Role of surgical resection in recurrent glioblastoma: prognostic factors and outcome evaluation in an observational study

Brain Re-Irradiation Or Chemotherapy: a phase II randomised trial of re-irradiation and chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BRIOChe) - protocol for a multi-centre open-label randomised trial

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common adult primary malignant brain tumour. The condition is incurable and, despite aggressive treatment at first presentation, almost all tumours recur after a median of 7 months. The aim of treatment at recurrence is to prolong survival and maintain health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Chemotherapy is typically employed for recurrent GBM, often using nitrosourea-based regimens. However, efficacy is limited, with reported median survivals between 5 and 9 months from recurrence. Although less commonly used in the UK, there is growing evidence that re-irradiation may produce survival outcomes at least similar to nitrosourea-based chemotherapy. However, there remains uncertainty as to the optimum approach and there is a paucity of available data, especially with regards to HRQoL. Brain Re-Irradiation Or Chemotherapy (BRIOChe) aims to assess re-irradiation, as an acceptable treatment option for recurrent IDH-wild-type GBM.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

BRIOChe is a phase II, multi-centre, open-label, randomised trial in patients with recurrent GBM. The trial uses Sargent's three-outcome design and will recruit approximately 55 participants from 10 to 15 UK radiotherapy sites, allocated (2:1) to receive re-irradiation (35 Gy in 10 daily fractions) or nitrosourea-based chemotherapy (up to six, 6-weekly cycles). The primary endpoint is overall survival rate for re-irradiation patients at 9 months. There will be no formal statistical comparison between treatment arms for the decision-making primary analysis. The chemotherapy arm will be used for calibration purposes, to collect concurrent data to aid interpretation of results. Secondary outcomes include HRQoL, dexamethasone requirement, anti-epileptic drug requirement, radiological response, treatment compliance, acute and late toxicities, progression-free survival.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

BRIOChe obtained ethical approval from Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (reference no. 20/NI/0070). Final trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and adhere to the ICMJE guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN60524.

Surgical Management and Advances in the Treatment of Glioma

The care of patients with both high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma necessitates an interdisciplinary collaboration between neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, neurologists and other practitioners. In this review, we aim to detail the considerations, approaches and advances in the neurosurgical care of gliomas. We describe the impact of extent-of-resection in high-grade and low-grade glioma, with particular focus on primary and recurrent glioblastoma. We address advances in surgical methods and adjunct technologies such as intraoperative imaging and fluorescence guided surgery that maximize extent-of-resection while minimizing the potential for iatrogenic neurological deficits. Finally, we review surgically-mediated therapies other than resection and discuss the role of neurosurgery in emerging paradigm-shifts in inter-disciplinary glioma management such as serial tissue sampling and "window of opportunity trials".

The Impact of ioMRI on Glioblastoma Resection and Clinical Outcomes in a State-of-the-Art Neuro-Oncological Setup

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI) aims to improve gross total resection (GTR) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Despite some older randomized data on safety and feasibility, ioMRI's actual impact in a modern neurosurgical setting utilizing a larger armamentarium of techniques has not been sufficiently investigated to date. We therefore aimed to analyze its effects on residual tumor, patient outcome, and progression-free survival (PFS) in GBM patients in a modern high-volume center. Patients undergoing ioMRI for resection of supratentorial GBM were enrolled between March 2018 and June 2020. ioMRI was performed in all cases at the end of resection when surgeons expected complete macroscopic tumor removal. Extent of resection (EOR) was performed by volumetric analysis, with GTR defined as an EOR ≥ 95%, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed through univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression analyses. In total, we enrolled 172 patients. Mean EOR increased from 93.9% to 98.3% (p < 0.0001) due to ioMRI, equaling an increase in GTR rates from 78.5% to 93.0% (p = 0.0002). Residual tumor volume decreased from 1.3 ± 4.2 cm³ to 0.6 ± 2.5 cm³ (p = 0.0037). Logistic regression revealed recurrent GBM as a risk factor leading to subtotal resection (STR) (odds ratio (OR) = 3.047, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.165-7.974, p = 0.023). Additional resection after ioMRI led to equally long PFS compared to patients with complete tumor removal before ioMRI (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.898, 95%-CI 0.543-1.483, p = 0.67). ioMRI considerably reduces residual tumor volume and helps to achieve comparable PFS, even in patients with unexpected residual tumor after initial resection before ioMRI.

