Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process and Long-Term Interpersonal Outcomes for Parents Who Undergo Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Fanconi Anemia: a Qualitative Investigation

Day 5 versus day 3 embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects

BACKGROUND

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has allowed couples with a family history of a monogenic genetic disease, or a disease-carrying gene, to reduce the chance of them having a child with the genetic disorder. This is achieved by genetically testing the embryos using an advanced process called preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic or single gene disorders (PGT-M), such as Huntington's disease or cystic fibrosis. This current terminology (PGT-M) has replaced the formerly-known preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). During PGT-M, one or more embryo cells are biopsied and analysed for genetic or chromosomal anomalies before transferring the embryos to the endometrial cavity. Biopsy for PGT-M can be performed at day 3 of cleavage-stage embryo development when the embryo is at the six- to the eight-cell stage, with either one or two blastomeres being removed for analysis. Biopsy for PGT-M can also be performed on day 5 of the blastocyst stage of embryo development when the embryo has 80 to 100 cells, with five to six cells being removed for analysis. Day 5 biopsy has taken over from day 3 biopsy as the most widely-used biopsy technique; however, there is a lack of summarised evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assesses the effectiveness and safety of day 5 biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy. Since biopsy is an invasive process, whether it is carried out at day 3 or day 5 of embryo development may have different impacts on further development, implantation, pregnancy, live birth and perinatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of day 5 embryo biopsy, in comparison to day 3 biopsy, in PGT-M in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic bibliographic databases in December 2021 to identify relevant RCTs: the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGFG) Specialised Trials Register; CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. We also handsearched grey literature, such as trial registers, relevant journals, reference lists, Google Scholar, and published conference abstracts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible RCTs compared day 5 versus day 3 embryo biopsy for PGT-M.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were live births and miscarriages. We calculated outcomes per woman/couple randomised and reported odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We included one RCT involving 20 women. The evidence was of very low certainty; the main limitations of the study were serious risk of bias due to lack of blinding of study personnel, and imprecision. We are uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on live births (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.26 to 8.82; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that if the chance of live birth following day 3 biopsy was assumed to be 40%, then the chance with day 5 biopsy is between 15% and 85%. It is also uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on miscarriages (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.05 to 18.57; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence).  We are uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on other secondary outcome measures, including viable intrauterine pregnancies (OR 2.25, 95% CI 0.38 to 13.47; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence), ectopic pregnancies (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.85; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence), stillbirths (OR not estimable as no events in either group; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence) or termination of pregnancies (OR 3.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 91.60; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported on gestational age at birth, birthweight, neonatal mortality and major congenital anomaly.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are uncertain if there is a difference in live births and miscarriages, viable intrauterine pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies, stillbirths or termination of pregnancies between day 5 and day 3 embryo biopsy for PGT-M. There was insufficient evidence to draw any conclusions regarding other adverse outcomes. The results should be interpreted with caution, as the evidence was of very low certainty due to limited studies, high risk of bias in the included study, and an overall low level of precision.

Factors influencing patients' decision-making about preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders

STUDY QUESTION

What are the roles of individual and interpersonal factors in couples' decision-making regarding preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Couples' decision-making regarding PGT-M was associated with individual and interpersonal factors, that is the perceived consistency of information received, satisfaction with information, self-efficacy (individuals' beliefs in their ability to make decisions), actual knowledge about PGT-M and social support from the partner.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Various factors have been shown to be associated with decision-making regarding PGT-M. However, PGT-M is experienced at an individual level, and to date, no studies have investigated the roles of the above-mentioned individual and interpersonal factors.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a cross-sectional study with 279 participants. Participants were recruited through IVFAustralia, Sydney Children's Hospital and support groups from May 2020 to November 2021.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Participants were women who had undergone or were considering PGT-M and their partners. Participants were recruited through IVFAustralia, Sydney Children's Hospital and support groups to complete online questionnaires. Decisional regret, decisional satisfaction and decisional conflict were measured as outcome variables. Multiple linear regressions were performed to examine the association between factors and outcome variables. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to test the differences between participants who had undergone PGT-M and those who were considering PGT-M.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

