Stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly: outcomes by adenoma subtype

Diagnosis and Management of Aggressive/Refractory Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

The majority of acromegaly and gigantism are caused by growth hormone-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). Most cases can be cured or controlled by surgery, medical therapy, and/or radiotherapy. However, a few of these tumors are resistant to traditional therapy and always have a poor prognosis. The title aggressive/refractory is used to differentiate them from pituitary carcinomas. To date, there is no definitive conclusion on how to diagnose aggressive/refractory growth hormone-secreting PitNETs, which may have slowed the process of exploring new therapeutical strategies. We summarized the literature described diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Potential disease markers and prospective therapies were also included.

Comparative analysis of intraoperative and imaging features of invasive growth in pituitary adenomas

BACKGROUND

Most pituitary adenomas (PAs), also termed pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, are benign in nature and can be treated effectively by surgical resection, medical treatment, and in special cases by radiotherapy. However, invasive growth can be an important feature of a more aggressive behavior and adverse prognosis. The extension of PAs into the cavernous sinus can be categorized according to the Knosp criteria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Comparative analyses of MRI features and intraoperative findings of invasive growth regarding different clinical factors are still scarce.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of 764 PAs that were surgically treated between October 2004 and April 2018. Invasive growth was assessed according to the surgical reports and preoperative MRI (Knosp criteria). Clinical data, such as patient age at diagnosis and gender, histopathological adenoma type, and extent of resection, were collected.

RESULTS

Invasive features on MRI were seen in 24.4% (Knosp grades 3A-4, 186/764) of the cases. Intraoperatively, invasion was present in 42.4% (324/764). Complete resection was achieved in 80.0% of adenomas and subtotal resection, in 20.1%. By multivariate analysis, invasion according to intraoperative findings was associated with the sparsely granulated corticotroph (SGCA, P = .0026) and sparsely granulated somatotroph (SGSA, P = .0103) adenoma type as well as age (P = .0287). Radiographic invasion according to Knosp grades 3A-4 correlated with age (P = .0098), SGCAs (P = .0005), SGSAs (P = .0351), and gonadotroph adenomas (P = .0478). Both criteria of invasion correlated with subtotal resection (P = .0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both intraoperative and radiographic signs of invasive growth are high-risk lesions for incomplete extent of resection and occur more frequently in older patients. A particularly high prevalence of invasion can be found in the SGCA and SGSA types. Cavernous sinus invasion is also more common in gonadotroph adenomas. Usage of the Knosp classification is a valuable preoperative estimation tool.

Clinical and prognostic significance of granulation patterns in somatotroph adenomas/tumors of the pituitary: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Sparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma/tumor (SGST) is thought to be more clinically aggressive than densely granulated somatotroph adenoma/tumor (DGST). However, the literature is not entirely consistent as to the disparate demographic and behavioral features of these subtypes. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to further clarify the demographic, clinicopathological, prognostic, and molecular characteristics of SGST versus DGST.

METHODS

We accessed two electronic databases to search for potential data. Pooled estimates of odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

SGST was associated with younger patient age and lower male-to-female ratio (p < 0.001) compared to DGST. Clinically, SGST had larger tumor size and high rate of cavernous sinus and suprasellar extension (p < 0.001) than DGST. During postoperative follow-up, SGST was associated with a lower endocrinological remission rate (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.90; p = 0.01) and a poorer response rate to SRL (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.08-0.35; p < 0.001) in comparison to DGST. The prevalence of GSP mutations was significantly lower in SGST (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.79; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

SGST and DGST were demographically, clinicopathologically, and molecularly different from each other with the former associated with adverse treatment outcomes and poor response to medical therapy. There are still gaps in translational studies that could help us better understand the behavior of these tumors and identify potential targets in the treatment of sparsely granulated tumors.

Clinical, biological, radiological, and pathological comparison of sparsely and densely granulated somatotroph adenomas: a single center experience from a cohort of 131 patients with acromegaly

PURPOSE

Growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas are divided into two clinically relevant histologic subtypes, densely (DG-A) and sparsely (SG-A) granulated. Histologic subtype was evaluated in a large cohort of patients with acromegaly, separating DG-A and SG-A, and correlated with clinicopathological characteristics.

