J, Al-Mohtaseb Z, Santhiago MR, Lin CC, Pantanelli SM, Kim SJ, Schallhorn JM. Management of Pain after Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2023; 130:87-98. [PMID: 36207168 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate current best practices for postoperative photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) pain control. METHODS Literature searches in the PubMed database were last conducted in October 2021 and were restricted to publications in English. This search identified 219 citations, of which 84 were reviewed in full text for their relevance to the scope of this assessment. Fifty-one articles met the criteria for inclusion; 16 studies were rated level I, 33 studies were rated level II, and 2 studies were rated level III. RESULTS Systemic opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); topical NSAIDs; postoperative cold patches; bandage soft contact lenses (BCLs), notably senofilcon A contact lenses; and topical anesthetics were demonstrated to offer significantly better pain control than comparison treatments. Some other commonly reported pain mitigation interventions such as systemic gabapentinoids, chilled intraoperative balanced salt solution (BSS) irrigation, cycloplegia, and specific surface ablation technique strategies offered limited improvement in pain control over control treatments. CONCLUSIONS Systemic NSAIDs and opioid medications, topical NSAIDs, cold patches, BCLs, and topical anesthetics have been shown to provide improved pain control over alternative strategies and allow PRK-associated pain to be more tolerable for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Seth M Pantanelli
- Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen J Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Julie M Schallhorn
- Francis I. Proctor Foundation and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hashemi H, Alvani A, Aghamirsalim M, Miraftab M, Asgari S. Comparison of transepithelial and conventional photorefractive keratectomy in myopic and myopic astigmatism patients: a randomized contralateral trial. BMC Ophthalmol 2022; 22:68. [PMID: 35148689 PMCID: PMC8832736 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02293-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To assess transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) in terms of corneal epithelial healing rate, postoperative pain, postoperative discomfort, and visual and refraction outcomes compared to mechanical epithelial debridement PRK (mPRK) and alcohol-assisted PRK (aaPRK). Methods In this double-masked, randomized clinical trial, thirty-nine patients underwent tPRK in one eye and mPRK in the fellow eye (arm A), and 33 patients underwent tPRK in one eye and aaPRK in the contralateral eye (arm B). All surgical procedures were done using the Schwind Amaris excimer laser. The area of corneal epithelial defect in all eyes was captured and analyzed using ImageJ software. Results Mean epithelial healing time was respectively 3.74 ± 0.82 and 3.59 ± 0.79 days in tPRK versus mPRK (P = 0.21) in arm A, and 3.67 ± 0.92 and 3.67 ± 0.74 days in tPRK versus aaPRK (P = 1.00) in arm B. Accounting for the initial corneal epithelial defect area, the epithelial healing rate was faster in conventional PRK groups compared to tPRK (both P<0.001) in both arms. However, there was no significant difference in safety, efficacy, spherical equivalent refractive accuracy, or corneal haze development between tPRK and conventional PRK groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusions All three methods are effective in terms of visual and refractive outcomes. However, although time to complete re-epithelialization was similar with the three methods, the epithelial healing rate was faster in conventional PRK considering the initial corneal epithelial defect area, and the patients experienced less pain and discomfort in the first postoperative day. Trial registration IRCT, IRCT20200317046804N1. Retrospectively registered 5 May 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Hashemi
- Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, 96, Esfandiar Blvd, Valiasr St, Tehran, Tehran, 1968653111, Iran
| | - Azam Alvani
- Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, 96, Esfandiar Blvd, Valiasr St, Tehran, Tehran, 1968653111, Iran.
| | | | - Mohammad Miraftab
- Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, 96, Esfandiar Blvd, Valiasr St, Tehran, Tehran, 1968653111, Iran
| | - Soheila Asgari
- Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, 96, Esfandiar Blvd, Valiasr St, Tehran, Tehran, 1968653111, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bandage Contact Lens use after Photorefractive Keratectomy: The Updated Review. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021; 48:741-742. [PMID: 34753881 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Jacobs DS, Carrasquillo KG, Cottrell PD, Fernández-Velázquez FJ, Gil-Cazorla R, Jalbert I, Pucker AD, Riccobono K, Robertson DM, Szczotka-Flynn L, Speedwell L, Stapleton F. CLEAR - Medical use of contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2021; 44:289-329. [PMID: 33775381 DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The medical use of contact lenses is a solution for many complex ocular conditions, including high refractive error, irregular astigmatism, primary and secondary corneal ectasia, disfiguring disease, and ocular surface disease. The development of highly oxygen permeable soft and rigid materials has extended the suitability of contact lenses for such applications. There is consistent evidence that bandage soft contact lenses, particularly silicone hydrogel lenses, improve epithelial healing and reduce pain in persistent epithelial defects, after trauma or surgery, and in corneal dystrophies. Drug delivery applications of contact lens hold promise for improving topical therapy. Modern scleral lens practice has achieved great success for both visual rehabilitation and therapeutic applications, including those requiring retention of a tear reservoir or protection from an adverse environment. This report offers a practical and relevant summary of the current evidence for the medical use of contact lenses for all eye care professionals including optometrists, ophthalmologists, opticians, and orthoptists. Topics covered include indications for use in both acute and chronic conditions, lens selection, patient selection, wear and care regimens, and recommended aftercare schedules. Prevention, presentation, and management of complications of medical use are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah S Jacobs
- Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Cornea and Refractive Surgery Service, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Loretta Szczotka-Flynn
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lynne Speedwell
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
| | - Fiona Stapleton
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fisher D, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Fluid reservoir thickness and corneal oedema during closed eye scleral lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2021; 44:102-107. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
7
|
Lim L, Lim EWL. Therapeutic Contact Lenses in the Treatment of Corneal and Ocular Surface Diseases-A Review. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2020; 9:524-532. [PMID: 33181548 DOI: 10.1097/apo.0000000000000331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic contact lenses (TCLs) are often used in the management of a wide variety of corneal and ocular surface diseases (OSDs). Indications of TCL include pain relief, enhancing corneal healing, corneal sealing, corneal protection, and drug delivery. For painful corneal diseases such as bullous keratopathy, epidermolysis bullosa, and epithelial abrasions/erosions, bandage contact lenses (BCLs) provide symptomatic relief. Postoperatively in photorefractive keratectomy or laser epithelial keratomileusis, BCLs also alleviate pain. In severe OSDs such as severe dry eye, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, gas-permeable scleral contact lenses are often used to enhance corneal healing. BCLs are used post-keratoplasty, post-trabeculectomy, and post-amniotic membrane transplantation to enhance healing. BCLs, with or without glue adhesives, are used to seal small corneal perforations and sometimes also used as bridging treatment before penetrating keratoplasty in larger corneal perforations. In patients with eyelid conditions such as trichiasis, ptosis, and tarsal scarring, BCLs are also effective in forming a mechanical barrier to protect the cornea. A relatively new use for TCLs is in ocular drug delivery where TCLs are used to maintain therapeutic concentrations of medication on the ocular surface. Contraindications of the use of TCLs include infective keratitis, corneal anesthesia, and significant exposure keratopathy with inadequate eyelid position or movement. Complications of TCL include infective keratitis, corneal hypoxia and associated complications, corneal allergies and inflammation, and poor lens fit. Overall, TCLs are effective in the treatment of corneal and OSDs but contraindications and complications must be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Lim
- Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore
- Singapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
|