Italian Registry of Cardiac Computed Tomography

Medical Radiology: Current Progress

Recently, medical radiology has undergone significant improvements in patient management due to advancements in image acquisition by the last generation of machines, data processing, and the integration of artificial intelligence. In this way, cardiovascular imaging is one of the fastest-growing radiological subspecialties. In this study, a compressive review was focused on addressing how and why CT and MR have gained a I class indication in most cardiovascular diseases, and the potential impact of tissue and functional characterization by CT photon counting, quantitative MR mapping, and 4-D flow. Regarding rectal imaging, advances in cancer imaging using diffusion-weighted MRI sequences for identifying residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and [18F] FDG PET/MRI were provided for high-resolution anatomical and functional data in oncological patients. The results present a large overview of the approach to the imaging of diffuse and focal liver diseases by US elastography, contrast-enhanced US, quantitative MRI, and CT for patient risk stratification. Italy is currently riding the wave of these improvements. The development of large networks will be crucial to create high-quality databases for patient-centered precision medicine using artificial intelligence. Dedicated radiologists with specific training and a close relationship with the referring clinicians will be essential human factors.

Intravenous Contrast Material for Cardiac Computed Tomography: Results From the Open-label Multicenter, Multivendor Italian Registry of Contrast Material Use in Cardiac Computed Tomography

PURPOSE

The Italian Registry of Contrast Material use in Cardiac Computed Tomography (iRCM-CCT) is a multicenter, multivendor, observational study on the use of contrast media (CM) in patients undergoing cardiac computed tomography (CCT). The aim of iRCM-CCT is to assess image quality and safety profile of intravenous CM compounds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

iRCM-CCT enrolled 1842 consecutive patients undergoing CCT (≥50 per site) at 20 cluster sites with the indication of suspected coronary artery disease. Demographic characteristics, CCT, and CM protocols, clinical indications, safety markers, radiation dose reports, qualitative (ie, poor vascular enhancement) and quantitative (ie, HU attenuation values) image parameters were recorded. A centralized coordinating center collected and assessed all image parameters.

RESULTS

The cohort included 891 men and 951 women (age: 63±14 y, body mass index: 26±4 kg/m2) studied with ≥64 detector rows computed tomography scanners and different iodinated intravenous CM protocols and compounds (iodixanol, iopamidol, iohexol, iobitridol, iopromide, and iomeprol). The following vascular attenuation was reported: 504±147 HU in the aorta, 451±146 HU in the right coronary artery, 474±146 HU in the left main, 451±146 HU in the left anterior descending artery, and 441±149 HU in the circumflex artery. In 4% of cases the image quality was not satisfactory due to poor enhancement. The following adverse reactions to CM were recorded: 6 (0.3%) extravasations and 17 (0.9%) reactions (11 mild, 4 moderate, 2 severe).

CONCLUSIONS

In a multicenter registry on CM use during CCT the prevalence of CM-related adverse reactions was very low. The appropriate use of CM is a major determinant of image quality.

Quality and safety of coronary computed tomography angiography at academic and non-academic sites: insights from a large European registry (ESCR MR/CT Registry)

OBJECTIVES

To compare the use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) between academic and non-academic sites across Europe over the last decade.

METHODS

We analyzed a large multicenter registry (ESCR MR/CT Registry) of stable symptomatic patients who received CCTA 01/2010-01/2020 at 47 (22%) academic and 165 (78%) non-academic sites across 19 European countries. We compared image quality, radiation dose, contrast-media-related adverse events, patient characteristics, CCTA findings, and downstream testing between academic and non-academic sites.

RESULTS

Among 64,317 included patients (41% female; 60 ± 13 years), academic sites accounted for most cases in 2010-2014 (52%), while non-academic sites dominated in 2015-2020 (71%). Despite less contemporary technology, non-academic sites maintained low radiation doses (4.76 [2.46-6.85] mSv) with a 30% decline of high-dose scans ( > 7 mSv) over time. Academic and non-academic sites both reported diagnostic image quality in 98% of cases and low rate of scan-related adverse events (0.4%). Academic and non-academic sites examined similar patient populations (41% females both; age: 61 ± 14 vs. 60 ± 12 years; pretest probability for obstructive CAD: low 21% vs. 23%, intermediate 73% vs. 72%, high 6% both, CAD prevalence on CCTA: 40% vs. 41%). Nevertheless, non-academic sites referred more patients to non-invasive ischemia testing (6.5% vs. 4.2%) and invasive coronary angiography/surgery (8.5% vs. 5.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-academic and academic sites provide safe, high-quality CCTA across Europe, essential to successfully implement the recently updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. However, despite examining similar populations with comparable CAD prevalence, non-academic sites tend to refer more patients to downstream testing.