METHODS

Patients with acromegaly undergoing surgery as initial therapy between 1995 and 2015 were identified. Histologic subtype was determined by keratin expression pattern with CAM5.2 and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters, somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SST2) expression, post-surgical remission rate, and application of a prognostic scoring system incorporating proliferation and invasiveness.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one patients were included. Tumors were classified as DG-A (75, 57.3%), SG-A (29, 22.1%), intermediate (I-A) (9, 6.9%), and unclassified (18, 13.7%) when CAM5.2 was negative. DG-A and I-A were combined for analysis (DG/I-A) and compared to SG-A. Age, gender, proliferation, and post-surgical remission did not differ. SG-A were larger [2 vs. 1.5 cm (median), p = 0.03], more frequently invasive [65.5% vs. 32.9%, p = 0.004], associated with higher MRI T2-weighted signal ratio [1.01 vs. 0.82 (median), p = 0.01], showed lower SST2 expression (p < 0.0001), and scored higher in the prognostic classification (p = 0.004). Surgical remission occurred in 41.7% DG/I-A and 41.4% SG-A (p = 1.0). On multivariate analysis, absence of invasion (p = 0.009) and lower pre-operative IGF-1 index (p = 0.0002) were associated with post-surgical remission.

CONCLUSION

CAM5.2 allowed distinction between DG/I-A and SG-A in most but not all cases. Histologic subtype did not predict surgical outcome. Absence of invasion and lower pre-operative IGF-1 index were the only significant predictors of post-surgical remission in this cohort.

Gonadotroph tumours with a low SF-1 labelling index are more likely to recur and are associated with enrichment of the PI3K-AKT pathway

AIMS

The gonadotroph tumour (GT) is the most frequently resected pituitary neuroendocrine tumour. Although many symptomatic GT are successfully resected, some recur. We sought to identify histological biomarkers that may predict recurrence and explore biological mechanisms that explain this difference in behaviour.

METHODS

SF-1 immunohistochemistry of 51 GT, a subset belonging to a longitudinal prospective cohort study (n = 25), was reviewed. Four groups were defined: Group 1-recently diagnosed GT (n = 20), Group 2-non-recurrent GT with long-term follow up (n = 11), Group 3-initial resections of GT that recur (n = 7) and Group 4-recurrent GT (n = 13). The percentage of SF-1 immunolabelling in the lowest staining fields (SF-1 labelling index (SLI)) was assessed and RNA sequencing was performed on 5 GT with SLI <80% and 5 GT with SLI >80%.

RESULTS

Diffuse, strong SF-1 immunolabelling was the most frequent pattern in Groups 1/2, whereas patchy SF-1 staining predominated in Groups 3/4. There was a lower median SLI in Groups 3/4 than 1/2. Overall, GT with SLI <80% recurred earlier than GT with SLI >80%. Differential expression analysis identified 89 statistically significant differentially expressed genes (FDR <0.05) including over-expression of pituitary stem cell genes (SOX2, GFRA3) and various oncogenes (e.g. BCL2, ERRB4) in patchy SF-1 GT. Gene set enrichment analysis identified significant enrichment of genes involved in the PI3K-AKT pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

We speculate that patchy SF-1 labelling in GT reflects intratumoural heterogeneity and are less differentiated tumours than diffusely staining GT. SF-1 immunolabelling patterns may have prognostic significance in GT, but confirmatory studies are needed for further validation.

Comparing primary gamma knife radiosurgery and postoperative gamma knife radiosurgery for acromegaly: A monocenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety between primary GKS and postoperative GKS for acromegaly, and to elucidate predictors associated with endocrine remission, we performed a monocenter, retrospective study.

METHOD

Seventy-five patients with acromegaly who had received GKS in West China Hospital between March 2010 and December 2018 were included in this study. Endocrine remission was defined as age-sex matched IGF-I normalization and either nadir level of GH <1 ng/mL after OGTT or the random GH < 2.0 ng/mL.

RESULTS

We didn't find significant differences in endocrine remission, biochemical recurrence, imaging regression, imaging progression, radiation-induced complications between the primary GKS group and the postoperative GKS group(P > 0.05). Actuarial rates of durable endocrine remission at 3, 5, 8 year were 10.60 %, 33.80 % and 70.60 % in the primary GKS group and 6.70 %, 43.40 % and 78.80 % in the postoperative GKS group(P = 0.800). Only base nadir GH after OGTT (HR = 0.637,95 % CI:0.416-0.977; P = 0.039) was found to be a predictor of duration endocrine remission.

CONCLUSION

We find comparable efficacy and safety between primary GKS and postoperative GKS. Lower base nadir GH after OGTT was a positive predictor associated with endocrine remission. GKS should be considered for residual or recurrent tumor after surgery. For those who couldn't sustain surgery, GKS is an alternative treatment. Further studies are required to elucidate the efficacy and safety of GKS in acromegaly.

