1
|
Kim SY, Soh H, Jung JH, Cho EH, Kim H, Ju JM, Sheen JH, Lee SJ, Oh SJ, Lee SJ, Chung J, Ryu JS. Direct and Indirect Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Imaging with PET/MRI in a Tumor Xenograft Model. Radiology 2024; 310:e231406. [PMID: 38411517 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are a promising cancer therapy; however, reliable and repeatable methods for tracking and monitoring CAR T cells in vivo remain underexplored. Purpose To investigate direct and indirect imaging strategies for tracking the biodistribution of CAR T cells and monitoring their therapeutic effect in target tumors. Materials and Methods CAR T cells co-expressing a tumor-targeting gene (anti-CD19 CAR) and a human somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (hSSTr2) reporter gene were generated from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. After direct labeling with zirconium 89 (89Zr)-p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine (DFO), CAR T cells were intravenously injected into immunodeficient mice with a CD19-positive and CD19-negative human tumor xenograft on the left and right flank, respectively. PET/MRI was used for direct in vivo imaging of 89Zr-DFO-labeled CAR T cells on days 0, 1, 3, and 7 and for indirect cell imaging with the radiolabeled somatostatin receptor-targeted ligand gallium 68 (68Ga)-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide (DOTATOC) on days 6, 9, and 13. On day 13, mice were euthanized, and tissues and tumors were excised. Results The 89Zr-DFO-labeled CAR T cells were observed on PET/MRI scans in the liver and lungs of mice (n = 4) at all time points assessed. However, they were not visualized in CD19-positive or CD19-negative tumors, even on day 7. Serial 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI showed CAR T cell accumulation in CD19-positive tumors but not in CD19-negative tumors from days 6 to 13. Notably, 68Ga-DOTATOC accumulation in CD19-positive tumors was highest on day 9 (mean percentage injected dose [%ID], 3.7% ± 1.0 [SD]) and decreased on day 13 (mean %ID, 2.6% ± 0.7) in parallel with a decrease in tumor volume (day 9: mean, 195 mm3 ± 27; day 13: mean, 127 mm3 ± 43) in the group with tumor growth inhibition. Enhanced immunohistochemistry staining of cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) and hSSTr2 was also observed in excised CD19-positive tumor tissues. Conclusion Direct and indirect cell imaging with PET/MRI enabled in vivo tracking and monitoring of CAR T cells in an animal model. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bulte in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seog-Young Kim
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Hyunsu Soh
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Jin Hwa Jung
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Eun Hye Cho
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Hyori Kim
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Ji-Min Ju
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Joong Hyuk Sheen
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Sang Ju Lee
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Seung Jun Oh
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Sang-Jin Lee
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Junho Chung
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| | - Jin-Sook Ryu
- From the Convergence Medicine Research Center (S.Y.K., H.S., J.H.J., H.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (E.H.C., Sang Ju Lee, S.J.O., J.S.R.), Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea; Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (J.M.J., J.H.S., Sang-Jin Lee); and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kosmala A, Seifert S, Schneid S, Dreher N, Higuchi T, Weich A, Serfling SE, Hartrampf PE, Einsele H, Buck AK, Topp MS, Duell J, Werner RA. Lymphoma-Sink Effect in Marginal Zone Lymphoma Based on CXCR4-Targeted Molecular Imaging. Mol Imaging Biol 2023:10.1007/s11307-023-01830-9. [PMID: 37286923 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-023-01830-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent studies investigating a tumor-sink effect in solid tumors reported on decreasing uptake in normal organs in patients with higher tumor burden. This phenomenon, however, has not been evaluated yet for theranostic radiotracers applied to hematological neoplasms. As such, we aimed to determine a potential "lymphoma-sink effect" in patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) imaged with C-X-C motif chemokine receptor (CXCR) 4-directed PET/CTs. PROCEDURES We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients with MZL who underwent CXCR4-directed [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT. Normal unaffected organ uptake (heart, liver, spleen, bone marrow, kidneys) was quantified using volumes of interests (VOIs) and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) were derived. MZL manifestations were also segmented to determine the maximum and peak standardized uptake values SUV (SUVmax/peak) and volumetric parameters, including lymphoma volume (LV), and fractional lymphoma activity (FLA, defined as LV*SUVmean of lymphoma burden). This approach resulted in 666 VOIs to capture the entire MZL manifestation load. We used Spearman's rank correlations to determine associations between organ uptake and CXCR4-expressing lymphoma lesions. RESULTS We recorded the following median SUVmean in normal organs: heart, 1.82 (range, 0.78-4.11); liver, 1.35 (range, 0.72-2.99); bone marrow, 2.36 (range, 1.12-4.83); kidneys, 3.04 (range, 2.01-6.37); spleen, 5.79 (range, 2.07-10.5). No relevant associations between organ radiotracer uptake and MZL manifestation were observed, neither for SUVmax (ρ ≤ 0.21, P ≥ 0.07), SUVpeak (ρ ≤ 0.20, P ≥ 0.09), LV (ρ ≤ 0.13, P ≥ 0.27), nor FLA (ρ ≤ 0.15, P ≥ 0.33). CONCLUSIONS Investigating a lymphoma-sink effect in patients with hematological neoplasms, we observed no relevant associations between lymphoma burden and uptake in normal organs. Those observations may have therapeutic implications, e.g., for "cold" SDF1-pathway disrupting or "hot," CXCR4-directed radiolabeled drugs, as with higher lymphoma load, normal organ uptake seems to remain stable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander Kosmala
