Simultaneous en-bloc robot-assisted radical cystectomy and nephro-ureterectomy: technique description, outcomes, and literature summary

Concurrent radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy indications and outcomes: a systematic review and comparative analysis

Introduction

Urothelial carcinoma can arise from the urinary bladder or from the upper urinary tract. In some instances, urinary bladder cancer (UBC) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) can be concurrently diagnosed, necessitating a combined radical cystectomy (RC) with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). A systematic review was done on the combined procedure exploring outcomes and indications, in addition to a comparative analysis between the combined procedure and cystectomy alone.

Methods

For the systematic review, three databases (Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane) were queried, selecting only studies that included intraoperative and perioperative data. For the comparative analysis, using the NSQIP database, CPT codes for RC and RNU were used to identify two cohorts, one with RC and RNU and one with RC alone. A descriptive analysis was performed on all preoperative variables, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Postoperative events were then compared between the two matched cohorts.

Results

For the systematic review, 28 relevant articles were included amounting to 947 patients who underwent the combined procedure. The most common indication was synchronous multifocal disease, the most common approach was open surgery, and the most common diversion technique was using an ileal conduit. Almost 28% of patients required blood transfusion and remained in the hospital for an average of 13 days. The most common postoperative complication was prolonged paralytic ileus. For the comparative analysis, 11,759 patients were included of which 97.5% underwent RC only and 2.5% underwent the combined procedure. After PSM, the cohort that had undergone the combined procedure showed an increased risk of renal injury, increased readmission rates, and increased reoperation rates. Whereas the cohort that had undergone RC only showed an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), sepsis, or septic shock.

Conclusion

A combined RC and RNU is a treatment option for concurrent UCB and UTUC that should be cautiously utilized as it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patient selection, discussion of the risks and benefits of the procedure, and explanation of the available treatment options remain the most important pillars in managing patients with this complex disease.

Less invasive and equivalent short-term outcomes with simultaneous en bloc robot-assisted radical cystectomy and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: Comparison with conventional open radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy

INTRODUCTION

To clarify the safety and efficacy of en bloc simultaneous robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) for synchronous muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) or UTUC of a solitary kidney, we evaluated the perioperative and short-term outcomes of this surgical procedure compared with those of simultaneous open radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients receiving en bloc simultaneous RARC and LNU between December 2018 and March 2020 at two institutes. Patients' characteristics, surgical, perioperative, and pathological outcomes and recurrence rate within 6 months were compared with a historical control receiving simultaneous open radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy.

RESULTS

Ten patients receiving simultaneous RARC and LNU and 17 receiving simultaneous open radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy were included in the study. Simultaneous RARC and LNU significantly reduced bleeding volume and blood transfusion (P < .0001, P < .0001, respectively) and significantly prolonged operating time (P = .035). RARC and LNU significantly shortened hospitalization after operation (P = .003) and showed reduced tendency of postoperative complications within 30 days but not significantly (P = .25). Pathological characteristics and recurrence within 6 months were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that en bloc simultaneous RARC and LNU were safer surgical procedures with equivalent short-term oncological outcomes compared to conventional open procedures. It can be a standard minimally invasive surgical method in countries where robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy is inaccessible.

Simultaneous laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and robot-assisted anterior pelvic exenteration with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion: step-by-step video-illustrated technique

Introduction:

One of the most remarkable characteristics of urothelial carcinomas is multifocality. However, occurrence of synchronous bladder cancer and upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is exceptional. Minimally invasive approach for these synchronous tumors was just occasionally reported (1-4). The aim of this video article is to describe step-by-step the technique for simultaneous laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and robot-assisted anterior pelvic exenteration with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion (ICUD). Patients and methods: A 66-year-old female presented with synchronous BCG refractory non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and a right-side UTUC. She was a former smoker and had previously been submitted to multiple transurethral resections of bladder tumor, BCG and right distal ureterectomy with ureteral reimplant. We performed a simultaneous laparoscopic right nephroureterectomy and robot-assisted anterior pelvic exenteration with totally intracorporeal ICUD. Combination of robot-assisted and pure laparoscopic approaches was proposed focusing on optimization of total operative time (TOT).

Results:

Surgery was uneventful. TOT was of 330 minutes. Operative time for nephroureterectomy, anterior pelvic exenteration and ICUD were 48, 135, 87 minutes, respectively. Estimated blood loss was 150mL. Postoperative course was unremarkable and patient was discharged after 7 days.

Histopathological evaluation showed a pT1 high grade urothelial carcinoma plus carcinoma in situ both in proximal right ureter and bladder, with negative margins. Twelve lymph nodes were excised, all of them negative.

Conclusion:

In our preliminary experience, totally minimally invasive simultaneous nephroureterectomy and cystectomy with intracorporeal ICUD is feasible. Pure laparoscopic approach to upper urinary tract may be a useful tactic to reduce total operative time.