Effect of Stereotactic Radiosurgery on Residual or Relapsed Pituitary Adenoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In pituitary tumors, the presence of residual tumor after transsphenoidal surgery and recurrence of the tumor after resection are frequent, and the best treatment is not well established. The effects and complications of stereotactic radiosurgery have not been extensively studied.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to reveal the effect of stereotactic radiosurgery on residual and recurrent adenomas.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Database, and Google Scholar was conducted using the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search was structured according to the PICOT (i.e., Participants, types of Interventions, Comparator between the treatments, types of Outcome measures, and Follow-up [Time of duration]) strategy. The methodologic quality assessment (risk of bias) was performed according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scale. The studies were grouped and analyzed after data extraction using the software "R".

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles including 2315 patients were analyzed, with an average follow-up duration of 57.8 months and mean radiation marginal dose of 19.6 Gy. The overall tumor control rate was 95%, tumor reduction rate was 46%, and hormonal control rate was 67%. The side effects were evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic radiosurgery was efficient in residual or recurrence tumor control, with few side effects, and is recommended for treating residual or recurrent tumors, both secreting and nonsecreting tumors. A limitation of this study is that there were no randomized trials included in the synthesis.

The Clinicopathological Spectrum of Acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly results from a persistent excess in growth hormone with clinical features that may be subtle or severe. The most common cause of acromegaly is a pituitary tumor that causes excessive production of growth hormone (GH), and rare cases are due to an excess of the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) or the ectopic production of GH.

OBJECTIVE

Discuss the different diseases that present with manifestations of GH excess and clinical acromegaly, emphasizing the distinct clinical and radiological characteristics of the different pathological entities.

METHODS

We performed a narrative review of the published clinicopathological information about acromegaly. An English-language search for relevant studies was conducted on PubMed from inception to 1 August 2019. The reference lists of relevant studies were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Pituitary tumors that cause GH excess have several variants, including pure somatotroph tumors that can be densely or sparsely granulated, or plurihormonal tumors that include mammosomatotroph, mixed somatotroph-lactotroph tumors and mature plurihomonal Pit1-lineage tumors, acidophil stem cell tumors and poorly-differentiated Pit1-lineage tumors. Each tumor type has a distinct pathophysiology, resulting in variations in clinical manifestations, imaging and responses to therapies.

CONCLUSION

Detailed clinicopathological information will be useful in the era of precision medicine, in which physicians tailor the correct treatment modality to each patient.

Mammosomatotroph and mixed somatotroph-lactotroph adenoma in acromegaly: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

Although well-documented from pathological aspect, the clinical features and outcomes of acromegaly with mammosomatotroph (MSA) and mixed somatotroph-lactotroph adenoma (MSLA) are seldom reported. Thus, in this study, we analyzed and reported the clinical data about MSAs and MSLAs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with acromegaly in our institution during 2008-2017. Growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas were categorized into pure somatotroph adenoma (PSA), MSA and MSLA based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical information and treatment outcomes during follow-up were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

Among 94 patients within this cohort, PSAs, MSAs, and MSLAs accounted for 53, 28 and 13 cases, respectively. MSAs often had smaller size, lower frequency of cavernous sinus invasion and higher gross total resection (GTR) rate. MSLAs were characterized by bigger tumor size, higher frequency of preoperative hyperprolactinemia, and lower GTR rate. Thus, MSLAs had worse long-term biological remission rate than MSAs and PSAs (15.4% vs. 50.0% and 26.4%, p = 0.0371). Gender (male, OR = 0.784, p = 0.011) and tumor volume (OR = 0.784, p = 0.020) were independent predictors for long-term biological remission in binary logistic regression. Subgroup analyses indicated that postoperative nadir GH level (GH-7, HR = 1.242, p = 0.001) was the only risk factor for tumor recurrence for patients with GTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide valuable insights into clinicopathological features of acromegaly. MSAs were relatively smaller lesions with better prognosis. MSLAs were more aggressive with massive size, invasiveness and preoperative hyperprolactinemia. Tumor size and GH-7 were significantly associated with biological remission and tumor relapse after GTR, respectively.

Empirical versus progression-guided stereotactic radiosurgery for non-functional pituitary macroadenomas after subtotal resection

OBJECTIVE

There is a lack of consensus regarding whether if residual non-functional macroadenomas (NFM) should undergo empirical stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or be monitored until tumor progression before SRS treatment. The aim of this study is to compare the risks and benefits of empirical versus progression-guided SRS for NFM after subtotal resection.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of consecutive NFM patients who subtotal surgical resection followed by SRS between 1999 and 2014. Patients were dichotomized into two groups: empirical SRS (SRS without evidence of tumor progression) and progression-guided SRS (SRS after demonstration of tumor progression) groups. Tumor response was categorized into: (1) regression, ≥ 10% decrease in tumor volume; (2) stable, < 10% increase or decrease in tumor volume; and (3) progression, ≥ 10% increase in tumor volume. Tumor control comprised stable tumor response and tumor regression.