Implications of Cellular Immaturity in Necrosis and Microvascularization in Glioblastomas IDH-Wild-Type

Necrosis and increased microvascular density in glioblastoma IDH-wild-type are the consequence of both hypoxia and cellular immaturity. Our study aimed to identify the main clinical-imaging and morphogenetic risk factors associated with tumor necrosis and microvascular in the prognosis of patient survival. We performed a retrospective study (10 years) in which we identified 39 cases. We used IDH1, Ki-67 and Nestin immunomarkers, as well as CDKN2A by FISH. The data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics. The clinical characterization identified only age over 50 years as a risk factor (HR = 3.127). The presence of the tumor residue, as well as the absence of any therapeutic element from the trimodal treatment, were predictive factors of mortality (HR = 1.024, respectively HR = 7.460). Cellular immaturity quantified by Nestin was associated with reduced overall survival (p = 0.007). Increased microvascular density was associated with an increased proliferative index (p = 0.009) as well as alterations of the CDKN2A gene (p < 0.001). CDKN2A deletions and cellular immaturity were associated with an increased percentage of necrosis (p < 0.001, respectively, p = 0.017). The main risk factors involved in the unfavorable prognosis are moderate and increased Nestin immunointensity, as well as the association of increased microvascular density with age over 50 years. Necrosis was not a risk factor.

Surgical Treatment of Glioblastoma: State-of-the-Art and Future Trends

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive disease and is associated with poor prognosis despite treatment advances in recent years. Surgical resection of tumor remains the main therapeutic option when approaching these patients, especially when combined with adjuvant radiochemotherapy. In the present study, we conducted a comprehensive literature review on the state-of-the-art and future trends of the surgical treatment of GBM, emphasizing topics that have been the object of recent study.

Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index in recurrent glioblastoma: a new prognostic factor?

Background

For recurrent glioblastoma (GB) patients, several therapy options have been established over the last years such as more aggressive surgery, re-irradiation or chemotherapy. Age and the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS) are used to make decisions for these patients as these are established as prognostic factors in the initial diagnosis of GB. This study’s aim was to evaluate preoperative patient comorbidities by using the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) as a prognostic factor for recurrent GB patients.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis we could include 123 patients with surgery for primary recurrence of GB from January 2007 until December 2016 (43 females, 80 males, mean age 57 years (range 21–80 years)). Preoperative age, sex, ACCI, KPSS and adjuvant treatment regimes were recorded for each patient. Extent of resection (EOR) was recorded as a complete/incomplete resection of the contrast-enhancing tumor part.

Results

Median overall survival (OS) was 9.0 months (95% CI 7.1–10.9 months) after first re-resection. Preoperative KPSS > 80% (P < 0.001) and EOR (P = 0.013) were associated with significantly improved survival in univariate analysis. Including these factors in multivariate analysis, preoperative KPSS < 80 (HR 2.002 [95% CI: 1.246–3.216], P = 0.004) and EOR are the only significant prognostic factor (HR 1.611 [95% CI: 1.036–2.505], P = 0.034). ACCI was not shown as a prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Conclusion

For patients with surgery for recurrent glioblastoma, the ACCI does not add further information about patient’s prognosis besides the well-established KPSS and extent of resection.

Second surgery for progressive glioblastoma: a multi-centre questionnaire and cohort-based review of clinical decision-making and patient outcomes in current practice

PURPOSE

Glioblastoma prognosis is poor. Treatment options are limited at progression. Surgery may benefit, but no quality guidelines exist to inform patient selection. We sought to describe variations in surgical management at progression, highlight where further evidence is needed, and build towards a consensus strategy.

