Is secondary robotic pyeloplasty safe and effective as primary robotic pyeloplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies for Ureteral Polyps: A Systematic Review

Background: Ureteral polyps are rare benign ureteral tumor. No guideline recommends that open or minimally invasive surgery is best for treating ureteral polyps. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the minimally invasive techniques currently available for treating ureteral polyps. Materials and Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of articles published in PubMed, using the keywords "ureteral" and "polyp," or "polyps." Results: A total of 275 studies were obtained from the literature search but 96 articles were excluded. Conclusions: Several minimally invasive approaches were developed with the advancement of medical technology, including endoscopic, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches; however, the best surgical technique was yet to be decided. Due to the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, the best surgical approach should be tailored to each patient's needs and the surgeon's preferences and experience.

The Utility of Radiologic and Symptomatic Surveillance After Minimally-invasive Adult Pyeloplasty

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate different types of failure after minimally-invasive pyeloplasty (MIP) when stratified by initial radiologic study and symptoms after ureteral stent removal.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed adults who underwent MIP (1996-2019) at a single academic center. Patients with at least 11 months of follow-up and patients who had a Mag3 scan as their initial postoperative imaging were included. Postprocedure, patients were categorized as having normal, equivocal, or obstructed imaging based on their initial radiologic test. Patients who were obstructed were excluded. Primary outcome was procedural failure, defined as the need for a procedure to treat recurrent obstruction. Secondary outcomes were radiologic failure and symptomatic failure. Groups were compared to assess for statistical significance (P <.05).

RESULTS

Overall, 122 patients met inclusion criteria. On initial postoperative imaging, 108 (89%) patients had no obstruction and 14 (11%) had equivocal findings. The procedural failure rate was 6.5% in the unobstructed group and 28.6% in the equivocal group (P = .023). Seven unobstructed patients (6.5%) and 2 equivocal patients (14.3%) eventually experienced radiologic failure (P = .275). Among patients who had no obstruction on initial imaging and remained asymptomatic, only one (0.9%) required a salvage procedure.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent obstruction after pyeloplasty varied based on the outcome of the initial radiologic study. These rates can be used to counsel patients and guide physicians' choice of surveillance schedules. The risk of future failure is very low in asymptomatic patients with normal initial imaging. The utility of routine radiologic surveillance in these patients may be limited.

Salvage minimally invasive robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: a systematic review

Introduction

A UPJO is a blockage of the ureter that affects urine flow. UPJO is mainly treated by an open approach, however, in recent years minimally invasive techniques are taking place. These techniques include robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Some patients require a redo after a primary intervention. A systematic review was conducted through the examinations of the efficacy and safety of a robotic redo pyeloplasty in adult patients from previous literature reviews.

Methods

A literature search was made through PubMed. A selection process was done based on our eligibility criteria. The data were represented numerically, listed on tables and analyzed cumulatively using Microsoft Excel.

Results

Twenty studies were included in this review, of which nine were studies on robotic outcomes () (157 patients), 10 on laparoscopic (210 patients), and one review by Zhang et al., focused on both types of surgeries. Two papers (24 patients) from the robotic studies and one paper (21 patients) from the laparoscopic studies were excluded from the intra and post-operative characteristics because not enough data were available and were only included for the success and complication rates. The success rate for the robotic studies was 88.5% while the laparoscopic studies had a success rate of 91%. However, the robotic studies had a complication rate of (11.8%) while the laparoscopic studies had a complication rate of (15.9%). Conversion surgery was required in one patient undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

Conclusion

The minimally invasive methods are becoming more viable in adult patients with rUPJO, considering its effectiveness and fast recovery. This can lead to a new era of robotic assisted surgeries to becoming the gold standard.Abbreviations: Systematic review: Redo robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults; UPJO = Ureteropelvic junction obstruction; rUPJO = redo ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1: urologic and therapeutic management

While the surgical approaches available in primary hyperoxaluria (PH) are common to all patients requiring intervention for urolithiasis, the indications for treatment and their corresponding toxicities are unique. Being a rare disease, we are guided by case series. This review summarizes the available literature highlighting the important disease-specific considerations. Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is of particular interest. It is generally the first-line treatment for stones in children, but here the stones produced will be relatively resistant to fragmentation. In addition, there are concerning reports in children of sudden unilateral decline in function in the treated kidney as measured by nuclear renography. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy might intuitively seem favorable given the shortest drain duration and the ability to treat larger stones efficiently but, similar to SWL, rapid chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression has been seen postoperatively. Ureteroscopy is therefore generally the safest option, but considerations regarding stent encrustation, the growth of residual fragments and the large volume of stone often faced may limit this approach. The surgeon must balance the above with consideration of the patient's CKD status when considering a plan of monitoring and treating stones in PH.

Cryopreserved placental tissue allograft accelerates time to continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Intra-operatively placed cryopreserved placental tissue allograft (CPTA) has shown promise in expediting the recovery urinary continence (UC) following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In this retrospective review of a prospectively maintained single-surgeon, single-institution RARP database, we compare three groups of patients: historical controls (C; N = 183 men) that received no allograft versus two different CPTA products (total CPTA N = 162 [A1 N = 81; A2 N = 81]). The CPTA product was intra-operatively placed as an onlay over the area of the neurovascular bundles during RARP. CPTA cases had significantly faster median time to UC (A1 = 1.4 months; A2 = 1.45 months) versus controls (1.64 months), p = 0.01. On multivariable analysis, use of A1 (HR 1.55, 95% CI [1.14-2.09], p = 0.005) and use of A2 (HR 1.53, CI [1.11-2.11], p = 0.01) were significantly associated with quicker return of UC. Older age (HR 0.97, CI [0.96-0.99], p = 0.001) and non-organ-confined clinical stage (HR 0.51, CI [0.26-1.0] p = 0.05), were significantly associated with slower return of UC. In a propensity score-matched analysis of 77 CPTA patients with sufficient follow-up versus controls, there was significantly less biochemical recurrence (BCR; p = 0.01). Our study indicates that CPTA use appears to accelerate time to UC in age- and performance status-matched men undergoing RARP without increased risk of BCR.