RESULTS

Of the 112 patients who underwent SRS for NFM, 106 patients were treated for residual NFM after surgical resection, and included in the final analysis. The empirical SRS and progression-guided SRS groups comprised 46 and 60 patients, respectively. Overall tumor control rate was 88.7%. Higher rate of tumor control was achieved in the empirical SRS group compared to the progression-guided SRS group (95.65% vs. 83.33%, p = 0.047). Rates of new visual field deficit, cranial neuropathy and endocrinopathy were comparable between the two groups. Empirical SRS group had higher rates of progression-free survival compared to progression-guided SRS group (p = 0.015). Actuarial progression-free survival rates for the empirical SRS group were 93.2%, 93.2%, and 81.5% at 3, 5, and 10 years after SRS. Actuarial progression-free survival rates for the progression-guided SRS were 86.4%, 82.1%, and 68.4% at 3, 5, and 10 years after SRS.

CONCLUSION

Empirical SRS offers higher rates of tumor control and progression-free survival compared to progression-guided SRS in patients with residual NFM after surgical resection. Rates of new hypopituitarism and cranial neuropathies were comparable between the two groups.

Radiosurgery as primary management for acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) remains the recommended primary treatment for acromegaly. Long-term outcome data are not available for patients treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (STRS) as a primary treatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

DATA COLLECTION

notes review, laboratory results, general physician notes, patient questionnaire and death certification.

PATIENTS

Twenty acromegaly patients underwent primary STRS at the National Centre for Radiosurgery, Sheffield, UK, between 1985 and 2015.

MEASUREMENTS

Biochemical control (GH/IGF1), hypopituitarism, morbidity and mortality were all recorded.

RESULTS

At 20 years of follow-up, control was seen in all on acromegaly-specific medication (n = 12) and 75% of those off medication (3/4). Time for 50% to achieve control on medication was 3 years, and 7.4 years off medication. Median marginal radiation dose was 27.5 Gy, and median follow-up was 166.5 months. 53% of patients developed new hypopituitarism at a median follow-up of 146 months, and the development of first onset of hypopituitarism occurred as late as 20 years after treatment. With MRI planning, no other complications were noted. Three patients underwent subsequent TSS due to poor biochemical control. During follow-up, 7 patients died at a median age of 65 years. There were no STRS-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

This is the longest follow-up of patients who have undergone primary STRS for acromegaly. It shows low morbidity, but significant latency to biochemical control and new-onset hypopituitarism. This mandates very long-term follow-up for these patients. STRS has shown good long-term efficacy providing initial control can be afforded by optimal medical management. While TSS remains best practice, STRS offers an alternative for those in whom surgery is not an option.

Factors affecting early versus late remission in acromegaly following stereotactic radiosurgery

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established treatment modality for patients with acromegaly. Our previously published study demonstrated a median time to remission of 29 months. This study aims to identify factors affecting the timing of remission and also to quantify the rate of late remission. This is a retrospective analysis of acromegaly patients who underwent SRS between 1988 and 2016. Early and late remissions were defined based on our prior median remission time of 29 months. The median imaging and endocrine follow-ups are 66 and 104.8 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis was conducted to analyze factors leading to late remission. A total number of 157 patients, of those 102 (64.9%) patients achieved remission. of those 102 patients, 62 patients (60.7%) had remission in less than 29 months (early remission) whereas 40 patients (39.3%) achieved remission later than (late remission) 29 months. The two groups differed significantly in the time interval between the last resection and the first SRS (p = 0.040) whole sella radiosurgery (p = 0.025) or radiosurgery to the cavernous sinus (p = 0.041). Competing risk analysis showed the interval between resection and SRS was significantly longer in the late remission group (HR 1.013, 95% CI 1.004-1.02; p = 0.007). Fifty-one of 157 patients (32.5%) developed a new endocrine deficiency following SRS. Those with shorter time between resection and SRS were more likely to achieve early remission. While most patients achieve remission in less than 4 years, the latency of effect with SRS yields a small percentage of patients achieving remission beyond that time point.

Growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas in childhood and young adulthood: clinical features and outcomes

PURPOSE

Growth hormone (GH)-producing pituitary adenomas (PAs) in childhood or young adulthood are rare, and the details surrounding these tumors remain enigmatic. We present the clinical, pathological and genetic features of this disease.