Surgical benchmarks, mid-term oncological outcomes, and impact of surgical team composition on simultaneous enbloc robot-assisted radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy

Background

Simultaneous urothelial cancer manifestation in the lower and upper urinary tract affects approximately 2% of patients. Data on the surgical benchmarks and mid-term oncological outcomes of enbloc robot-assisted radical cystectomy and nephro-ureterectomy are scarce.

Methods

After written informed consent was obtained, we prospectively enrolled consecutive patients undergoing enbloc radical cystectomy and nephro-ureterectomy with robotic assistance from the DaVinci Si-HD® system in a prospective institutional database and collected surgical benchmarks and oncological outcomes. Furthermore, as one console surgeon conducted all the procedures, whereas the team providing bedside assistance was composed ad hoc, we assessed the impact of this approach on the operative duration.

Results

Nineteen patients (9 women), with a mean age of 73 (SD: 7.5) years, underwent simultaneous enbloc robot-assisted radical cystectomy and nephro-ureterectomy. There were no cases of conversion to open surgery. In the postoperative period, we registered 2 Clavien-Dindo class 2 complications (transfusions) and 1 Clavien-Dindo class 3b complication (port hernia). After a median follow-up of 23 months, there were 3 cases of mortality and 1 case of metachronous urothelial cancer (contralateral kidney).The total operative duration did not decrease with increasing experience (r = 0.174, p = 0.534). In contrast, there was a significant, inverse, strong correlation between the console time relative to the total operative duration and the number of conducted procedures after adjusting for the degree of adhesions and the type of urinary diversion(r = -0.593, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

These data suggest that en bloc simultaneous robot-assisted radical cystectomy and nephro-ureterectomy can be safely conducted with satisfactory mid-term oncological outcomes. With increasing experience, improved performance was detectable for the console surgeon but not in terms of the total operative duration. Simulation training of all team members for highly complex procedures might be a suitable approach for improving team performance.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

Outcomes and Complications of Simultaneous Laparoscopic Cystectomy and Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy with Umbilical Reduced Port Surgery

Objective:

In recent years, although reduced port surgeries (RPS) have been reported for many urological diseases, there have been no reports regarding simultaneous laparoscopic cystectomy and unilateral or bilateral nephroureterectomy with umbilical RPS. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and complications of simultaneous laparoscopic cystectomy and unilateral or bilateral nephroureterectomy with umbilical RPS.

Methods:

We performed a preliminary case series of 4 patients with synchronous upper urinary tract (UUT) tumor and invasive bladder cancer who underwent simultaneous laparoscopic cystectomy and unilateral or bilateral nephroureterectomy with umbilical RPS between 2014 and 2017 at our hospital. Demographic data, pathologic features, the surgical technique, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

Result:

All 4 patients were men whose median age was 79 years (range 65-85 years) and median body mass index was 24.2 kg/m² (range 21.5-27.3 kg/m²). The laparoscopic approach was technically successful in all 4 patients without the need for open conversion. The median total operative time was 434 minutes (range 372-481 minutes). The median estimated blood loss was 773 ml (range 153-923 ml), median interval to resuming oral intake was 2 days (range 1-7 days), and median hospital stay was 16 days (range 13-20 days).

Conclusion:

The reduced port approach is technically feasible in terms of many outcome measures, with significant cosmetic advantages. This method can be performed safely and recommended as a viable option for patients with concomitant UUT and bladder cancer.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial hepatic caudate lobectomy

Background: Hepatic caudate lobectomy is considered to be a technically difficult surgery because of the unique anatomy and deep location of the hepatic caudate lobe. Here, we assessed the technical feasibility and safety of robotic partial caudate lobectomy using the da Vinci^® Surgical System and compared it with traditional open/laparoscopic surgery.Material and methods: Six patients diagnosed with liver cancer (primary liver cancer, 5; metastasis of breast cancer, 1) who underwent caudate lobectomy were prospectively enrolled. Two patients underwent robotic surgery, one underwent laparoscopic surgery, and three underwent traditional/open surgery. Surgical procedure, recovery, and characteristics of robotic surgery were noted and compared with other approaches.Results: All surgeries were successfully completed, and no serious postsurgical complications were observed. In the robotic group, the time taken to complete the surgery and the estimated intraoperative bleeding were 150 and 90 min and 50 and 100 ml in patient 1 and patient 2, respectively. The patients were able to tolerate fluid diet on the following postsurgical day. These two patients had no postsurgical complications and were discharged from the hospital on days 5 and 6 after recovery, respectively. Pathologically, the margins of specimens obtained from these two patients were tumor-free (R0 resection). Tumor size in the traditional/open group was larger than that in the robotic and laparoscopic groups. Blood loss in the laparoscopic case was 50 ml and was less than that in the traditional/open surgery cases (300, 2100, and 1500 ml).Conclusions: Robot-assisted partial hepatic caudate lobectomy is a technically feasible surgery. Our study illustrated an advantage of robotic hepatic caudate lobectomy over laparoscopic or traditional/open surgery and suggested that da Vinci^® minimally invasive hepatectomy is applicable in even more technically challenging anatomic locations.