Children's behavioral health system transformation: one state's context and strategies for sustained change

Investing in School Mental Health: Strategies to Wisely Spend Federal and State Funding

In the context of the current youth mental health crisis, it is prudent to reconsider how resources are allocated to facilitate the delivery of effective and comprehensive supports and services to children and adolescents. Schools are the main delivery sites for youth mental health services. Many districts have adopted comprehensive school mental health systems (CSMHS) to provide a multitiered approach comprising mental health promotion, prevention, and intervention to students via partnerships between school and community health and behavioral health providers. COVID-19 relief funding and other new federal and state investments in school mental health have led to expansions of school mental health programming in most states. An impending federal funding cliff necessitates an examination of how to wisely invest now to achieve the greatest positive future impact on youth mental health. To capitalize on opportunities to sustain effective school mental health and maximize return on investment, states may consider four strategies: leverage cross-sector partnerships to advance school mental health policies and funding, strengthen and expand Medicaid coverage of CSMHS, establish and enhance data systems, and create state technical assistance and professional development support for CSMHS implementation through local education agencies.

State Strategies for Enhancing Access and Quality in Systems of Care for Youth with Complex Behavioral Health Needs

The investigators conducted a qualitative study with state administrators and policymakers about the financing and policies that structure public systems of care for children with complex behavioral healthcare needs. The objective was to characterize diverse strategies states employed to enhance funding for, access to, and quality and effectiveness of home and community-based services (HCBS) for these youth. States report using a wide variety of creative solutions while navigating the unique needs and constraints of their political and economic environments. Findings can benefit public officials, researchers, and advocates by advancing knowledge-sharing of public policy-making and resourceful problem-solving.

Patterns and predictors of compliance with utilization management guidelines supporting a state policy to improve the quality of youth mental health services

Despite a need to improve community mental health services for youths, little is known about compliance with state policies created to improve the quality of services in these settings. This study examined rates, patterns, and predictors of compliance with utilization management guidelines developed by the state of Texas to support a public health policy based on empirical evidence of effective mental health services (i.e., an evidence-based policy). Compliance was defined as authorizing policy-recommended service packages, whereas policy "overrides" occurred when recommended service packages were not authorized. The study sample consisted of 688 youths from ethnically and economically diverse backgrounds. Clinics reported that forty-six percent of youths were not authorized the policy-recommended service package. Overrides were primarily based on level of intensity. Most often, authorized services were less intensive than those recommended by the state guidelines. Higher severity at intake across multiple indicators was associated with authorizing less intensive services than what the policy guidelines recommended. Future studies evaluating system-level efforts such as state mental health policies should pay close attention to levels of service intensity, and their relation to the needs of youth in community settings.