METHODS

We identified 25 patients aged 20 years or younger with GH-producing PAs who underwent surgery between 2003 and 2016 at Toranomon Hospital in Tokyo. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data, treatment outcomes and pathological features of these patients to shed light on childhood acromegaly.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 14 male and 11 female patients whose average age at the time of surgery was 17.3 years. Germline AIP mutations were present in 5 of 13 patients examined, and Carney complex was identified in 2 of 25 patients. The mean maximum tumor diameter was 26.7 mm, and total resection assessed during surgery was achieved in 17 patients. Based on their respective pathological findings, patients were divided into the following 4 groups: sparsely granulated adenomas (5), densely granulated (DG) adenomas (6), plurihormonal adenomas (9), and silent subtype 3 (SS3) adenomas (5). During the mean follow-up period of 50.3 months, complete endocrinological remission was achieved in 14 of 25 patients (56%) by surgery alone and in 19 patients (76%) after postoperative adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

GH-producing PAs in young patients are intriguing and difficult to treat due to their distinct tumor characteristics, including a lower incidence of the DG subtype and a higher incidence of SS3 adenomas and genetic abnormalities. Therefore, multi-modal therapies are essential to achieve optimal clinical outcomes.

Utility of Pit-1 Immunostaining in Distinguishing Pituitary Adenomas of Primitive Differentiation from Null Cell Adenomas

Pit-1 immunostaining is not routinely used in the characterization of pituitary adenomas, and its utility in distinguishing adenomas dedicated towards the lactotroph, somatotroph, and thyrotroph lineage from null cell adenomas warrants further evaluation. Pituitary adenomas that were negative for expression of a basic panel of hormonal markers (ACTH, prolactin, and growth hormone) were further evaluated for TSH, SF-1, and Pit-1 expression using a tissue microarray. Among the 147 identified pituitary adenomas that were negative for ACTH, prolactin, growth hormone, and TSH, expression of SF-1 was present in 68 cases (46%). Of the remaining 72 cases with sufficient tissue for further analysis, four were Pit-1 positive (6% of the adenomas negative for ACTH, prolactin, growth hormone, TSH, and SF-1); the remaining 68 were potentially null cell adenomas. Two of the Pit-1-positive adenomas displayed a paranuclear CAM 5.2 staining pattern suggestive of a sparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma; however, only one case contained fibrous bodies within a majority of the adenoma cells. Our data suggests that Pit-1 can be utilized as a second tier immunostain in cases of clinically non-functioning adenomas that are immunonegative for ACTH, prolactin, growth hormone, TSH, and SF-1 in order to further segregate rare cases of Pit-1-positive adenomas from null cell adenomas. Pit-1 immunostaining can recognize rare cases of sparsely granulated somatotroph adenomas that appear immunonegative for growth hormone, as well as rare cases of other Pit-1-positive adenomas that are negative for Pit-1 lineage hormones. Overall, pituitary adenomas of the Pit-1 lineage that do not produce prolactin, growth hormone, or TSH are rare, with only four cases identified in the current study.

The 2017 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the pituitary gland: a summary

The 4th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of endocrine tumors has been recently released. In this new edition, major changes are recommended in several areas of the classification of tumors of the anterior pituitary gland (adenophypophysis). The scope of the present manuscript is to summarize these recommended changes, emphasizing a few significant topics. These changes include the following: (1) a novel approach for classifying pituitary neuroendocrine tumors according to pituitary adenohypophyseal cell lineages; (2) changes to the histological grading of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with the elimination of the term "atypical adenoma;" and (3) introduction of new entities like the pituitary blastoma and re-definition of old entities like the null-cell adenoma. This new classification is very practical and mostly based on immunohistochemistry for pituitary hormones, pituitary-specific transcription factors, and other immunohistochemical markers commonly used in pathology practice, not requiring routine ultrastructural analysis of the tumors. Evaluation of tumor proliferation potential, by mitotic count and Ki-67 labeling index, and tumor invasion is strongly recommended on individual case basis to identify clinically aggressive adenomas. In addition, the classification offers the treating clinical team information on tumor prognosis by identifying specific variants of adenomas associated with an elevated risk for recurrence. Changes in the classification of non-neuroendocrine tumors are also proposed, in particular those tumors arising in the posterior pituitary including pituicytoma, granular cell tumor of the posterior pituitary, and spindle cell oncocytoma. These changes endorse those previously published in the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors. Other tumors arising in the sellar region are also reviewed in detail including craniopharyngiomas, mesenchymal and stromal tumors, germ cell tumors, and hematopoietic tumors. It is hoped that the 2017 WHO classification of pituitary tumors will establish more biologically and clinically uniform groups of tumors, make it possible for practicing pathologists to better diagnose these tumors, and contribute to our understanding of clinical outcomes for patients harboring pituitary tumors.