KEY POINTS

• Smaller non-academic providers increasingly use CCTA to rule out obstructive coronary artery disease. • Non-academic and academic sites provide comparably safe, high-quality CCTA across Europe. • Compared to academic sites, non-academic sites tend to refer more patients to downstream testing.

Challenges and opportunities to delivering cardiac imaging training: a national survey by the Italian college of cardiac radiology

BACKGROUND

Delivering consistent levels of training in cardiac imaging to radiologist is of pivotal importance because of the increasing clinical indications to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Our study sought to capture the heterogeneity of cardiac imaging training programs and to explore residents' vision on cardiac imaging both in the present and in the future.

METHODS

Two web-based surveys were created. The first was administered to all chief residents from the 42 University Hospitals within Italy, aiming to explore the local educational offer in cardiac imaging. The second was administered via social media to all Italian residents, including questions about their overall vision regarding cardiac imaging.

RESULTS

42/42 University Hospitals responded to the first survey and 235 residents to the second. There was at least a 64-slice CT scanner and a 1.5 T MR scanner per center. In the majority of sites, the weekly routine consisted of more than 10 CCTA and more than 5 CMR. Approximately, half of the centers used advanced CCTA and CMR techniques. The majority of the interviewed resident (94%) perceived cardiac imaging training to be moderately to very important, while requirement for external educational resources was advocated in 25% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

Our survey highlighted a significant awareness of radiology residents regarding the importance of cardiac imaging in their training curriculum. All centers met the technical requirements for cardiac imaging, limiting its use to basic applications in around half of cases. Implementation of an educational network might be the key for supporting the growth of this subspecialty field.

Noninvasive imaging of congenital cardiovascular defects

Advances in the treatment have drastically increased the survival rate of congenital heart disease (CHD) patients. Therefore, the prevalence of these patients is growing. Imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of this population as a key component of patient care at all stages, especially in those patients who survived into adulthood. Over the last decades, noninvasive imaging techniques, such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiac computed tomography (CCT), progressively increased their clinical relevance, reaching stronger levels of accuracy and indications in the clinical surveillance of CHD. The current review highlights the main technical aspects and clinical applications of CMR and CCT in the setting of congenital cardiovascular abnormalities, aiming to address a state-of-the-art guidance to every physician and cardiac imager not routinely involved in the field.

Radiological outpatient' visits to avoid inappropriate cardiac CT examinations: an 8-year experience report

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of the cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) prescriptions according to the "2010-Appropriate-Use-Criteria-for-Cardiac-Computed-Tomography-Angiography" (AUCCTA) and "Clinical-indication-for-CCTA" (CICCTA) among different specialities (Cardiologist [CA], General Practitioner [GP], Other Specialists [OS]) and prescribers' age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-centre, single-arm, cohort study. We prospectively enrolled 815 patients (October 2012-May 2019) who underwent a radiological outpatient visit, before CCTA examination. Prescriptions to the examination were categorized as follows: Appropriate (A), Uncertain (U) and Inappropriate (Ina), according to AUCCTA and I, II, III and Inv for CICCTA. This categorization was stratified according to CA, GP and OS and prescribers' age. CCTA was performed in patients whom indications belong to A/U categories.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and fifteen CCTA prescriptions were analysed. An yearly increase in prescriptions was found in the eight-year observational period (2012/2019 projection: 72 vs 223). Considering AUCCTA, indication A was 540/815 (66.3%), indication U was 113/815 (13.9%) and Ina accounted for 162/815 (19.9%; 128/162 [79.0%] indications with stress test listed as criterium of inappropriateness). Only U indications decreased over years (p = 0.003). Regarding CICCTA, 501/815 (61.5%) patients were categorized as I, 144/815 (17.7%) as II, 102/815 (12.5%) as III, 67/815 (8.2%) were INV and 1/815 (0.1%) were non-classified. Clinical referrals were CA in 495/786 (63.0%), GPs in 57/786 (7.3%) GP and OS in 234/786 (29.8%) [p < 0.01]. No statistically significant differences were observed in the appropriateness among different specialty physicians. Younger doctors have a lower chance to not meet A indication (OR 0.98 [CI 95% 0.96-0.99]; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the importance of a pre-radiological visit prior to CCTA, which prevented execution of 19.9% of inappropriate examinations. Age of prescribers had an impact on appropriateness, with younger doctors having a lower chance to not meet A indication.

