Association between osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and DXA-derived 3D measurements at lumbar spine: a case-control study

Abdominal aortic calcification assessed on standard lateral lumbar radiographs as a screening tool for impaired bone status in spine surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) can predict patient bone status, represented by volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) assessed with quantitative computed tomography (QCT).

METHODS

Patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery at a tertiary care center between 2014 and 2021, with a preoperative lumbar CT-scan and lateral lumbar radiographs were retrospectively reviewed. A semi-quantitative measurement method for AAC (AAC 4, 8 and 24) was performed. QCT measurements were made for L1 and L2. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether AAC was present. A one-way analysis of covariance was conducted to adjust for age. A multiple linear regression model was used to test if age, sex, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, smoking and presence of AAC could predict the vBMD. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted for predicting impaired bone status.

RESULTS

267 patients with a median age of 65.1 years and BMI of 29.8 kg/m2 were analyzed, 59.6% of patients had AAC. The group comparison showed that vBMD was significantly lower in patients with the presence of AAC (97.8 mg/cm3 vs. 121.5 mg/cm3). Age (β = - 0.360; p < 0.001) and presence of AAC (β = -0.206; p = 0.005) significantly predict vBMD as independent variables. Impaired bone status could be discriminated using AAC 4, 8 and 24 (cut off value 0.5) with a sensitivity of 70.1% and a specificity of 60.2%.

CONCLUSION

The presence of AAC may identify patients at risk for impaired bone status. Preoperative evaluation of standard lumbar radiographs could be used as a potential diagnostic tool in assessing bone status.

Statistical Shape and Appearance Models: Development Towards Improved Osteoporosis Care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Statistical models of shape and appearance have increased their popularity since the 1990s and are today highly prevalent in the field of medical image analysis. In this article, we review the recent literature about how statistical models have been applied in the context of osteoporosis and fracture risk estimation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent developments have increased their ability to accurately segment bones, as well as to perform 3D reconstruction and classify bone anatomies, all features of high interest in the field of osteoporosis and fragility fractures diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. An increasing number of studies used statistical models to estimate fracture risk in retrospective case-control cohorts, which is a promising step towards future clinical application. All the reviewed application areas made considerable steps forward in the past 5-6 years. Heterogeneities in validation hinder a thorough comparison between the different methods and represent one of the future challenges to be addressed to reach clinical implementation.

3D analysis of bone mineral density in a cohort: age- and sex-related differences

Women have lower areal BMD (g/cm²) than men; however, the women have smaller-size bones. Our study showed that women ≤ 59 years have a hip volumetric BMD by DXA 3D similar to that of men of the same age. This makes us think about the importance of taking into account bone size at the time of analyzing the sex-related differences in bone mass.

PURPOSE

Women have lower areal BMD (g/cm²) than men; however, these studies do not take into account that women have smaller-size bones. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) modeling methods were proposed to analyze volumetric BMD (vBMD). We want to determine the values of vBMD at the hip by DXA-based 3D modeling in a cohort of people in order to know the age- and sex-related differences.

METHODS

A total of 2647 people of both sexes (65% women) were recruited from a large cohort (Camargo cohort, Santander, Spain). 3D-SHAPER® software (version 2.8, Galgo Medical, Barcelona, Spain) was used to derive 3D analysis from the hip DXA scans at baseline RESULTS: The differences were less pronounced for vBMD (cortical sBMD 9.3%, trabecular vBMD 6.4%, integral vBMD 2.2%) compared to aBMD (FN aBMD 11.4% and TH aBMD 13.3%). After stratifying by age (≤ 59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and ≥ 80 years), we observed in ≤ 59 years that aBMD was lower in women compared to men, at FN (0.758 [0.114] g/cm² vs. 0.833 [0.117] g/cm²; p = 1.4 × 10^-20) and TH (0.878 [0.117] g/cm² vs. 0.990 [0.119] g/cm²; p = 4.1 × 10^-40). Nevertheless, no statistically significant difference was observed for integral vBMD (331 [58] mg/cm³ in women and 326 [51] mg/cm³ in men; p = 0.19) and trabecular vBMD (190 [41] mg/cm³ in women and 195 [39] mg/cm³ in men; p = 0.20).

CONCLUSION

Our results make us think about the importance of taking into account bone size at the time of analyzing the sex-related differences in bone mass.