Remarkable Shrinkage of a Growth Hormone (GH)-secreting Macroadenoma Induced by Somatostatin Analogue Administration: A Case Report and Literature Review

Acromegaly is caused by excessive growth hormone secretion, usually from pituitary adenomas. Somoatostatin analogues are widely used as primary or adjunctive therapy in the management of acromegaly. In this report, we present a case with remarkable shrinkage of a tumor after relatively short-term octreotide long-acting release (LAR) administration. During the 30-month follow-up after starting octreotide LAR, there was no recurrence of acromegaly with remarkable shrinkage of the tumor on pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. A literature review of the predictors for tumor shrinkage after the administration of somatostatin analogues in patients with acromegaly is also discussed in relation to this case.

Overview of the 2017 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors

This review focuses on discussing the main changes on the upcoming fourth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Pituitary Gland emphasizing histopathological and molecular genetics aspects of pituitary neuroendocrine (i.e., pituitary adenomas) and some of the non-neuroendocrine tumors involving the pituitary gland. Instead of a formal review, we introduced the highlights of the new WHO classification by answering select questions relevant to practising pathologists. The revised classification of pituitary adenomas, in addition to hormone immunohistochemistry, recognizes the role of other immunohistochemical markers including but not limited to pituitary transcription factors. Recognizing this novel approach, the fourth edition of the WHO classification has abandoned the concept of "a hormone-producing pituitary adenoma" and adopted a pituitary adenohypophyseal cell lineage designation of the adenomas with subsequent categorization of histological variants according to hormone content and specific histological and immunohistochemical features. This new classification does not require a routine ultrastructural examination of these tumors. The new definition of the Null cell adenoma requires the demonstration of immunonegativity for pituitary transcription factors and adenohypophyseal hormones Moreover, the term of atypical pituitary adenoma is no longer recommended. In addition to the accurate tumor subtyping, assessment of the tumor proliferative potential by mitotic count and Ki-67 index, and other clinical parameters such as tumor invasion, is strongly recommended in individual cases for consideration of clinically aggressive adenomas. This classification also recognizes some subtypes of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors as "high-risk pituitary adenomas" due to the clinical aggressive behavior; these include the sparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma, the lactotroph adenoma in men, the Crooke's cell adenoma, the silent corticotroph adenoma, and the newly introduced plurihormonal Pit-1-positive adenoma (previously known as silent subtype III pituitary adenoma). An additional novel aspect of the new WHO classification was also the definition of the spectrum of thyroid transcription factor-1 expressing pituitary tumors of the posterior lobe as representing a morphological spectrum of a single nosological entity. These tumors include the pituicytoma, the spindle cell oncocytoma, the granular cell tumor of the neurohypophysis, and the sellar ependymoma.

Updates in outcomes of stereotactic radiation therapy in acromegaly

Purpose Treatment of acromegaly has undergone important progress in the last 20 years mainly due to the development of new medical options and advances in surgical techniques. Pituitary surgery is usually first-line therapy, and medical treatment is indicated for persistent disease, while radiation (RT) is often used as third-line therapy. The benefits of RT (tumor volume control and decreased hormonal secretion) are hampered by the long latency of the effect and the high risk of adverse effects. Stereotactic RT methods have been developed with the aim to provide more precise targeting of the tumor with better control of the radiation dose received by the adjacent brain structures. The purpose of this review is to present the updates in the efficacy and safety of pituitary RT in acromegalic patients, with an emphasis on the new stereotactic radiation techniques. Methods A systematic review was performed using PubMed and articles/abstracts and reviews detailing RT in acromegaly from 2000 to 2016 were included. Results Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic RT (FSRT) for patients with persistent active acromegaly after surgery and/or during medical therapy provide comparable high rates of tumor control, i.e. stable or decrease in size of the tumor in 93-100% of patients at 5-10 years and endocrinological remission in 40-60% of patients at 5 years. Hypofractionated RT is an optimal option for tumors located near the optic structures, due to its lower toxicity for the optic nerves compared to single-dose radiosurgery. The rate of new hypopituitarism varies from 10 to 50% at 5 years and increases with the duration of follow-up. The risk for other radiation-induced complications is usually low (0-5% for new visual deficits, cranial nerves damage or brain radionecrosis and 0-1% for secondary brain tumors) and risk of stroke may be higher in FSRT. Conclusion Although the use of radiotherapy in patients with acromegaly has decreased with advances in medical treatments, it remains an effective treatment option after unsuccessful surgery and/or resistance or unavailability of medical therapy. Long-term studies evaluating secondary morbidity and mortality rate after the new stereotactic techniques are needed, in order to evaluate their potential brain-sparing effect.