Epicardial fat thickness is significantly increased and related to LDL cholesterol level in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE

Increased epicardial fat thickness (EFT) is accepted as a risk factfcardiovascular diseases in some studies. There are conflicting results about the relation between plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level and EFT. As well, the relation between EFT and familial hypercholesterolemia is not clearly documented in the literature. Our aim was to investigate EFT in familial hypercholesterolemia patients and to determine which parameters were related to EFT increase.

METHODS

A total of 150 subjects enrolled in our study. Subjects were separated into two groups: 75 hypercholesterolemia patients (16 men, mean age 52.8 ± 7.4 years) and 75 familial hypercholesterolemia patients (26 men, mean age 50.7 ± 9.2 years). Medical history assessments and complete physical examinations were done. Routine laboratory tests and echocardiographic measurements were performed.

RESULTS

Coronary artery disease frequency was significantly higher in the familial hypercholesterolemia group (p < 0.001). This group had significantly higher TC and LDL-C levels than the hypercholesterolemia group (p < 0.05 for all). EFT values were higher in the familial hypercholesterolemia group, and were significantly different than in the other group (p < 0.001). LDL-C was found to be independently related to EFT in the linear regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Epicardial fat thickness increased in the familial hypercholesterolemia patients. In addition, LDL-C levels were significantly crelated with increased EFT.

Computed tomography coronary angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease can demonstrate possible non-cardiovascular causes of non-acute retrosternal chest pain

OBJECTIVES

To assess the computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) accuracy for demonstrating possible non-cardiovascular causes of non-acute retrosternal chest pain in patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) and to correlate CTCA results with the patient management and relief from pain.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was approved by the ethical committee. Consecutive patients suffering non-acute chest pain who underwent CTCA and with not known CAD were enrolled and classified as having coronary diseases (CD) or extracardiac diseases (ECD). Association between age, sex, body mass index (BMI), cardiovascular risk factors, and type of chest pain with CD or ECD was estimated. Correlation between BMI classes and each risk factor was also calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients (60 males; age 62 ± 14 years [mean ± standard deviation]; mean BMI 27) were enrolled. Hypertension was found in 71/106 (67%); smoking was significantly more frequent among males (p = 0.003) and hypercholesterolemia among females (p = 0.017); hypertension and hypercholesterolemia significantly correlated with age, and hypertension also with BMI. Pain was atypical in 70/106 (66%) patients. The kind of pain did not correlate with disease or gender. CTCA showed possible causes of chest pain in 69/106 (65%) patients; 32/69 (47%) having only CD, 23/69 (33%) only ECD, and 14/69 (20%) both CD and ECD. Prevalence was: hiatal hernia 35/106 (33%); significant CAD 24/106 (23%); myocardial bridging 22/106 (21%). At follow-up of 94/106 (89%) patients, 71/94 (76%) were pain-free, 14/17 (82%) significant CAD had been treated, and only one patient with non-significant CAD was treated after CTCA.

CONCLUSION

CTCA suggested possible causes of non-acute pain in 65% of patients.

MAIN MESSAGES

• CTCA can either rule in or rule out possible causes of chest pain alternative to CAD. • Clinically relevant findings were detected in 65% of patients with non-acute chest pain. • Non-cardiovascular diseases potentially explained symptoms in 35% of patients.