For couples who had undergone PGT-M, decisional regret was significantly negatively associated with perceived consistency of information received (β = -0.26, P < 0.01), self-efficacy (β = -0.25, P < 0.01) and actual knowledge about PGT-M (β = -0.30, P < 0.001), while decisional satisfaction had positive association with satisfaction with information received (β = 0.37, P < 0.001) and self-efficacy (β = 0.24, P < 0.05). For couples who were considering PGT-M, decisional conflict was negatively associated with satisfaction with information received (β = -0.56, P < 0.001). For females who had undergone PGT-M, decisional regret was negatively associated with social support from the partner (β = -0.35, P < 0.05) in addition to perceived consistency of information received (β = -0.24, P < 0.05). In this group, decisional satisfaction was positively associated with women's satisfaction with the information received (β = 0.34, P < 0.01), social support from the partner (β = 0.26, P < 0.05) and self-efficacy (β = 0.25, P < 0.05). For females who were considering PGT-M, decisional conflict was negatively associated with satisfaction with the information received (β = -0.43, P < 0.01) and social support from the partner (β = -0.30, P < 0.05). This study also identified those aspects of PGT-M that couples felt most concerned about in relation to their decision-making, in particular safety issues such as short- or long-term health problems for the baby and potential harms to the embryos and the mother's health. The likelihood of getting pregnant and having a baby with a genetic condition being tested for were also important in couples' decision-making.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study assessed the concerns of couples about having a baby with a variety of genetic conditions. However, condition-specific issues might not be covered. Furthermore, social support from the partner was assessed among females only. Male participants' perceived social support from their partner and the association between mutual support and decision-making were not assessed due to the absence of dyadic data.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Results highlight the importance of effective patient education on PGT-M and the need to provide high-quality and consistent information in the context of patient-centred care. Patients are likely to benefit from information that addresses their specific concerns in relation to PGT-M. From females' perspective, support from partners is essential, and partners should, therefore, be encouraged to participate in all stages of the decision-making process. Suggestions for future studies were made.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

B.M. was funded through a Senior Research Fellowship Level B (ID 1078523) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. L.C. was supported by a University International Postgraduate Award under the Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship. No other funding was received for this study. The authors report no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Fanconi Anaemia, Childhood Cancer and the BRCA Genes

Fanconi anaemia (FA) is an inherited chromosomal instability disorder characterised by congenital and developmental abnormalities and a strong cancer predisposition. In less than 5% of cases FA can be caused by bi-allelic pathogenic variants (PGVs) in BRCA2/FANCD1 and in very rare cases by bi-allelic PGVs in BRCA1/FANCS. The rarity of FA-like presentation due to PGVs in BRCA2 and even more due to PGVs in BRCA1 supports a fundamental role of the encoded proteins for normal development and prevention of malignant transformation. While FA caused by BRCA1/2 PGVs is strongly associated with distinct spectra of embryonal childhood cancers and AML with BRCA2-PGVs, and also early epithelial cancers with BRCA1 PGVs, germline variants in the BRCA1/2 genes have also been identified in non-FA childhood malignancies, and thereby implying the possibility of a role of BRCA PGVs also for non-syndromic cancer predisposition in children. We provide a concise review of aspects of the clinical and genetic features of BRCA1/2-associated FA with a focus on associated malignancies, and review novel aspects of the role of germline BRCA2 and BRCA1 PGVs occurring in non-FA childhood cancer and discuss aspects of clinical and biological implications.

Comparison of Patients' Ethical Perspectives of Preimplantation Embryo Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) vs. Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M)

What are the ethical perspectives of preimplantation genetic testing in patients using/considering PGT-A compared to those using/considering PGT-M? A 17-item questionnaire administered online was used to assess ethical perspectives in US patients who recently used/considered PGT-A (n=80) vs. those who used/considered PGT-M (n=72). Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests were conducted with STATA. Most PGT-A and PGT-M users/considerers supported using PGT to screen for diseases fatal in childhood (86-89%) and those causing lifelong disabilities (76-79%) and opposed using PGT to screen for non-medical physical (80-87%) or intellectual traits (74-86%). Both groups agreed that PGT aids in parental decision-making, although some expressed concern over its potential to lead to unforeseen consequences for society and the PGT offspring. More PGT-M than PGT-A users/considerers opposed implanting genetically abnormal embryos when requested by parents (29% PGT-A vs. 56% PGT-M, p = 0.007). For embryo disposition, more PGT-A users/considerers favored freezing (95% PGTA vs. 82% PGT-M, p = 0.018) or donating genetically normal embryos to research (73% PGT-A vs. 57% PGT-M, p = 0.044), while more PGT-M users/considerers supported donating embryos with known genetic abnormalities to research (56% PGT-A vs. 81% PGT-M, p = 0.001). Regardless of the reason for using PGT, users generally agreed on the acceptable and unacceptable uses for it, as well as the potential societal impact. PGT-M users/considerers expressed more opposition than PGT-A users/considerers to implanting embryos with a genetic alteration when requested by the parents.