Management of aggressive growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas

Aggressive GH-secreting pituitary adenomas (GHPAs) represent an important clinical problem in patients with acromegaly. Surgical therapy, although often the mainstay of treatment for GHPAs, is less effective in aggressive GHPAs due to their invasive and destructive growth patterns, and their proclivity for infrasellar invasion. Medical therapies for GHPAs, including somatostatin analogues and GH receptor antagonists, are becoming increasingly important adjuncts to surgical intervention. Stereotactic radiosurgery serves as an important fallback therapy for tumors that cannot be cured with surgery and medications. Data suggests that patients with aggressive and refractory GHPAs are best treated at dedicated tertiary pituitary centers with multidisciplinary teams of neuroendocrinologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists and other specialists who routinely provide advanced care to GHPA patients. Future research will help clarify the defining features of "aggressive" and "atypical" PAs, likely based on tumor behavior, preoperative imaging characteristics, histopathological characteristics, and molecular markers.

STEREOTACTIC RADIATION THERAPY IN PITUITARY ADENOMAS, IS IT BETTER THAN CONVENTIONAL RADIATION THERAPY?

Pituitary radiotherapy (RT) has undergone important progress in the last decades due to the development of new stereotactic techniques which provide more precise tumour targeting with less overall radiation received by the adjacent brain structures. Pituitary surgery is usually first-line therapy in most patients with nonfunctioning (NFPA) and functioning adenomas (except for prolactinomas and large growth hormone (GH) secreting adenomas), while RT is used as second or third-line therapy. The benefits of RT (tumour volume control and, in functional tumours, decreased hormonal secretion) are hampered by the long latency of the effect and the potential side effects. This review presents the updates in the efficacy and safety of the new stereotactic radiation techniques in patients with NFPA, GH-, ACTH- or PRL-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Methods

A systematic review was performed using PubMed and articles/abstracts and reviews detailing RT in pituitary adenomas from 2000 to 2017 were included.

Results

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic RT (FSRT) provide high rates of tumour control i.e. stable or decrease in tumour size, in all types of pituitary adenomas (median 92 - 98%) at 5 years. Endocrinological remission is however significantly lower: 44-52% in acromegaly, 54-64% in Cushing's disease and around 30% in prolactinomas at 5 years. The rate of new hypopituitarism varies from 10% to 50% at 5 years in all tumour types and as expected increases with the duration of follow-up (FU). The risk for other radiation-induced complications is usually low (0-5% for new visual deficits, cranial nerves damage or brain radionecrosis and extremely low for secondary brain tumours), however longer FU is needed to determine rates of secondary tumours. Notably, in acromegaly, there may be a higher risk for stroke with FSRT.

Conclusion

Stereotactic radiotherapy can be an effective treatment option for patients with persistent or recurrent pituitary adenomas after unsuccessful surgery (especially if residual tumour is enlarging) and/or resistance or unavailability of medical therapy. Comparison with conventional radiation therapy (CRT) is rather difficult, due to the substantial heterogeneity of the studies. In order to evaluate the potential brain-sparing effect of the new stereotactic techniques, suggested by the current data, long-term studies evaluating secondary morbidity and mortality are needed.

Histological features of pituitary adenomas and sellar region masses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Most pituitary region masses are pituitary adenomas; however, when other sellar region masses are encountered by clinicians or pathologists, the differential diagnosis can be broad. This review will focus on updates for pituitary adenomas, as well as briefly discuss some of these other entities: Rathke cleft cyst, hypophysitis, craniopharyngioma, pituicytoma, and spindle cell oncocytoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of new immunohistochemical (IHC) tools for assessing transcription factors, pituitary transcription factor-1, steroidogenic factor-1, and the not-yet-widely available Tpit IHC have provided insights into origin particularly of clinically silent and even hormone-negative pituitary adenomas. IHC for keratins coupled with use of E-cadherin IHC can serve to easily identify sparsely granulated growth hormone adenomas that behave more aggressively and may not respond well to some therapies. Thyroid transcription factor-1 IHC has shown common embryological lineage of pituicytoma, spindle cell oncocytoma, and granular cell tumor of neurohypophysis.