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Simone Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Simone Schneid
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Niklas Dreher
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Takahiro Higuchi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Alexander Weich
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian E Serfling
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Philipp E Hartrampf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andreas K Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Max S Topp
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Duell
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf A Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Strasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peterson AB, Wang C, Wong KK, Frey KA, Muzik O, Schipper MJ, Dewaraja YK. 177Lu-DOTATATE Theranostics: Predicting Renal Dosimetry From Pretherapy 68Ga-DOTATATE PET and Clinical Biomarkers. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:393-399. [PMID: 37010563 PMCID: PMC10353839 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pretreatment predictions of absorbed doses can be especially valuable for patient selection and dosimetry-guided individualization of radiopharmaceutical therapy. Our goal was to build regression models using pretherapy 68Ga-DOTATATE PET uptake data and other baseline clinical factors/biomarkers to predict renal absorbed dose delivered by 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (177Lu-PRRT) for neuroendocrine tumors. We explore the combination of biomarkers and 68Ga PET uptake metrics, hypothesizing that they will improve predictive power over univariable regression. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pretherapy 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CTs were analyzed for 25 patients (50 kidneys) who also underwent quantitative 177Lu SPECT/CT imaging at approximately 4, 24, 96, and 168 hours after cycle 1 of 177Lu-PRRT. Kidneys were contoured on the CT of the PET/CT and SPECT/CT using validated deep learning-based tools. Dosimetry was performed by coupling the multi-time point SPECT/CT images with an in-house Monte Carlo code. Pretherapy renal PET SUV metrics, activity concentration per injected activity (Bq/mL/MBq), and other baseline clinical factors/biomarkers were investigated as predictors of the 177Lu SPECT/CT-derived mean absorbed dose per injected activity to the kidneys using univariable and bivariable models. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) was used to estimate model performance using root mean squared error and absolute percent error in predicted renal absorbed dose including mean absolute percent error (MAPE) and associated standard deviation (SD). RESULTS The median therapy-delivered renal dose was 0.5 Gy/GBq (range, 0.2-1.0 Gy/GBq). In LOOCV of univariable models, PET uptake (Bq/mL/MBq) performs best with MAPE of 18.0% (SD = 13.3%), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) gives an MAPE of 28.5% (SD = 19.2%). Bivariable regression with both PET uptake and eGFR gives LOOCV MAPE of 17.3% (SD = 11.8%), indicating minimal improvement over univariable models. CONCLUSIONS Pretherapy 68Ga-DOTATATE PET renal uptake can be used to predict post-177Lu-PRRT SPECT-derived mean absorbed dose to the kidneys with accuracy within 18%, on average. Compared with PET uptake alone, including eGFR in the same model to account for patient-specific kinetics did not improve predictive power. Following further validation of these preliminary findings in an independent cohort, predictions using renal PET uptake can be used in the clinic for patient selection and individualization of treatment before initiating the first cycle of PRRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery B. Peterson
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit
| | - Chang Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Ka Kit Wong
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Kirk A. Frey
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Otto Muzik
- Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kosmala A, Serfling SE, Dreher N, Lindner T, Schirbel A, Lapa C, Higuchi T, Buck AK, Weich A, Werner RA. Associations between Normal Organs and Tumor Burden in Patients Imaged with Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor-Directed Positron Emission Tomography. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112609. [PMID: 35681588 PMCID: PMC9179441 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Several radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein targeted inhibitors (FAPI) have been developed for molecular imaging and therapy. A potential correlation of radiotracer uptake in normal organs and extent of tumor burden may have consequences for a theranostic approach using ligands structurally associated with [68Ga]Ga-FAPI, as one may anticipate decreased doses to normal organs in patients with extensive tumor load. In the present proof-of-concept study investigating patients with solid tumors, we aimed to quantitatively determine the normal organ biodistribution of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, depending on the extent of tumor. Except for a trend towards significance in the myocardium, we did not observe any relevant associations between PET-based tumor burden and normal organs. Those preliminary findings may trigger future studies to determine possible implications for theranostic approaches and FAP-directed drugs, as one may expect an unchanged dose for normal organs even in patients with higher tumor load. Abstract (1) Background: We aimed to quantitatively investigate [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 uptake in normal organs and to assess a relationship with the extent of FAPI-avid tumor burden. (2) Methods: In this single-center retrospective analysis, thirty-four patients with solid cancers underwent a total of 40 [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans. Mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) for normal organs were established by placing volumes of interest (VOIs) in the heart, liver, spleen, pancreas, kidneys, and bone marrow. Total tumor burden was determined by manual segmentation of tumor lesions with increased uptake. For tumor burden, quantitative assessment included maximum SUV (SUVmax), tumor volume (TV), and fractional tumor activity (FTA = TV × SUVmean). Associations between uptake in normal organs and tumor burden were investigated by applying Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. (3) Results: Median SUVmean values were 2.15 in the pancreas (range, 1.05–9.91), 1.42 in the right (range, 0.57–3.06) and 1.41 in the left kidney (range, 0.73–2.97), 1.2 in the heart (range, 0.46–2.59), 0.86 in the spleen (range, 0.55–1.58), 0.65 in the liver (range, 0.31–2.11), and 0.57 in the bone marrow (range, 0.26–0.94). We observed a trend towards significance for uptake in the myocardium and tumor-derived SUVmax (ρ = 0.29, p = 0.07) and TV (ρ = −0.30, p = 0.06). No significant correlation was achieved for any of the other organs: SUVmax (ρ ≤ 0.1, p ≥ 0.42), TV (ρ ≤ 0.11, p ≥ 0.43), and FTA (ρ ≤ 0.14, p ≥ 0.38). In a sub-analysis exclusively investigating patients with high tumor burden, significant correlations of myocardial uptake with tumor SUVmax (ρ = 0.44; p = 0.03) and tumor-derived FTA with liver uptake (ρ = 0.47; p = 0.02) were recorded. (4) Conclusions: In this proof-of-concept study, quantification of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET showed no significant correlation between normal organs and tumor burden, except for a trend in the myocardium. Those preliminary findings may trigger future studies to determine possible implications for treatment with radioactive FAP-targeted drugs, as higher tumor load or uptake may not lead to decreased doses in the majority of normal organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander Kosmala
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (S.E.S.); (N.D.); (T.L.); (A.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
- Correspondence: (A.K.); (C.L.); Tel.: +49-821-400-3050 (C.L.)
| | - Sebastian E. Serfling
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (S.E.S.); (N.D.); (T.L.); (A.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Niklas Dreher
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (S.E.S.); (N.D.); (T.L.); (A.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Thomas Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (S.E.S.); (N.D.); (T.L.); (A.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Andreas Schirbel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (S.E.S.); (N.D.); (T.L.); (A.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
- Correspondence: (A.K.); (C.L.); Tel.: +49-821-400-3050 (C.L.)
| | - Takahiro Higuchi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (S.E.S.); (N.D.); (T.L.); (A.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
| | - Andreas K. Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (S.E.S.); (N.D.); (T.L.); (A.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
| | - Alexander Weich
- Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany;
| | - Rudolf A. Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (S.E.S.); (N.D.); (T.L.); (A.S.); (T.H.); (A.K.B.); (R.A.W.)
- The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Serfling SE, Lapa C, Dreher N, Hartrampf PE, Rowe SP, Higuchi T, Schirbel A, Weich A, Hahner S, Fassnacht M, Buck AK, Werner RA. Impact of Tumor Burden on Normal Organ Distribution in Patients Imaged with CXCR4-Targeted [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT. Mol Imaging Biol 2022; 24:659-665. [PMID: 35312939 PMCID: PMC9296404 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01717-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
CXCR4-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been used as a diagnostic tool in patients with solid tumors. We aimed to determine a potential correlation between tumor burden and radiotracer accumulation in normal organs.
Methods
Ninety patients with histologically proven solid cancers underwent CXCR4-targeted [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were placed in normal organs (heart, liver, spleen, bone marrow, and kidneys) and tumor lesions. Mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) for normal organs were determined. For CXCR4-positive tumor burden, maximum SUV (SUVmax), tumor volume (TV), and fractional tumor activity (FTA, defined as SUVmean x TV), were calculated. We used a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) to derive correlative indices between normal organ uptake and tumor burden.