ESTABLISHING DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY IN SAUDI ARABIA

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a commonly used diagnostic imaging tool for cardiovascular disease. Despite constant improvements to imaging technologies, the radiation dose to patients remains a concern when using this procedure. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are used as a trigger to identify and alert individual facilities that are using high doses during CT. This study aims to assess patient radiation dose and establish new national DRLs (NDRL) associated with CCTA in Saudi clinical practices. A structured booklet survey was designed for recording patient and scanning protocols during CCTA procedures. The data were collected retrospectively from the participating centres. NDRLs for CCTA were defined as the 75th and 25th of volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP). Specific DRLs based on two main ECG-gating modes were also proposed. Data sets related to 197 CCTAs with a mean weight of 77 kg were analysed in detail. The DRL values for CTDIvol and DLP for prospective gating mode and retrospective gating mode were 29 and 62 mGy and 393 and 1057 mGy cm, respectively. NDRLs for CCTA in Saudi Arabia are comparable or slightly lower than European DRLs due to the current use of dose-saving technology. There are major variations in patient doses during CCTA due to differences in CT scanners, scanning modes and departmental CCTA protocols.

High-quality low-dose cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) in pediatric patients using a 64-slice scanner

Background Cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) technology is rapidly advancing allowing to perform good quality examinations with a radiation dose as low as 1.2 mSv. However, latest generation scanners are not available in all centers. Purpose To estimate radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CCT using a standard 64-slice scanner. Material and Methods A total of 100 patients aged 6.9 ± 5.4 years (mean ± standard deviation) who underwent a 64-slice CCT scan using 80, 100, or 120 kVp, were retrospectively evaluated. Radiation effective dose was calculated on the basis of the dose length product. Two independent readers assessed the image quality through signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and a qualitative score (3 = very good, 2 = good, 1 = poor). Non-parametric tests were used. Results Fifty-five exams were not electrocardiographically (ECG) triggered, 20 had a prospective ECG triggering, and 25 had retrospective ECG triggering. The median effective dose was 1.3 mSv (interquartile range [IQR] = 0.8-2.7 mSv). Median SNR was 30.6 (IQR = 23.4-33.6) at 120 kVp, 29.4 (IQR = 23.7-34.8) at 100 kVp, and 24.7 (IQR = 19.4-34.3) at 80 kVp. Median CNR was 21.0 (IQR = 14.8-24.4), 19.1 (IQR = 15.6-23.9), and 25.3 (IQR = 19.4-33.4), respectively. Image quality was very good, good, and poor in 56, 39, and 5 patients, respectively. No significant differences were found among voltage groups for SNR ( P = 0.486), CNR ( P = 0.336), and subjective image quality ( P = 0.296). The inter-observer reproducibility was almost perfect (κ = 0.880). Conclusion High-quality pediatric CCT can be performed using a 64-slice scanner, with a radiation effective dose close to 2 mSv in about 50% of the cases.

Coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of intermediate risk asymptomatic individuals

Cardiovascular disease is still one of the main causes of death and an early identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the primary step in clinical management of patients with cardiovascular risk factor. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has shown high sensitivity in CAD detection and could be helpful as screening method. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of coronary artery disease detected by CCTA in asymptomatic patients with an intermediate risk of CAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively selected 185 asymptomatic patients with an intermediate Framingan Risk Score (mean age was 62.3 ± 12.4 years); all patients underwent CCTA, using 640-slice CT.

RESULTS

Atherosclerotic plaques were present in 112 out of 185 patients (60.5%); 56 subjects (30.2%) had mild stenosis, 49 (26.5%) moderate stenosis, only 3 patients (1.6%) had severe stenosis and in 4 cases (2.2%) the "blooming effect" did not allow for evaluation of the degree of stenosis. Among the positive cases, a high number of patients (44.6%) [50] showed coronary artery disease in one vessel, 33 patients (29.4%) in two vessels, 22 patients (19.6%) in three vessels and 5 patients in four vessels or more (4.5%). Patients with moderate stenosis were older, had hypertension in most cases, higher total cholesterol levels and more often were smokers. The radiation dose (mSv) dispensed to the patients was 3.7 ± 1.6 mSv.

CONCLUSION

High prevalence of coronary stenosis detected by low-dose CCTA in patients not properly classified by the traditional methods of risk stratification commonly used in clinical practice emphasizes the need to extend the risk stratification to other diagnostic tools with higher capability to detect CAD.