METHODS

Current practice in selection of patients with progressive GBM for second surgery was surveyed online amongst specialists in the UK and Europe. We complemented this with an assessment of practice in a retrospective cohort study from six United Kingdom neurosurgical units. We used descriptive statistics to analyse the data.

RESULTS

234 questionnaire responses were received. Maintaining or improving patient quality of life was key to decision making, with variation as to whether patient age, performance status or intended extent of resection was relevant. MGMT methylation status was not important. Half considered no minimum time after first surgery. 288 patients were reported in the cohort analysis. Median time to second surgery from first surgery 390 days. Median overall survival 815 days, with no association between time to second surgery and time to death (p = 0.874).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the most wide-ranging examination of contemporaneous practice in management of GBM progression. Without evidence-based guidelines, the variation is unsurprising. We propose consensus guidelines for consideration, to reduce heterogeneity in decision making, support data collection and analysis of factors influencing outcomes, and to inform clinical trials to establish whether second surgery improves patient outcomes, or simply selects to patients already performing well.

Advancing Imaging to Enhance Surgery: From Image to Information Guidance

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) has an established role as a crucial disease parameter in the multidisciplinary management of glioblastoma, guiding diagnosis, treatment planning, assessment, and follow-up. Yet, cMRI cannot provide adequate information regarding tissue heterogeneity and the infiltrative extent beyond the contrast enhancement. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging and PET and newer analytical methods are transforming images into data (radiomics) and providing noninvasive biomarkers of molecular features (radiogenomics), conveying enhanced information for improving decision making in surgery. This review analyzes the shift from image guidance to information guidance that is relevant for the surgical treatment of glioblastoma.

Local treatment for relapsing glioblastoma: A decision-making tree for choosing between reirradiation and second surgery

In case of circumscribed recurrent glioblastoma (rec-GBM), a second surgery (Re-S) and reirradiation (Re-RT) are local strategies to consider. The aim is to provide an algorithm to use in the daily clinical practice. The first step is to consider the life expectancy in order to establish whether the patient should be a candidate for active treatment. In case of a relatively good life expectancy (>3 months) and a confirmed circumscribed disease(i.e. without multiple lesions that are in different lobes/hemispheres), the next step is the assessment of the prognostic factors for local treatments. Based on the existing prognostic score systems, patients who should be excluded from local treatments may be identified; based on the validated prognostic factors, one or the other local treatment may be preferred. The last point is the estimation of expected toxicity, considering patient-related, tumor-related and treatment-related factors impacting on side effects. Lastly, patients with very good prognostic factors may be considered for receiving a combined treatment.

Importance and Evidence of Extent of Resection in Glioblastoma

Maximal safe resection is an essential part of the multidisciplinary care of patients with glioblastoma. A growing body of data shows that gross total resection is an independent prognostic factor associated with improved clinical outcome. The relationship between extent of glioblastoma (GB) resection and clinical benefit depends critically on the balance between cytoreduction and avoiding neurologic morbidity. The definition of the extent of tumor resection, how this is best measured pre- and postoperatively, and its relation to volume of residual tumor is still discussed. We review the literature supporting extent of resection in GB, highlighting the importance of a standardized definition and measurement of extent of resection to allow greater collaboration in research projects and trials. Recent developments in neurosurgical techniques and technologies focused on maximizing extent of resection and safety are discussed.