A review on the motivations, decision-making factors, attitudes and experiences of couples using pre-implantation genetic testing for inherited conditions

BACKGROUND

In pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT), fertile couples undergo IVF with genetic testing of embryos to avoid conceptions with a genetic condition. There is an exponentially increasing uptake with over 600 applications listed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in the UK. The psychological aspects of the decision-making process and the experience of PGT, however, are relatively underevaluated, with the potential to leave patients unsupported in their journeys.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

In this review, we aim to comprehensively report on every aspect of couples' experiences of PGT. We consider what motivates users, the practical and ethical decisions involved and how couples navigate the decision-making process. Additionally, we report on the social and psychological impact on couples who are actively undergoing or have completed the PGT process.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic search of English peer-reviewed journals of three computerized databases was undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that examined the motivations, attitudes, decision-making factors and experiences of patients who have been actively engaged in the PGT process were included. No restrictions were placed on study design or date of publication. Studies examining patients using PGT in a hypothetical context or solely using PGT for aneuploidy were excluded. Qualitative data were extracted using thematic analysis.

OUTCOMES

The main outcomes were patient motivations, deciding factors and attitudes, as well as the patient experience of coming to a decision and going through PGT.Patients were primarily motivated by the desire to have a healthy child and to avoid termination of pregnancy. Those with a sick child or previous experience of termination were more likely to use PGT. Patients also felt compelled to make use of the technology available, either from a moral responsibility to do so or to avoid feelings of guilt if not. The main factors considered when deciding to use PGT were the need for IVF and the acceptability of the technology, the financial cost of the procedure and one's ethical standpoint on the creation and manipulation of embryos. There was a general consensus that PGT should be applied to lethal or severe childhood disease but less agreement on use for adult onset or variable expression conditions. There was an agreement that it should not be used to select for aesthetic traits and a frustration with the views of PGT in society. We report that couples find it difficult to consider all of the benefits and costs of PGT, resulting in ambivalence and prolonged indecision. After deciding on PGT use, we found that patients find the process extremely impractical and psychologically demanding.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This review aimed to summarize the current knowledge on how patients decide to use and experience PGT and to make suggestions to incorporate the findings into clinical practice. We cannot stress enough the importance of holistic evaluation of patients and thorough counselling prior to and during PGT use from a multidisciplinary team that includes geneticists, IVF clinicians, psychologists and also patient support groups. Large prospective studies using a validated psychological tool at various stages of the PGT process would provide an invaluable database for professionals to better aid patients in their decision-making and to improve the patient experience.

The decision-making process, experience, and perceptions of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) users

PURPOSE

The decision to undergo preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) entails a variety of personal and societal variables. Although PGT technology is widely accepted and used, few studies have queried the motives and concerns of PGT users; moreover, in-depth qualitative data regarding the PGT experience is scant.

METHODS

In order to explore and analyze the experience, concerns, expectations, and attitudes toward the PGT technique and its implications, semi-structured interviews were conducted in a single tertiary medical center with 43 Israeli PGT users for HLA matching and autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked genetic disorders.

RESULTS

The primary considerations in choosing PGT were prevention of birth of a child who would suffer a terminal or chronic disease as well as abrogation of a familial genetic condition. Religion played a decisive role in accepting PGT as an antenatal option. Regarding satisfaction with the PGT experience, many interviewees highlighted the need for greater attention to be given to potential stages of failure throughout the procedure and the need for emotional support. Our clinical results regarding implantation rate and cumulative live birth rate are 38-40% and 27-30%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This survey broadens understanding of the specialized needs of women, couples, and minority groups undergoing PGT and underscores the relevance of counseling services for PGT users.

Review of patient decision-making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis

The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro-genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision-making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic-variant-free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision-making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision-making process, and suggestions are offered.