Generation of a 3D melanoma model and visualization of doxorubicin uptake by fluorescence imaging

Targeting the Complexity of In Vitro Skin Models: A Review of Cutting-Edge Developments

Skin in vitro models offer much promise for research, testing drugs, cosmetics, and medical devices, reducing animal testing and extensive clinical trials. There are several in vitro approaches to mimicking human skin behavior, ranging from simple cell monolayer to complex organotypic and bioengineered 3-dimensional models. Some have been approved for preclinical studies in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and chemicals. However, development of physiologically reliable in vitro human skin models remains in its infancy. This review reports on advances in in vitro complex skin models to study skin homeostasis, aging, and skin disease.

The influence of viscosity of hydrogels on the spreading and migration of cells in 3D bioprinted skin cancer models

Various in vitro three-dimensional (3D) tissue culture models of human and diseased skin exist. Nevertheless, there is still room for the development and improvement of 3D bioprinted skin cancer models. The need for reproducible bioprinting methods, cell samples, biomaterial inks, and bioinks is becoming increasingly important. The influence of the viscosity of hydrogels on the spreading and migration of most types of cancer cells is well studied. There are however limited studies on the influence of viscosity on the spreading and migration of cells in 3D bioprinted skin cancer models. In this review, we will outline the importance of studying the various types of skin cancers by using 3D cell culture models. We will provide an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the various 3D bioprinting technologies. We will emphasize how the viscosity of hydrogels relates to the spreading and migration of cancer cells. Lastly, we will give an overview of the specific studies on cell migration and spreading in 3D bioprinted skin cancer models.

Bridging the gap between testing and clinics exploring alternative pre-clinical models in melanoma research

Melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, poses a significant clinical challenge for the development of effective treatments. Conventional in vivo animal studies have shown limited translational relevance to humans, raising strength to pre-clinical models for melanoma research. This review provides an in-depth analysis of alternative pre-clinical models including in vitro and ex vivo platforms such as reconstructed skin, spheroids, organoids, organotypic models, skin-on-a-chip, and bioprinting. Through a comprehensive analysis, the specific attributes, advantages, and limitations of each model are elucidated. It discusses the points related to the uniqueness advantages, from capturing complex interactions between melanoma cells and their microenvironment to enabling high-throughput drug screening and personalized medicine approaches. This review is structured covering firstly the roadmap to identify the co-occurrence of discovering new melanoma treatments and the development of its models, secondly it covers a comparative between the most used models followed by a section discussing each of them: the in vitro and ex vivo models. It intends to serve as an asset for researchers of melanoma field and clinicians involved in melanoma therapy, offering insights into the diverse preclinical models available for optimizing their integration into the translational pipeline.

Advances in tissue engineering of cancer microenvironment-from three-dimensional culture to three-dimensional printing

Cancer treatment development is a complex process, with tumor heterogeneity and inter-patient variations limiting the success of therapeutic intervention. Traditional two-dimensional cell culture has been used to study cancer metabolism, but it fails to capture physiologically relevant cell-cell and cell-environment interactions required to mimic tumor-specific architecture. Over the past three decades, research efforts in the field of 3D cancer model fabrication using tissue engineering have addressed this unmet need. The self-organized and scaffold-based model has shown potential to study the cancer microenvironment and eventually bridge the gap between 2D cell culture and animal models. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as an exciting and novel biofabrication strategy aimed at developing a 3D compartmentalized hierarchical organization with the precise positioning of biomolecules, including living cells. In this review, we discuss the advancements in 3D culture techniques for the fabrication of cancer models, as well as their benefits and limitations. We also highlight future directions associated with technological advances, detailed applicative research, patient compliance, and regulatory challenges to achieve a successful bed-to-bench transition.

Spheroid culture models adequately imitate distinctive features of the renal cancer or melanoma microenvironment

Tumor development studies should adapt to cancer cells' specific mechanisms in connection with their microenvironment. Standard two-dimensional cultures and gas composition are not relevant to the real cancer environment. Existing three-dimensional models are often requiring sophisticated conditions. Here, we propose and characterize, in two cancer models, melanoma (B16F10) and kidney cancer (RenCa), a three-dimensional culture method, reporting the presence of hypoxia-related genes/proteins and aggressiveness mechanisms (epithelial mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells). We validate the designed three-dimensional method by comparing it with in vivo growing tumors. The developed method brings simplicity and data reproducibility. Melanoma spheroid-growing cells reached a cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase and showed induction of hypoxia. Spheroid-recovered RenCa cells were enriched in proliferating cells and displayed delayed hypoxia. Moreover, the responses to hypoxia observed in spheroids were validated by in vivo tumor studies for both lines. Three-dimensional shapes induced cancer stem cells in renal cancer, whereas epithelial to mesenchymal transition occurred in the melanoma model. Such distinction in the use of different aggressiveness-leading pathways was observed in in vivo melanoma vs kidney tumors. Thus, this 3D culture model approach is adequate to uncover crucial molecular pathways using distinct mechanisms to reach aggressiveness; i.e., B16F10 cells perform epithelial to mesenchymal transition while RenCa cells dedifferentiate into cancer stem cells. Such three-dimensional models help mimic the in vivo tumor features, i.e., hypoxia and aggressiveness mechanisms as validated here by next-generation sequencing analysis, and are proposed for further alternative methods to in vivo studies.