Results
Median SUVmean in unaffected organs was 5.2 for the spleen (range, 2.44 – 10.55), 3.27 for the kidneys (range, 1.52 – 17.4), followed by bone marrow (1.76, range, 0.84 – 3.98), heart (1.66, range, 0.88 – 2.89), and liver (1.28, range, 0.73 – 2.45). No significant correlation between SUVmax in tumor lesions (ρ ≤ 0.189, P ≥ 0.07), TV (ρ ≥ -0.204, P ≥ 0.06) or FTA (ρ ≥ -0.142, P ≥ 0.18) with the investigated organs was found.
Conclusions
In patients with solid tumors imaged with [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT, no relevant tumor sink effect was noted. This observation may be of relevance for therapies with radioactive and non-radioactive CXCR4-directed drugs, as with increasing tumor burden, the dose to normal organs may remain unchanged.
Collapse
|
6
|
The Dependence of Renal 68Ga[Ga]-DOTATOC Uptake on Kidney Function and Its Relevance for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu[Lu]-DOTATOC. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11071216. [PMID: 34359299 PMCID: PMC8307408 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In addition to its SSTR-specific binding in tumors and healthy tissues, DOTATOC analogues accumulate in kidney parenchyma. Renal tracer uptake might be a surrogate of kidney function or dysfunction. This study aimed to evaluate if kidney function can be estimated from 68Ga[Ga]-DOTATOC uptake in PET/CT and its impact on the nephrotoxicity of 177Lu[Lu]-DOTATOC PRRT. Methods: Two cohorts of patients (A: 128 diagnostic patients; B: 32 PRRT patients) were evaluated retrospectively. SUV values of the kidneys, physiologically SSTR-expressing organs and in background compartments were assessed. Kidney function was calculated as eGFR by CKD-EPI creatinine equation. Pearson’s correlation coefficients and treatment-induced changes of uptake and kidney function were assessed and compared. Results: Kidney function and renal DOTATOC uptake showed a significant inverse correlation (R2 = 0.037; p = 0.029). Evaluated models of PET/CT measurements were not able to predict kidney function sufficiently. The uptake of other organs did not depend on eGFR. While the renal uptake increased after PRRT (p < 0.001), the kidney function did not change significantly (p = 0.382). Neither low pre-therapeutic eGFR nor high pre-therapeutic kidney uptake were risk factors of PRRT-induced deterioration in kidney function. Conclusion: The relevance of kidney function for renal 68Ga[Ga]-DOTATOC uptake is limited. The nephrotoxicity of 177Lu[Lu]-DOTATOC PRRT might be low and cannot be reliably predicted by pre-therapeutic measurements.
Collapse
|
7
|
Semiquantitative Parameters in PSMA-Targeted PET Imaging with [ 18F]DCFPyL: Impact of Tumor Burden on Normal Organ Uptake. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 22:190-197. [PMID: 31140110 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01375-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to quantitatively investigate the biodistribution of [18F]DCFPyL in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and to determine whether uptake in normal organs correlates with an increase in tumor burden. PROCEDURES Fifty patients who had been imaged with [18F]DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) were retrospectively included in this study. Forty of 50 (80 %) demonstrated radiotracer uptake on [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT compatible with sites of PCa. Volumes of interests (VOIs) were set on normal organs (lacrimal glands, parotid glands, submandibular glands, liver, spleen, and kidneys) and on tumor lesions. Mean standardized uptake values corrected to lean body mass (SULmean) and mean standardized uptake values corrected to body weight (SUVmean) for normal organs were assessed. For the entire tumor burden, SULmean/max, SUVmean, tumor volume (TV), and the total activity in the VOI were obtained using tumor segmentation. A Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to investigate correlations between normal organ uptake and tumor burden. RESULTS There was no significant correlation between TV with the vast majority of the investigated organs (lacrimal glands, parotid glands, submandibular glands, spleen, and liver). Only the kidney showed significant correlation: With an isocontour threshold at 50 %, left kidney uptake parameters correlated significantly with TV (SUVmean, ρ = - 0.214 and SULmean, ρ = - 0.176, p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Only a minimal sink effect with high tumor burden in patients imaged with [18F]DCFPyL was observed. Other factors, such as a high intra-patient variability of normal organ uptake, may be a much more important consideration for personalized dosimetry with PSMA-targeted therapeutic agents structurally related to [18F]DCFPyL than the tumor burden.