SUMMARY

IHC supplements classification of pituitary adenoma subtypes for clinicians and can confirm diagnosis of nonpituitary adenoma sellar region masses.

Advances in Gamma Knife radiosurgery for pituitary tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For the residual/recurrent pituitary adenomas, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plays an important role in long-term tumor control and, for secretory adenomas, endocrine remission. The purpose of this review is to address the advances in SRS technique and detail the latest treatment strategies for various types of pituitary adenomas with a focus on recently published literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

From recent publications, SRS may be considered as an upfront treatment in patients with an adenoma that resides largely in the cavernous sinus and for whom resection is unlikely to produce substantial reduction in the overall tumor volume. Early treatment (<6 months after prior resection) with SRS appears to decrease the rate of tumor progression of subtotally resected nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. Some types of adenomas may appear more aggressive with a high recurrence rate, for example, silent corticotroph pituitary adenomas, or sparsely granulated somatotroph-cell adenomas, may be indicated for a high-radiation dose. Finally, whole-sellar radiation and fractionated SRS are the alternative strategies, and may be indicated for challenging cases.

SUMMARY

The role of SRS for the pituitary adenoma is well established, and the treatment strategy is increasingly individualized based upon tumor histology, location, and volume. Hypopituitarism is the most complicated and can occur even years after SRS.

Advancing Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas through Targeted Molecular Therapies: The Acromegaly and Cushing Disease Paradigms

The current treatment of pituitary adenomas requires a balance of conservative management, surgical resection, and in select tumor types, molecular therapy. Acromegaly treatment is an evolving field where our understanding of molecular targets and drug therapies has improved treatment options for patients with excess growth hormone levels. We highlight the use of molecular therapies in this disease process and advances in this field, which may represent a paradigm shift for the future of pituitary adenoma treatment.

Long-term results of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma: evaluation by the Cortina consensus

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with CyberKnife for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA). Fifty-two patients with GH-PA were treated with hypofractionated SRT between September 2001 and October 2012. Eight patients had clinically silent GH-PA and 44 were symptomatic. Only 1 patient was inoperable. The other patients had recurrent or postoperative residual tumors on MRI. All patients had received pharmacotherapy prior to SRT with a somatostatin analog, dopamine agonist, and/or GH receptor antagonist. The marginal doses were 17.4-26.8 Gy for the 3-fraction schedule and 20.0-32.0 Gy for the 5-fraction schedule. Endocrinological remission was assessed by the Cortina consensus criteria 2010 (random GH <1 ng/ml or nadir GH after an oral glucose tolerance test <0.4 ng/ml and normalization of age- and sex-adjusted insulin-like growth factor-1). The median follow-up period was 60 months (range 27-137). The 5-year overall survival, local control, and disease-free survival rates were 100, 100, and 96 %, respectively. Nine patients (5 clinically silent and 4 symptomatic patients) satisfied the Cortina criteria without receiving further pharmacotherapy, whereas the remaining 43 patients did not. No post-SRT grade 2 or higher visual disorder occurred. Symptomatic post-SRT hypopituitarism was observed in 1 patient. CyberKnife hypofractionated SRT is safe and effective when judged by imaging findings for GH-PA. However, it may be difficult to satisfy the Cortina consensus criteria in most symptomatic patients with SRT alone. Further investigations of optimal treatments are warranted.

60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: Acromegaly

Acromegaly (ACM) is a chronic, progressive disorder caused by the persistent hypersecretion of GH, in the vast majority of cases secreted by a pituitary adenoma. The consequent increase in IGF1 (a GH-induced liver protein) is responsible for most clinical features and for the systemic complications associated with increased mortality. The clinical diagnosis, based on symptoms related to GH excess or the presence of a pituitary mass, is often delayed many years because of the slow progression of the disease. Initial testing relies on measuring the serum IGF1 concentration. The oral glucose tolerance test with concomitant GH measurement is the gold-standard diagnostic test. The therapeutic options for ACM are surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy (RT). The outcome of surgery is very good for microadenomas (80-90% cure rate), but at least half of the macroadenomas (most frequently encountered in ACM patients) are not cured surgically. Somatostatin analogs are mainly indicated after surgical failure. Currently their routine use as primary therapy is not recommended. Dopamine agonists are useful in a minority of cases. Pegvisomant is indicated for patients refractory to surgery and other medical treatments. RT is employed sparingly, in cases of persistent disease activity despite other treatments, due to its long-term side effects. With complex, combined treatment, at least three-quarters of the cases are controlled according to current criteria. With proper control of the disease, the specific complications are partially improved and the mortality rate is close to that of the background population.