Spontaneous analogising caused by text stimuli in design thinking: differences between higher- and lower-creativity groups

Application of expert system and LSTM in extracting index of synaptic plasticity

The indexes of synaptic plasticity, including long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), can usually be measured by evaluating the slope and/or magnitude of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs). So far, the process depends on manually labeling the linear portion of fEPSPs one by one, which is not only a subjective procedure but also a time-consuming job. In the present study, a novel approach has been developed in order to objectively and effectively evaluate the index of synaptic plasticity. Firstly, we introduced an expert system applying symbolic rules to discard the contaminated waveform in an interpretable way, and further generate supervisory signals for subsequent seq 2seq model based on neural networks. For the propose of enhancing the system generalization ability to deal with the contaminated data of fEPSPs, we employed long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. Finally, the comparison was performed between the automatically labeling system and manually labeling system. These results show that the expert system achieves an accuracy of 96.22% on Type-I labels, and the LSTM supervised by the expert system obtains an accuracy of 96.73% on Type-II labels. Compared to the manually labeling system, the hybrids system is able to measure the index of synaptic plasticity more objectively and efficiently. The new system can reach the level of the human expert ability, and accurately produce the index of synaptic plasticity in a fast way.

Design exploration predicts designer creativity: a deep learning approach

This study examined brain activation in graphic designers responding to pictorial stimulation during exploration tasks and determined the predictive effects of design exploration on designer creativity through a deep learning approach. The top and bottom 25% (10 each participants) were assigned high-creativity and low-creativity groups, respectively. The results provided the following indications. (i) Shallow architectures had higher prediction accuracy than deeper architectures. (ii) The prediction accuracy of shallow long short-term memory networks was higher than that of convolution neural networks. (iii) Bandpower exhibited increased prediction accuracy, and shallow LSTM networks with differing power spectra among independent components outperformed other deep learning methods. (iv) Direct acyclic graph networks did not improve prediction accuracy. (v) Design exploration could effectively predict designer creativity.

Functional and effective connectivity based features of EEG signals for object recognition

Classifying different object categories is one of the most important aims of brain-computer interface researches. Recently, interactions between brain regions were studied using different methods, such as functional and effective connectivity techniques. Functional and effective connectivity techniques are applied to estimate human brain areas connectivity. The main purpose of this study is to compare classification accuracy of the most advanced functional and effective methods in order to classify 12 basic object categories using Electroencephalography (EEG) signals. In this paper, 19 channels EEG signals were collected from 10 healthy subjects; when they were visiting color images and instructed to select the target images among others. Correlation, magnitude square coherence, wavelet coherence (WC), phase synchronization and mutual information were applied to estimate functional cortical connectivity. On the other hand, directed transfer function, partial directed coherence, generalized partial directed coherence (GPDC) were used to obtain effective cortical connectivity. After feature extraction, the scalar feature selection methods including T-test and one-sided-anova were applied to rank and select the most informative features. The selected features were classified by a one-against-one support vector machine classifier. The results indicated that the use of different techniques led to different classifying accuracy and brain lobes analysis. WC and GPDC are the most accurate methods with performances of 80.15% and 64.43%, respectively.