Altered expression of microRNAs in the response to ER stress

Identification of long non-coding RNA and circular RNA associated networks in cellular stress responses

Mammalian cells employ various adaptive responses to cope with multiple stresses to maintain homeostasis. Functional roles of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in response to cellular stresses have been proposed, and systematical investigations about the crosstalk among distinct types of RNAs are required. Here, we challenged HeLa cells with thapsigargin (TG) and glucose deprivation (GD) treatments to induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and metabolic stresses, respectively. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA)-depleted RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was then performed. Characterization of the RNA-seq data revealed a series of differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs) with parallel changes responsive to both stimuli. We further constructed the lncRNA/circRNA-mRNA co-expressing network, competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network in the lncRNA/circRNA-miRNA-mRNA axis, and lncRNA/circRNA-RNA binding protein (RBP) interactome map. These networks indicated the potential cis and/or trans regulatory roles of lncRNAs and circRNAs. Moreover, Gene Ontology analysis demonstrated that these identified ncRNAs were associated with several essential biological processes known to be related to cellular stress responses. In conclusion, we systematically established functional regulatory networks of lncRNA/circRNA-mRNA, lncRNA/circRNA-miRNA-mRNA and lncRNA/circRNA-RBP to perceive the potential interactions and biological processes during cellular stresses. These results provided insights in ncRNA regulatory networks of stress responses and the basis for further identification of pivotal factors involved in cellular stress responses.

Ascendancy of unfolded protein response over glioblastoma: estimating progression, prognosis and survival

Glioblastoma (GBM) is presented with a poor prognosis. The endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) has been implicated as a major contributor to disease progression and chemoresistance in GBM. Triggering ERS by chemical agents or genetic modulations is identified as some of the reasons for regulating gene expression and the pathogenesis of GBM. ERS initiates unfolded protein response (UPR), an integrated system useful in restoring homeostasis or inducing apoptosis. Modulation of UPR might have positive outcomes in GBM treatment as UPR inducers have been shown to alter cell survival and migration. In the current review, we have utilized GSE7806, a publicly available dataset from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), to evaluate the genes expressed during 6.5 hr and 18 hr, which can be comparable to the early and late-onset of the disease. Subsequently, we have elucidated the prognosis and survival information whilst the expression of these genes in the GBM was noted in previous studies. This is the first of its kind review summarizing the most recent gene information correlating UPR and GBM.

Comparing two approaches of miR-34a target identification, biotinylated-miRNA pulldown vs miRNA overexpression

microRNAs (miRNAs) are critical regulators of gene expression. For elucidating functional roles of miRNAs, it is critical to identify their direct targets. There are debates about whether pulldown of biotinylated miRNA mimics can be used to identify miRNA targets or not. Here we show that biotin-labelled miR-34a can be loaded to AGO2, and AGO2 immunoprecipitation can pulldown biotinylated miR-34a (Bio-miR pulldown). RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) of the Bio-miR pulldown RNAs efficiently identified miR-34a mRNA targets, which could be verified with luciferase assays. In contrast to the approach of Bio-miR pulldown, RNA-seq of miR-34a overexpression samples had limited value in identifying direct targets of miR-34a. It seems that pulldown of 3'-Biotin-tagged miRNA can identify bona fide microRNA targets at least for miR-34a.

Regulation of the unfolded protein response by noncoding RNA

Cells are exposed to various intrinsic and extrinsic stresses in both physiological and pathological conditions. To adapt to those conditions, cells have evolved various mechanisms to cope with the disturbances in protein demand, largely through the unfolded protein response (UPR) in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), but also through the integrated stress response (ISR). Both responses initiate downstream signaling to transcription factors that, in turn, trigger adaptive programs and/or in the case of prolonged stress, cell death mechanisms. Recently, noncoding RNAs, including microRNA and long noncoding RNA, have emerged as key players in the stress responses. These noncoding RNAs act as both regulators and effectors of the UPR and fine-tune the output of the stress signaling pathways. Although much is known about the UPR and the cross talk that exists between pathways, the contribution of small noncoding RNA has not been fully assessed. Herein we bring together and review the current known functions of noncoding RNA in regulating adaptive pathways in both physiological and pathophysiological conditions, illustrating how they operate within the known UPR functions and contribute to diverse cellular outcomes.

Induction of miR-3648 Upon ER Stress and Its Regulatory Role in Cell Proliferation

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles under multiple cellular conditions including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. We found that miR-3648, a human specific microRNA, was induced under ER stress. Moreover, Adenomatous polyposis coli 2 (APC2), a tumor suppressor and a negative regulator of Wnt signaling, was found to be the direct target of miR-3648. Levels of APC2 were downregulated when cells were under ER stress or after overexpressing miR-3648. Inhibition of miR-3648 by antagomir increased APC2 levels and decreased cell proliferation. Conversely, when miR-3648 was overexpressed, APC2 levels were decreased and the cell growth increased. Our data demonstrated that ER stress mediated induction of miR-3648 in human cells, which then downregulated APC2 to increase cell proliferation.

Differentially expressed microRNAs in the corpus cavernosum from a murine model with type 2 diabetes mellitus-associated erectile dysfunction

To better understand the molecular aetiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus-associated erectile dysfunction (T2DMED) and to provide candidates for further study of its diagnosis and treatment, this study was designed to investigate differentially expressed microRNAs (miRNAs) in the corpus cavernosum (CC) of mice with T2DMED using GeneChip array techniques (Affymetrix miRNA 4.0 Array) and to predict target genes and signalling pathways regulated by these miRNAs based on bioinformatic analysis using TargetScan, the DAIAN web platform and DAVID. In the initial screening, 21 miRNAs appeared distinctly expressed in the T2DMED group (fold change ≥3, p ≤ 0.01). Among them, the differential expression of miR-18a, miR-206, miR-122, and miR-133 were confirmed by qRT-PCR (p < 0.05 and FDR <5 %). According to bioinformatic analysis, the four miRNAs were speculated to play potential roles in the mechanisms of T2DMED via regulating 28 different genes and several pathways, including apoptosis, fibrosis, eNOS/cGMP/PKG, and vascular smooth muscle contraction processes, which mainly focused on influencing the functions of the endothelium and smooth muscle in the CC. IGF-1, as one of the target genes, was verified to decrease in the CCs of T2DMED animals via ELISA and was confirmed as the target of miR-18a or miR-206 via luciferase assay. Finally, these four miRNAs deserve further confirmation as biomarkers of T2DMED in larger studies. Additionally, miR-18a and/or miR-206 may provide new preventive/therapeutic targets for ED management by targeting IGF-1.