Collapse
|
8
|
Werner RA, Derlin T, Rowe SP, Bundschuh L, Sheikh GT, Pomper MG, Schulz S, Higuchi T, Buck AK, Bengel FM, Bundschuh RA, Lapa C. High Interobserver Agreement for the Standardized Reporting System SSTR-RADS 1.0 on Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2020; 62:514-520. [PMID: 32859702 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.245464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, a standardized framework system for interpreting somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET/CT, termed the SSTR reporting and data system (RADS) 1.0, was introduced, providing reliable standards and criteria for SSTR-targeted imaging. We determined the interobserver reliability of SSTR-RADS for interpretation of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scans in a multicentric, randomized setting. Methods: A set of 51 randomized 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scans was independently assessed by 4 masked readers with different levels of experience (2 experienced readers and 2 inexperienced readers) trained on the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria (based on a 5-point scale from 1 [definitively benign] to 5 [high certainty that neuroendocrine neoplasia is present]). For each scan, SSTR-RADS scores were assigned to a maximum of 5 target lesions (TLs). An overall scan impression based on SSTR-RADS was indicated, and interobserver agreement rates on a TL-based, on an organ-based, and on an overall SSTR-RADS score-based level were computed. The readers were also asked to decide whether peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) should be considered on the basis of the assigned RADS scores. Results: Among the selected TLs, 153 were chosen by at least 2 readers (all 4 readers selected the same TLs in 58 of 153 [37.9%] instances). The interobserver agreement for SSTR-RADS scoring among identical TLs was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ 0.73 for 4, 3, and 2 identical TLs). For lymph node and liver lesions, excellent interobserver agreement rates were derived (ICC, 0.91 and 0.77, respectively). Moreover, the interobserver agreement for an overall scan impression based on SSTR-RADS was excellent (ICC, 0.88). The SSTR-RADS-based decision to use PRRT also demonstrated excellent agreement, with an ICC of 0.80. No significant differences between experienced and inexperienced readers for an overall scan impression and TL-based SSTR-RADS scoring were observed (P ≥ 0.18), thereby suggesting that SSTR-RADS seems to be readily applicable even for less experienced readers. Conclusion: SSTR-RADS-guided assessment demonstrated a high concordance rate, even among readers with different levels of experience, supporting the adoption of SSTR-RADS for trials, clinical routine, or outcome studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudolf A Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lena Bundschuh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gabriel T Sheikh
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Martin G Pomper
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sebastian Schulz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Takahiro Higuchi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; and.,Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Andreas K Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; and
| | - Frank M Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ralph A Bundschuh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Bonn, Germany
| | - Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Werner RA, Thackeray JT, Pomper MG, Bengel FM, Gorin MA, Derlin T, Rowe SP. Recent Updates on Molecular Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (MI-RADS) for Theranostic Radiotracers-Navigating Pitfalls of SSTR- and PSMA-Targeted PET/CT. J Clin Med 2019; 8:E1060. [PMID: 31331016 PMCID: PMC6678732 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8071060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The theranostic concept represents a paradigmatic example of personalized treatment. It is based on the use of radiolabeled compounds which can be applied for both diagnostic molecular imaging and subsequent treatment, using different radionuclides for labelling. Clinically relevant examples include somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted imaging and therapy for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET), as well as prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted imaging and therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer (PC). As such, both classes of radiotracers can be used to triage patients for theranostic endoradiotherapy using positron emission tomography (PET). While interpreting PSMA- or SSTR-targeted PET/computed tomography scans, the reader has to navigate certain pitfalls, including (I.) varying normal biodistribution between different PSMA- and SSTR-targeting PET radiotracers, (II.) varying radiotracer uptake in numerous kinds of both benign and malignant lesions, and (III.) resulting false-positive and false-negative findings. Thus, two novel reporting and data system (RADS) classifications for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET imaging (PSMA- and SSTR-RADS) have been recently introduced under the umbrella term molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS). Notably, PSMA- and SSTR-RADS are structured in a reciprocal fashion, i.e., if the reader is familiar with one system, the other system can readily be applied. Learning objectives of the present case-based review are as follows: (I.) the theranostic concept for the treatment of NET and PC will be briefly introduced, (II.) the most common pitfalls on PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET/CT will be identified, (III.) the novel framework system for theranostic radiotracers (MI-RADS) will be explained, applied to complex clinical cases and recent studies in the field will be highlighted. Finally, current treatment strategies based on MI-RADS will be proposed, which will demonstrate how such a generalizable framework system truly paves the way for clinically meaningful molecular imaging-guided treatment of either PC or NET. Thus, beyond an introduction of MI-RADS, the present review aims to provide an update of recently published studies which have further validated the concept of structured reporting systems in the field of theranostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudolf A Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - James T Thackeray
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Martin G Pomper
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Frank M Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael A Gorin
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|