Advanced Non-invasive Imaging Techniques in Chronic Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies : Focus on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomographic

Cardiomyopathies (Cs) are a heterogeneous group of myocardial diseases with structural and/or functional abnormalities.The aetiology is due to genetic-family substrate in most cases, however, the correct and detailed analysis of morphofunctional abnormalities (severity and distribution of hypertrophy, ventricular dilatation, ventricular dysfunction) and tissue characteristics (myocardial fibrosis, myocardial infiltration) are a crucial element for a definite diagnosis.Among the different diagnostic imaging modalities applied in clinical practice (echocardiography, nuclear medicine), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as a non-invasive diagnostic tool having high ability to quantify systolic function and tissue abnormalities that represent the substrates of many Cs.The main added value of CMR is the ability to identify cardiomyopathies with respect to ischemic heart disease and, above all, to discriminate the major types of cardiomyopathies based on morpho-functional presentation patterns and the presence and location of myocardial fibrosis.Many CMR elements allow increasing diagnostic accuracy but CMR data should be integrated with an appropriate clinical and instrumental context.Computed Tomographic (CT) scan technology has showed a complementary role in patients having Cs and HF.In this chapter, the diagnostic, pathophysiologic and prognostic value of CMR and CT in heart failure due to the most common cardiomyopathies will be discussed.

Mandatory Reporting of Coronary Artery Calcifications Incidentally Noted on Chest Multi-Detector Computed Tomography: A Multicentre Experience

BACKGROUND

Coronary Artery Calcifications (CACs) are associated with coronary atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular (CV) events. In "non-cardiovascular" settings, CACs can be easily detected on chest Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT). Their evaluation may help to better stratify CV risk in the general population, especially for primary prevention.

AIMS

We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between CAC distribution and CV risk, determined by Framingham Risk Score (FRS), in a cohort of patients who underwent chest MDCT performed for several clinical indications.

METHOD

We retrospectively recruited 305 patients (194 men, 111 women; mean age 70.5 years) from 3 different Italian centres. Patients with coronary stent, pacemaker and/or CV devices were excluded from the study. Circumflex Artery (LCX), Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA), left Anterior Descending artery (LAD) and right coronary artery (RCA) were analysed.

RESULTS

From a total population of 305 patients, 119 (39%) had low FRS (<10%), 115 (38%) had intermediate FRS (10-20%), and 71 (23%) had high FRS (>20%). The study identified 842 CACs located in decreasing order as follows: RCA (34.5%), LAD (32.3%), LCX (28%) and LMCA (13%). Statistical two-step analysis subdivided patients into two clusters according to FRS (risk threshold = 12.38%): cluster I (mean 9.34) and cluster II (mean 15.09). A significant association between CAC distribution and cluster II was demonstrated. CACs were mostly detected in patients with intermediate FRS. All patients (100%) with the highest CV risk showed intermediate RCA and LMCA involvement.

CONCLUSION

Radiologists can note the distribution of CACs on a chest MDCT and should mandatorily record them in their reports. Depending on CAC presence and location, these findings may have important clinical implications, mostly in asymptomatic patients with intermediate FRS. This information may reclassify a patients' CV risk and improve clinical management.

German cardiac CT registry: indications, procedural data and clinical consequences in 7061 patients undergoing cardiac computed tomography

Cardiac computed tomography permits quantification of coronary calcification as well as detection of coronary artery stenoses after contrast enhancement. Moreover, cardiac CT offers high-resolution morphologic and functional imaging of cardiac structures which is valuable for various structural heart disease interventions and electrophysiology procedures. So far, only limited data exist regarding the spectrum of indications, image acquisition parameters as well as results and clinical consequences of cardiac CT examinations using state-of-the-art CT systems in experienced centers. Twelve cardiology centers with profound expertise in cardiovascular imaging participated in the German Cardiac CT Registry. Criteria for participation included adequate experience in cardiac CT as well of the availability of a 64-slice or newer CT system. Between 2009 and 2014, 7061 patients were prospectively enrolled. For all cardiac CT examinations, patient parameters, procedural data, indication and clinical consequences of the examination were documented. Mean patient age was 61 ± 12 years, 63% were males. The majority (63%) of all cardiac CT examinations were performed in an outpatient setting, 37% were performed during an inpatient stay. 91% were elective and 9% were scheduled in an acute setting. In most examinations (48%), reporting was performed by cardiologists, in 4% by radiologists and in 47% of the cases as a consensus reading. Cardiac CT was limited to native acquisitions for assessment of coronary artery calcification in 9% of patients, only contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography was performed in 16.6% and combined native and contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography was performed in 57.7% of patients. Non-coronary cardiac CT examinations constituted 16.6% of all cases. Coronary artery calcification assessment was performed using prospectively ECG-triggered acquisition in 76.9% of all cases. The median dose length product (DLP) was 42 mGy cm (estimated effective radiation dose of 0.6 mSv). Coronary CT angiography was performed using prospectively ECG-triggered acquisition in 77.3% of all cases. Tube voltage was 120 kV in 67.8% of patients and 100 kV in 30.7% of patients, with a resultant median DLP of 256 mGy cm (estimated effective dose of 3.6 mSv). Clinical consequences of cardiac CT were as follows: in 46.8% of the cases, invasive coronary angiography could be avoided; ischemia testing was recommended in 4.7% of the cases, invasive coronary angiography was recommended in 16.4% of the cases and change in medication in 21.6% of the examinations. Cardiac CT is performed in the majority of patients for non-invasive evaluation of the coronary arteries. CT frequently resulted in medication change, and otherwise planned downstream testing including invasive angiography could be avoided in a high percentage of patients. Radiation exposure in experienced centers is relatively low.