Treatment response of bevacizumab combination chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: A long-term retrospective study in Taiwan

Treatment options for recurrent glioblastoma are rare, with their response uncertain. This study aimed to determine the response of chemotherapy including bevacizumab in combination with vincristine and carboplatin for glioblastoma at first recurrence in a single-institution cohort.Clinical data of patients who received chemotherapy including bevacizumab, vincristine, and low-dose carboplatin for recurrent glioblastoma between 2008 and 2014 were analyzed. Differences between those who received combination chemotherapy (chemotherapy-positive) and those who did not (chemotherapy-negative) were estimated by Fisher exact test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between survival curves were estimated by the log-rank test. Univariate analysis of treatment response for all recurrent glioblastoma patients and secondary recurrence patients under different conditions were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test or the Kruskal-Wallis test.Although mortality rates were similar between the chemotherapy-negative and chemotherapy-positive groups (26.7% vs 28.6%), median overall survival was significantly longer in the chemotherapy-positive group than the chemotherapy-negative group (P = .006). There were no chemotherapy-related serious complications such as gastrointestinal perforation, serious bleeding, or new-onset seizure during chemotherapy, whereas others side effects including proteinuria and hypertension were more common albeit well controlled by medication.This study revealed combination regimen of bevacizumab, vincristine, and low-dose carboplatin as a potentially effective therapeutic approach in recurrent glioblastoma. More in-depth understanding of the mechanism underlying this combination treatment and potential contribution of alternative genetic therapeutic in recurrent glioblastoma is necessary.

Profiling of novel circulating microRNAs as a non-invasive biomarker in diagnosis and follow-up of high and low-grade gliomas

OBJECTIVE

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant neoplasm of the central nervous system (CNS). Despite the progress in therapeutic strategies such as surgical techniques, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, prognosis and therapeutically convenient monitoring tools in patients with GBM has not improved significantly up to now.Therefore, exosomal miRNAs as novel non-invasive biomarkers having high sensitivity and specificity are required to improve diagnosis and to develop new targeted therapy strategies for GBM patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate a novel miRNA signature as a predictive biomarker for diagnosis and measurement of response to therapeutic interventions in plasma of GBM patients versus traumatic brain injury and diffuse low-grade astrocytoma (LGA) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Plasma exosomal-microRNAs were isolated from GBM (n = 25), LGA (n = 25), and head trauma patients (n = 15) as non-glioma control from March 2017 to June 2018 in Department of Neurosurgery at Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital. Through a bioinformatics analysis, we used Miranda, TargetScan, mirBase, DIANA-microT-CDS, and KEGG database as well as microarray data analysis from GEO for microRNA candidates. Finally, miR-210, miR-185, miR-5194, and miR-449 were selected among those miRNAs because they were recorded to target the maximum number of genes in EGFR and c-MET signaling pathways. Then, exosomal microRNAs were extracted from plasma of patients and quantitated by locked nucleic acid real-time PCR in GBM, LGA, and trauma patients.

RESULTS

This result is the first report on the role of circulating miR-185, miR-449, and miR-5194 in GBM compared to LGA and trauma. The plasma expression of miR-210 as an oncogenic miR was upregulated in GBM and LGA groups (P < 0.0001). Otherwise, miR-185, miR-5194, and miR-449 were significantly downregulated (P ≤ 0.05) in GBM and LGA compared to trauma patients. There was no significant downregulation in the expression of miR-185 between GBM and LGA, while the expression of miR-5194 (P ≤ 0.05) and miR-449 (P ≤ 0.05) was significantly decreased in GBM patients compared with LGA.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the levels of miR-210, miR-449, and miR-5194 are a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker positively correlated with histopathological grade and invasiveness of GBM. These findings imply that circulating microRNA can be potentially used as novel biomarkers for glioma that might be beneficial in clinical management of glioma patients.

Treatment Results for Recurrent Glioblastoma and Alteration of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression After Recurrence

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to analyze the results of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) treatment, investigate the changes in molecular expression on paired primary and recurrent tumor specimens of GBM, and evaluate the effect of these changes on patient survival.

