The impact of surgical chest wall damage caused by classic thoracotomy on pulmonary function and morphology

Pulmonary function changes after thoracoscopic lobectomy versus intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic segmentectomy is increasingly used in the surgical treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, it remains unclear whether pulmonary function loss after thoracoscopic lung resection is in direct proportion to the number of resected segments, and thus intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy has the function-preserving advantage over thoracoscopic lobectomy.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, spirometry tests were performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The observed functional loss was compared with the expected loss estimated by the segment counting method. Resection extent index was introduced as the number of resected segments to total number of segments in the corresponding lobe. Spirometry changes after thoracoscopic lobectomy and intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy were compared using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

There were 338 thoracoscopic lobectomies and 321 thoracoscopic segmentectomies. Overall, the observed pulmonary function loss after segmentectomy was significantly less than after lobectomy. But the observed functional loss was significantly greater than the expected loss after segmentectomy. And pulmonary function loss per segment resected was almost doubled after segmentectomy comparing to lobectomy. For segmentectomies with a resection extent index less than 0.5, especially single segmentectomies, pulmonary function loss was significantly less than after corresponding lobectomies. Otherwise, no significant differences in spirometry changes between lobectomies and segmentectomies were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary function loss after thoracoscopic lung resection cannot be accurately evaluated by the number of resected segments. According to the resection extent index, intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy may help preserve more pulmonary function than thoracoscopic lobectomy only when less than half of the corresponding lobe are resected.

Efficacy of the Segment-Counting Method in Predicting Lung Function and Volume Following Stapler-Based Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy

Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of a segment-counting method in predicting lung function and volume after stapler-based thoracoscopic segmentectomy in comparison with lobectomy.

Methods: Between 2014 and 2018, patients who underwent these procedures were retrospectively reviewed. Thoracic computed tomography and spirometry data before and 1 year after the surgery were assessed. We evaluated the differences between the predicted values using a segment-counting method and the actual postoperative values for lung function and volume in each group. Sub-analyses were also performed to assess the impact of the number of staples and resected segments in predicting patient outcomes.

Results: We included 116 patients (segmentectomy, 69; lobectomy, 47). Actual postoperative lung function and volume values matched the predicted values in the stapler-based segmentectomy group, and significantly exceeded the predictions in the lobectomy group (P <0.01). Sub-analyses revealed lower postoperative lung function values than predicted existed after single segmentectomy, with an odds ratio of 3.29 (95% confidence interval: 1.02–10.70, P = 0.04) in a multivariable analysis. The degree of predicted error regarding lung function was negligible.

Conclusions: The segment-counting method was useful in predicting lung function after stapler-based thoracoscopic segmentectomy. Segmentectomy rarely yielded lower- than-predicted lung function and volume values.