Influence of irregular heart rhythm on radiation exposure, image quality and diagnostic impact of cardiac computed tomography angiography in 4,339 patients. Data from the German Cardiac Computed Tomography Registry

BACKGROUND

Coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA) provides non-invasive evaluation of the coronary arteries with high precision for the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD).

AIM

To investigate whether irregular heart rhythm including atrial fibrillation and premature beats during data acquisition influences (i) radiation and contrast media exposure, (ii) number of non-evaluable coronary segments and (iii) diagnostic impact of coronary CTA.

METHODS

Twelve tertiary care centers with ≥64 slice CT scanners and ≥5 years of experience with cardiovascular imaging participated in this registry. Between 2009 and 2014, 4339 examinations were analysed in patients who underwent clinically indicated coronary CTA for suspected CAD. Clinical and epidemiologic data were gathered from all patients. In addition, clinical presentation, heart rate and rhythm during the scan, Agatston score, radiation and contrast media exposure and the diagnostic impact of coronary CTA were systematically analysed.

RESULTS

Of 4339 patients in total, 260 (6.0%) had irregular heart rhythm, whereas the remaining 4079 (94.0%) had stable sinus rhythm. Patients with irregular heart rhythm were older (63.2 ± 12.5yrs versus 58.6 ± 11.4yrs. p < 0.001), exhibited a higher rate of pathologic stress tests before CTA (37.1% versus 26.1%, p < 0.01) and higher heart rates during CTA compared to those with sinus rhythm (62.5 ± 11.6bpm versus 58.9 ± 8.5bpm, p < 0.001). Both contrast media exposure and radiation exposure were significantly higher in patients with irregular heart rhythm (90 mL (95%CI = 80-110 mL) versus 80 mL (95%CI = 70-90 mL) and 6.2 mSv (95%CI = 2.5-11.7) versus 3.3 mSv (95%CI = 1.7-6.9), p < 0.001 for both). Coronary CTA excluded significant CAD less frequently in patients with irregular heart rhythm (32.9% versus 44.8%, p < 0.001). This was attributed to the higher rate of examinations with at least one non-diagnostic coronary segment in patients with irregular heart rhythm (10.8% versus 4.6%, p < 0.001). Subsequent invasive angiography could be avoided in 47.2% of patients with irregular heart rhythm compared to 52.9% of patients with sinus rhythm (p = NS), whereas downstream stress testing was recommended in 3.2% of patients with irregular heart rhythm versus 4.0% of patients with sinus rhythm (p = NS).

CONCLUSION

A significant number of patients scheduled for coronary CTA have irregular heart rhythm in a real-world clinical setting. In such patients, heart rate during coronary CTA is higher, possibly resulting in (i) higher radiation and contrast agent exposure and (ii) more frequent coronary CTA examinations with at least one non-diagnostic coronary artery segment. However, this does not seem to lead to increased downstream stress testing or subsequent invasive procedures.

Coronary Involvement in Marfan Syndrome: The Role of Electrocardiographically Gated Computed Tomography Angiography

We report a case of coronary artery and aortic root aneurysms in a 50-year-old man with Marfan syndrome. The coexistence of these findings is uncommon and rarely reported. We underline the role of electrocardiographically gated computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of coronary aneurysm in this category of patients.