METHODS

A total of 170 adult patients were diagnosed with recurrent GBM at a single institution between 2005 and 2015. Patients were divided into the reoperation and nonoperation groups. In addition, we evaluated the expression of immunologic markers of 43 paired surgical specimens from the first and second operations.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) after recurrence in the reoperation group was significantly longer than that in the nonoperation group (median, 9.1 months vs. 5.6 months; P = 0.024). The groups differed in characteristics such as age, performance scale, and progression-free survival. In the reoperation group, higher performance scale at recurrence, better extent of resection, and adjuvant treatment were related to longer overall survival. Among 43 paired surgical specimens, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was positively expressed in 17 (39.5%) and 6 (13.9%) patients after the first and second operations, respectively. PD-L1 expression after recurrence showed an increase, decrease, and no change in 6 (13.9%), 14 (32.5%), and 23 (53.4%) patients, respectively. Changes in PD-L1 expression after recurrence did not affect survival after recurrence during progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of resection and adjuvant treatment was important for prolonged survival. Reoperation without adjuvant treatment was not effective for prolonged survival. Initial and follow-up PD-L1 expression from both operations did not influence patient survival.

Survival Benefit of Maximal Resection for Glioblastoma Reoperation in the Temozolomide Era: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although reoperation likely confers survival benefit for glioblastoma, whether the extent of resection (EOR) of the reoperation affects survival outcome has yet to be thoroughly evaluated in the current temozolomide (TMZ) era. The aim of this meta-analysis was to pool the current literature and evaluate the prognostic significance of reoperation EOR for glioblastoma recurrence in the current TMZ era.

METHODS

Searches of 7 electronic databases from inception to January 2019 were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. There were 1203 articles identified for screening. Prognostic hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) derived from multivariate regression analysis were analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions.

RESULTS

Nine individual studies satisfied all selection criteria, describing survival in 1507 patients with glioblastoma, including 1335 reoperations for recurrence (89%). When studies incorporated the EOR of index surgery into their analysis, maximal resection at reoperation was significantly prognostic for longer OS (HR, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.79; I² = 0%; P heterogeneity <0.01). When studies did not incorporate the EOR of index surgery into their analysis, maximal resection remained significantly prognostic for longer OS at reoperation (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.45-0.64; I² = 5.2%; P heterogeneity <0.01). Based on EOR, radiographic gross total resection (GTR) was the most prognostic EOR definition at reoperation (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.44-0.61; I² = 0%; P heterogeneity <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current TMZ era, when reoperation is feasible for recurrent glioblastoma, maximal safe resection appears to confer a significant OS benefit based on the current literature. This benefit is most pronounced with radiographic GTR, and likely irrespective of EOR at index surgery.

Impact on Radiation Dose and Volume V57 Gy of the Brain on Recurrence and Survival of Patients with Glioblastoma Multiformae

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to analyze impact of irradiated brain volume V57 Gy (volume receiving 57 Gy and more) on time to progression and survival of patients with glioblastoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Dosimetric analysis of treatment plan data has been performed on 70 patients with glioblastoma, treated with postoperative radiochemotherapy with temozolomide, followed by adjuvant temozolomide. Patients were treated with 2 different methods of definition of treatment volumes and prescription of radiation dose. First group of patients has been treated with one treatment volume receiving 60 Gy in 2 Gy daily fraction (31 patients) and second group of the patients has been treated with "cone-down" technique, which consisted of two phases of treatment: the first phase of 46 Gy in 2 Gy fraction followed by "cone-down" boost of 14 Gy in 2 Gy fraction (39 patients). Quantification of V57 Gy and ratio brain volume/V57Gy has been done. Average values of both parameters have been taken as a threshold value and patients have been split into 2 groups for each parameter (values smaller/ lager than threshold value).

RESULTS

Mean value for V57 Gy was 593.39 cm3 (range 166.94 to 968.60 cm3), mean value of brain volume has was 1332.86 cm3 (range 1047.00 to 1671.90 cm3) and mean value of brain-to-V57Gy ratio was 2.46 (range 1.42 to 7.67). There was no significant difference between two groups for both V57 Gy and ratio between brain volume and V57 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Irradiated volume with dose 57 Gy or more (V57 Gy) and ration between whole brain volume and 57 Gy had no impact on time to progression and survival of patients with glioblastoma.