Single Port vs Multiport Robotic Pyeloplasty: Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of Perioperative and Follow-Up Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of single port (SP) robotic pyeloplasty and multiport (MP) robotic pyeloplasty using a propensity-score matched analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a chart review of all patients who underwent SP robotic pyeloplasty from January 2019 to October 2020 and MP robotic pyeloplasty from January 2016 to October 2020. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Propensity-score matching was performed on sex, body mass index, and history of previous pyeloplasty to adjust for potential baseline confounders. A post hoc sensitivity analysis for operative time was performed to examine the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

In total, 24 and 41 patients underwent sSP and MP robotic pyeloplasty, respectively. Following propensity-score matching, 21 MP cases were matched 1:1 to SP cases. The SP group was shown to have longer median operative times (128.0 vs 88.0 minutes, P = .0411) and shorter follow up time (9.3 vs 18.7 months, P = .0066). In a sensitivity analysis, SP robotic pyeloplasty was marginally associated with increased operative time (95% CI -0.25, 29.72, P = .0540).

CONCLUSIONS

SP robotic pyeloplasty is a safe and acceptable alternative to MP robotic pyeloplasty, achieving comparable perioperative and postoperative outcomes.

Minimal Invasive Treatment in Pelvic-Ureteric Junction Obstruction: A Comprehensive Review

Pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) is a common condition, and one of the lead causes of hydronephrosis in children. Currently, the gold standard treatment of PUJO is open surgery using the Anderson–Hynes-modified dismembered pyeloplasty technique. However, with the advancement of medical technology, several minimal invasive approaches were developed, including endoscopic, laparoscopic, and robotic approach, from which the best choice of surgical technique was yet to be determined. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of these methods, the recommended option is to tailor the best surgical approach to each individual patient, and to the surgeons’ preference and experience. Considering these recent advances, a new algorithm is proposed to choose the best minimal invasive modalities invasive treatment to treat PUJO.

Primary vs redo robotic pyeloplasty: A comparison of outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) is a safe and efficacious option for repair of UPJO. We hypothesize that redo-RALP is technically more difficult but has comparable outcomes to primary RALP.

METHODS

An IRB-approved single institutional registry was utilized to identify all patients undergoing primary or redo RALP from 2012 to 2019. Redo RALP consisted of pyeloplasty and ureterocalicostomy (RALUC). Peri-operative and post-operative details and outcomes were aggregated. Successful reconstruction was defined as resolution of symptoms, improved hydronephrosis and no need for additional procedures.

RESULTS

From 399 patients who underwent UPJO repair at our center, a total of 306 with a median age of 4.9 years at surgery and a median follow-up of 18.5 months were included: 276 primary and 30 redo (21 RALP and 9 RALUC). Redo group had significantly longer procedure time and length of stay compared to the primary group. However, no significant difference was noted in the post-operative complications, need for additional endoscopic procedures or redo reconstruction, and success between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that when controlled for age, gender, 30-days post-operative complication and anatomy of obstruction, redo as compared to primary reconstruction did not have a significant effect on success.

DISCUSSION

This study is the largest controlled cohort in the pediatric population comparing redo RALP with an established control group -primary RALP. This retrospective chart review possesses the biases innate to any retrospective study. The low number of re-operative cases as well as low rate of failure in redo RALP further complicates identification of statistically significant predictors of outcomes following redo RALP.

CONCLUSION

Redo RALP is an efficient and safe approach for reconstruction of recurrent UPJO, with low complication rate and high success rate, comparable to primary RALP.

Real-time navigation by three-dimensional virtual reconstruction models in robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: our initial experience

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of real-time surgical navigation by three-dimensional (3D) virtual reconstruction models in robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP).

Methods

Between November 2018 and January 2020, 38 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) who underwent RALP were retrospectively enrolled. The operations were assisted in real time by 3D models in 16 patients, while 22 patients underwent surgery without navigation. Based on whether patients had a prior intervention history, crossing vessels or congenital deformities, we further divided them into the “complicated UPJO” cohort and the “regular UPJO” cohort for subgroup analysis. The demographic characteristics, intraoperative parameters, perioperative data and follow-up data were recorded and compared between the groups.

Results

All of the procedures were successfully performed without open or laparoscopic conversion. The mean dissection time to the UPJ was shorter in the navigation group than in the non-navigation group, both in the whole cohort (15.3 vs. 24.8 min, P=0.011) and in the complicated cohort (15.4 vs. 27.5 min, P=0.004), while there was no significant difference in the regular cohort. The overall operative time and estimated blood loss in the navigation group tended to be less, although the difference was not statistically significant. No difference in anastomosis time, postoperative hospital stay or complications was noted between the two groups in either cohort. At a mean follow-up of 11.2 months, the overall success rate was 94.7% (36/38), and there was no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusions

Real-time navigation by 3D virtual reconstruction models might be helpful to improve surgical efficiency and safety of RALP by facilitating the dissection around the UPJ, especially for cases of complicated UPJO. However, the prospective study with larger sample size is further needed to confirm the results.